linux.git/kernel/bpf, branch v6.6.56 Clone of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git bpf: Make the pointer returned by iter next method valid 2024-10-10T09:57:39+00:00 Juntong Deng juntong.deng@outlook.com 2024-08-29T20:11:17+00:00 b111ae42bbfd18e096f2670f8b7f7930564f5da1 [ Upstream commit 4cc8c50c9abcb2646a7a4fcef3cea5dcb30c06cf ] Currently we cannot pass the pointer returned by iter next method as argument to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS or KF_RCU kfuncs, because the pointer returned by iter next method is not "valid". This patch sets the pointer returned by iter next method to be valid. This is based on the fact that if the iterator is implemented correctly, then the pointer returned from the iter next method should be valid. This does not make NULL pointer valid. If the iter next method has KF_RET_NULL flag, then the verifier will ask the ebpf program to check NULL pointer. KF_RCU_PROTECTED iterator is a special case, the pointer returned by iter next method should only be valid within RCU critical section, so it should be with MEM_RCU, not PTR_TRUSTED. Another special case is bpf_iter_num_next, which returns a pointer with base type PTR_TO_MEM. PTR_TO_MEM should not be combined with type flag PTR_TRUSTED (PTR_TO_MEM already means the pointer is valid). The pointer returned by iter next method of other types of iterators is with PTR_TRUSTED. In addition, this patch adds get_iter_from_state to help us get the current iterator from the current state. Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR03MB584869F8B448EA1C87B7CDA399962@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 4cc8c50c9abcb2646a7a4fcef3cea5dcb30c06cf ]

Currently we cannot pass the pointer returned by iter next method as
argument to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS or KF_RCU kfuncs, because the pointer
returned by iter next method is not "valid".

This patch sets the pointer returned by iter next method to be valid.

This is based on the fact that if the iterator is implemented correctly,
then the pointer returned from the iter next method should be valid.

This does not make NULL pointer valid. If the iter next method has
KF_RET_NULL flag, then the verifier will ask the ebpf program to
check NULL pointer.

KF_RCU_PROTECTED iterator is a special case, the pointer returned by
iter next method should only be valid within RCU critical section,
so it should be with MEM_RCU, not PTR_TRUSTED.

Another special case is bpf_iter_num_next, which returns a pointer with
base type PTR_TO_MEM. PTR_TO_MEM should not be combined with type flag
PTR_TRUSTED (PTR_TO_MEM already means the pointer is valid).

The pointer returned by iter next method of other types of iterators
is with PTR_TRUSTED.

In addition, this patch adds get_iter_from_state to help us get the
current iterator from the current state.

Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR03MB584869F8B448EA1C87B7CDA399962@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Zero former ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error 2024-10-04T14:29:23+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2024-09-13T19:17:50+00:00 a634fa8e480ac2423f86311a602f6295df2c8ed0 [ Upstream commit 4b3786a6c5397dc220b1483d8e2f4867743e966f ] For all non-tracing helpers which formerly had ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} as input arguments, zero the value for the case of an error as otherwise it could leak memory. For tracing, it is not needed given CAP_PERFMON can already read all kernel memory anyway hence bpf_get_func_arg() and bpf_get_func_ret() is skipped in here. Also, the MTU helpers mtu_len pointer value is being written but also read. Technically, the MEM_UNINIT should not be there in order to always force init. Removing MEM_UNINIT needs more verifier rework though: MEM_UNINIT right now implies two things actually: i) write into memory, ii) memory does not have to be initialized. If we lift MEM_UNINIT, it then becomes: i) read into memory, ii) memory must be initialized. This means that for bpf_*_check_mtu() we're readding the issue we're trying to fix, that is, it would then be able to write back into things like .rodata BPF maps. Follow-up work will rework the MEM_UNINIT semantics such that the intent can be better expressed. For now just clear the *mtu_len on error path which can be lifted later again. Fixes: 8a67f2de9b1d ("bpf: expose bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul to all program types") Fixes: d7a4cb9b6705 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e5edd241-59e7-5e39-0ee5-a51e31b6840a@iogearbox.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-5-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 4b3786a6c5397dc220b1483d8e2f4867743e966f ]

For all non-tracing helpers which formerly had ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} as input
arguments, zero the value for the case of an error as otherwise it could leak
memory. For tracing, it is not needed given CAP_PERFMON can already read all
kernel memory anyway hence bpf_get_func_arg() and bpf_get_func_ret() is skipped
in here.

Also, the MTU helpers mtu_len pointer value is being written but also read.
Technically, the MEM_UNINIT should not be there in order to always force init.
Removing MEM_UNINIT needs more verifier rework though: MEM_UNINIT right now
implies two things actually: i) write into memory, ii) memory does not have
to be initialized. If we lift MEM_UNINIT, it then becomes: i) read into memory,
ii) memory must be initialized. This means that for bpf_*_check_mtu() we're
readding the issue we're trying to fix, that is, it would then be able to
write back into things like .rodata BPF maps. Follow-up work will rework the
MEM_UNINIT semantics such that the intent can be better expressed. For now
just clear the *mtu_len on error path which can be lifted later again.

Fixes: 8a67f2de9b1d ("bpf: expose bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul to all program types")
Fixes: d7a4cb9b6705 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e5edd241-59e7-5e39-0ee5-a51e31b6840a@iogearbox.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-5-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Improve check_raw_mode_ok test for MEM_UNINIT-tagged types 2024-10-04T14:29:23+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2024-09-13T19:17:49+00:00 abf7559b4ff697714a6ca2600c16b02cfd75a2cb [ Upstream commit 18752d73c1898fd001569195ba4b0b8c43255f4a ] When checking malformed helper function signatures, also take other argument types into account aside from just ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM. This concerns (formerly) ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} given uninitialized memory can be passed there, too. The func proto sanity check goes back to commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type"), and its purpose was to detect wrong func protos which had more than just one MEM_UNINIT-tagged type as arguments. The reason more than one is currently not supported is as we mark stack slots with STACK_MISC in check_helper_call() in case of raw mode based on meta.access_size to allow uninitialized stack memory to be passed to helpers when they just write into the buffer. Probing for base type as well as MEM_UNINIT tagging ensures that other types do not get missed (as it used to be the case for ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG}). Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types") Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-4-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 18752d73c1898fd001569195ba4b0b8c43255f4a ]

When checking malformed helper function signatures, also take other argument
types into account aside from just ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM.

This concerns (formerly) ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} given uninitialized memory can
be passed there, too.

The func proto sanity check goes back to commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier:
add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type"), and its purpose was to detect wrong func protos
which had more than just one MEM_UNINIT-tagged type as arguments.

The reason more than one is currently not supported is as we mark stack slots with
STACK_MISC in check_helper_call() in case of raw mode based on meta.access_size to
allow uninitialized stack memory to be passed to helpers when they just write into
the buffer.

Probing for base type as well as MEM_UNINIT tagging ensures that other types do not
get missed (as it used to be the case for ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG}).

Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types")
Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-4-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix helper writes to read-only maps 2024-10-04T14:29:23+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2024-09-13T19:17:48+00:00 a2c8dc7e21803257e762b0bf067fd13e9c995da0 [ Upstream commit 32556ce93bc45c730829083cb60f95a2728ea48b ] Lonial found an issue that despite user- and BPF-side frozen BPF map (like in case of .rodata), it was still possible to write into it from a BPF program side through specific helpers having ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} as arguments. In check_func_arg() when the argument is as mentioned, the meta->raw_mode is never set. Later, check_helper_mem_access(), under the case of PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE as register base type, it assumes BPF_READ for the subsequent call to check_map_access_type() and given the BPF map is read-only it succeeds. The helpers really need to be annotated as ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} | MEM_UNINIT when results are written into them as opposed to read out of them. The latter indicates that it's okay to pass a pointer to uninitialized memory as the memory is written to anyway. However, ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} is a special case of ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM just with additional alignment requirement. So it is better to just get rid of the ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} special cases altogether and reuse the fixed size memory types. For this, add MEM_ALIGNED to additionally ensure alignment given these helpers write directly into the args via *<ptr> = val. The .arg*_size has been initialized reflecting the actual sizeof(*<ptr>). MEM_ALIGNED can only be used in combination with MEM_FIXED_SIZE annotated argument types, since in !MEM_FIXED_SIZE cases the verifier does not know the buffer size a priori and therefore cannot blindly write *<ptr> = val. Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types") Reported-by: Lonial Con <kongln9170@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-3-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 32556ce93bc45c730829083cb60f95a2728ea48b ]

Lonial found an issue that despite user- and BPF-side frozen BPF map
(like in case of .rodata), it was still possible to write into it from
a BPF program side through specific helpers having ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT}
as arguments.

