It fix the bug 67951 on bugzilla https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67951 The patch can't be applied directly, as it' used the function introduced by "commit 94e187c0" ip6_rt_put(), that patch can't be applied directly either. ==================== From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> commit 33d99113b1102c2d2f8603b9ba72d89d915c13f5 upstream. This commit don't have a stable tag, but it fix the bug no reply after loopback down-up.It's very worthy to be applied to stable 3.4 kernels. The bug is 67951 on bugzilla https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67951 CC: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> CC: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Reported-by: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> [weilong: s/ip6_rt_put/dst_release] Signed-off-by: Chen Weilong <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit ecab67015ef6e3f3635551dcc9971cf363cc1cd5 ] tmp_prefered_lft is an offset to ifp->tstamp, not now. Therefore age needs to be added to the condition. Age calculation in ipv6_create_tempaddr is different from the one in addrconf_verify and doesn't consider ADDRCONF_TIMER_FUZZ_MINUS. This can cause age in ipv6_create_tempaddr to be less than the one in addrconf_verify and therefore unnecessary temporary address to be generated. Use age calculation as in addrconf_modify to avoid this. Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <heiner.kallweit@web.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit 4b08a8f1bd8cb4541c93ec170027b4d0782dab52 ] Because of the max_addresses check attackers were able to disable privacy extensions on an interface by creating enough autoconfigured addresses: <http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q4/292> But the check is not actually needed: max_addresses protects the kernel to install too many ipv6 addresses on an interface and guards addrconf_prefix_rcv to install further addresses as soon as this limit is reached. We only generate temporary addresses in direct response of a new address showing up. As soon as we filled up the maximum number of addresses of an interface, we stop installing more addresses and thus also stop generating more temp addresses. Even if the attacker tries to generate a lot of temporary addresses by announcing a prefix and removing it again (lifetime == 0) we won't install more temp addresses, because the temporary addresses do count to the maximum number of addresses, thus we would stop installing new autoconfigured addresses when the limit is reached. This patch fixes CVE-2013-0343 (but other layer-2 attacks are still possible). Thanks to Ding Tianhong to bring this topic up again. Cc: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Cc: George Kargiotakis <kargig@void.gr> Cc: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com> Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Acked-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit 8965779d2c0e6ab246c82a405236b1fb2adae6b2, with
some bits from commit b7b1bfce0bb68bd8f6e62a28295922785cc63781
("ipv6: split duplicate address detection and router solicitation timer")
to get the __ipv6_get_lladdr() used by this patch. ]
dingtianhong reported the following deadlock detected by lockdep:
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.4.24.05-0.1-default #1 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
ksoftirqd/0/3 is trying to acquire lock:
(&ndev->lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8147f804>] ipv6_get_lladdr+0x74/0x120
but task is already holding lock:
(&mc->mca_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8149d130>] mld_send_report+0x40/0x150
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&mc->mca_lock){+.+...}:
[<ffffffff810a8027>] validate_chain+0x637/0x730
[<ffffffff810a8417>] __lock_acquire+0x2f7/0x500
[<ffffffff810a8734>] lock_acquire+0x114/0x150
[<ffffffff814f691a>] rt_spin_lock+0x4a/0x60
[<ffffffff8149e4bb>] igmp6_group_added+0x3b/0x120
[<ffffffff8149e5d8>] ipv6_mc_up+0x38/0x60
[<ffffffff81480a4d>] ipv6_find_idev+0x3d/0x80
[<ffffffff81483175>] addrconf_notify+0x3d5/0x4b0
[<ffffffff814fae3f>] notifier_call_chain+0x3f/0x80
[<ffffffff81073471>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
[<ffffffff813d8722>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x32/0x60
[<ffffffff813d92d4>] __dev_notify_flags+0x34/0x80
[<ffffffff813d9360>] dev_change_flags+0x40/0x70
[<ffffffff813ea627>] do_setlink+0x237/0x8a0
[<ffffffff813ebb6c>] rtnl_newlink+0x3ec/0x600
[<ffffffff813eb4d0>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x160/0x310
[<ffffffff814040b9>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x89/0xb0
[<ffffffff813eb357>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x27/0x40
[<ffffffff81403e20>] netlink_unicast+0x140/0x180
[<ffffffff81404a9e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x33e/0x380
[<ffffffff813c4252>] sock_sendmsg+0x112/0x130
[<ffffffff813c537e>] __sys_sendmsg+0x44e/0x460
[<ffffffff813c5544>] sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x70
[<ffffffff814feab9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
-> #0 (&ndev->lock){+.+...}:
[<ffffffff810a798e>] check_prev_add+0x3de/0x440
[<ffffffff810a8027>] validate_chain+0x637/0x730
[<ffffffff810a8417>] __lock_acquire+0x2f7/0x500
[<ffffffff810a8734>] lock_acquire+0x114/0x150
[<ffffffff814f6c82>] rt_read_lock+0x42/0x60
[<ffffffff8147f804>] ipv6_get_lladdr+0x74/0x120
[<ffffffff8149b036>] mld_newpack+0xb6/0x160
[<ffffffff8149b18b>] add_grhead+0xab/0xc0
[<ffffffff8149d03b>] add_grec+0x3ab/0x460
[<ffffffff8149d14a>] mld_send_report+0x5a/0x150
[<ffffffff8149f99e>] igmp6_timer_handler+0x4e/0xb0
[<ffffffff8105705a>] call_timer_fn+0xca/0x1d0
[<ffffffff81057b9f>] run_timer_softirq+0x1df/0x2e0
[<ffffffff8104e8c7>] handle_pending_softirqs+0xf7/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8104ea3b>] __do_softirq_common+0x7b/0xf0
[<ffffffff8104f07f>] __thread_do_softirq+0x1af/0x210
[<ffffffff8104f1c1>] run_ksoftirqd+0xe1/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8106c7de>] kthread+0xae/0xc0
[<ffffffff814fff74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
actually we can just hold idev->lock before taking pmc->mca_lock,
and avoid taking idev->lock again when iterating idev->addr_list,
since the upper callers of mld_newpack() already take
read_lock_bh(&idev->lock).
