commit ff6e2163f28a1094fb5ca5950fe2b43c3cf6bc7a accidentally added a
regression on the bnep code. Fixing it.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch removes from net/ (but not any netfilter files)
all the unnecessary return; statements that precede the
last closing brace of void functions.

It does not remove the returns that are immediately
preceded by a label as gcc doesn't like that.

Done via:
$ grep -rP --include=*.[ch] -l "return;\n}" net/ | \
  xargs perl -i -e 'local $/ ; while (<>) { s/\n[ \t\n]+return;\n}/\n}/g; print; }'

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

There were some left-overs that used sk->sk_sleep instead of the new
sk_sleep() helper.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Use strict_strtoul as suggested by checkpatch.pl for more strict input
checking.

Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Instead of having a global workqueue for all controllers, it makes
more sense to have a workqueue per controller.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

On the receipt of an RR(P=1) under RemoteBusy set to TRUE(on the RECV
state table) we have to call sendIorRRorRNR(F=1) and just after set
RemoteBusy to False. This leads to a freeze in the sending process since
it's not allowed send data with RemoteBusy set to true and no one
call SendPending-I-Frames after set RemoteBusy to false(The last action
for that event).

Actually sendIorRRorRNR() calls SendPending-I-Frames but at that moment
RemoteBusy is still True and we cannot send any frame, after, no one
calls SendPending-I-Frames again and the sending process stops.

The solution here is to set RemoteBusy to false inside
SendPending-I-Frames just before call SendPending-I-Frames. That will
make SendPending-I-Frames able to send frames. This solution is similar
to what RR(P=0)(F=0) on the RECV table and RR(P=1) on the SREJ_SENT
table do.

Actually doesn't make any sense call SendPending-I-Frames if we can send
any frame, i. e., RemoteBusy is True.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

The checks should be done before the the memcpy to avoid buffer
overflow.

Reported-by: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

l2cap_ertm_send() can be called both from user context and bottom half
context. The socket locks for that contexts are different, the user
context uses a mutex(which can sleep) and the second one uses a
spinlock_bh. That creates a race condition when we have interruptions on
both contexts at the same time.

The better way to solve this is to add a new spinlock to lock
l2cap_ertm_send() and the vars it access. The other solution was to defer
l2cap_ertm_send() with a workqueue, but we the sending process already
has one defer on the hci layer. It's not a good idea add another one.

The patch refactor the code to create l2cap_retransmit_frames(), then we
encapulate the lock of l2cap_ertm_send() for some call. It also changes
l2cap_retransmit_frame() to l2cap_retransmit_one_frame() to avoid
confusion

Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Reviewed-by: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

To guarantee that all packets we sent were received we need to wait for
theirs ack before shutdown the socket.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Reviewed-by: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Supports Local Busy condition handling through a waitqueue that wake ups
each 200ms and try to push the packets to the upper layer. If it can
push all the queue then it leaves the Local Busy state.

The patch modifies the behaviour of l2cap_ertm_reassembly_sdu() to
support retry of the push operation.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Reviewed-by: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>