In check_func_arg() when the argument is as mentioned, the meta->raw_mode
is never set. Later, check_helper_mem_access(), under the case of
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE as register base type, it assumes BPF_READ for the
subsequent call to check_map_access_type() and given the BPF map is
read-only it succeeds.

The helpers really need to be annotated as ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} | MEM_UNINIT
when results are written into them as opposed to read out of them. The
latter indicates that it's okay to pass a pointer to uninitialized memory
as the memory is written to anyway.

However, ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} is a special case of ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM
just with additional alignment requirement. So it is better to just get
rid of the ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} special cases altogether and reuse the
fixed size memory types. For this, add MEM_ALIGNED to additionally ensure
alignment given these helpers write directly into the args via *<ptr> = val.
The .arg*_size has been initialized reflecting the actual sizeof(*<ptr>).

MEM_ALIGNED can only be used in combination with MEM_FIXED_SIZE annotated
argument types, since in !MEM_FIXED_SIZE cases the verifier does not know
the buffer size a priori and therefore cannot blindly write *<ptr> = val.

Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types")
Reported-by: Lonial Con <kongln9170@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-3-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers for 32bit 2024-10-04T14:29:22+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2024-09-13T19:17:46+00:00 81197a9b45109522d1eb2755eb65662c3b23a080 [ Upstream commit cfe69c50b05510b24e26ccb427c7cc70beafd6c1 ] The bpf_strtol() and bpf_strtoul() helpers are currently broken on 32bit: The argument type ARG_PTR_TO_LONG is BPF-side "long", not kernel-side "long" and therefore always considered fixed 64bit no matter if 64 or 32bit underlying architecture. This contract breaks in case of the two mentioned helpers since their BPF_CALL definition for the helpers was added with {unsigned,}long *res. Meaning, the transition from BPF-side "long" (BPF program) to kernel-side "long" (BPF helper) breaks here. Both helpers call __bpf_strtoll() with "long long" correctly, but later assigning the result into 32-bit "*(long *)" on 32bit architectures. From a BPF program point of view, this means upper bits will be seen as uninitialised. Therefore, fix both BPF_CALL signatures to {s,u}64 types to fix this situation. Now, changing also uapi/bpf.h helper documentation which generates bpf_helper_defs.h for BPF programs is tricky: Changing signatures there to __{s,u}64 would trigger compiler warnings (incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to parameter of type '__s64 *' (aka 'long long *')) for existing BPF programs. Leaving the signatures as-is would be fine as from BPF program point of view it is still BPF-side "long" and thus equivalent to __{s,u}64 on 64 or 32bit underlying architectures. Note that bpf_strtol() and bpf_strtoul() are the only helpers with this issue. Fixes: d7a4cb9b6705 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers") Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/481fcec8-c12c-9abb-8ecb-76c71c009959@iogearbox.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit cfe69c50b05510b24e26ccb427c7cc70beafd6c1 ]

The bpf_strtol() and bpf_strtoul() helpers are currently broken on 32bit:

The argument type ARG_PTR_TO_LONG is BPF-side "long", not kernel-side "long"
and therefore always considered fixed 64bit no matter if 64 or 32bit underlying
architecture.

This contract breaks in case of the two mentioned helpers since their BPF_CALL
definition for the helpers was added with {unsigned,}long *res. Meaning, the
transition from BPF-side "long" (BPF program) to kernel-side "long" (BPF helper)
breaks here.

Both helpers call __bpf_strtoll() with "long long" correctly, but later assigning
the result into 32-bit "*(long *)" on 32bit architectures. From a BPF program
point of view, this means upper bits will be seen as uninitialised.

Therefore, fix both BPF_CALL signatures to {s,u}64 types to fix this situation.

Now, changing also uapi/bpf.h helper documentation which generates bpf_helper_defs.h
for BPF programs is tricky: Changing signatures there to __{s,u}64 would trigger
compiler warnings (incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to parameter of type
'__s64 *' (aka 'long long *')) for existing BPF programs.

Leaving the signatures as-is would be fine as from BPF program point of view it is
still BPF-side "long" and thus equivalent to __{s,u}64 on 64 or 32bit underlying
architectures.

Note that bpf_strtol() and bpf_strtoul() are the only helpers with this issue.

Fixes: d7a4cb9b6705 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/481fcec8-c12c-9abb-8ecb-76c71c009959@iogearbox.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: correctly handle malformed BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL relos 2024-10-04T14:29:19+00:00 Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com 2024-08-22T08:01:23+00:00 2288b54b96dcb55bedebcef3572bb8821fc5e708 [ Upstream commit 3d2786d65aaa954ebd3fcc033ada433e10da21c4 ] In case of malformed relocation record of kind BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL referencing a non-existing BTF type, function bpf_core_calc_relo_insn would cause a null pointer deference. Fix this by adding a proper check upper in call stack, as malformed relocation records could be passed from user space. Simplest reproducer is a program: r0 = 0 exit With a single relocation record: .insn_off = 0, /* patch first instruction */ .type_id = 100500, /* this type id does not exist */ .access_str_off = 6, /* offset of string "0" */ .kind = BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL, See the link for original reproducer or next commit for a test case. Fixes: 74753e1462e7 ("libbpf: Replace btf__type_by_id() with btf_type_by_id().") Reported-by: Liu RuiTong <cnitlrt@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAK55_s6do7C+DVwbwY_7nKfUz0YLDoiA1v6X3Y9+p0sWzipFSA@mail.gmail.com/ Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822080124.2995724-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 3d2786d65aaa954ebd3fcc033ada433e10da21c4 ]

In case of malformed relocation record of kind BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL
referencing a non-existing BTF type, function bpf_core_calc_relo_insn
would cause a null pointer deference.

Fix this by adding a proper check upper in call stack, as malformed
relocation records could be passed from user space.

Simplest reproducer is a program:

    r0 = 0
    exit

With a single relocation record:

    .insn_off = 0,          /* patch first instruction */
    .type_id = 100500,      /* this type id does not exist */
    .access_str_off = 6,    /* offset of string "0" */
    .kind = BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL,

See the link for original reproducer or next commit for a test case.

Fixes: 74753e1462e7 ("libbpf: Replace btf__type_by_id() with btf_type_by_id().")
Reported-by: Liu RuiTong <cnitlrt@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAK55_s6do7C+DVwbwY_7nKfUz0YLDoiA1v6X3Y9+p0sWzipFSA@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822080124.2995724-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Add sockptr support for setsockopt 2024-09-12T09:11:34+00:00 Breno Leitao leitao@debian.org 2023-10-16T13:47:40+00:00 09fba0162ba095665f3f226cc6220f9fbb00c9d9 [ Upstream commit 3f31e0d14d44ad491a81b7c1f83f32fbc300a867 ] The whole network stack uses sockptr, and while it doesn't move to something more modern, let's use sockptr in setsockptr BPF hooks, so, it could be used by other callers. The main motivation for this change is to use it in the io_uring {g,s}etsockopt(), which will use a userspace pointer for *optval, but, a kernel value for optlen. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZSArfLaaGcfd8LH8@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016134750.1381153-3-leitao@debian.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Stable-dep-of: 33f339a1ba54 ("bpf, net: Fix a potential race in do_sock_getsockopt()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 3f31e0d14d44ad491a81b7c1f83f32fbc300a867 ]

The whole network stack uses sockptr, and while it doesn't move to
something more modern, let's use sockptr in setsockptr BPF hooks, so, it
could be used by other callers.

The main motivation for this change is to use it in the io_uring
{g,s}etsockopt(), which will use a userspace pointer for *optval, but, a
kernel value for optlen.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZSArfLaaGcfd8LH8@gmail.com/

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016134750.1381153-3-leitao@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Stable-dep-of: 33f339a1ba54 ("bpf, net: Fix a potential race in do_sock_getsockopt()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Add sockptr support for getsockopt 2024-09-12T09:11:34+00:00 Breno Leitao leitao@debian.org 2023-10-16T13:47:39+00:00 4a746fb253fa7c2908b3f317d37d8c0202d5f278 [ Upstream commit a615f67e1a426f35366b8398c11f31c148e7df48 ] The whole network stack uses sockptr, and while it doesn't move to something more modern, let's use sockptr in getsockptr BPF hooks, so, it could be used by other callers. The main motivation for this change is to use it in the io_uring {g,s}etsockopt(), which will use a userspace pointer for *optval, but, a kernel value for optlen. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZSArfLaaGcfd8LH8@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016134750.1381153-2-leitao@debian.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Stable-dep-of: 33f339a1ba54 ("bpf, net: Fix a potential race in do_sock_getsockopt()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a615f67e1a426f35366b8398c11f31c148e7df48 ]

The whole network stack uses sockptr, and while it doesn't move to
something more modern, let's use sockptr in getsockptr BPF hooks, so, it
could be used by other callers.

The main motivation for this change is to use it in the io_uring
{g,s}etsockopt(), which will use a userspace pointer for *optval, but, a
kernel value for optlen.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZSArfLaaGcfd8LH8@gmail.com/

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016134750.1381153-2-leitao@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Stable-dep-of: 33f339a1ba54 ("bpf, net: Fix a potential race in do_sock_getsockopt()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf, verifier: Correct tail_call_reachable for bpf prog 2024-09-12T09:11:29+00:00 Leon Hwang hffilwlqm@gmail.com 2024-06-10T12:42:23+00:00 3c9e7909df159717486198b2046429318ab88b19 [ Upstream commit 01793ed86b5d7df1e956520b5474940743eb7ed8 ] It's confusing to inspect 'prog->aux->tail_call_reachable' with drgn[0], when bpf prog has tail call but 'tail_call_reachable' is false. This patch corrects 'tail_call_reachable' when bpf prog has tail call. Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610124224.34673-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 01793ed86b5d7df1e956520b5474940743eb7ed8 ]

It's confusing to inspect 'prog->aux->tail_call_reachable' with drgn[0],
when bpf prog has tail call but 'tail_call_reachable' is false.

This patch corrects 'tail_call_reachable' when bpf prog has tail call.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610124224.34673-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix a kernel verifier crash in stacksafe() 2024-08-29T15:33:58+00:00 Yonghong Song yonghong.song@linux.dev 2024-08-12T21:48:47+00:00 7cad3174cc79519bf5f6c4441780264416822c08 commit bed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25 upstream. Daniel Hodges reported a kernel verifier crash when playing with sched-ext. Further investigation shows that the crash is due to invalid memory access in stacksafe(). More specifically, it is the following code: if (exact != NOT_EXACT && old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] != cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE]) return false; The 'i' iterates old->allocated_stack. If cur->allocated_stack < old->allocated_stack the out-of-bound access will happen. To fix the issue add 'i >= cur->allocated_stack' check such that if the condition is true, stacksafe() should fail. Otherwise, cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] memory access is legal. Fixes: 2793a8b015f7 ("bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks") Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Reported-by: Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812214847.213612-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> [ shung-hsi.yu: "exact" variable is bool instead enum because commit 4f81c16f50ba ("bpf: Recognize that two registers are safe when their ranges match") is not present. ] Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit bed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25 upstream.

Daniel Hodges reported a kernel verifier crash when playing with sched-ext.
Further investigation shows that the crash is due to invalid memory access
in stacksafe(). More specifically, it is the following code:

    if (exact != NOT_EXACT &&
        old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] !=
        cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE])
            return false;

The 'i' iterates old->allocated_stack.
If cur->allocated_stack < old->allocated_stack the out-of-bound
access will happen.

To fix the issue add 'i >= cur->allocated_stack' check such that if
the condition is true, stacksafe() should fail. Otherwise,
cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] memory access is legal.

Fixes: 2793a8b015f7 ("bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks")
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812214847.213612-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[ shung-hsi.yu: "exact" variable is bool instead enum because commit
  4f81c16f50ba ("bpf: Recognize that two registers are safe when their
  ranges match") is not present. ]
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>