Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.

This patch adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request the use of
the per-CPU behavior. Both flags coexist for one release cycle to allow
callers to transition their calls.

Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
become the implicit default.

tj: Merged doc patch.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

WQ_MAX_ACTIVE is currently set to 512, which was established approximately
15 yeas ago. However, with the significant increase in machine sizes and
capabilities, the previous limit of 256 concurrent tasks is no longer
sufficient. Therefore, we propose to increase WQ_MAX_ACTIVE to 2048.
and WQ_DFL_ACTIVE is 1024 now.

Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

If something is expected to generate large number of concurrent works,
it should utilize its own dedicated workqueue rather than system wq.
Because this may saturate system_wq and potentially block other's works.
eg, cgroup release work. Let's document this as a note.

Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

- s/alloc_ordered_queue()/alloc_ordered_workqueue()/
- remove markers to convert it into a link.

Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Due to commit 8318d6a6362f ("workqueue: Shorten
events_freezable_power_efficient name") we now have some stale
references in the workqeueue documentation, so updating those
references accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Audra Mitchell <audra@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Pull workqueue updates from Tejun Heo:
 "This cycle, a lot of workqueue changes including some that are
  significant and invasive.

   - During v6.6 cycle, unbound workqueues were updated so that they are
     more topology aware and flexible, which among other things improved
     workqueue behavior on modern multi-L3 CPUs. In the process, commit
     636b927eba5b ("workqueue: Make unbound workqueues to use per-cpu
     pool_workqueues") switched unbound workqueues to use per-CPU
     frontend pool_workqueues as a part of increasing front-back mapping
     flexibility.

     An unwelcome side effect of this change was that this made max
     concurrency enforcement per-CPU blowing up the maximum number of
     allowed concurrent executions. I incorrectly assumed that this
     wouldn't cause practical problems as most unbound workqueue users
     are self-regulate max concurrency; however, there definitely are
     which don't (e.g. on IO paths) and the drastic increase in the
     allowed max concurrency led to noticeable perf regressions in some
     use cases.

     This is now addressed by separating out max concurrency enforcement
     to a separate struct - wq_node_nr_active - which makes @max_active
     consistently mean system-wide max concurrency regardless of the
     number of CPUs or (finally) NUMA nodes. This is a rather invasive
     and, in places, a bit clunky; however, the clunkiness rises from
     the the inherent requirement to handle the disagreement between the
     execution locality domain and max concurrency enforcement domain on
     some modern machines.

     See commit 5797b1c18919 ("workqueue: Implement system-wide
     nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues") for more details.

   - BH workqueue support is added.

     They are similar to per-CPU workqueues but execute work items in
     the softirq context. This is expected to replace tasklet. However,
     currently, it's missing the ability to disable and enable work
     items which is needed to convert many tasklet users. To avoid
     crowding this merge window too much, this will be included in the
     next merge window. A separate pull request will be sent for the
     couple conversion patches that are currently pending.

   - Waiman plugged a long-standing hole in workqueue CPU isolation
     where ordered workqueues didn't follow wq_unbound_cpumask updates.
     Ordered workqueues now follow the same rules as other unbound
     workqueues.

   - More CPU isolation improvements: Juri fixed another deficit in
     workqueue isolation where unbound rescuers don't respect
     wq_unbound_cpumask. Leonardo fixed delayed_work timers firing on
     isolated CPUs.

   - Other misc changes"

* tag 'wq-for-6.9' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq: (54 commits)
  workqueue: Drain BH work items on hot-unplugged CPUs
  workqueue: Introduce from_work() helper for cleaner callback declarations
  workqueue: Control intensive warning threshold through cmdline
  workqueue: Make @flags handling consistent across set_work_data() and friends
  workqueue: Remove clear_work_data()
  workqueue: Factor out work_grab_pending() from __cancel_work_sync()
  workqueue: Clean up enum work_bits and related constants
  workqueue: Introduce work_cancel_flags
  workqueue: Use variable name irq_flags for saving local irq flags
  workqueue: Reorganize flush and cancel[_sync] functions
  workqueue: Rename __cancel_work_timer() to __cancel_timer_sync()
  workqueue: Use rcu_read_lock_any_held() instead of rcu_read_lock_held()
  workqueue: Cosmetic changes
  workqueue, irq_work: Build fix for !CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
  workqueue: Fix queue_work_on() with BH workqueues
  async: Use a dedicated unbound workqueue with raised min_active
  workqueue: Implement workqueue_set_min_active()
  workqueue: Fix kernel-doc comment of unplug_oldest_pwq()
  workqueue: Bind unbound workqueue rescuer to wq_unbound_cpumask
  kernel/workqueue: Let rescuers follow unbound wq cpumask changes
  ...

5c0338c68706 ("workqueue: restore WQ_UNBOUND/max_active==1 to be ordered")
automoatically promoted UNBOUND workqueues w/ @max_active==1 to ordered
workqueues because UNBOUND workqueues w/ @max_active==1 used to be the way
to create ordered workqueues and the new NUMA support broke it. These
problems can be subtle and the fact that they can only trigger on NUMA
machines made them even more difficult to debug.

However, overloading the UNBOUND allocation interface this way creates other
issues. It's difficult to tell whether a given workqueue actually needs to
be ordered and users that legitimately want a min concurrency level wq
unexpectedly gets an ordered one instead. With planned UNBOUND workqueue
udpates to improve execution locality and more prevalence of chiplet designs
which can benefit from such improvements, this isn't a state we wanna be in
forever.

There aren't that many UNBOUND w/ @max_active==1 users in the tree and the
preceding patches audited all and converted them to
alloc_ordered_workqueue() as appropriate. This patch removes the implicit
promotion of UNBOUND w/ @max_active==1 workqueues to ordered ones.

v2: v1 patch incorrectly dropped !list_empty(&wq->pwqs) condition in
    apply_workqueue_attrs_locked() which spuriously triggers WARNING and
    fails workqueue creation. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202304251050.45a5df1f-oliver.sang@intel.com

The only generic interface to execute asynchronously in the BH context is
tasklet; however, it's marked deprecated and has some design flaws such as
the execution code accessing the tasklet item after the execution is
complete which can lead to subtle use-after-free in certain usage scenarios
and less-developed flush and cancel mechanisms.

This patch implements BH workqueues which share the same semantics and
features of regular workqueues but execute their work items in the softirq
context. As there is always only one BH execution context per CPU, none of
the concurrency management mechanisms applies and a BH workqueue can be
thought of as a convenience wrapper around softirq.

Except for the inability to sleep while executing and lack of max_active
adjustments, BH workqueues and work items should behave the same as regular
workqueues and work items.

Currently, the execution is hooked to tasklet[_hi]. However, the goal is to
convert all tasklet users over to BH workqueues. Once the conversion is
complete, tasklet can be removed and BH workqueues can directly take over
the tasklet softirqs.

system_bh[_highpri]_wq are added. As queue-wide flushing doesn't exist in
tasklet, all existing tasklet users should be able to use the system BH
workqueues without creating their own workqueues.

v3: - Add missing interrupt.h include.

v2: - Instead of using tasklets, hook directly into its softirq action
      functions - tasklet[_hi]_action(). This is slightly cheaper and closer
      to the eventual code structure we want to arrive at. Suggested by Lai.

    - Lai also pointed out several places which need NULL worker->task
      handling or can use clarification. Updated.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjDW53w4-YcSmgKC5RruiRLHmJ1sXeYdp_ZgVoBw=5byA@mail.gmail.com
Tested-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>

Correct to "following" from "followings" in the sentence "The followings
are the read bandwidths and CPU utilizations depending on different affinity
scope settings on ``kcryptd`` measured over five runs."

Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240110185746.24974-1-tintinm2017@gmail.com

Correct to “boundaries” from “bounaries”

Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231223175316.24951-1-tintinm2017@gmail.com