<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/drivers/cpuidle, branch v6.6.118</title>
<subtitle>Clone of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>cpuidle: Fail cpuidle device registration if there is one already</title>
<updated>2025-11-24T09:29:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-09-19T11:22:20+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=b8961542d2aeaa1b0454295ee7793f1cee0ac2cf'/>
<id>b8961542d2aeaa1b0454295ee7793f1cee0ac2cf</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 7b1b7961170e4fcad488755e5ffaaaf9bd527e8f ]

Refuse to register a cpuidle device if the given CPU has a cpuidle
device already and print a message regarding it.

Without this, an attempt to register a new cpuidle device without
unregistering the existing one leads to the removal of the existing
cpuidle device without removing its sysfs interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 7b1b7961170e4fcad488755e5ffaaaf9bd527e8f ]

Refuse to register a cpuidle device if the given CPU has a cpuidle
device already and print a message regarding it.

Without this, an attempt to register a new cpuidle device without
unregistering the existing one leads to the removal of the existing
cpuidle device without removing its sysfs interface.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cpuidle: governors: menu: Select polling state in some more cases</title>
<updated>2025-11-24T09:29:16+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-11-02T19:02:52+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=a60be7339353f6be2f80c084a1dcb5e022650950'/>
<id>a60be7339353f6be2f80c084a1dcb5e022650950</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit db86f55bf81a3a297be05ee8775ae9a8c6e3a599 ]

A throughput regression of 11% introduced by commit 779b1a1cb13a ("cpuidle:
governors: menu: Avoid selecting states with too much latency") has been
reported and it is related to the case when the menu governor checks if
selecting a proper idle state instead of a polling one makes sense.

In particular, it is questionable to do so if the exit latency of the
idle state in question exceeds the predicted idle duration, so add a
check for that, which is sufficient to make the reported regression go
away, and update the related code comment accordingly.

Fixes: 779b1a1cb13a ("cpuidle: governors: menu: Avoid selecting states with too much latency")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/004501dc43c9$ec8aa930$c59ffb90$@telus.net/
Reported-by: Doug Smythies &lt;dsmythies@telus.net&gt;
Tested-by: Doug Smythies &lt;dsmythies@telus.net&gt;
Cc: All applicable &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/12786727.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit db86f55bf81a3a297be05ee8775ae9a8c6e3a599 ]

A throughput regression of 11% introduced by commit 779b1a1cb13a ("cpuidle:
governors: menu: Avoid selecting states with too much latency") has been
reported and it is related to the case when the menu governor checks if
selecting a proper idle state instead of a polling one makes sense.

In particular, it is questionable to do so if the exit latency of the
idle state in question exceeds the predicted idle duration, so add a
check for that, which is sufficient to make the reported regression go
away, and update the related code comment accordingly.

Fixes: 779b1a1cb13a ("cpuidle: governors: menu: Avoid selecting states with too much latency")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/004501dc43c9$ec8aa930$c59ffb90$@telus.net/
Reported-by: Doug Smythies &lt;dsmythies@telus.net&gt;
Tested-by: Doug Smythies &lt;dsmythies@telus.net&gt;
Cc: All applicable &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/12786727.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cpuidle: governors: menu: Rearrange main loop in menu_select()</title>
<updated>2025-11-24T09:29:16+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-11-02T19:02:51+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=58c347aa881dc2e57ce95594d6e71757495baf6d'/>
<id>58c347aa881dc2e57ce95594d6e71757495baf6d</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 17224c1d2574d29668c4879e1fbf36d6f68cd22b ]

Reduce the indentation level in the main loop of menu_select() by
rearranging some checks and assignments in it.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2389215.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki
Stable-dep-of: db86f55bf81a ("cpuidle: governors: menu: Select polling state in some more cases")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 17224c1d2574d29668c4879e1fbf36d6f68cd22b ]

Reduce the indentation level in the main loop of menu_select() by
rearranging some checks and assignments in it.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2389215.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki
Stable-dep-of: db86f55bf81a ("cpuidle: governors: menu: Select polling state in some more cases")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Revert "cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information"</title>
<updated>2025-10-29T13:07:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-10-18T12:27:15+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=29d96bcc1495260ada5aae073b8939d7afcecc16'/>
<id>29d96bcc1495260ada5aae073b8939d7afcecc16</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 10fad4012234a7dea621ae17c0c9486824f645a0 upstream.

It is reported that commit 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding
useful information") led to a performance regression on Intel Jasper Lake
systems because it reduced the time spent by CPUs in idle state C7 which
is correlated to the maximum frequency the CPUs can get to because of an
average running power limit [1].

Before that commit, get_typical_interval() would have returned UINT_MAX
whenever it had been unable to make a high-confidence prediction which
had led to selecting the deepest available idle state too often and
both power and performance had been inadequate as a result of that on
some systems.  However, this had not been a problem on systems with
relatively aggressive average running power limits, like the Jasper Lake
systems in question, because on those systems it was compensated by the
ability to run CPUs faster.

It was addressed by causing get_typical_interval() to return a number
based on the recent idle duration information available to it even if it
could not make a high-confidence prediction, but that clearly did not
take the possible correlation between idle power and available CPU
capacity into account.

For this reason, revert most of the changes made by commit 85975daeaa4d,
except for one cosmetic cleanup, and add a comment explaining the
rationale for returning UINT_MAX from get_typical_interval() when it
is unable to make a high-confidence prediction.

Fixes: 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/36iykr223vmcfsoysexug6s274nq2oimcu55ybn6ww4il3g3cv@cohflgdbpnq7/ [1]
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky &lt;senozhatsky@chromium.org&gt;
Cc: All applicable &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3663603.iIbC2pHGDl@rafael.j.wysocki
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 10fad4012234a7dea621ae17c0c9486824f645a0 upstream.

It is reported that commit 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding
useful information") led to a performance regression on Intel Jasper Lake
systems because it reduced the time spent by CPUs in idle state C7 which
is correlated to the maximum frequency the CPUs can get to because of an
average running power limit [1].

Before that commit, get_typical_interval() would have returned UINT_MAX
whenever it had been unable to make a high-confidence prediction which
had led to selecting the deepest available idle state too often and
both power and performance had been inadequate as a result of that on
some systems.  However, this had not been a problem on systems with
relatively aggressive average running power limits, like the Jasper Lake
systems in question, because on those systems it was compensated by the
ability to run CPUs faster.

It was addressed by causing get_typical_interval() to return a number
based on the recent idle duration information available to it even if it
could not make a high-confidence prediction, but that clearly did not
take the possible correlation between idle power and available CPU
capacity into account.

For this reason, revert most of the changes made by commit 85975daeaa4d,
except for one cosmetic cleanup, and add a comment explaining the
rationale for returning UINT_MAX from get_typical_interval() when it
is unable to make a high-confidence prediction.

Fixes: 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/36iykr223vmcfsoysexug6s274nq2oimcu55ybn6ww4il3g3cv@cohflgdbpnq7/ [1]
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky &lt;senozhatsky@chromium.org&gt;
Cc: All applicable &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3663603.iIbC2pHGDl@rafael.j.wysocki
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cpuidle: qcom-spm: fix device and OF node leaks at probe</title>
<updated>2025-10-15T09:57:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Johan Hovold</name>
<email>johan@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-09-08T15:22:12+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=2af05a03b1d21d8b8c7cf5a111bf03780141f86c'/>
<id>2af05a03b1d21d8b8c7cf5a111bf03780141f86c</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit cdc06f912670c8c199d5fa9e78b64b7ed8e871d0 ]

Make sure to drop the reference to the saw device taken by
of_find_device_by_node() after retrieving its driver data during
probe().

Also drop the reference to the CPU node sooner to avoid leaking it in
case there is no saw node or device.

Fixes: 60f3692b5f0b ("cpuidle: qcom_spm: Detach state machine from main SPM handling")
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold &lt;johan@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio &lt;konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit cdc06f912670c8c199d5fa9e78b64b7ed8e871d0 ]

Make sure to drop the reference to the saw device taken by
of_find_device_by_node() after retrieving its driver data during
probe().

Also drop the reference to the CPU node sooner to avoid leaking it in
case there is no saw node or device.

Fixes: 60f3692b5f0b ("cpuidle: qcom_spm: Detach state machine from main SPM handling")
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold &lt;johan@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio &lt;konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cpuidle: governors: menu: Avoid selecting states with too much latency</title>
<updated>2025-08-28T14:28:45+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-08-23T13:34:49+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=d404824f3d25281cb7c972945ca59d43ba932f84'/>
<id>d404824f3d25281cb7c972945ca59d43ba932f84</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 779b1a1cb13ae17028aeddb2fbbdba97357a1e15 ]

Occasionally, the exit latency of the idle state selected by the menu
governor may exceed the PM QoS CPU wakeup latency limit.  Namely, if the
scheduler tick has been stopped already and predicted_ns is greater than
the tick period length, the governor may return an idle state whose exit
latency exceeds latency_req because that decision is made before
checking the current idle state's exit latency.

