linux.git/kernel/time, branch v3.10.65

alarmtimer: Lock k_itimer during timer callback

2014-10-05T21:54:14+00:00

commit 474e941bed9262f5fa2394f9a4a67e24499e5926 upstream.

Locks the k_itimer's it_lock member when handling the alarm timer's
expiry callback.

The regular posix timers defined in posix-timers.c have this lock held
during timout processing because their callbacks are routed through
posix_timer_fn().  The alarm timers follow a different path, so they
ought to grab the lock somewhere else.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Richard Cochran 
Cc: Prarit Bhargava 
Cc: Sharvil Nanavati 
Signed-off-by: Richard Larocque 
Signed-off-by: John Stultz 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

alarmtimer: Do not signal SIGEV_NONE timers

2014-10-05T21:54:14+00:00

commit 265b81d23a46c39df0a735a3af4238954b41a4c2 upstream.

Avoids sending a signal to alarm timers created with sigev_notify set to
SIGEV_NONE by checking for that special case in the timeout callback.

The regular posix timers avoid sending signals to SIGEV_NONE timers by
not scheduling any callbacks for them in the first place.  Although it
would be possible to do something similar for alarm timers, it's simpler
to handle this as a special case in the timeout.

Prior to this patch, the alarm timer would ignore the sigev_notify value
and try to deliver signals to the process anyway.  Even worse, the
sanity check for the value of sigev_signo is skipped when SIGEV_NONE was
specified, so the signal number could be bogus.  If sigev_signo was an
unitialized value (as it often would be if SIGEV_NONE is used), then
it's hard to predict which signal will be sent.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Richard Cochran 
Cc: Prarit Bhargava 
Cc: Sharvil Nanavati 
Signed-off-by: Richard Larocque 
Signed-off-by: John Stultz 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

timer: Fix lock inversion between hrtimer_bases.lock and scheduler locks

2014-08-07T21:30:26+00:00

commit 504d58745c9ca28d33572e2d8a9990b43e06075d upstream.

clockevents_increase_min_delta() calls printk() from under
hrtimer_bases.lock. That causes lock inversion on scheduler locks because
printk() can call into the scheduler. Lockdep puts it as:

======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.15.0-rc8-06195-g939f04b #2 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
trinity-main/74 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&port_lock_key){-.....}, at: [<811c60be>] serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c

but task is already holding lock:
 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<8103caeb>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x13/0x66

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #5 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}:
       [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101
       [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e
       [<8103c918>] __hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x1c/0x197
       [<8107ec20>] perf_swevent_start_hrtimer.part.41+0x7a/0x85
       [<81080792>] task_clock_event_start+0x3a/0x3f
       [<810807a4>] task_clock_event_add+0xd/0x14
       [<8108259a>] event_sched_in+0xb6/0x17a
       [<810826a2>] group_sched_in+0x44/0x122
       [<81082885>] ctx_sched_in.isra.67+0x105/0x11f
       [<810828e6>] perf_event_sched_in.isra.70+0x47/0x4b
       [<81082bf6>] __perf_install_in_context+0x8b/0xa3
       [<8107eb8e>] remote_function+0x12/0x2a
       [<8105f5af>] smp_call_function_single+0x2d/0x53
       [<8107e17d>] task_function_call+0x30/0x36
       [<8107fb82>] perf_install_in_context+0x87/0xbb
       [<810852c9>] SYSC_perf_event_open+0x5c6/0x701
       [<810856f9>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x17/0x19
       [<8142f8ee>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

-> #4 (&ctx->lock){......}:
       [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101
       [<8142f04c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x21/0x30
       [<81081df3>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x1dc/0x34f
       [<8142cacc>] __schedule+0x4c6/0x4cb
       [<8142cae0>] schedule+0xf/0x11
       [<8142f9a6>] work_resched+0x5/0x30

-> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
       [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101
       [<8142f04c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x21/0x30
       [<81040873>] __task_rq_lock+0x33/0x3a
       [<8104184c>] wake_up_new_task+0x25/0xc2
       [<8102474b>] do_fork+0x15c/0x2a0
       [<810248a9>] kernel_thread+0x1a/0x1f
       [<814232a2>] rest_init+0x1a/0x10e
       [<817af949>] start_kernel+0x303/0x308
       [<817af2ab>] i386_start_kernel+0x79/0x7d

-> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-...}:
       [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101
       [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e
       [<810413dd>] try_to_wake_up+0x1d/0xd6
       [<810414cd>] default_wake_function+0xb/0xd
       [<810461f3>] __wake_up_common+0x39/0x59
       [<81046346>] __wake_up+0x29/0x3b
       [<811b8733>] tty_wakeup+0x49/0x51
       [<811c3568>] uart_write_wakeup+0x17/0x19
       [<811c5dc1>] serial8250_tx_chars+0xbc/0xfb
       [<811c5f28>] serial8250_handle_irq+0x54/0x6a
       [<811c5f57>] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x19/0x1c
       [<811c56d8>] serial8250_interrupt+0x38/0x9e
       [<810510e7>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x5f/0x1e2
       [<81051296>] handle_irq_event+0x2c/0x43
       [<81052cee>] handle_level_irq+0x57/0x80
       [<81002a72>] handle_irq+0x46/0x5c
       [<810027df>] do_IRQ+0x32/0x89
       [<8143036e>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x33
       [<8142f23c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x49
       [<811c25a4>] uart_start+0x2d/0x32
       [<811c2c04>] uart_write+0xc7/0xd6
       [<811bc6f6>] n_tty_write+0xb8/0x35e
       [<811b9beb>] tty_write+0x163/0x1e4
       [<811b9cd9>] redirected_tty_write+0x6d/0x75
       [<810b6ed6>] vfs_write+0x75/0xb0
       [<810b7265>] SyS_write+0x44/0x77
       [<8142f8ee>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

-> #1 (&tty->write_wait){-.....}:
       [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101
       [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e
       [<81046332>] __wake_up+0x15/0x3b
       [<811b8733>] tty_wakeup+0x49/0x51
       [<811c3568>] uart_write_wakeup+0x17/0x19
       [<811c5dc1>] serial8250_tx_chars+0xbc/0xfb
       [<811c5f28>] serial8250_handle_irq+0x54/0x6a
       [<811c5f57>] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x19/0x1c
       [<811c56d8>] serial8250_interrupt+0x38/0x9e
       [<810510e7>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x5f/0x1e2
       [<81051296>] handle_irq_event+0x2c/0x43
       [<81052cee>] handle_level_irq+0x57/0x80
       [<81002a72>] handle_irq+0x46/0x5c
       [<810027df>] do_IRQ+0x32/0x89
       [<8143036e>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x33
       [<8142f23c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x49
       [<811c25a4>] uart_start+0x2d/0x32
       [<811c2c04>] uart_write+0xc7/0xd6
       [<811bc6f6>] n_tty_write+0xb8/0x35e
       [<811b9beb>] tty_write+0x163/0x1e4
       [<811b9cd9>] redirected_tty_write+0x6d/0x75
       [<810b6ed6>] vfs_write+0x75/0xb0
       [<810b7265>] SyS_write+0x44/0x77
       [<8142f8ee>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

-> #0 (&port_lock_key){-.....}:
       [<8104a62d>] __lock_acquire+0x9ea/0xc6d
       [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101
       [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e
       [<811c60be>] serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c
       [<8104e402>] call_console_drivers.constprop.31+0x87/0x118
       [<8104f5d5>] console_unlock+0x1d7/0x398
       [<8104fb70>] vprintk_emit+0x3da/0x3e4
       [<81425f76>] printk+0x17/0x19
       [<8105bfa0>] clockevents_program_min_delta+0x104/0x116
       [<8105c548>] clockevents_program_event+0xe7/0xf3
       [<8105cc1c>] tick_program_event+0x1e/0x23
       [<8103c43c>] hrtimer_force_reprogram+0x88/0x8f
       [<8103c49e>] __remove_hrtimer+0x5b/0x79
       [<8103cb21>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x49/0x66
       [<8103cb4b>] hrtimer_cancel+0xd/0x18
       [<8107f102>] perf_swevent_cancel_hrtimer.part.60+0x2b/0x30
       [<81080705>] task_clock_event_stop+0x20/0x64
       [<81080756>] task_clock_event_del+0xd/0xf
       [<81081350>] event_sched_out+0xab/0x11e
       [<810813e0>] group_sched_out+0x1d/0x66
       [<81081682>] ctx_sched_out+0xaf/0xbf
       [<81081e04>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x1ed/0x34f
       [<8142cacc>] __schedule+0x4c6/0x4cb
       [<8142cae0>] schedule+0xf/0x11
       [<8142f9a6>] work_resched+0x5/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &port_lock_key --> &ctx->lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
                               lock(&ctx->lock);
                               lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
  lock(&port_lock_key);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

4 locks held by trinity-main/74:
 #0:  (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<8142c6f3>] __schedule+0xed/0x4cb
 #1:  (&ctx->lock){......}, at: [<81081df3>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x1dc/0x34f
 #2:  (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<8103caeb>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x13/0x66
 #3:  (console_lock){+.+...}, at: [<8104fb5d>] vprintk_emit+0x3c7/0x3e4

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 74 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted 3.15.0-rc8-06195-g939f04b #2
 00000000 81c3a310 8b995c14 81426f69 8b995c44 81425a99 8161f671 8161f570
 8161f538 8161f559 8161f538 8b995c78 8b142bb0 00000004 8b142fdc 8b142bb0
 8b995ca8 8104a62d 8b142fac 000016f2 81c3a310 00000001 00000001 00000003
Call Trace:
 [<81426f69>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
 [<81425a99>] print_circular_bug+0x18f/0x19c
 [<8104a62d>] __lock_acquire+0x9ea/0xc6d
 [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101
 [<811c60be>] ? serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c
 [<811c6032>] ? wait_for_xmitr+0x76/0x76
 [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e
 [<811c60be>] ? serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c
 [<811c60be>] serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c
 [<8104af87>] ? lock_release+0x191/0x223
 [<811c6032>] ? wait_for_xmitr+0x76/0x76
 [<8104e402>] call_console_drivers.constprop.31+0x87/0x118
 [<8104f5d5>] console_unlock+0x1d7/0x398
 [<8104fb70>] vprintk_emit+0x3da/0x3e4
 [<81425f76>] printk+0x17/0x19
 [<8105bfa0>] clockevents_program_min_delta+0x104/0x116
 [<8105cc1c>] tick_program_event+0x1e/0x23
 [<8103c43c>] hrtimer_force_reprogram+0x88/0x8f
 [<8103c49e>] __remove_hrtimer+0x5b/0x79
 [<8103cb21>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x49/0x66
 [<8103cb4b>] hrtimer_cancel+0xd/0x18
 [<8107f102>] perf_swevent_cancel_hrtimer.part.60+0x2b/0x30
 [<81080705>] task_clock_event_stop+0x20/0x64
 [<81080756>] task_clock_event_del+0xd/0xf
 [<81081350>] event_sched_out+0xab/0x11e
 [<810813e0>] group_sched_out+0x1d/0x66
 [<81081682>] ctx_sched_out+0xaf/0xbf
 [<81081e04>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x1ed/0x34f
 [<8104416d>] ? __dequeue_entity+0x23/0x27
 [<81044505>] ? pick_next_task_fair+0xb1/0x120
 [<8142cacc>] __schedule+0x4c6/0x4cb
 [<81047574>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0xd7/0x108
 [<810475b0>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd
 [<81056346>] ? rcu_irq_exit+0x64/0x77

Fix the problem by using printk_deferred() which does not call into the
scheduler.

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

alarmtimer: Fix bug where relative alarm timers were treated as absolute

2014-07-28T15:00:07+00:00

commit 16927776ae757d0d132bdbfabbfe2c498342bd59 upstream.

Sharvil noticed with the posix timer_settime interface, using the
CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM or CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM clockid, if the users
tried to specify a relative time timer, it would incorrectly be
treated as absolute regardless of the state of the flags argument.

This patch corrects this, properly checking the absolute/relative flag,
as well as adds further error checking that no invalid flag bits are set.

Reported-by: Sharvil Nanavati 
Signed-off-by: John Stultz 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Prarit Bhargava 
Cc: Sharvil Nanavati 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1404767171-6902-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nohz: Fix another inconsistency between CONFIG_NO_HZ=n and nohz=off

2014-06-26T19:12:41+00:00

commit 0e576acbc1d9600cf2d9b4a141a2554639959d50 upstream.

If CONFIG_NO_HZ=n tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() returns NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ.

If CONFIG_NO_HZ=y and the nohz functionality is disabled via the
command line option "nohz=off" or not enabled due to missing hardware
support, then tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() returns 0. That happens
because ts->sleep_length is never set in that case.

Set it to NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ when the NOHZ mode is inactive.

Reported-by: Michal Hocko 
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Rui Xiang 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tick: Make oneshot broadcast robust vs. CPU offlining

2014-03-24T04:38:21+00:00

commit c9b5a266b103af873abb9ac03bc3d067702c8f4b upstream.

In periodic mode we remove offline cpus from the broadcast propagation
mask. In oneshot mode we fail to do so. This was not a problem so far,
but the recent changes to the broadcast propagation introduced a
constellation which can result in a NULL pointer dereference.

What happens is:

CPU0			CPU1
			idle()
			  arch_idle()
			    tick_broadcast_oneshot_control(OFF);
			      set cpu1 in tick_broadcast_force_mask
			  if (cpu_offline())
			     arch_cpu_dead()

cpu_dead_cleanup(cpu1)
 cpu1 tickdevice pointer = NULL

broadcast interrupt
  dereference cpu1 tickdevice pointer -> OOPS

We dereference the pointer because cpu1 is still set in
tick_broadcast_force_mask and tick_do_broadcast() expects a valid
cpumask and therefor lacks any further checks.

Remove the cpu from the tick_broadcast_force_mask before we set the
tick device pointer to NULL. Also add a sanity check to the oneshot
broadcast function, so we can detect such issues w/o crashing the
machine.

Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava 
Cc: athorlton@sgi.com
Cc: CAI Qian 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1306261303260.4013@ionos.tec.linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

time: Fix overflow when HZ is smaller than 60

2014-02-22T20:41:29+00:00

commit 80d767d770fd9c697e434fd080c2db7b5c60c6dd upstream.

When compiling for the IA-64 ski emulator, HZ is set to 32 because the
emulation is slow and we don't want to waste too many cycles processing
timers. Alpha also has an option to set HZ to 32.

This causes integer underflow in
kernel/time/jiffies.c:
kernel/time/jiffies.c:66:2: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
  .mult  = NSEC_PER_JIFFY << JIFFIES_SHIFT, /* details above */
  ^

This patch reduces the JIFFIES_SHIFT value to avoid the overflow.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LRH.2.02.1401241639100.23871@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tick: Clear broadcast pending bit when switching to oneshot

2014-02-22T20:41:29+00:00

commit dd5fd9b91a77b4c9c28b7ef9c181b1a875820d0a upstream.

AMD systems which use the C1E workaround in the amd_e400_idle routine
trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE in the broadcast code when onlining a CPU.

The reason is that the idle routine of those AMD systems switches the
cpu into forced broadcast mode early on before the newly brought up
CPU can switch over to high resolution / NOHZ mode. The timer related
CPU1 bringup looks like this:

  clockevent_register_device(local_apic);
  tick_setup(local_apic);
  ...
  idle()
	tick_broadcast_on_off(FORCE);
	tick_broadcast_oneshot_control(ENTER)
	  cpumask_set(cpu, broadcast_oneshot_mask);
	halt();

Now the broadcast interrupt on CPU0 sets CPU1 in the
broadcast_pending_mask and wakes CPU1. So CPU1 continues:

	local_apic_timer_interrupt()
	   tick_handle_periodic();
	   softirq()
	     tick_init_highres();
	       cpumask_clr(cpu, broadcast_oneshot_mask);

	tick_broadcast_oneshot_control(ENTER)
	   WARN_ON(cpumask_test(cpu, broadcast_pending_mask);

So while we remove CPU1 from the broadcast_oneshot_mask when we switch
over to highres mode, we do not clear the pending bit, which then
triggers the warning when we go back to idle.

The reason why this is only visible on C1E affected AMD systems is
that the other machines enter the deep sleep states via
acpi_idle/intel_idle and exit the broadcast mode before executing the
remote triggered local_apic_timer_interrupt. So the pending bit is
already cleared when the switch over to highres mode is clearing the
oneshot mask.

The solution is simple: Clear the pending bit together with the mask
bit when we switch over to highres mode.

Stanislaw came up independently with the same patch by enforcing the
C1E workaround and debugging the fallout. I picked mine, because mine
has a changelog :)

Reported-by: poma 
Debugged-by: Stanislaw Gruszka 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Olaf Hering 
Cc: Dave Jones 
Cc: Justin M. Forbes 
Cc: Josh Boyer 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1402111434180.21991@ionos.tec.linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

timekeeping: Avoid possible deadlock from clock_was_set_delayed

2014-02-13T21:48:04+00:00

commit 6fdda9a9c5db367130cf32df5d6618d08b89f46a upstream.

