[ Upstream commit 63cc54a6f0736a432b04308a74677ab0ba8a58ee ]

There were several issues with 53568438e381 ("net: dsa: b53: Add support for port_egress_floods callback") that resulted in breaking connectivity for standalone ports:

- both user and CPU ports must allow unicast and multicast forwarding by
  default otherwise this just flat out breaks connectivity for
  standalone DSA ports
- IP multicast is treated similarly as multicast, but has separate
  control registers
- the UC, MC and IPMC lookup failure register offsets were wrong, and
  instead used bit values that are meaningful for the
  B53_IP_MULTICAST_CTRL register

Fixes: 53568438e381 ("net: dsa: b53: Add support for port_egress_floods callback")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Clearing the existing bitmask of mirrored ports essentially prevents us
from capturing more than one port at any given time. This is clearly
wrong, do not clear the bitmask prior to setting up the new port.

Reported-by: Hubert Feurstein <h.feurstein@gmail.com>
Fixes: ed3af5fd08eb ("net: dsa: b53: Add support for port mirroring")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add support for configuring the per-port egress flooding control for
both Unicast and Multicast traffic.

Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The .port_enable and .port_disable operations are currently only
called for user ports, hence assuming they have a slave device. In
preparation for using these operations for other port types as well,
simply guard all implementations against non user ports and return
directly in such case.

Note that bcm_sf2_sw_suspend() currently calls bcm_sf2_port_disable()
(and thus b53_disable_port()) against the user and CPU ports, so do
not guards those functions. They will be called for unused ports in
the future, but that was expected by those drivers anyway.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

A b53 device may configured through an external EEPROM like the switch
device on the Lamobo R1 router board. The configuration of a port may
therefore differ from the reset configuration of the switch.

The switch configuration reported by the DSA subsystem is different until
the port is configured by DSA i.e. a port can be active, while the DSA
subsystem reports the port is inactive. Disable all ports and not only
the unused ones to put all ports into a well defined state.

Signed-off-by: Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

While possible (and safe) to use the newly introduced
dsa_port_is_vlan_filtering helper, fabricating a dsa_port pointer is a
bit awkward, so simply retrieve this from the dsa_switch structure.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Since DSA has recently learned to treat better with drivers that set
vlan_filtering_is_global, doing this is no longer required.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The DSA core is now able to do this check prior to calling the
.port_vlan_filtering callback, so tell it that VLAN filtering is global
for this particular hardware.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

No current DSA driver makes use of the phydev parameter passed to the
disable_port call. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The CPU port is special and does not need to obey VLAN restrictions as
far as untagged traffic goes, also, having the CPU port be part of a
particular PVID is against the idea of keeping it tagged in all VLANs.

Fixes: ca8931948344 ("net: dsa: b53: Keep CPU port as tagged in all VLANs")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>