linux.git/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c, branch v6.6.132

bpf: Fix stackmap overflow check on 32-bit arches

2024-03-26T22:19:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7a4b21250bf79eef26543d35bd390448646c536b ]

The stackmap code relies on roundup_pow_of_two() to compute the number
of hash buckets, and contains an overflow check by checking if the
resulting value is 0. However, on 32-bit arches, the roundup code itself
can overflow by doing a 32-bit left-shift of an unsigned long value,
which is undefined behaviour, so it is not guaranteed to truncate
neatly. This was triggered by syzbot on the DEVMAP_HASH type, which
contains the same check, copied from the hashtab code.

The commit in the fixes tag actually attempted to fix this, but the fix
did not account for the UB, so the fix only works on CPUs where an
overflow does result in a neat truncation to zero, which is not
guaranteed. Checking the value before rounding does not have this
problem.

Fixes: 6183f4d3a0a2 ("bpf: Check for integer overflow when using roundup_pow_of_two()")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 
Reviewed-by: Bui Quang Minh 
Message-ID: <20240307120340.99577-4-toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Add crosstask check to __bpf_get_stack

2024-01-25T23:35:19+00:00

[ Upstream commit b8e3a87a627b575896e448021e5c2f8a3bc19931 ]

Currently get_perf_callchain only supports user stack walking for
the current task. Passing the correct *crosstask* param will return
0 frames if the task passed to __bpf_get_stack isn't the current
one instead of a single incorrect frame/address. This change
passes the correct *crosstask* param but also does a preemptive
check in __bpf_get_stack if the task is current and returns
-EOPNOTSUPP if it is not.

This issue was found using bpf_get_task_stack inside a BPF
iterator ("iter/task"), which iterates over all tasks.
bpf_get_task_stack works fine for fetching kernel stacks
but because get_perf_callchain relies on the caller to know
if the requested *task* is the current one (via *crosstask*)
it was failing in a confusing way.

It might be possible to get user stacks for all tasks utilizing
something like access_process_vm but that requires the bpf
program calling bpf_get_task_stack to be sleepable and would
therefore be a breaking change.

Fixes: fa28dcb82a38 ("bpf: Introduce helper bpf_get_task_stack()")
Signed-off-by: Jordan Rome 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231108112334.3433136-1-jordalgo@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Centralize permissions checks for all BPF map types

2023-06-19T12:04:04+00:00

This allows to do more centralized decisions later on, and generally
makes it very explicit which maps are privileged and which are not
(e.g., LRU_HASH and LRU_PERCPU_HASH, which are privileged HASH variants,
as opposed to unprivileged HASH and HASH_PERCPU; now this is explicit
and easy to verify).

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230613223533.3689589-4-andrii@kernel.org

bpf: return long from bpf_map_ops funcs

2023-03-22T22:11:30+00:00

This patch changes the return types of bpf_map_ops functions to long, where
previously int was returned. Using long allows for bpf programs to maintain
the sign bit in the absence of sign extension during situations where
inlined bpf helper funcs make calls to the bpf_map_ops funcs and a negative
error is returned.

The definitions of the helper funcs are generated from comments in the bpf
uapi header at `include/uapi/linux/bpf.h`. The return type of these
helpers was previously changed from int to long in commit bdb7b79b4ce8. For
any case where one of the map helpers call the bpf_map_ops funcs that are
still returning 32-bit int, a compiler might not include sign extension
instructions to properly convert the 32-bit negative value a 64-bit
negative value.

For example:
bpf assembly excerpt of an inlined helper calling a kernel function and
checking for a specific error:

; err = bpf_map_update_elem(&mymap, &key, &val, BPF_NOEXIST);
  ...
  46:	call   0xffffffffe103291c	; htab_map_update_elem
; if (err && err != -EEXIST) {
  4b:	cmp    $0xffffffffffffffef,%rax ; cmp -EEXIST,%rax

kernel function assembly excerpt of return value from
`htab_map_update_elem` returning 32-bit int:

movl $0xffffffef, %r9d
...
movl %r9d, %eax

...results in the comparison:
cmp $0xffffffffffffffef, $0x00000000ffffffef

Fixes: bdb7b79b4ce8 ("bpf: Switch most helper return values from 32-bit int to 64-bit long")
Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman 
Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322194754.185781-3-inwardvessel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: stackmap memory usage

2023-03-07T17:33:42+00:00

A new helper is introduced to get stackmap memory usage. Some small
memory allocations are ignored as their memory size is quite small
compared to the totol usage.

The result as follows,
- before
16: stack_trace  name count_map  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 8B  max_entries 65536  memlock 1048576B

- after
16: stack_trace  name count_map  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 8B  max_entries 65536  memlock 2097472B

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230305124615.12358-6-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

perf/bpf: Always use perf callchains if exist

2022-09-13T13:03:22+00:00

If the perf_event has PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN, BPF can use it for stack trace.
The problematic cases like PEBS and IBS already handled in the PMU driver and
they filled the callchain info in the sample data.  For others, we can call
perf_callchain() before the BPF handler.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220908214104.3851807-2-namhyung@kernel.org

bpf: Compute map_btf_id during build time

2022-04-26T18:35:21+00:00

For now, the field 'map_btf_id' in 'struct bpf_map_ops' for all map
types are computed during vmlinux-btf init:

  btf_parse_vmlinux() -> btf_vmlinux_map_ids_init()

It will lookup the btf_type according to the 'map_btf_name' field in
'struct bpf_map_ops'. This process can be done during build time,
thanks to Jiri's resolve_btfids.

selftest of map_ptr has passed:

  $96 map_ptr:OK
  Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Reported-by: kernel test robot 
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Fix excessive memory allocation in stack_map_alloc()

2022-04-08T22:28:21+00:00

The 'n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))' part of the
allocated memory for 'smap' is never used after the memlock accounting was
removed, thus get rid of it.

[ Note, Daniel:

Commit b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
moved `cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))`
up and therefore before the bpf_map_area_alloc() allocation, sigh. In a later
step commit c85d69135a91 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()"),
and the overflow checks of `cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE` moved into
bpf_map_charge_init(). And then 370868107bf6 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based
memory accounting for stackmap maps") finally removed the bpf_map_charge_init().
Anyway, the original code did the allocation same way as /after/ this fix. ]

Fixes: b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220407130423.798386-1-ytcoode@gmail.com

bpf: Remove redundant assignment to smap->map.value_size

2022-04-01T20:44:44+00:00

The attr->value_size is already assigned to smap->map.value_size
in bpf_map_init_from_attr(), there is no need to do it again in
stack_map_alloc().

Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Joanne Koong 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220323073626.958652-1-ytcoode@gmail.com

bpf: Adjust BPF stack helper functions to accommodate skip > 0

2022-03-21T02:16:23+00:00

Let's say that the caller has storage for num_elem stack frames.  Then,
the BPF stack helper functions walk the stack for only num_elem frames.
This means that if skip > 0, one keeps only 'num_elem - skip' frames.

This is because it sets init_nr in the perf_callchain_entry to the end
of the buffer to save num_elem entries only.  I believe it was because
the perf callchain code unwound the stack frames until it reached the
global max size (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack).

However it now has perf_callchain_entry_ctx.max_stack to limit the
iteration locally.  This simplifies the code to handle init_nr in the
BPF callstack entries and removes the confusion with the perf_event's
__PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY which sets init_nr to 0.

Also change the comment on bpf_get_stack() in the header file to be
more explicit what the return value means.

Fixes: c195651e565a ("bpf: add bpf_get_stack helper")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Acked-by: Yonghong Song 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/30a7b5d5-6726-1cc2-eaee-8da2828a9a9c@oracle.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220314182042.71025-1-namhyung@kernel.org

Based-on-patch-by: Eugene Loh