<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S, branch v3.18.64</title>
<subtitle>Clone of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>Merge remote-tracking branch 'scott/next' into next</title>
<updated>2014-08-05T04:13:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Benjamin Herrenschmidt</name>
<email>benh@kernel.crashing.org</email>
</author>
<published>2014-08-05T04:13:41+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=9287b95ec9ded0a4458094ebd967502263d80112'/>
<id>9287b95ec9ded0a4458094ebd967502263d80112</id>
<content type='text'>
Scott writes:

Highlights include e6500 hardware threading support, an e6500 TLB erratum
workaround, corenet error reporting, support for a new board, and some
minor fixes.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Scott writes:

Highlights include e6500 hardware threading support, an e6500 TLB erratum
workaround, corenet error reporting, support for a new board, and some
minor fixes.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>powerpc/e6500: Add support for hardware threads</title>
<updated>2014-07-30T00:26:20+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Andy Fleming</name>
<email>afleming@freescale.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-12-08T07:20:27+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=e16c8765533a155ebd3d7c36fc80440a03bbf46a'/>
<id>e16c8765533a155ebd3d7c36fc80440a03bbf46a</id>
<content type='text'>
The general idea is that each core will release all of its
threads into the secondary thread startup code, which will
eventually wait in the secondary core holding area, for the
appropriate bit in the PACA to be set. The kick_cpu function
pointer will set that bit in the PACA, and thus "release"
the core/thread to boot. We also need to do a few things that
U-Boot normally does for CPUs (like enable branch prediction).

Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming &lt;afleming@freescale.com&gt;
[scottwood@freescale.com: various changes, including only enabling
 threads if Linux wants to kick them]
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood &lt;scottwood@freescale.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The general idea is that each core will release all of its
threads into the secondary thread startup code, which will
eventually wait in the secondary core holding area, for the
appropriate bit in the PACA to be set. The kick_cpu function
pointer will set that bit in the PACA, and thus "release"
the core/thread to boot. We also need to do a few things that
U-Boot normally does for CPUs (like enable branch prediction).

Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming &lt;afleming@freescale.com&gt;
[scottwood@freescale.com: various changes, including only enabling
 threads if Linux wants to kick them]
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood &lt;scottwood@freescale.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>powerpc: Remove STAB code</title>
<updated>2014-07-28T04:10:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Michael Ellerman</name>
<email>mpe@ellerman.id.au</email>
</author>
<published>2014-07-10T02:29:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=376af5947c0e441ccbf98f0212d4ffbf171528f6'/>
<id>376af5947c0e441ccbf98f0212d4ffbf171528f6</id>
<content type='text'>
Old cpus didn't have a Segment Lookaside Buffer (SLB), instead they had
a Segment Table (STAB). Now that we've dropped support for those cpus,
we can remove the STAB support entirely.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt &lt;benh@kernel.crashing.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Old cpus didn't have a Segment Lookaside Buffer (SLB), instead they had
a Segment Table (STAB). Now that we've dropped support for those cpus,
we can remove the STAB support entirely.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt &lt;benh@kernel.crashing.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>powerpc: Fix SMP issues with ppc64le ABIv2</title>
<updated>2014-04-23T00:05:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Anton Blanchard</name>
<email>anton@samba.org</email>
</author>
<published>2014-03-11T00:54:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=2751b628c97e66e61f482935ca59148751972941'/>
<id>2751b628c97e66e61f482935ca59148751972941</id>
<content type='text'>
There is no need to put a function descriptor in
__secondary_hold_spinloop. Use ppc_function_entry to get the
instruction address and put it in __secondary_hold_spinloop instead.

Also fix an issue where we assumed cur_cpu_spec held a function
descriptor.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
There is no need to put a function descriptor in
__secondary_hold_spinloop. Use ppc_function_entry to get the
instruction address and put it in __secondary_hold_spinloop instead.

Also fix an issue where we assumed cur_cpu_spec held a function
descriptor.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>powerpc: ABIv2 function calls must place target address in r12</title>
<updated>2014-04-23T00:05:20+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Anton Blanchard</name>
<email>anton@samba.org</email>
</author>
<published>2014-02-04T05:07:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=cc7efbf91933a4b59c20e60115c336b26dfc1195'/>
<id>cc7efbf91933a4b59c20e60115c336b26dfc1195</id>
<content type='text'>
To establish addressability quickly, ABIv2 requires the target
address of the function being called to be in r12. Fix a number of
places in assembly code that we do indirect function calls.

We need to avoid function descriptors on ABIv2 too.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
To establish addressability quickly, ABIv2 requires the target
address of the function being called to be in r12. Fix a number of
places in assembly code that we do indirect function calls.

We need to avoid function descriptors on ABIv2 too.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>powerpc: Remove some unnecessary uses of _GLOBAL() and _STATIC()</title>
<updated>2014-04-23T00:05:18+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Anton Blanchard</name>
<email>anton@samba.org</email>
</author>
<published>2014-02-04T05:06:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=6a3bab90cf78bc579638525cb76ac240f8253803'/>
<id>6a3bab90cf78bc579638525cb76ac240f8253803</id>
<content type='text'>
There is no need to create a function descriptor for functions
called locally out of assembly.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
There is no need to create a function descriptor for functions
called locally out of assembly.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>powerpc: Remove superflous function descriptors in assembly only code</title>
<updated>2014-04-23T00:05:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Anton Blanchard</name>
<email>anton@samba.org</email>
</author>
<published>2014-02-04T05:04:52+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=ad0289e4acf2bd6989e745cff3b4f0781a919e30'/>
<id>ad0289e4acf2bd6989e745cff3b4f0781a919e30</id>
<content type='text'>
We have a number of places where we load the text address of a local
function and indirectly branch to it in assembly. Since it is an
indirect branch binutils will not know to use the function text
address, so that trick wont work.

There is no need for these functions to have a function descriptor
so we can replace it with a label and remove the dot symbol.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
We have a number of places where we load the text address of a local
function and indirectly branch to it in assembly. Since it is an
indirect branch binutils will not know to use the function text
address, so that trick wont work.

There is no need for these functions to have a function descriptor
so we can replace it with a label and remove the dot symbol.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>powerpc: No need to use dot symbols when branching to a function</title>
<updated>2014-04-23T00:05:16+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Anton Blanchard</name>
<email>anton@samba.org</email>
</author>
<published>2014-02-04T05:04:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=b1576fec7f4dd4657694fefc97fda4cf28ec68e9'/>
<id>b1576fec7f4dd4657694fefc97fda4cf28ec68e9</id>
<content type='text'>
binutils is smart enough to know that a branch to a function
descriptor is actually a branch to the functions text address.

Alan tells me that binutils has been doing this for 9 years.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
binutils is smart enough to know that a branch to a function
descriptor is actually a branch to the functions text address.

Alan tells me that binutils has been doing this for 9 years.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard &lt;anton@samba.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>powerpc: Delete non-required instances of include &lt;linux/init.h&gt;</title>
<updated>2014-01-15T02:46:44+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul Gortmaker</name>
<email>paul.gortmaker@windriver.com</email>
</author>
<published>2014-01-09T05:44:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=c141611fb1ee2cfc374cf9be5327e97f361c4bed'/>
<id>c141611fb1ee2cfc374cf9be5327e97f361c4bed</id>
<content type='text'>
None of these files are actually using any __init type directives
and hence don't need to include &lt;linux/init.h&gt;.  Most are just a
left over from __devinit and __cpuinit removal, or simply due to
code getting copied from one driver to the next.

The one instance where we add an include for init.h covers off
a case where that file was implicitly getting it from another
header which itself didn't need it.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt &lt;benh@kernel.crashing.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
None of these files are actually using any __init type directives
and hence don't need to include &lt;linux/init.h&gt;.  Most are just a
left over from __devinit and __cpuinit removal, or simply due to
code getting copied from one driver to the next.

The one instance where we add an include for init.h covers off
a case where that file was implicitly getting it from another
header which itself didn't need it.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt &lt;benh@kernel.crashing.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>powerpc: Fix alignment of secondary cpu spin vars</title>
<updated>2013-12-30T03:02:34+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Olof Johansson</name>
<email>olof@lixom.net</email>
</author>
<published>2013-12-28T21:01:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=7d4151b5098fb0bf7f6f8d1156e1ab9d83260580'/>
<id>7d4151b5098fb0bf7f6f8d1156e1ab9d83260580</id>
<content type='text'>
Commit 5c0484e25ec0 ('powerpc: Endian safe trampoline') resulted in
losing proper alignment of the spinlock variables used when booting
secondary CPUs, causing some quite odd issues with failing to boot on
PA Semi-based systems.

This showed itself on ppc64_defconfig, but not on pasemi_defconfig,
so it had gone unnoticed when I initially tested the LE patch set.

Fix is to add explicit alignment instead of relying on good luck. :)

[ It appears that there is a different issue with PA Semi systems
  however this fix is definitely correct so applying anyway -- BenH
]

Fixes: 5c0484e25ec0 ('powerpc: Endian safe trampoline')
Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky &lt;chzigotzky@xenosoft.de&gt;
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67811
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson &lt;olof@lixom.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt &lt;benh@kernel.crashing.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Commit 5c0484e25ec0 ('powerpc: Endian safe trampoline') resulted in
losing proper alignment of the spinlock variables used when booting
secondary CPUs, causing some quite odd issues with failing to boot on
PA Semi-based systems.

This showed itself on ppc64_defconfig, but not on pasemi_defconfig,
so it had gone unnoticed when I initially tested the LE patch set.

Fix is to add explicit alignment instead of relying on good luck. :)

[ It appears that there is a different issue with PA Semi systems
  however this fix is definitely correct so applying anyway -- BenH
]

Fixes: 5c0484e25ec0 ('powerpc: Endian safe trampoline')
Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky &lt;chzigotzky@xenosoft.de&gt;
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67811
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson &lt;olof@lixom.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt &lt;benh@kernel.crashing.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