As part of normal operaions, the hrtimer subsystem frequently calls
into the timekeeping code, creating a locking order of
  hrtimer locks -> timekeeping locks

clock_was_set_delayed() was suppoed to allow us to avoid deadlocks
between the timekeeping the hrtimer subsystem, so that we could
notify the hrtimer subsytem the time had changed while holding
the timekeeping locks. This was done by scheduling delayed work
that would run later once we were out of the timekeeing code.

But unfortunately the lock chains are complex enoguh that in
scheduling delayed work, we end up eventually trying to grab
an hrtimer lock.

Sasha Levin noticed this in testing when the new seqlock lockdep
enablement triggered the following (somewhat abrieviated) message:

[  251.100221] ======================================================
[  251.100221] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[  251.100221] 3.13.0-rc2-next-20131206-sasha-00005-g8be2375-dirty #4053 Not tainted
[  251.101967] -------------------------------------------------------
[  251.101967] kworker/10:1/4506 is trying to acquire lock:
[  251.101967]  (timekeeper_seq){----..}, at: [] retrigger_next_event+0x56/0x70
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] but task is already holding lock:
[  251.101967]  (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}, at: [] retrigger_next_event+0x3c/0x70
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  251.101967]
-> #5 (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}:
[snipped]
-> #4 (&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock){-.-...}:
[snipped]
-> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[snipped]
-> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[snipped]
-> #1 (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){-.-...}:
[  251.101967]        [] validate_chain+0x6c3/0x7b0
[  251.101967]        [] __lock_acquire+0x4ad/0x580
[  251.101967]        [] lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0
[  251.101967]        [] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
[  251.101967]        [] __queue_work+0x1a9/0x3f0
[  251.101967]        [] queue_work_on+0x98/0x120
[  251.101967]        [] clock_was_set_delayed+0x21/0x30
[  251.101967]        [] do_adjtimex+0x111/0x160
[  251.101967]        [] compat_sys_adjtimex+0x41/0x70
[  251.101967]        [] ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5
[  251.101967]
-> #0 (timekeeper_seq){----..}:
[snipped]
[  251.101967] other info that might help us debug this:
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] Chain exists of:
  timekeeper_seq --> &rt_b->rt_runtime_lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock#11

[  251.101967]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  251.101967]        ----                    ----
[  251.101967]   lock(hrtimer_bases.lock#11);
[  251.101967]                                lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
[  251.101967]                                lock(hrtimer_bases.lock#11);
[  251.101967]   lock(timekeeper_seq);
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] 3 locks held by kworker/10:1/4506:
[  251.101967]  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [] process_one_work+0x200/0x530
[  251.101967]  #1:  (hrtimer_work){+.+...}, at: [] process_one_work+0x200/0x530
[  251.101967]  #2:  (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}, at: [] retrigger_next_event+0x3c/0x70
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] stack backtrace:
[  251.101967] CPU: 10 PID: 4506 Comm: kworker/10:1 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc2-next-20131206-sasha-00005-g8be2375-dirty #4053
[  251.101967] Workqueue: events clock_was_set_work

So the best solution is to avoid calling clock_was_set_delayed() while
holding the timekeeping lock, and instead using a flag variable to
decide if we should call clock_was_set() once we've released the locks.

This works for the case here, where the do_adjtimex() was the deadlock
trigger point. Unfortuantely, in update_wall_time() we still hold
the jiffies lock, which would deadlock with the ipi triggered by
clock_was_set(), preventing us from calling it even after we drop the
timekeeping lock. So instead call clock_was_set_delayed() at that point.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Prarit Bhargava 
Cc: Richard Cochran 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Sasha Levin 
Reported-by: Sasha Levin 
Tested-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: John Stultz 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

timekeeping: Fix missing timekeeping_update in suspend path

2014-02-13T21:48:03+00:00

commit 330a1617b0a6268d427aa5922c94d082b1d3e96d upstream.

Since 48cdc135d4840 (Implement a shadow timekeeper), we have to
call timekeeping_update() after any adjustment to the timekeeping
structure in order to make sure that any adjustments to the structure
persist.

In the timekeeping suspend path, we udpate the timekeeper
structure, so we should be sure to update the shadow-timekeeper
before releasing the timekeeping locks. Currently this isn't done.

In most cases, the next time related code to run would be
timekeeping_resume, which does update the shadow-timekeeper, but
in an abundence of caution, this patch adds the call to
timekeeping_update() in the suspend path.

Cc: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Prarit Bhargava 
Cc: Richard Cochran 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: John Stultz 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman