linux.git/net/rose, branch master

net: change proto and proto_ops accept type

2024-05-14T00:19:09+00:00

Rather than pass in flags, error pointer, and whether this is a kernel
invocation or not, add a struct proto_accept_arg struct as the argument.
This then holds all of these arguments, and prepares accept for being
able to pass back more information.

No functional changes in this patch.

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

net: Remove ctl_table sentinel elements from several networking subsystems

2024-05-03T12:29:42+00:00

This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which
will reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time
memory bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link :
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZO5Yx5JFogGi%2FcBo@bombadil.infradead.org/)

To avoid lots of small commits, this commit brings together network
changes from (as they appear in MAINTAINERS) LLC, MPTCP, NETROM NETWORK
LAYER, PHONET PROTOCOL, ROSE NETWORK LAYER, RXRPC SOCKETS, SCTP
PROTOCOL, SHARED MEMORY COMMUNICATIONS (SMC), TIPC NETWORK LAYER and
NETWORKING [IPSEC]

* Remove sentinel element from ctl_table structs.
* Replace empty array registration with the register_net_sysctl_sz call
  in llc_sysctl_init
* Replace the for loop stop condition that tests for procname == NULL
  with one that depends on array size in sctp_sysctl_net_register
* Remove instances where an array element is zeroed out to make it look
  like a sentinel in xfrm_sysctl_init. This is not longer needed and is
  safe after commit c899710fe7f9 ("networking: Update to
  register_net_sysctl_sz") added the array size to the ctl_table
  registration
* Use a table_size variable to keep the value of ARRAY_SIZE

Signed-off-by: Joel Granados 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net/rose: fix races in rose_kill_by_device()

2023-12-15T11:59:53+00:00

syzbot found an interesting netdev refcounting issue in
net/rose/af_rose.c, thanks to CONFIG_NET_DEV_REFCNT_TRACKER=y [1]

Problem is that rose_kill_by_device() can change rose->device
while other threads do not expect the pointer to be changed.

We have to first collect sockets in a temporary array,
then perform the changes while holding the socket
lock and rose_list_lock spinlock (in this order)

Change rose_release() to also acquire rose_list_lock
before releasing the netdev refcount.

[1]

[ 1185.055088][ T7889] ref_tracker: reference already released.
[ 1185.061476][ T7889] ref_tracker: allocated in:
[ 1185.066081][ T7889]  rose_bind+0x4ab/0xd10
[ 1185.070446][ T7889]  __sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220
[ 1185.074818][ T7889]  __x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0
[ 1185.079356][ T7889]  do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110
[ 1185.083897][ T7889]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
[ 1185.089835][ T7889] ref_tracker: freed in:
[ 1185.094088][ T7889]  rose_release+0x2f5/0x570
[ 1185.098629][ T7889]  __sock_release+0xae/0x260
[ 1185.103262][ T7889]  sock_close+0x1c/0x20
[ 1185.107453][ T7889]  __fput+0x270/0xbb0
[ 1185.111467][ T7889]  task_work_run+0x14d/0x240
[ 1185.116085][ T7889]  get_signal+0x106f/0x2790
[ 1185.120622][ T7889]  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x90/0x7f0
[ 1185.126205][ T7889]  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x121/0x240
[ 1185.131846][ T7889]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e/0x60
[ 1185.137293][ T7889]  do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x110
[ 1185.141783][ T7889]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
[ 1185.148085][ T7889] ------------[ cut here ]------------