For instance, say that there are 3 idle states, 0, 1, and 2.  For idle
states 0 and 1, the exit latency is equal to the target residency and
the values are 0 and 5 us, respectively.  State 2 is deeper and has the
exit latency and target residency of 200 us and 2 ms (which is greater
than the tick period length), respectively.

Say that predicted_ns is equal to TICK_NSEC and the PM QoS latency
limit is 20 us.  After the first two iterations of the main loop in
menu_select(), idx becomes 1 and in the third iteration of it the target
residency of the current state (state 2) is greater than predicted_ns.
State 2 is not a polling one and predicted_ns is not less than TICK_NSEC,
so the check on whether or not the tick has been stopped is done.  Say
that the tick has been stopped already and there are no imminent timers
(that is, delta_tick is greater than the target residency of state 2).
In that case, idx becomes 2 and it is returned immediately, but the exit
latency of state 2 exceeds the latency limit.

Address this issue by modifying the code to compare the exit latency of
the current idle state (idle state i) with the latency limit before
comparing its target residency with predicted_ns, which allows one
more exit_latency_ns check that becomes redundant to be dropped.

However, after the above change, latency_req cannot take the predicted_ns
value any more, which takes place after commit 38f83090f515 ("cpuidle:
menu: Remove iowait influence"), because it may cause a polling state
to be returned prematurely.

In the context of the previous example say that predicted_ns is 3000 and
the PM QoS latency limit is still 20 us.  Additionally, say that idle
state 0 is a polling one.  Moving the exit_latency_ns check before the
target_residency_ns one causes the loop to terminate in the second
iteration, before the target_residency_ns check, so idle state 0 will be
returned even though previously state 1 would be returned if there were
no imminent timers.

For this reason, remove the assignment of the predicted_ns value to
latency_req from the code.

Fixes: 5ef499cd571c ("cpuidle: menu: Handle stopped tick more aggressively")
Cc: 4.17+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 4.17+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5043159.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 779b1a1cb13ae17028aeddb2fbbdba97357a1e15 ]

Occasionally, the exit latency of the idle state selected by the menu
governor may exceed the PM QoS CPU wakeup latency limit.  Namely, if the
scheduler tick has been stopped already and predicted_ns is greater than
the tick period length, the governor may return an idle state whose exit
latency exceeds latency_req because that decision is made before
checking the current idle state's exit latency.

For instance, say that there are 3 idle states, 0, 1, and 2.  For idle
states 0 and 1, the exit latency is equal to the target residency and
the values are 0 and 5 us, respectively.  State 2 is deeper and has the
exit latency and target residency of 200 us and 2 ms (which is greater
than the tick period length), respectively.

Say that predicted_ns is equal to TICK_NSEC and the PM QoS latency
limit is 20 us.  After the first two iterations of the main loop in
menu_select(), idx becomes 1 and in the third iteration of it the target
residency of the current state (state 2) is greater than predicted_ns.
State 2 is not a polling one and predicted_ns is not less than TICK_NSEC,
so the check on whether or not the tick has been stopped is done.  Say
that the tick has been stopped already and there are no imminent timers
(that is, delta_tick is greater than the target residency of state 2).
In that case, idx becomes 2 and it is returned immediately, but the exit
latency of state 2 exceeds the latency limit.

Address this issue by modifying the code to compare the exit latency of
the current idle state (idle state i) with the latency limit before
comparing its target residency with predicted_ns, which allows one
more exit_latency_ns check that becomes redundant to be dropped.

However, after the above change, latency_req cannot take the predicted_ns
value any more, which takes place after commit 38f83090f515 ("cpuidle:
menu: Remove iowait influence"), because it may cause a polling state
to be returned prematurely.

In the context of the previous example say that predicted_ns is 3000 and
the PM QoS latency limit is still 20 us.  Additionally, say that idle
state 0 is a polling one.  Moving the exit_latency_ns check before the
target_residency_ns one causes the loop to terminate in the second
iteration, before the target_residency_ns check, so idle state 0 will be
returned even though previously state 1 would be returned if there were
no imminent timers.

For this reason, remove the assignment of the predicted_ns value to
latency_req from the code.

Fixes: 5ef499cd571c ("cpuidle: menu: Handle stopped tick more aggressively")
Cc: 4.17+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 4.17+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5043159.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cpuidle: menu: Remove iowait influence</title>
<updated>2025-08-28T14:28:45+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Christian Loehle</name>
<email>christian.loehle@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-08-23T13:34:48+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=3a92598c3e55c6d29f242b1cbb4f685aff311ab4'/>
<id>3a92598c3e55c6d29f242b1cbb4f685aff311ab4</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 38f83090f515b4b5d59382dfada1e7457f19aa47 ]

Remove CPU iowaiters influence on idle state selection.

Remove the menu notion of performance multiplier which increased with
the number of tasks that went to iowait sleep on this CPU and haven't
woken up yet.

Relying on iowait for cpuidle is problematic for a few reasons:

 1. There is no guarantee that an iowaiting task will wake up on the
    same CPU.

 2. The task being in iowait says nothing about the idle duration, we
    could be selecting shallower states for a long time.

 3. The task being in iowait doesn't always imply a performance hit
    with increased latency.

 4. If there is such a performance hit, the number of iowaiting tasks
    doesn't directly correlate.

 5. The definition of iowait altogether is vague at best, it is
    sprinkled across kernel code.

Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240905092645.2885200-2-christian.loehle@arm.com
[ rjw: Minor edits in the changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Stable-dep-of: 779b1a1cb13a ("cpuidle: governors: menu: Avoid selecting states with too much latency")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 38f83090f515b4b5d59382dfada1e7457f19aa47 ]

Remove CPU iowaiters influence on idle state selection.

Remove the menu notion of performance multiplier which increased with
the number of tasks that went to iowait sleep on this CPU and haven't
woken up yet.

Relying on iowait for cpuidle is problematic for a few reasons:

 1. There is no guarantee that an iowaiting task will wake up on the
    same CPU.

 2. The task being in iowait says nothing about the idle duration, we
    could be selecting shallower states for a long time.

 3. The task being in iowait doesn't always imply a performance hit
    with increased latency.

 4. If there is such a performance hit, the number of iowaiting tasks
    doesn't directly correlate.

 5. The definition of iowait altogether is vague at best, it is
    sprinkled across kernel code.

Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240905092645.2885200-2-christian.loehle@arm.com
[ rjw: Minor edits in the changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Stable-dep-of: 779b1a1cb13a ("cpuidle: governors: menu: Avoid selecting states with too much latency")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cpuidle: governors: menu: Avoid using invalid recent intervals data</title>
<updated>2025-08-28T14:28:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-08-11T15:03:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=7337a6356dffc93194af24ee31023b3578661a5b'/>
<id>7337a6356dffc93194af24ee31023b3578661a5b</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit fa3fa55de0d6177fdcaf6fc254f13cc8f33c3eed ]

Marc has reported that commit 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid
discarding useful information") caused the number of wakeup interrupts
to increase on an idle system [1], which was not expected to happen
after merely allowing shallower idle states to be selected by the
governor in some cases.

However, on the system in question, all of the idle states deeper than
WFI are rejected by the driver due to a firmware issue [2].  This causes
the governor to only consider the recent interval duriation data
corresponding to attempts to enter WFI that are successful and the
recent invervals table is filled with values lower than the scheduler
tick period.  Consequently, the governor predicts an idle duration
below the scheduler tick period length and avoids stopping the tick
more often which leads to the observed symptom.

Address it by modifying the governor to update the recent intervals
table also when entering the previously selected idle state fails, so
it knows that the short idle intervals might have been the minority
had the selected idle states been actually entered every time.

Fixes: 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/86o6sv6n94.wl-maz@kernel.org/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/7ffcb716-9a1b-48c2-aaa4-469d0df7c792@arm.com/ [2]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier &lt;maz@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2793874.mvXUDI8C0e@rafael.j.wysocki
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit fa3fa55de0d6177fdcaf6fc254f13cc8f33c3eed ]

Marc has reported that commit 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid
discarding useful information") caused the number of wakeup interrupts
to increase on an idle system [1], which was not expected to happen
after merely allowing shallower idle states to be selected by the
governor in some cases.

However, on the system in question, all of the idle states deeper than
WFI are rejected by the driver due to a firmware issue [2].  This causes
the governor to only consider the recent interval duriation data
corresponding to attempts to enter WFI that are successful and the
recent invervals table is filled with values lower than the scheduler
tick period.  Consequently, the governor predicts an idle duration
below the scheduler tick period length and avoids stopping the tick
more often which leads to the observed symptom.

Address it by modifying the governor to update the recent intervals
table also when entering the previously selected idle state fails, so
it knows that the short idle intervals might have been the minority
had the selected idle states been actually entered every time.

