<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c, branch v6.12.80</title>
<subtitle>Clone of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>ACPI: processor: Move arch_init_invariance_cppc() call later</title>
<updated>2024-11-06T20:31:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Mario Limonciello</name>
<email>mario.limonciello@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-11-04T22:28:55+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=b79276dcac9124a79c8cf7cc8fbdd3d4c3c9a7c7'/>
<id>b79276dcac9124a79c8cf7cc8fbdd3d4c3c9a7c7</id>
<content type='text'>
arch_init_invariance_cppc() is called at the end of
acpi_cppc_processor_probe() in order to configure frequency invariance
based upon the values from _CPC.

This however doesn't work on AMD CPPC shared memory designs that have
AMD preferred cores enabled because _CPC needs to be analyzed from all
cores to judge if preferred cores are enabled.

This issue manifests to users as a warning since commit 21fb59ab4b97
("ACPI: CPPC: Adjust debug messages in amd_set_max_freq_ratio() to warn"):
```
Could not retrieve highest performance (-19)
```

However the warning isn't the cause of this, it was actually
commit 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()") which exposed the issue.

To fix this problem, change arch_init_invariance_cppc() into a new weak
symbol that is called at the end of acpi_processor_driver_init().
Each architecture that supports it can declare the symbol to override
the weak one.

Define it for x86, in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c, and for all of the
architectures using the generic arch_topology.c code.

Fixes: 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()")
Reported-by: Ivan Shapovalov &lt;intelfx@intelfx.name&gt;
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219431
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko &lt;oleksandr@natalenko.name&gt;
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello &lt;mario.limonciello@amd.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241104222855.3959267-1-superm1@kernel.org
[ rjw: Changelog edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
arch_init_invariance_cppc() is called at the end of
acpi_cppc_processor_probe() in order to configure frequency invariance
based upon the values from _CPC.

This however doesn't work on AMD CPPC shared memory designs that have
AMD preferred cores enabled because _CPC needs to be analyzed from all
cores to judge if preferred cores are enabled.

This issue manifests to users as a warning since commit 21fb59ab4b97
("ACPI: CPPC: Adjust debug messages in amd_set_max_freq_ratio() to warn"):
```
Could not retrieve highest performance (-19)
```

However the warning isn't the cause of this, it was actually
commit 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()") which exposed the issue.

To fix this problem, change arch_init_invariance_cppc() into a new weak
symbol that is called at the end of acpi_processor_driver_init().
Each architecture that supports it can declare the symbol to override
the weak one.

Define it for x86, in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c, and for all of the
architectures using the generic arch_topology.c code.

Fixes: 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()")
Reported-by: Ivan Shapovalov &lt;intelfx@intelfx.name&gt;
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219431
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko &lt;oleksandr@natalenko.name&gt;
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello &lt;mario.limonciello@amd.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241104222855.3959267-1-superm1@kernel.org
[ rjw: Changelog edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ACPI: processor: Simplify initial onlining to use same path for cold and hotplug</title>
<updated>2024-06-28T17:38:27+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jonathan Cameron</name>
<email>Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-05-29T13:34:28+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=c1385c1f0ba3b80bd12f26c440612175088c664c'/>
<id>c1385c1f0ba3b80bd12f26c440612175088c664c</id>
<content type='text'>
Separate code paths, combined with a flag set in acpi_processor.c to
indicate a struct acpi_processor was for a hotplugged CPU ensured that
per CPU data was only set up the first time that a CPU was initialized.
This appears to be unnecessary as the paths can be combined by letting
the online logic also handle any CPUs online at the time of driver load.

Motivation for this change, beyond simplification, is that ARM64
virtual CPU HP uses the same code paths for hotplug and cold path in
acpi_processor.c so had no easy way to set the flag for hotplug only.
Removing this necessity will enable ARM64 vCPU HP to reuse the existing
code paths.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo &lt;guohanjun@huawei.com&gt;
Tested-by: Miguel Luis &lt;miguel.luis@oracle.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan &lt;gshan@redhat.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Miguel Luis &lt;miguel.luis@oracle.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron &lt;Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529133446.28446-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Separate code paths, combined with a flag set in acpi_processor.c to
indicate a struct acpi_processor was for a hotplugged CPU ensured that
per CPU data was only set up the first time that a CPU was initialized.
This appears to be unnecessary as the paths can be combined by letting
the online logic also handle any CPUs online at the time of driver load.

