linux.git/kernel/bpf, branch v4.16.13

bpf: Prevent memory disambiguation attack

2018-05-22T16:56:31+00:00

commit af86ca4e3088fe5eacf2f7e58c01fa68ca067672 upstream

Detect code patterns where malicious 'speculative store bypass' can be used
and sanitize such patterns.

 39: (bf) r3 = r10
 40: (07) r3 += -216
 41: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0)   // slow read
 42: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -72) = 0  // verifier inserts this instruction
 43: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +0) = r3   // this store becomes slow due to r8
 44: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0)   // cpu speculatively executes this load
 45: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0)    // speculatively arbitrary 'load byte'
                                 // is now sanitized

Above code after x86 JIT becomes:
 e5: mov    %rbp,%rdx
 e8: add    $0xffffffffffffff28,%rdx
 ef: mov    0x0(%r13),%r14
 f3: movq   $0x0,-0x48(%rbp)
 fb: mov    %rdx,0x0(%r14)
 ff: mov    0x0(%rbx),%rdi
103: movzbq 0x0(%rdi),%rsi

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf/tracing: fix a deadlock in perf_event_detach_bpf_prog

2018-05-16T08:12:27+00:00

commit 3a38bb98d9abdc3856f26b5ed4332803065cd7cf upstream.

syzbot reported a possible deadlock in perf_event_detach_bpf_prog.
The error details:
  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  4.16.0-rc7+ #3 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor7/24531 is trying to acquire lock:
   (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000008a849b07>] perf_event_detach_bpf_prog+0x92/0x3d0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:854

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<0000000038768f87>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x198/0x280 mm/util.c:353

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
       __might_fault+0x13a/0x1d0 mm/memory.c:4571
       _copy_to_user+0x2c/0xc0 lib/usercopy.c:25
       copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:155 [inline]
       bpf_prog_array_copy_info+0xf2/0x1c0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1694
       perf_event_query_prog_array+0x1c7/0x2c0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:891
       _perf_ioctl kernel/events/core.c:4750 [inline]
       perf_ioctl+0x3e1/0x1480 kernel/events/core.c:4770
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
       do_vfs_ioctl+0x1b1/0x1520 fs/ioctl.c:686
       SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:701 [inline]
       SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:692
       do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7

  -> #0 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}:
       lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x16f/0x1a80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
       mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
       perf_event_detach_bpf_prog+0x92/0x3d0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:854
       perf_event_free_bpf_prog kernel/events/core.c:8147 [inline]
       _free_event+0xbdb/0x10f0 kernel/events/core.c:4116
       put_event+0x24/0x30 kernel/events/core.c:4204
       perf_mmap_close+0x60d/0x1010 kernel/events/core.c:5172
       remove_vma+0xb4/0x1b0 mm/mmap.c:172
       remove_vma_list mm/mmap.c:2490 [inline]
       do_munmap+0x82a/0xdf0 mm/mmap.c:2731
       mmap_region+0x59e/0x15a0 mm/mmap.c:1646
       do_mmap+0x6c0/0xe00 mm/mmap.c:1483
       do_mmap_pgoff include/linux/mm.h:2223 [inline]
       vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1de/0x280 mm/util.c:355
       SYSC_mmap_pgoff mm/mmap.c:1533 [inline]
       SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x462/0x5f0 mm/mmap.c:1491
       SYSC_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:100 [inline]
       SyS_mmap+0x16/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:91
       do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
                                 lock(bpf_event_mutex);
                                 lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
    lock(bpf_event_mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***
  ======================================================

The bug is introduced by Commit f371b304f12e ("bpf/tracing: allow
user space to query prog array on the same tp") where copy_to_user,
which requires mm->mmap_sem, is called inside bpf_event_mutex lock.
At the same time, during perf_event file descriptor close,
mm->mmap_sem is held first and then subsequent
perf_event_detach_bpf_prog needs bpf_event_mutex lock.
Such a senario caused a deadlock.

As suggested by Daniel, moving copy_to_user out of the
bpf_event_mutex lock should fix the problem.