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7889 at lib/ref_tracker.c:255 ref_tracker_free+0x61a/0x810 lib/ref_tracker.c:255
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 7889 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00162-g65c95f78917e #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023
RIP: 0010:ref_tracker_free+0x61a/0x810 lib/ref_tracker.c:255
Code: 00 44 8b 6b 18 31 ff 44 89 ee e8 21 62 f5 fc 45 85 ed 0f 85 a6 00 00 00 e8 a3 66 f5 fc 48 8b 34 24 48 89 ef e8 27 5f f1 05 90 <0f> 0b 90 bb ea ff ff ff e9 52 fd ff ff e8 84 66 f5 fc 4c 8d 6d 44
RSP: 0018:ffffc90004917850 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000201 RBX: ffff88802618f4c0 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000202 RSI: ffffffff8accb920 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffff8880269ea5b8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffffbfff23e35f6
R10: ffffffff91f1afb7 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 1ffff92000922f0c
R13: 0000000005a2039b R14: ffff88802618f4d8 R15: 00000000ffffffff
FS: 00007f0a720ef6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f43a819d988 CR3: 0000000076c64000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:

netdev_tracker_free include/linux/netdevice.h:4127 [inline]
netdev_put include/linux/netdevice.h:4144 [inline]
netdev_put include/linux/netdevice.h:4140 [inline]
rose_kill_by_device net/rose/af_rose.c:195 [inline]
rose_device_event+0x25d/0x330 net/rose/af_rose.c:218
notifier_call_chain+0xb6/0x3b0 kernel/notifier.c:93
call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xbe/0x130 net/core/dev.c:1967
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2005 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2019 [inline]
__dev_notify_flags+0x1f5/0x2e0 net/core/dev.c:8646
dev_change_flags+0x122/0x170 net/core/dev.c:8682
dev_ifsioc+0x9ad/0x1090 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:529
dev_ioctl+0x224/0x1090 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:786
sock_do_ioctl+0x198/0x270 net/socket.c:1234
sock_ioctl+0x22e/0x6b0 net/socket.c:1339
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x18f/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:857
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
RIP: 0033:0x7f0a7147cba9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f0a720ef0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f0a7159bf80 RCX: 00007f0a7147cba9
RDX: 0000000020000040 RSI: 0000000000008914 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007f0a714c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f0a7159bf80 R15: 00007ffc8bb3a5f8


Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reported-by: syzbot 
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Cc: Bernard Pidoux 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net/rose: Fix Use-After-Free in rose_ioctl

2023-12-12T12:24:58+00:00

Because rose_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue
without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can
cause a race with rose_accept().
A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow.
```
rose_ioctl() -> skb_peek()
rose_accept() -> skb_dequeue() -> kfree_skb()
```
Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to rose_ioctl() to fix this issue.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209100538.GA407321@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni

net: implement lockless SO_PRIORITY

2023-10-01T18:09:54+00:00

This is a followup of 8bf43be799d4 ("net: annotate data-races
around sk->sk_priority").

sk->sk_priority can be read and written without holding the socket lock.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)

2023-06-24T22:50:13+00:00

Remove ->sendpage() and ->sendpage_locked().  sendmsg() with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES should be used instead.  This allows multiple pages and
multipage folios to be passed through.

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde  # for net/can
cc: Jens Axboe 
cc: Matthew Wilcox 
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
cc: rds-devel@oss.oracle.com
cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230623225513.2732256-16-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

net/rose: Fix to not accept on connected socket

2023-01-28T08:19:57+00:00

If you call listen() and accept() on an already connect()ed
rose socket, accept() can successfully connect.
This is because when the peer socket sends data to sendmsg,
the skb with its own sk stored in the connected socket's
sk->sk_receive_queue is connected, and rose_accept() dequeues
the skb waiting in the sk->sk_receive_queue.

This creates a child socket with the sk of the parent
rose socket, which can cause confusion.

Fix rose_listen() to return -EINVAL if the socket has
already been successfully connected, and add lock_sock
to prevent this issue.

Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim 
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230125105944.GA133314@ubuntu
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rose: Fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()

2022-11-02T11:57:30+00:00

The syzkaller reported an issue:

KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000380-0x0000000000000387]
CPU: 0 PID: 4069 Comm: kworker/0:15 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-02734-g0326074ff465 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022
Workqueue: rcu_gp srcu_invoke_callbacks
RIP: 0010:rose_send_frame+0x1dd/0x2f0 net/rose/rose_link.c:101
Call Trace:
 
 rose_transmit_clear_request+0x1d5/0x290 net/rose/rose_link.c:255
 rose_rx_call_request+0x4c0/0x1bc0 net/rose/af_rose.c:1009
 rose_loopback_timer+0x19e/0x590 net/rose/rose_loopback.c:111
 call_timer_fn+0x1a0/0x6b0 kernel/time/timer.c:1474
 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1519 [inline]
 __run_timers.part.0+0x674/0xa80 kernel/time/timer.c:1790
 __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1768 [inline]
 run_timer_softirq+0xb3/0x1d0 kernel/time/timer.c:1803
 __do_softirq+0x1d0/0x9c8 kernel/softirq.c:571
 [...]
 

It triggers NULL pointer dereference when 'neigh->dev->dev_addr' is
called in the rose_send_frame(). It's the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh', and
the 'dev' in 'rose_loopback_neigh' is initialized sa nullptr.

It had been fixed by commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf
("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()") ever.
But it's introduced by commit 3c53cd65dece47dd1f9d3a809f32e59d1d87b2b8
("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback") again.

We fix it by add NULL check in rose_transmit_clear_request(). When
the 'dev' in 'neigh' is NULL, we don't reply the request and just
clear it.

syzkaller don't provide repro, and I provide a syz repro like:
r0 = syz_init_net_socket$bt_sco(0x1f, 0x5, 0x2)
ioctl$sock_inet_SIOCSIFFLAGS(r0, 0x8914, &(0x7f0000000180)={'rose0\x00', 0x201})
r1 = syz_init_net_socket$rose(0xb, 0x5, 0x0)
bind$rose(r1, &(0x7f00000000c0)=@full={0xb, @dev, @null, 0x0, [@null, @null, @netrom, @netrom, @default, @null]}, 0x40)
connect$rose(r1, &(0x7f0000000240)=@short={0xb, @dev={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x1, 0x0}, @remote={0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0x1}, 0x1, @netrom={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x0, 0x0}}, 0x1c)

Fixes: 3c53cd65dece ("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback

2022-08-22T13:24:54+00:00

Commit 3b3fd068c56e3fbea30090859216a368398e39bf added NULL check for
`rose_loopback_neigh->dev` in rose_loopback_timer() but omitted to
check rose_loopback_neigh->loopback.

It thus prevents *all* rose connect.

The reason is that a special rose_neigh loopback has a NULL device.

/proc/net/rose_neigh illustrates it via rose_neigh_show() function :
[...]
seq_printf(seq, "%05d %-9s %-4s   %3d %3d  %3s     %3s %3lu %3lu",
	   rose_neigh->number,
	   (rose_neigh->loopback) ? "RSLOOP-0" : ax2asc(buf, &rose_neigh->callsign),
	   rose_neigh->dev ? rose_neigh->dev->name : "???",
	   rose_neigh->count,

/proc/net/rose_neigh displays special rose_loopback_neigh->loopback as
callsign RSLOOP-0:

addr  callsign  dev  count use mode restart  t0  tf digipeaters
00001 RSLOOP-0  ???      1   2  DCE     yes   0   0

By checking rose_loopback_neigh->loopback, rose_rx_call_request() is called
even in case rose_loopback_neigh->dev is NULL. This repairs rose connections.

Verification with rose client application FPAC:

FPAC-Node v 4.1.3 (built Aug  5 2022) for LINUX (help = h)
F6BVP-4 (Commands = ?) : u
Users - AX.25 Level 2 sessions :
Port   Callsign     Callsign  AX.25 state  ROSE state  NetRom status
axudp  F6BVP-5   -> F6BVP-9   Connected    Connected   ---------

Fixes: 3b3fd068c56e ("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()")
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux 
Suggested-by: Francois Romieu 
Cc: Thomas DL9SAU Osterried 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: rose: add netdev ref tracker to 'struct rose_sock'

2022-08-01T18:59:23+00:00

This will help debugging netdevice refcount problems with
CONFIG_NET_DEV_REFCNT_TRACKER=y

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Cc: Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux 
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski