linux.git/kernel/rcu/tree.h, branch v6.12.80 Clone of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to softirq 2026-03-04T12:19:21+00:00 Yao Kai yaokai34@huawei.com 2026-01-01T16:34:10+00:00 1f16679a5aa60238466ce339c35f5e82ece60337 [ Upstream commit d41e37f26b3157b3f1d10223863519a943aa239b ] Commit 5f5fa7ea89dc ("rcu: Don't use negative nesting depth in __rcu_read_unlock()") removes the recursion-protection code from __rcu_read_unlock(). Therefore, we could invoke the deadloop in raise_softirq_irqoff() with ftrace enabled as follows: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/trace.c:3021 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x172/0x180 Modules linked in: my_irq_work(O) CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G O 6.18.0-rc7-dirty #23 PREEMPT(full) Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x172/0x180 RSP: 0018:ffffc900000034a8 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff826d7b87 RDI: ffffffff826e9329 RBP: 0000000000090009 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffffffff82afbc4c R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000011d7a R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff888003874100 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: ffff8880038c1054 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880fa8ea000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055b31fa7f540 CR3: 00000000078f4005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80 raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0 rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160 unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0 __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0 arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0 stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80 raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0 rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160 unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0 __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0 arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0 stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80 raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0 rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160 unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0 __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0 arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0 stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80 raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0 rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160 __is_insn_slot_addr+0x54/0x70 kernel_text_address+0x48/0xc0 __kernel_text_address+0xd/0x40 unwind_get_return_address+0x1e/0x40 arch_stack_walk+0x9c/0xf0 stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80 __raise_softirq_irqoff+0x61/0x80 __flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x115/0x420 __sysvec_call_function_single+0x17/0xb0 sysvec_call_function_single+0x8c/0xc0 </IRQ> Commit b41642c87716 ("rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work") fixed the infinite loop in rcu_read_unlock_special() for IRQ work by setting a flag before calling irq_work_queue_on(). We fix this issue by setting the same flag before calling raise_softirq_irqoff() and rename the flag to defer_qs_pending for more common. Fixes: 5f5fa7ea89dc ("rcu: Don't use negative nesting depth in __rcu_read_unlock()") Reported-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yao Kai <yaokai34@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit d41e37f26b3157b3f1d10223863519a943aa239b ]

Commit 5f5fa7ea89dc ("rcu: Don't use negative nesting depth in
__rcu_read_unlock()") removes the recursion-protection code from
__rcu_read_unlock(). Therefore, we could invoke the deadloop in
raise_softirq_irqoff() with ftrace enabled as follows:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/trace.c:3021 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x172/0x180
Modules linked in: my_irq_work(O)
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G O 6.18.0-rc7-dirty #23 PREEMPT(full)
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x172/0x180
RSP: 0018:ffffc900000034a8 EFLAGS: 00010002
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff826d7b87 RDI: ffffffff826e9329
RBP: 0000000000090009 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffffffff82afbc4c
R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000011d7a R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff888003874100 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: ffff8880038c1054
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880fa8ea000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055b31fa7f540 CR3: 00000000078f4005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220
 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260
 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80
 raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0
 rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160
 unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0
 __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0
 arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0
 stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70
 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180
 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220
 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260
 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80
 raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0
 rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160
 unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0
 __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0
 arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0
 stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70
 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180
 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220
 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260
 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80
 raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0
 rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160
 unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0
 __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0
 arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0
 stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70
 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180
 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220
 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260
 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80
 raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0
 rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160
 __is_insn_slot_addr+0x54/0x70
 kernel_text_address+0x48/0xc0
 __kernel_text_address+0xd/0x40
 unwind_get_return_address+0x1e/0x40
 arch_stack_walk+0x9c/0xf0
 stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70
 __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180
 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220
 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260
 trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80
 __raise_softirq_irqoff+0x61/0x80
 __flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x115/0x420
 __sysvec_call_function_single+0x17/0xb0
 sysvec_call_function_single+0x8c/0xc0
 </IRQ>

Commit b41642c87716 ("rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work")
fixed the infinite loop in rcu_read_unlock_special() for IRQ work by
setting a flag before calling irq_work_queue_on(). We fix this issue by
setting the same flag before calling raise_softirq_irqoff() and rename the
flag to defer_qs_pending for more common.

Fixes: 5f5fa7ea89dc ("rcu: Don't use negative nesting depth in __rcu_read_unlock()")
Reported-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yao Kai <yaokai34@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rcu: Fix racy re-initialization of irq_work causing hangs 2025-08-20T16:30:58+00:00 Frederic Weisbecker frederic@kernel.org 2025-08-08T17:03:22+00:00 b672daa89d1a84cfe1c2391175e36a14768bef06 commit 61399e0c5410567ef60cb1cda34cca42903842e3 upstream. RCU re-initializes the deferred QS irq work everytime before attempting to queue it. However there are situations where the irq work is attempted to be queued even though it is already queued. In that case re-initializing messes-up with the irq work queue that is about to be handled. The chances for that to happen are higher when the architecture doesn't support self-IPIs and irq work are then all lazy, such as with the following sequence: 1) rcu_read_unlock() is called when IRQs are disabled and there is a grace period involving blocked tasks on the node. The irq work is then initialized and queued. 2) The related tasks are unblocked and the CPU quiescent state is reported. rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending is reset to DEFER_QS_IDLE, allowing the irq work to be requeued in the future (note the previous one hasn't fired yet). 3) A new grace period starts and the node has blocked tasks. 4) rcu_read_unlock() is called when IRQs are disabled again. The irq work is re-initialized (but it's queued! and its node is cleared) and requeued. Which means it's requeued to itself. 5) The irq work finally fires with the tick. But since it was requeued to itself, it loops and hangs. Fix this with initializing the irq work only once before the CPU boots. Fixes: b41642c87716 ("rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202508071303.c1134cce-lkp@intel.com Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 61399e0c5410567ef60cb1cda34cca42903842e3 upstream.

RCU re-initializes the deferred QS irq work everytime before attempting
to queue it. However there are situations where the irq work is
attempted to be queued even though it is already queued. In that case
re-initializing messes-up with the irq work queue that is about to be
handled.

The chances for that to happen are higher when the architecture doesn't
support self-IPIs and irq work are then all lazy, such as with the
following sequence:

1) rcu_read_unlock() is called when IRQs are disabled and there is a
   grace period involving blocked tasks on the node. The irq work
   is then initialized and queued.

2) The related tasks are unblocked and the CPU quiescent state
   is reported. rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending is reset to DEFER_QS_IDLE,
   allowing the irq work to be requeued in the future (note the previous
   one hasn't fired yet).

3) A new grace period starts and the node has blocked tasks.

4) rcu_read_unlock() is called when IRQs are disabled again. The irq work
   is re-initialized (but it's queued! and its node is cleared) and
   requeued. Which means it's requeued to itself.

5) The irq work finally fires with the tick. But since it was requeued
   to itself, it loops and hangs.

Fix this with initializing the irq work only once before the CPU boots.

Fixes: b41642c87716 ("rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202508071303.c1134cce-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work 2025-08-20T16:30:39+00:00 Joel Fernandes joelagnelf@nvidia.com 2025-07-08T14:22:19+00:00 1cfa244f7198d325594e627574930b7b91df5bfe [ Upstream commit b41642c87716bbd09797b1e4ea7d904f06c39b7b ] During rcu_read_unlock_special(), if this happens during irq_exit(), we can lockup if an IPI is issued. This is because the IPI itself triggers the irq_exit() path causing a recursive lock up. This is precisely what Xiongfeng found when invoking a BPF program on the trace_tick_stop() tracepoint As shown in the trace below. Fix by managing the irq_work state correctly. irq_exit() __irq_exit_rcu() /* in_hardirq() returns false after this */ preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET) tick_irq_exit() tick_nohz_irq_exit() tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() trace_tick_stop() /* a bpf prog is hooked on this trace point */ __bpf_trace_tick_stop() bpf_trace_run2() rcu_read_unlock_special() /* will send a IPI to itself */ irq_work_queue_on(&rdp->defer_qs_iw, rdp->cpu); A simple reproducer can also be obtained by doing the following in tick_irq_exit(). It will hang on boot without the patch: static inline void tick_irq_exit(void) { + rcu_read_lock(); + WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs, true); + rcu_read_unlock(); + Reported-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9acd5f9f-6732-7701-6880-4b51190aa070@huawei.com/ Tested-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> [neeraj: Apply Frederic's suggested fix for PREEMPT_RT] Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit b41642c87716bbd09797b1e4ea7d904f06c39b7b ]

During rcu_read_unlock_special(), if this happens during irq_exit(), we
can lockup if an IPI is issued. This is because the IPI itself triggers
the irq_exit() path causing a recursive lock up.

This is precisely what Xiongfeng found when invoking a BPF program on
the trace_tick_stop() tracepoint As shown in the trace below. Fix by
managing the irq_work state correctly.

irq_exit()
  __irq_exit_rcu()
    /* in_hardirq() returns false after this */
    preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET)
    tick_irq_exit()
      tick_nohz_irq_exit()
	    tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick()
	      trace_tick_stop()  /* a bpf prog is hooked on this trace point */
		   __bpf_trace_tick_stop()
		      bpf_trace_run2()
			    rcu_read_unlock_special()
                              /* will send a IPI to itself */
			      irq_work_queue_on(&rdp->defer_qs_iw, rdp->cpu);

A simple reproducer can also be obtained by doing the following in
tick_irq_exit(). It will hang on boot without the patch:

  static inline void tick_irq_exit(void)
  {
 +	rcu_read_lock();
 +	WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs, true);
 +	rcu_read_unlock();
 +

Reported-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9acd5f9f-6732-7701-6880-4b51190aa070@huawei.com/
Tested-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
[neeraj: Apply Frederic's suggested fix for PREEMPT_RT]
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rcu/cpu_stall_cputime: fix the hardirq count for x86 architecture 2025-06-19T13:31:30+00:00 Yongliang Gao leonylgao@tencent.com 2025-02-16T08:41:09+00:00 58beaa1aee559c5cb9f1cd096207ef1a29be0bd7 [ Upstream commit da6b85598af30e9fec34d82882d7e1e39f3da769 ] When counting the number of hardirqs in the x86 architecture, it is essential to add arch_irq_stat_cpu to ensure accuracy. For example, a CPU loop within the rcu_read_lock function. Before: [ 70.910184] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU [ 70.910436] rcu: 3-....: (4999 ticks this GP) idle=*** [ 70.910711] rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system [ 70.910870] rcu: number: 0 657 0 [ 70.911024] rcu: cputime: 0 0 2498 ==> 2498(ms) [ 70.911278] rcu: (t=5001 jiffies g=3677 q=29 ncpus=8) After: [ 68.046132] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU [ 68.046354] rcu: 2-....: (4999 ticks this GP) idle=*** [ 68.046628] rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system [ 68.046793] rcu: number: 2498 663 0 [ 68.046951] rcu: cputime: 0 0 2496 ==> 2496(ms) [ 68.047244] rcu: (t=5000 jiffies g=3825 q=4 ncpus=8) Fixes: be42f00b73a0 ("rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501090842.SfI6QPGS-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Yongliang Gao <leonylgao@tencent.com> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250216084109.3109837-1-leonylgao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit da6b85598af30e9fec34d82882d7e1e39f3da769 ]

When counting the number of hardirqs in the x86 architecture,
it is essential to add arch_irq_stat_cpu to ensure accuracy.

For example, a CPU loop within the rcu_read_lock function.

Before:
[   70.910184] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
[   70.910436] rcu:     3-....: (4999 ticks this GP) idle=***
[   70.910711] rcu:              hardirqs   softirqs   csw/system
[   70.910870] rcu:      number:        0        657            0
[   70.911024] rcu:     cputime:        0          0         2498   ==> 2498(ms)
[   70.911278] rcu:     (t=5001 jiffies g=3677 q=29 ncpus=8)

After:
[   68.046132] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
[   68.046354] rcu:     2-....: (4999 ticks this GP) idle=***
[   68.046628] rcu:              hardirqs   softirqs   csw/system
[   68.046793] rcu:      number:     2498        663            0
[   68.046951] rcu:     cputime:        0          0         2496   ==> 2496(ms)
[   68.047244] rcu:     (t=5000 jiffies g=3825 q=4 ncpus=8)

Fixes: be42f00b73a0 ("rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501090842.SfI6QPGS-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Yongliang Gao <leonylgao@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250216084109.3109837-1-leonylgao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Merge branches 'context_tracking.15.08.24a', 'csd.lock.15.08.24a', 'nocb.09.09.24a', 'rcutorture.14.08.24a', 'rcustall.09.09.24a', 'srcu.12.08.24a', 'rcu.tasks.14.08.24a', 'rcu_scaling_tests.15.08.24a', 'fixes.12.08.24a' and 'misc.11.08.24a' into next.09.09.24a 2024-09-08T18:39:47+00:00 Neeraj Upadhyay neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org 2024-09-08T18:39:47+00:00 355debb83bf79853cde43579f88eed16adb1da29 






rcu: Rename struct rcu_data .exp_dynticks_snap into .exp_watching_snap
2024-08-15T16:00:42+00:00

Valentin Schneider
vschneid@redhat.com

2024-04-29T12:05:29+00:00

76ce2b3d75305d02174655062e3a68a8f45117cd

The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to
RCU_WATCHING, and the snapshot helpers are now prefix by
"rcu_watching". Reflect that change into the storage variables for these
snapshots.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>





The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to
RCU_WATCHING, and the snapshot helpers are now prefix by
"rcu_watching". Reflect that change into the storage variables for these
snapshots.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>







rcu: Rename struct rcu_data .dynticks_snap into .watching_snap
2024-08-15T16:00:42+00:00

Valentin Schneider
vschneid@redhat.com

2024-04-29T12:05:29+00:00

2dba2230f9e26ad492fcd70e9ef2edc28313ea50

The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to
RCU_WATCHING, and the snapshot helpers are now prefix by
"rcu_watching". Reflect that change into the storage variables for these
snapshots.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>





The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to
RCU_WATCHING, and the snapshot helpers are now prefix by
"rcu_watching". Reflect that change into the storage variables for these
snapshots.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>







rcu/nocb: Introduce nocb mutex
2024-07-29T02:04:31+00:00

Frederic Weisbecker
frederic@kernel.org

2024-05-30T13:45:45+00:00

7121dd915a262aee1f5a88cf86b1543f3a9439d7

The barrier_mutex is used currently to protect (de-)offloading
operations and prevent from nocb_lock locking imbalance in rcu_barrier()
and shrinker, and also from misordered RCU barrier invocation.

Now since RCU (de-)offloading is going to happen on offline CPUs, an RCU
barrier will have to be executed while transitionning from offloaded to
de-offloaded state. And this can't happen while holding the
barrier_mutex.

Introduce a NOCB mutex to protect (de-)offloading transitions. The
barrier_mutex is still held for now when necessary to avoid barrier
callbacks reordering and nocb_lock imbalance.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>





The barrier_mutex is used currently to protect (de-)offloading
operations and prevent from nocb_lock locking imbalance in rcu_barrier()
and shrinker, and also from misordered RCU barrier invocation.

Now since RCU (de-)offloading is going to happen on offline CPUs, an RCU
barrier will have to be executed while transitionning from offloaded to
de-offloaded state. And this can't happen while holding the
barrier_mutex.

Introduce a NOCB mutex to protect (de-)offloading transitions. The
barrier_mutex is still held for now when necessary to avoid barrier
callbacks reordering and nocb_lock imbalance.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>







rcu/nocb: Move nocb field at the end of state struct
2024-07-29T02:04:31+00:00

Frederic Weisbecker
frederic@kernel.org

2024-05-30T13:45:43+00:00

ff81428ede8a290fc5fd85135e39be1065ae6176

nocb_is_setup is a rarely used field, mostly on boot and CPU hotplug.
It shouldn't occupy the middle of the rcu state hot fields cacheline.

Move it to the end and build it conditionally while at it. More cold
NOCB fields are to come.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>





nocb_is_setup is a rarely used field, mostly on boot and CPU hotplug.
It shouldn't occupy the middle of the rcu state hot fields cacheline.

Move it to the end and build it conditionally while at it. More cold
NOCB fields are to come.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>







Merge branches 'doc.2024.06.06a', 'fixes.2024.07.04a', 'mb.2024.06.28a', 'nocb.2024.06.03a', 'rcu-tasks.2024.06.06a', 'rcutorture.2024.06.06a' and 'srcu.2024.06.18a' into HEAD
2024-07-04T20:54:17+00:00

Paul E. McKenney
paulmck@kernel.org

2024-07-04T20:54:17+00:00

02219caa92b5b0ed97f8d8b9cf580f6f34a9be31

doc.2024.06.06a: Documentation updates.
fixes.2024.07.04a: Miscellaneous fixes.
mb.2024.06.28a: Grace-period memory-barrier redundancy removal.
nocb.2024.06.03a: No-CB CPU updates.
rcu-tasks.2024.06.06a: RCU-Tasks updates.
rcutorture.2024.06.06a: Torture-test updates.
srcu.2024.06.18a: SRCU polled-grace-period updates.





doc.2024.06.06a: Documentation updates.
fixes.2024.07.04a: Miscellaneous fixes.
mb.2024.06.28a: Grace-period memory-barrier redundancy removal.
nocb.2024.06.03a: No-CB CPU updates.
rcu-tasks.2024.06.06a: RCU-Tasks updates.
rcutorture.2024.06.06a: Torture-test updates.
srcu.2024.06.18a: SRCU polled-grace-period updates.