Motivation for this change, beyond simplification, is that ARM64
virtual CPU HP uses the same code paths for hotplug and cold path in
acpi_processor.c so had no easy way to set the flag for hotplug only.
Removing this necessity will enable ARM64 vCPU HP to reuse the existing
code paths.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo &lt;guohanjun@huawei.com&gt;
Tested-by: Miguel Luis &lt;miguel.luis@oracle.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan &lt;gshan@redhat.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Miguel Luis &lt;miguel.luis@oracle.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron &lt;Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529133446.28446-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ACPI: cpufreq: Add highest perf change notification</title>
<updated>2024-01-31T13:54:50+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Meng Li</name>
<email>li.meng@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-01-19T09:04:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=9c4a13a08a9b7afa4bc33f57675358f0195e302c'/>
<id>9c4a13a08a9b7afa4bc33f57675358f0195e302c</id>
<content type='text'>
Platform firmware sends notify 0x85 to inform the OS that the highest
performance of a CPU has changed.

This will be used by the AMD P-state driver to update the ranking of
preferred cores and set the priority of cores accordingly.

Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko &lt;oleksandr@natalenko.name&gt;
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello &lt;mario.limonciello@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui &lt;ray.huang@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan &lt;perry.yuan@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Meng Li &lt;li.meng@amd.com&gt;
Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#processor-device-notification-values
[ rjw: New subject, changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Platform firmware sends notify 0x85 to inform the OS that the highest
performance of a CPU has changed.

This will be used by the AMD P-state driver to update the ranking of
preferred cores and set the priority of cores accordingly.

Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko &lt;oleksandr@natalenko.name&gt;
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello &lt;mario.limonciello@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui &lt;ray.huang@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan &lt;perry.yuan@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Meng Li &lt;li.meng@amd.com&gt;
Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#processor-device-notification-values
[ rjw: New subject, changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ACPI: processor: Reorder acpi_processor_driver_init()</title>
<updated>2023-03-22T14:20:38+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-17T16:52:33+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=c0e0421a60bf468e88cf569fbd727346b138ed04'/>
<id>c0e0421a60bf468e88cf569fbd727346b138ed04</id>
<content type='text'>
The cpufreq policy notifier in the ACPI processor driver may as
well be registered before the driver itself, which causes
acpi_processor_cpufreq_init to be true (unless the notifier
registration fails, which is unlikely at that point) when the
ACPI CPU thermal cooling devices are registered, so the
processor_get_max_state() result does not change while
acpi_processor_driver_init() is running.

Change the ordering in acpi_processor_driver_init() accordingly
to prevent the max_state value from remaining 0 permanently for all
ACPI CPU cooling devices due to setting acpi_processor_cpufreq_init
too late.  [Note that processor_get_max_state() may still return
different values at different times after this change, depending on
the cpufreq driver registration time, but that issue needs to be
addressed separately.]

Fixes: a365105c685c("thermal: sysfs: Reuse cdev-&gt;max_state")
Reported-by: Wang, Quanxian &lt;quanxian.wang@intel.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/53ec1f06f61c984100868926f282647e57ecfb2d.camel@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Zhang Rui &lt;rui.zhang@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui &lt;rui.zhang@intel.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The cpufreq policy notifier in the ACPI processor driver may as
well be registered before the driver itself, which causes
acpi_processor_cpufreq_init to be true (unless the notifier
registration fails, which is unlikely at that point) when the
ACPI CPU thermal cooling devices are registered, so the
processor_get_max_state() result does not change while
acpi_processor_driver_init() is running.

Change the ordering in acpi_processor_driver_init() accordingly
to prevent the max_state value from remaining 0 permanently for all
ACPI CPU cooling devices due to setting acpi_processor_cpufreq_init
too late.  [Note that processor_get_max_state() may still return
different values at different times after this change, depending on
the cpufreq driver registration time, but that issue needs to be
addressed separately.]

Fixes: a365105c685c("thermal: sysfs: Reuse cdev-&gt;max_state")
Reported-by: Wang, Quanxian &lt;quanxian.wang@intel.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/53ec1f06f61c984100868926f282647e57ecfb2d.camel@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Zhang Rui &lt;rui.zhang@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui &lt;rui.zhang@intel.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ACPI: processor: Split out thermal initialization from ACPI PSS</title>
<updated>2022-06-29T16:51:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Riwen Lu</name>
<email>luriwen@kylinos.cn</email>
</author>
<published>2022-06-17T02:51:51+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=7fdc74da940ddf8f2eb0dd1202cbfbfe08342cbb'/>
<id>7fdc74da940ddf8f2eb0dd1202cbfbfe08342cbb</id>
<content type='text'>
Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor
driver"), moves processor thermal registration to acpi_pss_perf_init(),
which doesn't get executed if ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is not enabled.

As ARM64 supports P-states using CPPC, it should be possible to also
support processor passive cooling even if PSS is not enabled. Split
out the processor thermal cooling register from ACPI PSS to support
this, and move it into a separate function in processor_thermal.c.

Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu &lt;luriwen@kylinos.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal &lt;punit.agrawal@bytedance.com&gt;
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor
driver"), moves processor thermal registration to acpi_pss_perf_init(),
which doesn't get executed if ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is not enabled.

As ARM64 supports P-states using CPPC, it should be possible to also
support processor passive cooling even if PSS is not enabled. Split
out the processor thermal cooling register from ACPI PSS to support
this, and move it into a separate function in processor_thermal.c.

Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu &lt;luriwen@kylinos.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal &lt;punit.agrawal@bytedance.com&gt;
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ACPI: Use acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() instead of acpi_bus_get_device()</title>
<updated>2021-12-17T17:45:51+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-03T16:37:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=99ece713773bfa17fdb4ee2a1fb3b7bee82e4b1a'/>
<id>99ece713773bfa17fdb4ee2a1fb3b7bee82e4b1a</id>
<content type='text'>
Modify the ACPI code to use acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() instead of
acpi_bus_get_device() where applicable.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg &lt;mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede &lt;hdegoede@redhat.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Modify the ACPI code to use acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() instead of
acpi_bus_get_device() where applicable.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg &lt;mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede &lt;hdegoede@redhat.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ACPI: processor: Get rid of ACPICA message printing</title>
<updated>2021-03-08T15:51:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-02-22T18:59:13+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=52af99c3f55ff0afd815eac0271db2e1751af55c'/>
<id>52af99c3f55ff0afd815eac0271db2e1751af55c</id>
<content type='text'>
The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere.  Special configuration (either kernel command line or
sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and
the format of those messages is also special and convoluted.

For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and
ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in the ACPI processor driver with
corresponding dev_*(), acpi_handle_*() and pr_*() calls depending
on the context in which they appear.

Also drop the ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT definition that is not going
to be necessary any more.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo &lt;guohanjun@huawei.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere.  Special configuration (either kernel command line or
sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and
the format of those messages is also special and convoluted.

For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and
ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in the ACPI processor driver with
corresponding dev_*(), acpi_handle_*() and pr_*() calls depending
on the context in which they appear.

Also drop the ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT definition that is not going
to be necessary any more.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo &lt;guohanjun@huawei.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS</title>
<updated>2019-10-21T00:05:21+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-10-16T10:47:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=3000ce3c52f8b8db093e4dc649cd172390f71137'/>
<id>3000ce3c52f8b8db093e4dc649cd172390f71137</id>
<content type='text'>
Replace the CPU device PM QoS used for the management of min and max
frequency constraints in cpufreq (and its users) with per-policy
frequency QoS to avoid problems with cpufreq policies covering
more then one CPU.

Namely, a cpufreq driver is registered with the subsys interface
which calls cpufreq_add_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0, so
currently the PM QoS notifiers are added to the first CPU in the
policy (i.e. CPU0 in the majority of cases).

In turn, when the cpufreq driver is unregistered, the subsys interface
doing that calls cpufreq_remove_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0,
and the PM QoS notifiers are only removed when cpufreq_remove_dev() is
called for the last CPU in the policy, say CPUx, which as a rule is
not CPU0 if the policy covers more than one CPU.  Then, the PM QoS
notifiers cannot be removed, because CPUx does not have them, and
they are still there in the device PM QoS notifiers list of CPU0,
which prevents new PM QoS notifiers from being registered for CPU0
on the next attempt to register the cpufreq driver.

The same issue occurs when the first CPU in the policy goes offline
before unregistering the driver.

After this change it does not matter which CPU is the policy CPU at
the driver registration time and whether or not it is online all the
time, because the frequency QoS is per policy and not per CPU.

Fixes: 67d874c3b2c6 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework")
Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko &lt;digetx@gmail.com&gt;
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko &lt;digetx@gmail.com&gt;
Reported-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Diagnosed-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c577a19.1562210705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/T/#md2d89e95906b8c91c15f582146173dce2e86e99f
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20191017094612.6tbkwoq4harsjcqv@vireshk-i7/T/#m30d48cc23b9a80467fbaa16e30f90b3828a5a29b
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Replace the CPU device PM QoS used for the management of min and max
frequency constraints in cpufreq (and its users) with per-policy
frequency QoS to avoid problems with cpufreq policies covering
more then one CPU.

Namely, a cpufreq driver is registered with the subsys interface
which calls cpufreq_add_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0, so
currently the PM QoS notifiers are added to the first CPU in the
policy (i.e. CPU0 in the majority of cases).

In turn, when the cpufreq driver is unregistered, the subsys interface
doing that calls cpufreq_remove_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0,
and the PM QoS notifiers are only removed when cpufreq_remove_dev() is
called for the last CPU in the policy, say CPUx, which as a rule is
not CPU0 if the policy covers more than one CPU.  Then, the PM QoS
notifiers cannot be removed, because CPUx does not have them, and
they are still there in the device PM QoS notifiers list of CPU0,
which prevents new PM QoS notifiers from being registered for CPU0
on the next attempt to register the cpufreq driver.

The same issue occurs when the first CPU in the policy goes offline
before unregistering the driver.

After this change it does not matter which CPU is the policy CPU at
the driver registration time and whether or not it is online all the
time, because the frequency QoS is per policy and not per CPU.

Fixes: 67d874c3b2c6 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework")
Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko &lt;digetx@gmail.com&gt;
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko &lt;digetx@gmail.com&gt;
Reported-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Diagnosed-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c577a19.1562210705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/T/#md2d89e95906b8c91c15f582146173dce2e86e99f
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20191017094612.6tbkwoq4harsjcqv@vireshk-i7/T/#m30d48cc23b9a80467fbaa16e30f90b3828a5a29b
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier</title>
<updated>2019-08-28T09:21:53+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Viresh Kumar</name>
<email>viresh.kumar@linaro.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-08-28T08:50:13+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=d15ce412737accaba5e4c7d653b184772da47365'/>
<id>d15ce412737accaba5e4c7d653b184772da47365</id>
<content type='text'>
The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS
requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on.

Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint
for acpi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS
requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on.

Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint
for acpi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 157</title>
<updated>2019-05-30T18:26:37+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Thomas Gleixner</name>
<email>tglx@linutronix.de</email>
</author>
<published>2019-05-27T06:55:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=c942fddf8793b2013be8c901b47d0a8dc02bf99f'/>
<id>c942fddf8793b2013be8c901b47d0a8dc02bf99f</id>
<content type='text'>
Based on 3 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
  your option any later version this program is distributed in the
  hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even
  the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
  purpose see the gnu general public license for more details

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
  your option any later version [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham]
  [i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that
  it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied
  warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see
  the gnu general public license for more details

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
  your option any later version [author] [graeme] [gregory]
  [gg]@[slimlogic] [co] [uk] [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i]
  [kishon]@[ti] [com] [based] [on] [twl6030]_[usb] [c] [author] [hema]
  [hk] [hemahk]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope
  that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the
  implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
  purpose see the gnu general public license for more details

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-or-later

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1105 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal &lt;allison@lohutok.net&gt;
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana &lt;rfontana@redhat.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart &lt;kstewart@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.202006027@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Based on 3 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
  your option any later version this program is distributed in the
  hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even
  the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
  purpose see the gnu general public license for more details

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
  your option any later version [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham]
  [i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that
  it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied
  warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see
  the gnu general public license for more details

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
  your option any later version [author] [graeme] [gregory]
  [gg]@[slimlogic] [co] [uk] [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i]
  [kishon]@[ti] [com] [based] [on] [twl6030]_[usb] [c] [author] [hema]
  [hk] [hemahk]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope
  that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the
  implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
  purpose see the gnu general public license for more details

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-or-later

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1105 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal &lt;allison@lohutok.net&gt;
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana &lt;rfontana@redhat.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart &lt;kstewart@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.202006027@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