Fixes: 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/86o6sv6n94.wl-maz@kernel.org/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/7ffcb716-9a1b-48c2-aaa4-469d0df7c792@arm.com/ [2]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier &lt;maz@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2793874.mvXUDI8C0e@rafael.j.wysocki
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information</title>
<updated>2025-06-04T12:42:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-02-06T14:29:05+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=3cd2aa93674ee9e6cb711d81c0486ade690f98fc'/>
<id>3cd2aa93674ee9e6cb711d81c0486ade690f98fc</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 85975daeaa4d6ec560bfcd354fc9c08ad7f38888 ]

When giving up on making a high-confidence prediction,
get_typical_interval() always returns UINT_MAX which means that the
next idle interval prediction will be based entirely on the time till
the next timer.  However, the information represented by the most
recent intervals may not be completely useless in those cases.

Namely, the largest recent idle interval is an upper bound on the
recently observed idle duration, so it is reasonable to assume that
the next idle duration is unlikely to exceed it.  Moreover, this is
still true after eliminating the suspected outliers if the sample
set still under consideration is at least as large as 50% of the
maximum sample set size.

Accordingly, make get_typical_interval() return the current maximum
recent interval value in that case instead of UINT_MAX.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reported-by: Artem Bityutskiy &lt;artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy &lt;artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Aboorva Devarajan &lt;aboorvad@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/7770672.EvYhyI6sBW@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 85975daeaa4d6ec560bfcd354fc9c08ad7f38888 ]

When giving up on making a high-confidence prediction,
get_typical_interval() always returns UINT_MAX which means that the
next idle interval prediction will be based entirely on the time till
the next timer.  However, the information represented by the most
recent intervals may not be completely useless in those cases.

Namely, the largest recent idle interval is an upper bound on the
recently observed idle duration, so it is reasonable to assume that
the next idle duration is unlikely to exceed it.  Moreover, this is
still true after eliminating the suspected outliers if the sample
set still under consideration is at least as large as 50% of the
maximum sample set size.

Accordingly, make get_typical_interval() return the current maximum
recent interval value in that case instead of UINT_MAX.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reported-by: Artem Bityutskiy &lt;artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy &lt;artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Christian Loehle &lt;christian.loehle@arm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Aboorva Devarajan &lt;aboorvad@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/7770672.EvYhyI6sBW@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cpuidle: riscv-sbi: fix device node release in early exit of for_each_possible_cpu</title>
<updated>2025-01-17T12:36:16+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Javier Carrasco</name>
<email>javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-11-15T23:32:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=387f5b8ad3ffbc8ee1c8ba67cca6082c57d6609e'/>
<id>387f5b8ad3ffbc8ee1c8ba67cca6082c57d6609e</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 7e25044b804581b9c029d5a28d8800aebde18043 ]

The 'np' device_node is initialized via of_cpu_device_node_get(), which
requires explicit calls to of_node_put() when it is no longer required
to avoid leaking the resource.

Instead of adding the missing calls to of_node_put() in all execution
paths, use the cleanup attribute for 'np' by means of the __free()
macro, which automatically calls of_node_put() when the variable goes
out of scope. Given that 'np' is only used within the
for_each_possible_cpu(), reduce its scope to release the nood after
every iteration of the loop.

Fixes: 6abf32f1d9c5 ("cpuidle: Add RISC-V SBI CPU idle driver")
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones &lt;ajones@ventanamicro.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco &lt;javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241116-cpuidle-riscv-sbi-cleanup-v3-1-a3a46372ce08@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt &lt;palmer@rivosinc.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 7e25044b804581b9c029d5a28d8800aebde18043 ]

The 'np' device_node is initialized via of_cpu_device_node_get(), which
requires explicit calls to of_node_put() when it is no longer required
to avoid leaking the resource.

Instead of adding the missing calls to of_node_put() in all execution
paths, use the cleanup attribute for 'np' by means of the __free()
macro, which automatically calls of_node_put() when the variable goes
out of scope. Given that 'np' is only used within the
for_each_possible_cpu(), reduce its scope to release the nood after
every iteration of the loop.

Fixes: 6abf32f1d9c5 ("cpuidle: Add RISC-V SBI CPU idle driver")
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones &lt;ajones@ventanamicro.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco &lt;javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241116-cpuidle-riscv-sbi-cleanup-v3-1-a3a46372ce08@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt &lt;palmer@rivosinc.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
