SRCU keeps a count of the number of callbacks that the current
srcu_barrier() is waiting on, but there is currently no easy way to
work out which callback is stuck.  One way to do this is to mark idle
SRCU-barrier callbacks by making the ->next pointer point to the callback
itself, and this commit does just that.

Later commits will use this for debug output.

Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>

SRCU maintains the ->srcu_n_exp_nodelay and ->reschedule_count values
to guide heuristics governing auto-expediting of normal SRCU grace
periods and grace-period-state-machine delays.  This commit adds KCSAN
ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER() calls to check for concurrent updates to
these fields.

Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>

Using a higher value for the initial gp sequence counters allows for
wrapping to occur faster. It can help with surfacing any issues that may
be happening as a result of the wrap around.

Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>

doc.2024.06.06a: Documentation updates.
fixes.2024.07.04a: Miscellaneous fixes.
mb.2024.06.28a: Grace-period memory-barrier redundancy removal.
nocb.2024.06.03a: No-CB CPU updates.
rcu-tasks.2024.06.06a: RCU-Tasks updates.
rcutorture.2024.06.06a: Torture-test updates.
srcu.2024.06.18a: SRCU polled-grace-period updates.

This commit adds the get_completed_synchronize_srcu() and the
same_state_synchronize_srcu() functions.  The first returns a cookie
that is always interpreted as corresponding to an expired grace period.
The second does an equality comparison of a pair of cookies.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Now that we have polled SRCU grace periods, a grace period can be
started by start_poll_synchronize_srcu() as well as call_srcu(),
synchronize_srcu(), and synchronize_srcu_expedited().  This commit
therefore calls out this new start_poll_synchronize_srcu() possibility
in the comment on the WARN_ON().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

Interrupts are enabled in srcu_gp_end(), so this commit switches from
spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node() and spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node()
to spin_lock_irq_rcu_node() and spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/febb13ab-a4bb-48b4-8e97-7e9f7749e6da@moroto.mountain/

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

This commit make rcu-tasks related rcutorture test support rcu-tasks
gp state printing when the writer stall occurs or the at the end of
rcutorture test, and generate rcu_ops->get_gp_data() operation to
simplify the acquisition of gp state for different types of rcutorture
tests.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

The comments added in commit 1ef990c4b36b ("srcu: No need to
advance/accelerate if no callback enqueued") are a bit confusing.
The comments are describing a scenario for code that was moved and is
no longer the way it was (snapshot after advancing). Improve the code
comments to reflect this and also document why acceleration can never
fail.

Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

If an SRCU barrier is queued while callbacks are running and a new
callbacks invocator for the same sdp were to run concurrently, the
RCU barrier might execute too early. As this requirement is non-obvious,
make sure to keep a record.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>