- fs/lockd/xdr4.c:140:27: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different
   explicit signedness)
 - fs/lockd/xdr4.c:141:27: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different
   explicit signedness)
 - fs/lockd/xdr4.c:432:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different
   explicit signedness)
 - fs/lockd/xdr4.c:433:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different
   explicit signedness)
 - fs/lockd/xdr4.c:587:20: warning: symbol 'nlm_version4' was not declared.
   Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

reclaimer() calls allow_signal() which plays with parent process's ->sighand.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

nlmsvc_timeout is already in units of HZ...

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Remove includes of <linux/smp_lock.h> where it is not used/needed.
Suggested by Al Viro.

Builds cleanly on x86_64, i386, alpha, ia64, powerpc, sparc,
sparc64, and arm (all 59 defconfigs).

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

* 'server-cluster-locking-api' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux:
  gfs2: nfs lock support for gfs2
  lockd: add code to handle deferred lock requests
  lockd: always preallocate block in nlmsvc_lock()
  lockd: handle test_lock deferrals
  lockd: pass cookie in nlmsvc_testlock
  lockd: handle fl_grant callbacks
  lockd: save lock state on deferral
  locks: add fl_grant callback for asynchronous lock return
  nfsd4: Convert NFSv4 to new lock interface
  locks: add lock cancel command
  locks: allow {vfs,posix}_lock_file to return conflicting lock
  locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from setlock code
  locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from test_lock
  locks: give posix_test_lock same interface as ->lock
  locks: make ->lock release private data before returning in GETLK case
  locks: create posix-to-flock helper functions
  locks: trivial removal of unnecessary parentheses

Rewrite nlmsvc_lock() to use the asynchronous interface.

As with testlock, we answer nlm requests in nlmsvc_lock by first looking up
the block and then using the results we find in the block if B_QUEUED is
set, and calling vfs_lock_file() otherwise.

If this a new lock request and we get -EINPROGRESS return on a non-blocking
request then we defer the request.

Also modify nlmsvc_unlock() to call the filesystem method if appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

Normally we could skip ever having to allocate a block in the case where
the client asks for a non-blocking lock, or asks for a blocking lock that
succeeds immediately.

However we're going to want to always look up a block first in order to
check whether we're revisiting a deferred lock call, and to be prepared to
handle the case where the filesystem returns -EINPROGRESS--in that case we
want to make sure the lock we've given the filesystem is the one embedded
in the block that we'll use to track the deferred request.

Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

Rewrite nlmsvc_testlock() to use the new asynchronous interface: instead of
immediately doing a posix_test_lock(), we first look for a matching block.
If the subsequent test_lock returns anything other than -EINPROGRESS, we
then remove the block we've found and return the results.

If it returns -EINPROGRESS, then we defer the lock request.

In the case where the block we find in the first step has B_QUEUED set,
we bypass the vfs_test_lock entirely, instead using the block to decide how
to respond:
	with nlm_lck_denied if B_TIMED_OUT is set.
	with nlm_granted if B_GOT_CALLBACK is set.
	by dropping if neither B_TIMED_OUT nor B_GOT_CALLBACK is set

Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

Change NLM internal interface to pass more information for test lock; we
need this to make sure the cookie information is pushed down to the place
where we do request deferral, which is handled for testlock by the
following patch.

Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

Add code to handle file system callback when the lock is finally granted.

Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>