Fixes: f371b304f12e ("bpf/tracing: allow user space to query prog array on the same tp")
Reported-by: syzbot+dc5ca0e4c9bfafaf2bae@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: skip unnecessary capability check

2018-03-20T22:50:39+00:00

The current check statement in BPF syscall will do a capability check
for CAP_SYS_ADMIN before checking sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled. This
code path will trigger unnecessary security hooks on capability checking
and cause false alarms on unprivileged process trying to get CAP_SYS_ADMIN
access. This can be resolved by simply switch the order of the statement
and CAP_SYS_ADMIN is not required anyway if unprivileged bpf syscall is
allowed.

Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng 
Acked-by: Lorenzo Colitti 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: allow xadd only on aligned memory

2018-02-23T22:33:39+00:00

The requirements around atomic_add() / atomic64_add() resp. their
JIT implementations differ across architectures. E.g. while x86_64
seems just fine with BPF's xadd on unaligned memory, on arm64 it
triggers via interpreter but also JIT the following crash:

  [  830.864985] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff8097d7ed6703
  [...]
  [  830.916161] Internal error: Oops: 96000021 [#1] SMP
  [  830.984755] CPU: 37 PID: 2788 Comm: test_verifier Not tainted 4.16.0-rc2+ #8
  [  830.991790] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.29 07/17/2017
  [  830.998998] pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO)
  [  831.003793] pc : __ll_sc_atomic_add+0x4/0x18
  [  831.008055] lr : ___bpf_prog_run+0x1198/0x1588
  [  831.012485] sp : ffff00001ccabc20
  [  831.015786] x29: ffff00001ccabc20 x28: ffff8017d56a0f00
  [  831.021087] x27: 0000000000000001 x26: 0000000000000000
  [  831.026387] x25: 000000c168d9db98 x24: 0000000000000000
  [  831.031686] x23: ffff000008203878 x22: ffff000009488000
  [  831.036986] x21: ffff000008b14e28 x20: ffff00001ccabcb0
  [  831.042286] x19: ffff0000097b5080 x18: 0000000000000a03
  [  831.047585] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
  [  831.052885] x15: 0000ffffaeca8000 x14: 0000000000000000
  [  831.058184] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
  [  831.063484] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000
  [  831.068783] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000
  [  831.074083] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000580d428000000
  [  831.079383] x5 : 0000000000000018 x4 : 0000000000000000
  [  831.084682] x3 : ffff00001ccabcb0 x2 : 0000000000000001
  [  831.089982] x1 : ffff8097d7ed6703 x0 : 0000000000000001
  [  831.095282] Process test_verifier (pid: 2788, stack limit = 0x0000000018370044)
  [  831.102577] Call trace:
  [  831.105012]  __ll_sc_atomic_add+0x4/0x18
  [  831.108923]  __bpf_prog_run32+0x4c/0x70
  [  831.112748]  bpf_test_run+0x78/0xf8
  [  831.116224]  bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xb4/0x120
  [  831.120567]  SyS_bpf+0x77c/0x1110
  [  831.123873]  el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34
  [  831.127437] Code: 97fffe97 17ffffec 00000000 f9800031 (885f7c31)

Reason for this is because memory is required to be aligned. In
case of BPF, we always enforce alignment in terms of stack access,
but not when accessing map values or packet data when the underlying
arch (e.g. arm64) has CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS set.

xadd on packet data that is local to us anyway is just wrong, so
forbid this case entirely. The only place where xadd makes sense in
fact are map values; xadd on stack is wrong as well, but it's been
around for much longer. Specifically enforce strict alignment in case
of xadd, so that we handle this case generically and avoid such crashes
in the first place.

Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: fix rcu lockdep warning for lpm_trie map_free callback

2018-02-22T20:29:12+00:00

Commit 9a3efb6b661f ("bpf: fix memory leak in lpm_trie map_free callback function")
fixed a memory leak and removed unnecessary locks in map_free callback function.
Unfortrunately, it introduced a lockdep warning. When lockdep checking is turned on,
running tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map will have:

  [   98.294321] =============================
  [   98.294807] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
  [   98.295359] 4.16.0-rc2+ #193 Not tainted
  [   98.295907] -----------------------------
  [   98.296486] /home/yhs/work/bpf/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:572 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
  [   98.297657]
  [   98.297657] other info that might help us debug this:
  [   98.297657]
  [   98.298663]
  [   98.298663] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
  [   98.299536] 2 locks held by kworker/2:1/54:
  [   98.300152]  #0:  ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}, at: [<00000000196bc1f0>] process_one_work+0x157/0x5c0
  [   98.301381]  #1:  ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: [<00000000196bc1f0>] process_one_work+0x157/0x5c0

Since actual trie tree removal happens only after no other
accesses to the tree are possible, replacing
  rcu_dereference_protected(*slot, lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock))
with
  rcu_dereference_protected(*slot, 1)
fixed the issue.

Fixes: 9a3efb6b661f ("bpf: fix memory leak in lpm_trie map_free callback function")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet 
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song 
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet 
Acked-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: add schedule points in percpu arrays management

2018-02-22T20:27:06+00:00

syszbot managed to trigger RCU detected stalls in
bpf_array_free_percpu()

It takes time to allocate a huge percpu map, but even more time to free
it.

Since we run in process context, use cond_resched() to yield cpu if
needed.

Fixes: a10423b87a7e ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY map")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Reported-by: syzbot 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: fix mlock precharge on arraymaps

2018-02-16T05:34:33+00:00

syzkaller recently triggered OOM during percpu map allocation;
while there is work in progress by Dennis Zhou to add __GFP_NORETRY
semantics for percpu allocator under pressure, there seems also a
missing bpf_map_precharge_memlock() check in array map allocation.

Given today the actual bpf_map_charge_memlock() happens after the
find_and_alloc_map() in syscall path, the bpf_map_precharge_memlock()
is there to bail out early before we go and do the map setup work
when we find that we hit the limits anyway. Therefore add this for
array map as well.

Fixes: 6c9059817432 ("bpf: pre-allocate hash map elements")
Fixes: a10423b87a7e ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY map")
Reported-by: syzbot+adb03f3f0bb57ce3acda@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Cc: Dennis Zhou 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: fix bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user warning from perf event prog query

2018-02-14T16:59:37+00:00

syzkaller tried to perform a prog query in perf_event_query_prog_array()
where struct perf_event_query_bpf had an ids_len of 1,073,741,353 and
thus causing a warning due to failed kcalloc() allocation out of the
bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user() helper. Given we cannot attach more than
64 programs to a perf event, there's no point in allowing huge ids_len.
Therefore, allow a buffer that would fix the maximum number of ids and
also add a __GFP_NOWARN to the temporary ids buffer.

Fixes: f371b304f12e ("bpf/tracing: allow user space to query prog array on the same tp")
Fixes: 0911287ce32b ("bpf: fix bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user() issues")
Reported-by: syzbot+cab5816b0edbabf598b3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: cpumap: use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC in __cpu_map_entry_alloc()

2018-02-14T14:34:27+00:00

There're several implications after commit 0bf7800f1799 ("ptr_ring:
try vmalloc() when kmalloc() fails") with the using of vmalloc() since
can't allow GFP_ATOMIC but mandate GFP_KERNEL. This will lead a WARN
since cpumap try to call with GFP_ATOMIC. Fortunately, entry
allocation of cpumap can only be done through syscall path which means
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, so fixing this by replacing GFP_ATOMIC
with GFP_KERNEL.

Reported-by: syzbot+1a240cdb1f4cc88819df@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 0bf7800f1799 ("ptr_ring: try vmalloc() when kmalloc() fails")
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Daniel Borkmann 
Cc: Matthew Wilcox 
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer 
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang 
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: fix sock_map_alloc() error path

2018-02-14T03:19:15+00:00

In case user program provides silly parameters, we want
a map_alloc() handler to return an error, not a NULL pointer,
otherwise we crash later in find_and_alloc_map()

Fixes: 1aa12bdf1bfb ("bpf: sockmap, add sock close() hook to remove socks")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Reported-by: syzbot 
Acked-by: John Fastabend 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov