<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/drivers/regulator/core.c, branch v6.1.2</title>
<subtitle>Clone of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>regulator: core: fix deadlock on regulator enable</title>
<updated>2022-12-31T12:33:10+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Johan Hovold</name>
<email>johan+linaro@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-15T10:46:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=9e977e2642a154dab6240f8d15fdbf4b86323ff6'/>
<id>9e977e2642a154dab6240f8d15fdbf4b86323ff6</id>
<content type='text'>
commit cb3543cff90a4448ed560ac86c98033ad5fecda9 upstream.

When updating the operating mode as part of regulator enable, the caller
has already locked the regulator tree and drms_uA_update() must not try
to do the same in order not to trigger a deadlock.

The lock inversion is reported by lockdep as:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.1.0-next-20221215 #142 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  udevd/154 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffc11f123d7e50 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x280

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff80000e4c36e8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable+0x34/0x80

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  ...

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
                                 lock(regulator_list_mutex);
                                 lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
    lock(regulator_list_mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

just before probe of a Qualcomm UFS controller (occasionally) deadlocks
when enabling one of its regulators.

Fixes: 9243a195be7a ("regulator: core: Change voltage setting path")
Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org      # 5.0
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold &lt;johan+linaro@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221215104646.19818-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit cb3543cff90a4448ed560ac86c98033ad5fecda9 upstream.

When updating the operating mode as part of regulator enable, the caller
has already locked the regulator tree and drms_uA_update() must not try
to do the same in order not to trigger a deadlock.

The lock inversion is reported by lockdep as:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.1.0-next-20221215 #142 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  udevd/154 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffc11f123d7e50 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x280

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff80000e4c36e8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable+0x34/0x80

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  ...

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
                                 lock(regulator_list_mutex);
                                 lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
    lock(regulator_list_mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

just before probe of a Qualcomm UFS controller (occasionally) deadlocks
when enabling one of its regulators.

Fixes: 9243a195be7a ("regulator: core: Change voltage setting path")
Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org      # 5.0
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold &lt;johan+linaro@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221215104646.19818-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>regulator: core: Fix resolve supply lookup issue</title>
<updated>2022-12-31T12:33:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>ChiYuan Huang</name>
<email>cy_huang@richtek.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-14T01:37:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=65a1a20caf72328541cea3f557fe5d87c8ef54eb'/>
<id>65a1a20caf72328541cea3f557fe5d87c8ef54eb</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 0debed5b117d11e33cba52870c4dcb64f5911891 ]

From Marek's log, the previous change modify the parent of rdev.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/58b92e75-f373-dae7-7031-8abd465bb874@samsung.com/

In 'regulator_resolve_supply', it uses the parent DT node of rdev as the
DT-lookup starting node. But the parent DT node may not exist. This will
cause the NULL supply issue.

This patch modify the parent of rdev back to the device that provides
from 'regulator_config' in 'regulator_register'.

Fixes: 8f3cbcd6b440 ("regulator: core: Use different devices for resource allocation and DT lookup")
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski &lt;m.szyprowski@samsung.com&gt;
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski &lt;m.szyprowski@samsung.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang &lt;cy_huang@richtek.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1670981831-12583-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 0debed5b117d11e33cba52870c4dcb64f5911891 ]

From Marek's log, the previous change modify the parent of rdev.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/58b92e75-f373-dae7-7031-8abd465bb874@samsung.com/

In 'regulator_resolve_supply', it uses the parent DT node of rdev as the
DT-lookup starting node. But the parent DT node may not exist. This will
cause the NULL supply issue.

This patch modify the parent of rdev back to the device that provides
from 'regulator_config' in 'regulator_register'.

Fixes: 8f3cbcd6b440 ("regulator: core: Use different devices for resource allocation and DT lookup")
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski &lt;m.szyprowski@samsung.com&gt;
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski &lt;m.szyprowski@samsung.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang &lt;cy_huang@richtek.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1670981831-12583-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>regulator: core: Use different devices for resource allocation and DT lookup</title>
<updated>2022-12-31T12:33:04+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>ChiYuan Huang</name>
<email>cy_huang@richtek.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-06T07:22:21+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=b0f25ca1ff9be7abd1679ae7e59a8f25dbffe67a'/>
<id>b0f25ca1ff9be7abd1679ae7e59a8f25dbffe67a</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 8f3cbcd6b440032ebc7f7d48a1689dcc70a4eb98 ]

Following by the below discussion, there's the potential UAF issue
between regulator and mfd.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221128143601.1698148-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com/

From the analysis of Yingliang

CPU A				|CPU B
mt6370_probe()			|
  devm_mfd_add_devices()	|
				|mt6370_regulator_probe()
				|  regulator_register()
				|    //allocate init_data and add it to devres
				|    regulator_of_get_init_data()
i2c_unregister_device()		|
  device_del()			|
    devres_release_all()	|
      // init_data is freed	|
      release_nodes()		|
				|  // using init_data causes UAF
				|  regulator_register()

It's common to use mfd core to create child device for the regulator.
In order to do the DT lookup for init data, the child that registered
the regulator would pass its parent as the parameter. And this causes
init data resource allocated to its parent, not itself. The issue happen
when parent device is going to release and regulator core is still doing
some operation of init data constraint for the regulator of child device.

To fix it, this patch expand 'regulator_register' API to use the
different devices for init data allocation and DT lookup.

Reported-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang &lt;cy_huang@richtek.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1670311341-32664-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 8f3cbcd6b440032ebc7f7d48a1689dcc70a4eb98 ]

Following by the below discussion, there's the potential UAF issue
between regulator and mfd.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221128143601.1698148-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com/

From the analysis of Yingliang

CPU A				|CPU B
mt6370_probe()			|
  devm_mfd_add_devices()	|
				|mt6370_regulator_probe()
				|  regulator_register()
				|    //allocate init_data and add it to devres
				|    regulator_of_get_init_data()
i2c_unregister_device()		|
  device_del()			|
    devres_release_all()	|
      // init_data is freed	|
      release_nodes()		|
				|  // using init_data causes UAF
				|  regulator_register()

It's common to use mfd core to create child device for the regulator.
In order to do the DT lookup for init data, the child that registered
the regulator would pass its parent as the parameter. And this causes
init data resource allocated to its parent, not itself. The issue happen
when parent device is going to release and regulator core is still doing
some operation of init data constraint for the regulator of child device.

To fix it, this patch expand 'regulator_register' API to use the
different devices for init data allocation and DT lookup.

Reported-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang &lt;cy_huang@richtek.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1670311341-32664-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>regulator: core: fix use_count leakage when handling boot-on</title>
<updated>2022-12-31T12:33:04+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rui Zhang</name>
<email>zr.zhang@vivo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-01T03:38:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=bc6c381df5793ebcf32db88a3e65acf7870379fc'/>
<id>bc6c381df5793ebcf32db88a3e65acf7870379fc</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 0591b14ce0398125439c759f889647369aa616a0 ]

I found a use_count leakage towards supply regulator of rdev with
boot-on option.

┌───────────────────┐           ┌───────────────────┐
│  regulator_dev A  │           │  regulator_dev B  │
│     (boot-on)     │           │     (boot-on)     │
│    use_count=0    │◀──supply──│    use_count=1    │
│                   │           │                   │
└───────────────────┘           └───────────────────┘

In case of rdev(A) configured with `regulator-boot-on', the use_count
of supplying regulator(B) will increment inside
regulator_enable(rdev-&gt;supply).

Thus, B will acts like always-on, and further balanced
regulator_enable/disable cannot actually disable it anymore.

However, B was also configured with `regulator-boot-on', we wish it
could be disabled afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang &lt;zr.zhang@vivo.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201033806.2567812-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 0591b14ce0398125439c759f889647369aa616a0 ]

I found a use_count leakage towards supply regulator of rdev with
boot-on option.

┌───────────────────┐           ┌───────────────────┐
│  regulator_dev A  │           │  regulator_dev B  │
│     (boot-on)     │           │     (boot-on)     │
│    use_count=0    │◀──supply──│    use_count=1    │
│                   │           │                   │
└───────────────────┘           └───────────────────┘

In case of rdev(A) configured with `regulator-boot-on', the use_count
of supplying regulator(B) will increment inside
regulator_enable(rdev-&gt;supply).

Thus, B will acts like always-on, and further balanced
regulator_enable/disable cannot actually disable it anymore.

However, B was also configured with `regulator-boot-on', we wish it
could be disabled afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang &lt;zr.zhang@vivo.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201033806.2567812-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>regulator: core: fix resource leak in regulator_register()</title>
<updated>2022-12-31T12:32:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yang Yingliang</name>
<email>yangyingliang@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-02T02:51:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=f86b2f216636790d5922458578825e4628fb570f'/>
<id>f86b2f216636790d5922458578825e4628fb570f</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit ba62319a42c50e6254e98b3f316464fac8e77968 ]

I got some resource leak reports while doing fault injection test:

  OF: ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 100,
  of_node_get()/of_node_put() unbalanced - destroy cset entry:
  attach overlay node /i2c/pmic@64/regulators/buck1

unreferenced object 0xffff88810deea000 (size 512):
  comm "490-i2c-rt5190a", pid 253, jiffies 4294859840 (age 5061.046s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00  .....N..........
    ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff a0 1e 00 a1 ff ff ff ff  ................
  backtrace:
    [&lt;00000000d78541e2&gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110
    [&lt;00000000b343d153&gt;] device_private_init+0x32/0xd0
    [&lt;00000000be1f0c70&gt;] device_add+0xb2d/0x1030
    [&lt;00000000e3e6344d&gt;] regulator_register+0xaf2/0x12a0
    [&lt;00000000e2f5e754&gt;] devm_regulator_register+0x57/0xb0
    [&lt;000000008b898197&gt;] rt5190a_probe+0x52a/0x861 [rt5190a_regulator]

unreferenced object 0xffff88810b617b80 (size 32):
  comm "490-i2c-rt5190a", pid 253, jiffies 4294859904 (age 5060.983s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    72 65 67 75 6c 61 74 6f 72 2e 32 38 36 38 2d 53  regulator.2868-S
    55 50 50 4c 59 00 ff ff 29 00 00 00 2b 00 00 00  UPPLY...)...+...
  backtrace:
    [&lt;000000009da9280d&gt;] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x44/0x1b0
    [&lt;0000000025c6a4e5&gt;] kstrdup+0x3a/0x70
    [&lt;00000000790efb69&gt;] create_regulator+0xc0/0x4e0
    [&lt;0000000005ed203a&gt;] regulator_resolve_supply+0x2d4/0x440
    [&lt;0000000045796214&gt;] regulator_register+0x10b3/0x12a0
    [&lt;00000000e2f5e754&gt;] devm_regulator_register+0x57/0xb0
    [&lt;000000008b898197&gt;] rt5190a_probe+0x52a/0x861 [rt5190a_regulator]

After calling regulator_resolve_supply(), the 'rdev-&gt;supply' is set
by set_supply(), after this set, in the error path, the resources
need be released, so call regulator_put() to avoid the leaks.

Fixes: aea6cb99703e ("regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator")
Fixes: 8a866d527ac0 ("regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202025111.496402-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit ba62319a42c50e6254e98b3f316464fac8e77968 ]

I got some resource leak reports while doing fault injection test:

  OF: ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 100,
  of_node_get()/of_node_put() unbalanced - destroy cset entry:
  attach overlay node /i2c/pmic@64/regulators/buck1

unreferenced object 0xffff88810deea000 (size 512):
  comm "490-i2c-rt5190a", pid 253, jiffies 4294859840 (age 5061.046s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00  .....N..........
    ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff a0 1e 00 a1 ff ff ff ff  ................
  backtrace:
    [&lt;00000000d78541e2&gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110
    [&lt;00000000b343d153&gt;] device_private_init+0x32/0xd0
    [&lt;00000000be1f0c70&gt;] device_add+0xb2d/0x1030
    [&lt;00000000e3e6344d&gt;] regulator_register+0xaf2/0x12a0
    [&lt;00000000e2f5e754&gt;] devm_regulator_register+0x57/0xb0
    [&lt;000000008b898197&gt;] rt5190a_probe+0x52a/0x861 [rt5190a_regulator]

unreferenced object 0xffff88810b617b80 (size 32):
  comm "490-i2c-rt5190a", pid 253, jiffies 4294859904 (age 5060.983s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    72 65 67 75 6c 61 74 6f 72 2e 32 38 36 38 2d 53  regulator.2868-S
    55 50 50 4c 59 00 ff ff 29 00 00 00 2b 00 00 00  UPPLY...)...+...
  backtrace:
    [&lt;000000009da9280d&gt;] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x44/0x1b0
    [&lt;0000000025c6a4e5&gt;] kstrdup+0x3a/0x70
    [&lt;00000000790efb69&gt;] create_regulator+0xc0/0x4e0
    [&lt;0000000005ed203a&gt;] regulator_resolve_supply+0x2d4/0x440
    [&lt;0000000045796214&gt;] regulator_register+0x10b3/0x12a0
    [&lt;00000000e2f5e754&gt;] devm_regulator_register+0x57/0xb0
    [&lt;000000008b898197&gt;] rt5190a_probe+0x52a/0x861 [rt5190a_regulator]

After calling regulator_resolve_supply(), the 'rdev-&gt;supply' is set
by set_supply(), after this set, in the error path, the resources
need be released, so call regulator_put() to avoid the leaks.

Fixes: aea6cb99703e ("regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator")
Fixes: 8a866d527ac0 ("regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202025111.496402-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>regulator: core: fix module refcount leak in set_supply()</title>
<updated>2022-12-31T12:32:21+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yang Yingliang</name>
<email>yangyingliang@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-01T12:27:05+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=89f19d11aad82780d1d065164e98a6c1cb04a817'/>
<id>89f19d11aad82780d1d065164e98a6c1cb04a817</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit da46ee19cbd8344d6860816b4827a7ce95764867 ]

If create_regulator() fails in set_supply(), the module refcount
needs be put to keep refcount balanced.

Fixes: e2c09ae7a74d ("regulator: core: Increase refcount for regulator supply's module")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201122706.4055992-2-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit da46ee19cbd8344d6860816b4827a7ce95764867 ]

If create_regulator() fails in set_supply(), the module refcount
needs be put to keep refcount balanced.

Fixes: e2c09ae7a74d ("regulator: core: Increase refcount for regulator supply's module")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201122706.4055992-2-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>regulator: core: use kfree_const() to free space conditionally</title>
<updated>2022-12-31T12:32:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Wang ShaoBo</name>
<email>bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-11-23T03:46:16+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=55e44791a547830b2906dd364afae2a1ec49a401'/>
<id>55e44791a547830b2906dd364afae2a1ec49a401</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit dc8d006d15b623c1d80b90b45d6dcb6e890dad09 ]

Use kfree_const() to free supply_name conditionally in create_regulator()
as supply_name may be allocated from kmalloc() or directly from .rodata
section.

Fixes: 87fe29b61f95 ("regulator: push allocations in create_regulator() outside of lock")
Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo &lt;bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221123034616.3609537-1-bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit dc8d006d15b623c1d80b90b45d6dcb6e890dad09 ]

Use kfree_const() to free supply_name conditionally in create_regulator()
as supply_name may be allocated from kmalloc() or directly from .rodata
section.

Fixes: 87fe29b61f95 ("regulator: push allocations in create_regulator() outside of lock")
Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo &lt;bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221123034616.3609537-1-bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>regulator: core: fix unbalanced of node refcount in regulator_dev_lookup()</title>
<updated>2022-12-31T12:32:11+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yang Yingliang</name>
<email>yangyingliang@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-11-15T09:15:08+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=2f98469c3141f8e42ba11075a273fb795bbad57f'/>
<id>2f98469c3141f8e42ba11075a273fb795bbad57f</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit f2b41b748c19962b82709d9f23c6b2b0ce9d2f91 ]

I got the the following report:

  OF: ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2,
  of_node_get()/of_node_put() unbalanced - destroy cset entry:
  attach overlay node /i2c/pmic@62/regulators/exten

In of_get_regulator(), the node is returned from of_parse_phandle()
with refcount incremented, after using it, of_node_put() need be called.

Fixes: 69511a452e6d ("regulator: map consumer regulator based on device tree")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115091508.900752-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit f2b41b748c19962b82709d9f23c6b2b0ce9d2f91 ]

I got the the following report:

  OF: ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2,
  of_node_get()/of_node_put() unbalanced - destroy cset entry:
  attach overlay node /i2c/pmic@62/regulators/exten

In of_get_regulator(), the node is returned from of_parse_phandle()
with refcount incremented, after using it, of_node_put() need be called.

Fixes: 69511a452e6d ("regulator: map consumer regulator based on device tree")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115091508.900752-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'regulator-fix-v6.1-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator</title>
<updated>2022-11-25T21:54:48+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-11-25T21:54:48+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=f10b439638e2482a89a1a402941207f6d8791ff8'/>
<id>f10b439638e2482a89a1a402941207f6d8791ff8</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull regulator fixes from Mark Brown:
 "This is more changes than I'd like this late although the diffstat is
  still fairly small, I kept on holding off as new fixes came in to give
  things time to soak in -next but should probably have tagged and sent
  an additional pull request earlier.

  There's some relatively large fixes to the twl6030 driver to fix
  issues with the TWL6032 variant which resulted from some work on the
  core TWL6030 driver, a couple of fixes for error handling paths
  (mostly in the core), and a nice stability fix for the sgl51000 driver
  that's been pulled out of a BSP"

* tag 'regulator-fix-v6.1-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator:
  regulator: twl6030: fix get status of twl6032 regulators
  regulator: twl6030: re-add TWL6032_SUBCLASS
  regulator: slg51000: Wait after asserting CS pin
  regulator: core: fix UAF in destroy_regulator()
  regulator: rt5759: fix OOB in validate_desc()
  regulator: core: fix kobject release warning and memory leak in regulator_register()
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Pull regulator fixes from Mark Brown:
 "This is more changes than I'd like this late although the diffstat is
  still fairly small, I kept on holding off as new fixes came in to give
  things time to soak in -next but should probably have tagged and sent
  an additional pull request earlier.

  There's some relatively large fixes to the twl6030 driver to fix
  issues with the TWL6032 variant which resulted from some work on the
  core TWL6030 driver, a couple of fixes for error handling paths
  (mostly in the core), and a nice stability fix for the sgl51000 driver
  that's been pulled out of a BSP"

* tag 'regulator-fix-v6.1-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator:
  regulator: twl6030: fix get status of twl6032 regulators
  regulator: twl6030: re-add TWL6032_SUBCLASS
  regulator: slg51000: Wait after asserting CS pin
  regulator: core: fix UAF in destroy_regulator()
  regulator: rt5759: fix OOB in validate_desc()
  regulator: core: fix kobject release warning and memory leak in regulator_register()
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>regulator: core: fix UAF in destroy_regulator()</title>
<updated>2022-11-16T13:45:27+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yang Yingliang</name>
<email>yangyingliang@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-11-16T03:37:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=1f386d6894d0f1b7de8ef640c41622ddd698e7ab'/>
<id>1f386d6894d0f1b7de8ef640c41622ddd698e7ab</id>
<content type='text'>
I got a UAF report as following:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810e838220 by task python3/268
Call Trace:
 &lt;TASK&gt;
 dump_stack_lvl+0x67/0x83
 print_report+0x178/0x4b0
 kasan_report+0x90/0x190
 __lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
 lock_acquire+0x156/0x400
 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
 lockref_get+0x11/0x30
 simple_recursive_removal+0x41/0x440
 debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
 debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
 _regulator_put.cold.54+0x3e/0x27f
 regulator_put+0x1f/0x30
 release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0
 devres_release_all+0xf8/0x150

Allocated by task 37:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x5d/0x70
 slab_post_alloc_hook+0x62/0x510
 kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x222/0x5a0
 __d_alloc+0x31/0x440
 d_alloc+0x30/0xf0
 d_alloc_parallel+0xc4/0xd20
 __lookup_slow+0x15e/0x2f0
 lookup_one_len+0x13a/0x150
 start_creating+0xea/0x190
 debugfs_create_dir+0x1e/0x210
 create_regulator+0x254/0x4e0
 _regulator_get+0x2a1/0x467
 _devm_regulator_get+0x5a/0xb0
 regulator_virtual_probe+0xb9/0x1a0

Freed by task 30:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
 kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50
 __kasan_slab_free+0x102/0x190
 kmem_cache_free+0xf6/0x600
 rcu_core+0x54c/0x12b0
 __do_softirq+0xf2/0x5e3

Last potentially related work creation:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
 __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x98/0xb0
 call_rcu+0x42/0x700
 dentry_free+0x6c/0xd0
 __dentry_kill+0x23b/0x2d0
 dput.part.31+0x431/0x780
 simple_recursive_removal+0xa9/0x440
 debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
 debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
 regulator_unregister+0xe3/0x230
 release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0

==================================================================

Here is how happened:

processor A					processor B
regulator_register()
  rdev_init_debugfs()
    rdev-&gt;debugfs = debugfs_create_dir()
						devm_regulator_get()
						  rdev = regulator_dev_lookup()
						  create_regulator(rdev)
						    // using rdev-&gt;debugfs as parent
						    debugfs_create_dir(rdev-&gt;debugfs)

mfd_remove_devices_fn()
  release_nodes()
    regulator_unregister()
      // free rdev-&gt;debugfs
      debugfs_remove_recursive(rdev-&gt;debugfs)
						release_nodes()
						  destroy_regulator()
						    debugfs_remove_recursive() &lt;- causes UAF

In devm_regulator_get(), after getting rdev, the refcount
is get, so fix this by moving debugfs_remove_recursive()
to regulator_dev_release(), then it can be proctected by
the refcount, the 'rdev-&gt;debugfs' can not be freed until
the refcount is 0.

Fixes: 5de705194e98 ("regulator: Add basic per consumer debugfs")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116033706.3595812-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
I got a UAF report as following:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810e838220 by task python3/268
Call Trace:
 &lt;TASK&gt;
 dump_stack_lvl+0x67/0x83
 print_report+0x178/0x4b0
 kasan_report+0x90/0x190
 __lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
 lock_acquire+0x156/0x400
 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
 lockref_get+0x11/0x30
 simple_recursive_removal+0x41/0x440
 debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
 debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
 _regulator_put.cold.54+0x3e/0x27f
 regulator_put+0x1f/0x30
 release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0
 devres_release_all+0xf8/0x150

Allocated by task 37:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x5d/0x70
 slab_post_alloc_hook+0x62/0x510
 kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x222/0x5a0
 __d_alloc+0x31/0x440
 d_alloc+0x30/0xf0
 d_alloc_parallel+0xc4/0xd20
 __lookup_slow+0x15e/0x2f0
 lookup_one_len+0x13a/0x150
 start_creating+0xea/0x190
 debugfs_create_dir+0x1e/0x210
 create_regulator+0x254/0x4e0
 _regulator_get+0x2a1/0x467
 _devm_regulator_get+0x5a/0xb0
 regulator_virtual_probe+0xb9/0x1a0

Freed by task 30:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
 kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50
 __kasan_slab_free+0x102/0x190
 kmem_cache_free+0xf6/0x600
 rcu_core+0x54c/0x12b0
 __do_softirq+0xf2/0x5e3

Last potentially related work creation:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
 __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x98/0xb0
 call_rcu+0x42/0x700
 dentry_free+0x6c/0xd0
 __dentry_kill+0x23b/0x2d0
 dput.part.31+0x431/0x780
 simple_recursive_removal+0xa9/0x440
 debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
 debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
 regulator_unregister+0xe3/0x230
 release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0

==================================================================

Here is how happened:

processor A					processor B
regulator_register()
  rdev_init_debugfs()
    rdev-&gt;debugfs = debugfs_create_dir()
						devm_regulator_get()
						  rdev = regulator_dev_lookup()
						  create_regulator(rdev)
						    // using rdev-&gt;debugfs as parent
						    debugfs_create_dir(rdev-&gt;debugfs)

mfd_remove_devices_fn()
  release_nodes()
    regulator_unregister()
      // free rdev-&gt;debugfs
      debugfs_remove_recursive(rdev-&gt;debugfs)
						release_nodes()
						  destroy_regulator()
						    debugfs_remove_recursive() &lt;- causes UAF

In devm_regulator_get(), after getting rdev, the refcount
is get, so fix this by moving debugfs_remove_recursive()
to regulator_dev_release(), then it can be proctected by
the refcount, the 'rdev-&gt;debugfs' can not be freed until
the refcount is 0.

Fixes: 5de705194e98 ("regulator: Add basic per consumer debugfs")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang &lt;yangyingliang@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116033706.3595812-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown &lt;broonie@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
