linux.git/drivers/base, branch v4.14.161

drivers/base/platform.c: kmemleak ignore a known leak

2019-12-05T14:37:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit 967d3010df8b6f6f9aa95c198edc5fe3646ebf36 ]

unreferenced object 0xffff808ec6dc5a80 (size 128):
  comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294938063 (age 2560.530s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b  ........kkkkkkkk
    6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b  kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
  backtrace:
    [<00000000476dcf8c>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x430/0x500
    [<000000004f708d37>] platform_device_register_full+0xbc/0x1e8
    [<000000006c2a7ec7>] acpi_create_platform_device+0x370/0x450
    [<00000000ef135642>] acpi_default_enumeration+0x34/0x78
    [<000000003bd9a052>] acpi_bus_attach+0x2dc/0x3e0
    [<000000003cf4f7f2>] acpi_bus_attach+0x108/0x3e0
    [<000000003cf4f7f2>] acpi_bus_attach+0x108/0x3e0
    [<000000002968643e>] acpi_bus_scan+0xb0/0x110
    [<0000000010dd0bd7>] acpi_scan_init+0x1a8/0x410
    [<00000000965b3c5a>] acpi_init+0x408/0x49c
    [<00000000ed4b9fe2>] do_one_initcall+0x178/0x7f4
    [<00000000a5ac5a74>] kernel_init_freeable+0x9d4/0xa9c
    [<0000000070ea6c15>] kernel_init+0x18/0x138
    [<00000000fb8fff06>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
    [<0000000041273a0d>] 0xffffffffffffffff

Then, faddr2line pointed out this line,

/*
 * This memory isn't freed when the device is put,
 * I don't have a nice idea for that though.  Conceptually
 * dma_mask in struct device should not be a pointer.
 * See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/9081
 */
pdev->dev.dma_mask =
	kmalloc(sizeof(*pdev->dev.dma_mask), GFP_KERNEL);

Since this leak has existed for more than 8 years and it does not
reference other parts of the memory, let kmemleak ignore it, so users
don't need to waste time reporting this in the future.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181206160751.36211-1-cai@gmx.us
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai 
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" 
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm/memory_hotplug: Do not unlock when fails to take the device_hotplug_lock

2019-12-01T08:14:14+00:00

[ Upstream commit d2ab99403ee00d8014e651728a4702ea1ae5e52c ]

When adding the memory by probing memory block in sysfs interface, there is an
obvious issue that we will unlock the device_hotplug_lock when fails to takes it.

That issue was introduced in Commit 8df1d0e4a265
("mm/memory_hotplug: make add_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock")

We should drop out in time when fails to take the device_hotplug_lock.

Fixes: 8df1d0e4a265 ("mm/memory_hotplug: make add_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock")
Reported-by: Yang yingliang 
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador 
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Cc: stable 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm/memory_hotplug: make add_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock

2019-12-01T08:13:57+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8df1d0e4a265f25dc1e7e7624ccdbcb4a6630c89 ]

add_memory() currently does not take the device_hotplug_lock, however
is aleady called under the lock from
	arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
	drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
to synchronize against CPU hot-remove and similar.

In general, we should hold the device_hotplug_lock when adding memory to
synchronize against online/offline request (e.g.  from user space) - which
already resulted in lock inversions due to device_lock() and
mem_hotplug_lock - see 30467e0b3be ("mm, hotplug: fix concurrent memory
hot-add deadlock").  add_memory()/add_memory_resource() will create memory
block devices, so this really feels like the right thing to do.

Holding the device_hotplug_lock makes sure that a memory block device
can really only be accessed (e.g. via .online/.state) from user space,
once the memory has been fully added to the system.

The lock is not held yet in
	drivers/xen/balloon.c
	arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c
	drivers/s390/char/sclp_cmd.c
	drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
So, let's either use the locked variants or take the lock.

Don't export add_memory_resource(), as it once was exported to be used by
XEN, which is never built as a module.  If somebody requires it, we also
have to export a locked variant (as device_hotplug_lock is never
exported).

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-3-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand 
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin 
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta 
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: Paul Mackerras 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" 
Cc: Len Brown 
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky 
Cc: Juergen Gross 
Cc: Nathan Fontenot 
Cc: John Allen 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Dan Williams 
Cc: Joonsoo Kim 
Cc: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre 
Cc: Pavel Tatashin 
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU 
Cc: Balbir Singh 
Cc: Haiyang Zhang 
Cc: Heiko Carstens 
Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
Cc: Kate Stewart 
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" 
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Michael Neuling 
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne 
Cc: Stephen Hemminger 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

PM / Domains: Deal with multiple states but no governor in genpd

2019-12-01T08:13:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2c9b7f8772033cc8bafbd4eefe2ca605bf3eb094 ]

A caller of pm_genpd_init() that provides some states for the genpd via the
->states pointer in the struct generic_pm_domain, should also provide a
governor. This because it's the job of the governor to pick a state that
satisfies the constraints.

Therefore, let's print a warning to inform the user about such bogus
configuration and avoid to bail out, by instead picking the shallowest
state before genpd invokes the ->power_off() callback.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson 
Reviewed-by: Lina Iyer 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Revert "OPP: Protect dev_list with opp_table lock"

2019-11-24T07:22:45+00:00

This reverts commit 714ab224a8db6e8255c61a42613de9349ceb0bba which is
commit 3d2556992a878a2210d3be498416aee39e0c32aa upstream.

Turns out to break the build on the odroid machines, so it needs to be
reverted.

Reported-by: Viresh Kumar 
Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" 
Cc: Niklas Cassel 
Cc: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

OPP: Protect dev_list with opp_table lock

2019-11-20T17:00:13+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3d2556992a878a2210d3be498416aee39e0c32aa ]

The dev_list needs to be protected with a lock, else we may have
simultaneous access (addition/removal) to it and that would be racy.
Extend scope of the opp_table lock to protect dev_list as well.

Tested-by: Niklas Cassel 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

component: fix loop condition to call unbind() if bind() fails

2019-11-20T17:00:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit bdae566d5d9733b6e32b378668b84eadf28a94d4 ]

During component_bind_all(), if bind() fails for any
particular component associated with a master, unbind()
should be called for all previous components in that
master's match array, whose bind() might have completed
successfully. As per the current logic, if bind() fails
for the component at position 'n' in the master's match
array, it would start calling unbind() from component in
'n'th position itself and work backwards, and will always
skip calling unbind() for component in 0th position in the
master's match array.
Fix this by updating the loop condition, and the logic to
refer to the components in master's match array, so that
unbind() is called for all components starting from 'n-1'st
position in the array, until (and including) component in
0th position.

Signed-off-by: Banajit Goswami 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/bugs: Add ITLB_MULTIHIT bug infrastructure

2019-11-12T18:19:03+00:00

commit db4d30fbb71b47e4ecb11c4efa5d8aad4b03dfae upstream.

Some processors may incur a machine check error possibly resulting in an
unrecoverable CPU lockup when an instruction fetch encounters a TLB
multi-hit in the instruction TLB. This can occur when the page size is
changed along with either the physical address or cache type. The relevant
erratum can be found here:

   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205195

There are other processors affected for which the erratum does not fully
disclose the impact.

This issue affects both bare-metal x86 page tables and EPT.

It can be mitigated by either eliminating the use of large pages or by
using careful TLB invalidations when changing the page size in the page
tables.

Just like Spectre, Meltdown, L1TF and MDS, a new bit has been allocated in
MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES (PSCHANGE_MC_NO) and will be set on CPUs which
are mitigated against this issue.

Signed-off-by: Vineela Tummalapalli 
Co-developed-by: Pawan Gupta 
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/speculation/taa: Add sysfs reporting for TSX Async Abort

2019-11-12T18:19:00+00:00

commit 6608b45ac5ecb56f9e171252229c39580cc85f0f upstream.

Add the sysfs reporting file for TSX Async Abort. It exposes the
vulnerability and the mitigation state similar to the existing files for
the other hardware vulnerabilities.

Sysfs file path is:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta 
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Tested-by: Neelima Krishnan 
Reviewed-by: Mark Gross 
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck 
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: Avoid cpufreq_suspend() deadlock on system shutdown

2019-10-29T08:17:44+00:00

commit 65650b35133ff20f0c9ef0abd5c3c66dbce3ae57 upstream.

It is incorrect to set the cpufreq syscore shutdown callback pointer
to cpufreq_suspend(), because that function cannot be run in the
syscore stage of system shutdown for two reasons: (a) it may attempt
to carry out actions depending on devices that have already been shut
down at that point and (b) the RCU synchronization carried out by it
may not be able to make progress then.

The latter issue has been present since commit 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu:
Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds"),
but the former one has been there since commit 90de2a4aa9f3 ("cpufreq:
suspend cpufreq governors on shutdown") regardless.

Fix that by dropping cpufreq_syscore_ops altogether and making
device_shutdown() call cpufreq_suspend() directly before shutting
down devices, which is along the lines of what system-wide power
management does.

Fixes: 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu: Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds")
Fixes: 90de2a4aa9f3 ("cpufreq: suspend cpufreq governors on shutdown")
Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä 
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 
Cc: 4.0+  # 4.0+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman