commit 3c89a068bfd0698a5478f4cf39493595ef757d5e upstream.

s2idle works like a regular suspend with freezing processes and freezing
devices. All CPUs except the control CPU go into idle. Once this is
completed the control CPU kicks all other CPUs out of idle, so that they
reenter the idle loop and then enter s2idle state. The control CPU then
issues an swait() on the suspend state and therefore enters the idle loop
as well.

Due to being kicked out of idle, the other CPUs leave their NOHZ states,
which means the tick is active and the corresponding hrtimer is programmed
to the next jiffie.

On entering s2idle the CPUs shut down their local clockevent device to
prevent wakeups. The last CPU which enters s2idle shuts down its local
clockevent and freezes timekeeping.

On resume, one of the CPUs receives the wakeup interrupt, unfreezes
timekeeping and its local clockevent and starts the resume process. At that
point all other CPUs are still in s2idle with their clockevents switched
off. They only resume when they are kicked by another CPU or after resuming
devices and then receiving a device interrupt.

That means there is no guarantee that all CPUs will wakeup directly on
resume. As a consequence there is no guarantee that timers which are queued
on those CPUs and should expire directly after resume, are handled. Also
timer list timers which are remotely queued to one of those CPUs after
resume will not result in a reprogramming IPI as the tick is
active. Queueing a hrtimer will also not result in a reprogramming IPI
because the first hrtimer event is already in the past.

The recent introduction of the timer pull model (7ee988770326 ("timers:
Implement the hierarchical pull model")) amplifies this problem, if the
current migrator is one of the non woken up CPUs. When a non pinned timer
list timer is queued and the queuing CPU goes idle, it relies on the still
suspended migrator CPU to expire the timer which will happen by chance.

The problem exists since commit 8d89835b0467 ("PM: suspend: Do not pause
cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle path"). There the cpuidle_pause() call which
in turn invoked a wakeup for all idle CPUs was moved to a later point in
the resume process. This might not be reached or reached very late because
it waits on a timer of a still suspended CPU.

Address this by kicking all CPUs out of idle after the control CPU returns
from swait() so that they resume their timers and restore consistent system
state.

Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218641
Fixes: 8d89835b0467 ("PM: suspend: Do not pause cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle path")
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: 5.16+ <stable@kernel.org> # 5.16+
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 9bc4ffd32ef8943f5c5a42c9637cfd04771d021b ]

psci_init_system_suspend() invokes suspend_set_ops() very early during
bootup even before kernel command line for mem_sleep_default is setup.
This leads to kernel command line mem_sleep_default=s2idle not working
as mem_sleep_current gets changed to deep via suspend_set_ops() and never
changes back to s2idle.

Set mem_sleep_current along with mem_sleep_default during kernel command
line setup as default suspend mode.

Fixes: faf7ec4a92c0 ("drivers: firmware: psci: add system suspend support")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "Debuggability:

   - Change most occurances of BUG_ON() to WARN_ON_ONCE()

   - Reorganize & fix TASK_ state comparisons, turn it into a bitmap

   - Update/fix misc scheduler debugging facilities

  Load-balancing & regular scheduling:

   - Improve the behavior of the scheduler in presence of lot of
     SCHED_IDLE tasks - in particular they should not impact other
     scheduling classes.

   - Optimize task load tracking, cleanups & fixes

   - Clean up & simplify misc load-balancing code

  Freezer:

   - Rewrite the core freezer to behave better wrt thawing and be
     simpler in general, by replacing PF_FROZEN with TASK_FROZEN &
     fixing/adjusting all the fallout.

  Deadline scheduler:

   - Fix the DL capacity-aware code

   - Factor out dl_task_is_earliest_deadline() &
     replenish_dl_new_period()

   - Relax/optimize locking in task_non_contending()

  Cleanups:

   - Factor out the update_current_exec_runtime() helper

   - Various cleanups, simplifications"

* tag 'sched-core-2022-10-07' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (41 commits)
  sched: Fix more TASK_state comparisons
  sched: Fix TASK_state comparisons
  sched/fair: Move call to list_last_entry() in detach_tasks
  sched/fair: Cleanup loop_max and loop_break
  sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task
  sched: Show PF_flag holes
  freezer,sched: Rewrite core freezer logic
  sched: Widen TAKS_state literals
  sched/wait: Add wait_event_state()
  sched/completion: Add wait_for_completion_state()
  sched: Add TASK_ANY for wait_task_inactive()
  sched: Change wait_task_inactive()s match_state
  freezer,umh: Clean up freezer/initrd interaction
  freezer: Have {,un}lock_system_sleep() save/restore flags
  sched: Rename task_running() to task_on_cpu()
  sched/fair: Cleanup for SIS_PROP
  sched/fair: Default to false in test_idle_cores()
  sched/fair: Remove useless check in select_idle_core()
  sched/fair: Avoid double search on same cpu
  sched/fair: Remove redundant check in select_idle_smt()
  ...

On some platforms it is found that Linux more aggressively enters s2idle
than Windows enters Modern Standby and this uncovers some synchronization
issues for the platform.  To aid in debugging this class of problems in
the future, add support for an extra optional callback intended for
drivers to emit extra debugging.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829162953.5947-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Rafael explained that the reason for having both PF_NOFREEZE and
PF_FREEZER_SKIP is that {,un}lock_system_sleep() is callable from
kthread context that has previously called set_freezable().

In preparation of merging the flags, have {,un}lock_system_slee() save
and restore current->flags.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220822114648.725003428@infradead.org

The CXL specification claims S3 support at a hardware level, but at a
system software level there are some missing pieces. Section 9.4 (CXL
2.0) rightly claims that "CXL mem adapters may need aux power to retain
memory context across S3", but there is no enumeration mechanism for the
OS to determine if a given adapter has that support. Moreover the save
state and resume image for the system may inadvertantly end up in a CXL
device that needs to be restored before the save state is recoverable.
I.e. a circular dependency that is not resolvable without a third party
save-area.

Arrange for the cxl_mem driver to fail S3 attempts. This still nominaly
allows for suspend, but requires unbinding all CXL memory devices before
the suspend to ensure the typical DRAM flow is taken. The cxl_mem unbind
flow is intended to also tear down all CXL memory regions associated
with a given cxl_memdev.

It is reasonable to assume that any device participating in a System RAM
range published in the EFI memory map is covered by aux power and
save-area outside the device itself. So this restriction can be
minimized in the future once pre-existing region enumeration support
arrives, and perhaps a spec update to clarify if the EFI memory map is
sufficent for determining the range of devices managed by
platform-firmware for S3 support.

Per Rafael, if the CXL configuration prevents suspend then it should
fail early before tasks are frozen, and mem_sleep should stop showing
'mem' as an option [1]. Effectively CXL augments the platform suspend
->valid() op since, for example, the ACPI ops are not aware of the CXL /
PCI dependencies. Given the split role of platform firmware vs OS
provisioned CXL memory it is up to the cxl_mem driver to determine if
the CXL configuration has elements that platform firmware may not be
prepared to restore.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0hGVN_=3iU8OLpHY3Ak35T5+JcBM-qs8SbojKrpd0VXsA@mail.gmail.com [1]
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165066828317.3907920.5690432272182042556.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

After commit e3728b50cd9b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race
related to the EC GPE") wakeup interrupts occurring immediately after
the one discarded by acpi_s2idle_wake() may be missed.  Moreover, if
the SCI triggers again immediately after the rearming in
acpi_s2idle_wake(), that wakeup may be missed too.

The problem is that pm_system_irq_wakeup() only calls pm_system_wakeup()
when pm_wakeup_irq is 0, but that's not the case any more after the
interrupt causing acpi_s2idle_wake() to run until pm_wakeup_irq is
cleared by the pm_wakeup_clear() call in s2idle_loop().  However,
there may be wakeup interrupts occurring in that time frame and if
that happens, they will be missed.

To address that issue first move the clearing of pm_wakeup_irq to
the point at which it is known that the interrupt causing
acpi_s2idle_wake() to tun will be discarded, before rearming the SCI
for wakeup.  Moreover, because that only reduces the size of the
time window in which the issue may manifest itself, allow
pm_system_irq_wakeup() to register two second wakeup interrupts in
a row and, when discarding the first one, replace it with the second
one.  [Of course, this assumes that only one wakeup interrupt can be
discarded in one go, but currently that is the case and I am not
aware of any plans to change that.]

Fixes: e3728b50cd9b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE")
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Make valid_state() check if the ->enter callback is present in
suspend_ops (only PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE can be valid otherwise) and
make sleep_state_supported() call valid_state() consistently to
validate the states other than PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE.

While at it, clean up the comment in valid_state().

No expected functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 8651f97bd951 ("PM / cpuidle: System resume hang fix with
cpuidle") that introduced cpuidle pausing during system suspend
did that to work around a platform firmware issue causing systems
to hang during resume if CPUs were allowed to enter idle states
in the system suspend and resume code paths.

However, pausing cpuidle before the last phase of suspending
devices is the source of an otherwise arbitrary difference between
the suspend-to-idle path and other system suspend variants, so it is
cleaner to do that later, before taking secondary CPUs offline (it
is still safer to take secondary CPUs offline with cpuidle paused,
though).

Modify the code accordingly, but in order to avoid code duplication,
introduce new wrapper functions, pm_sleep_disable_secondary_cpus()
and pm_sleep_enable_secondary_cpus(), to combine cpuidle_pause()
and cpuidle_resume(), respectively, with the handling of secondary
CPUs during system-wide transitions to sleep states.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

It is pointless to pause cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle path,
because it is going to be resumed in the same path later and
pausing it does not serve any particular purpose in that case.

Rework the code to avoid doing that.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>