Reported-by: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Tested-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Chen Weilong <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit a881ae1f625c599b460cc8f8a7fcb1c438f699ad ] If we disable all of the net interfaces, and enable un-lo interface before lo interface, we already allocated the addrconf dst in ipv6_add_addr. So we shouldn't allocate it again when we enable lo interface. Otherwise the message below will be triggered. unregister_netdevice: waiting for sit1 to become free. Usage count = 1 This problem is introduced by commit 25fb6ca4ed9cad72f14f61629b68dc03c0d9713f "net IPv6 : Fix broken IPv6 routing table after loopback down-up" Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit 534c877928a16ae5f9776436a497109639bf67dc ] Commit 25fb6ca4ed9cad72f14f61629b68dc03c0d9713f "net IPv6 : Fix broken IPv6 routing table after loopback down-up" forgot to assign rt6_info to the inet6_ifaddr. When disable the net device, the rt6_info which allocated in init_loopback will not be destroied in __ipv6_ifa_notify. This will trigger the waring message below [23527.916091] unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap0 to become free. Usage count = 1 Reported-by: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit 25fb6ca4ed9cad72f14f61629b68dc03c0d9713f ] IPv6 Routing table becomes broken once we do ifdown, ifup of the loopback(lo) interface. After down-up, routes of other interface's IPv6 addresses through 'lo' are lost. IPv6 addresses assigned to all interfaces are routed through 'lo' for internal communication. Once 'lo' is down, those routing entries are removed from routing table. But those removed entries are not being re-created properly when 'lo' is brought up. So IPv6 addresses of other interfaces becomes unreachable from the same machine. Also this breaks communication with other machines because of NDISC packet processing failure. This patch fixes this issue by reading all interface's IPv6 addresses and adding them to IPv6 routing table while bringing up 'lo'. ==Testing== Before applying the patch: $ route -A inet6 Kernel IPv6 routing table Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref Use If 2000::20/128 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo ::1/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo 2000::20/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo fe80::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo $ sudo ifdown lo $ sudo ifup lo $ route -A inet6 Kernel IPv6 routing table Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref Use If 2000::20/128 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo ::1/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo $ After applying the patch: $ route -A inet6 Kernel IPv6 routing table Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref Use If 2000::20/128 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo ::1/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo 2000::20/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo fe80::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo $ sudo ifdown lo $ sudo ifup lo $ route -A inet6 Kernel IPv6 routing table Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref Use If 2000::20/128 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo ::1/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo 2000::20/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo fe80::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx/128 :: Un 0 1 0 lo ff00::/8 :: U 256 0 0 eth0 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 1 lo $ Signed-off-by: Balakumaran Kannan <Balakumaran.Kannan@ap.sony.com> Signed-off-by: Maruthi Thotad <Maruthi.Thotad@ap.sony.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit a79ca223e029aa4f09abb337accf1812c900a800 ] Signed-off-by: Hong Zhiguo <honkiko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit 85da53bf1c336bb07ac038fb951403ab0478d2c5 ] The tests on the flags in addrconf_get_prefix_route() does no make much sense: the 'noflags' parameter contains the set of flags that must not match with the route flags, so the test must be done against 'noflags', and not against 'flags'. Signed-off-by: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@ipflavors.com> Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit 4acd4945cd1e1f92b20d14e349c6c6a52acbd42d ]
Cong Wang reports that lockdep detected suspicious RCU usage while
enabling IPV6 forwarding:
[ 1123.310275] ===============================
[ 1123.442202] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[ 1123.558207] 3.6.0-rc1+ #109 Not tainted
[ 1123.665204] -------------------------------
[ 1123.768254] include/linux/rcupdate.h:430 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
[ 1123.992320]
[ 1123.992320] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1123.992320]
[ 1124.307382]
[ 1124.307382] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
[ 1124.522220] 2 locks held by sysctl/5710:
[ 1124.648364] #0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81768498>] rtnl_trylock+0x15/0x17
[ 1124.882211] #1: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81871df8>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x0/0x29
[ 1125.085209]
[ 1125.085209] stack backtrace:
[ 1125.332213] Pid: 5710, comm: sysctl Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1+ #109
[ 1125.441291] Call Trace:
[ 1125.545281] [<ffffffff8109d915>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x109/0x112
[ 1125.667212] [<ffffffff8107c240>] rcu_preempt_sleep_check+0x45/0x47
[ 1125.781838] [<ffffffff8107c260>] __might_sleep+0x1e/0x19b
[...]
[ 1127.445223] [<ffffffff81757ac5>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x4a/0x4f
[...]
[ 1127.772188] [<ffffffff8175e125>] dev_disable_lro+0x32/0x6b
[ 1127.885174] [<ffffffff81872d26>] dev_forward_change+0x30/0xcb
[ 1128.013214] [<ffffffff818738c4>] addrconf_forward_change+0x85/0xc5
[...]
addrconf_forward_change() uses RCU iteration over the netdev list,
which is unnecessary since it already holds the RTNL lock. We also
cannot reasonably require netdevice notifier functions not to sleep.
Reported-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>