<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/scripts/kconfig/tests/inter_choice, branch v6.6.131</title>
<subtitle>Clone of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>kconfig: change "modules" from sub-option to first-level attribute</title>
<updated>2021-04-14T06:22:49+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2021-03-13T19:48:36+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=6dd85ff178cd76851e2184b13e545f5a88d1be30'/>
<id>6dd85ff178cd76851e2184b13e545f5a88d1be30</id>
<content type='text'>
Now "modules" is the only member of the "option" property.

Remove "option", and move "modules" to the top level property.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Now "modules" is the only member of the "option" property.

Remove "option", and move "modules" to the top level property.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kconfig: convert to SPDX License Identifier</title>
<updated>2018-12-28T13:22:28+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>yamada.masahiro@socionext.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-12-18T12:13:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=0c874100108f03401cb3154801d2671bbad40ad4'/>
<id>0c874100108f03401cb3154801d2671bbad40ad4</id>
<content type='text'>
All files in lxdialog/ are licensed under GPL-2.0+, and the rest are
under GPL-2.0. I added GPL-2.0 tags to test scripts in tests/.

Documentation/process/license-rules.rst does not suggest anything
about the flex/bison files. Because flex does not accept the C++
comment style at the very top of a file, I used the C style for
zconf.l, and so for zconf.y for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;yamada.masahiro@socionext.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
All files in lxdialog/ are licensed under GPL-2.0+, and the rest are
under GPL-2.0. I added GPL-2.0 tags to test scripts in tests/.

Documentation/process/license-rules.rst does not suggest anything
about the flex/bison files. Because flex does not accept the C++
comment style at the very top of a file, I used the C style for
zconf.l, and so for zconf.y for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;yamada.masahiro@socionext.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kconfig: tests: test defconfig when two choices interact</title>
<updated>2018-03-25T17:04:04+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>yamada.masahiro@socionext.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-03-13T09:12:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=beaaddb625400e4a561d2d8443f9df2aa3f9a899'/>
<id>beaaddb625400e4a561d2d8443f9df2aa3f9a899</id>
<content type='text'>
Commit fbe98bb9ed3d ("kconfig: Fix defconfig when one choice menu
selects options that another choice menu depends on") fixed defconfig
when two choices interact (i.e. calculating the visibility of a choice
requires to calculate another choice).

The test code in that commit log was based on the real world example,
and complicated.  So, I shrunk it down to the following:

defconfig.choice:
---8&lt;---
CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=y
---8&lt;---

---8&lt;---
config MODULES
        def_bool y
        option modules

choice
        prompt "Choice"

config CHOICE_VAL0
        tristate "Choice 0"

config CHOICE_VAL1
        tristate "Choice 1"

endchoice

choice
        prompt "Another choice"
        depends on CHOICE_VAL0

config DUMMY
        bool "dummy"

endchoice
---8&lt;---

Prior to commit fbe98bb9ed3d,

  $ scripts/kconfig/conf --defconfig=defconfig.choice Kconfig.choice

resulted in:

  CONFIG_MODULES=y
  CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=m
  # CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL1 is not set
  CONFIG_DUMMY=y

where the expected result would be:

  CONFIG_MODULES=y
  CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=y
  # CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL1 is not set
  CONFIG_DUMMY=y

Roughly, this weird behavior happened like this:

Symbols are calculated a couple of times.  First, all symbols are
calculated in conf_read().  The first 'choice' is evaluated to 'y'
due to the SYMBOL_DEF_USER flag, but sym_calc_choice() clears it
unless all of its choice values are explicitly set by the user.

conf_set_all_new_symbols() clears all SYMBOL_VALID flags.  Then, only
choices are calculated.  Here, the SYMBOL_DEF_USER for the first choice
has been forgotten, so it is evaluated to 'm'.  set_all_choice_values()
sets SYMBOL_DEF_USER again to choice symbols.

When calculating the second choice, due to 'depends on CHOICE_VAL0',
it triggers the calculation of CHOICE_VAL0.  As a result, SYMBOL_VALID
is set for CHOICE_VAL0.

Symbols except choices get the final chance of re-calculation in
conf_write().  In a normal case, CHOICE_VAL0 would be re-calculated,
then the first choice would be indirectly re-calculated with the
SYMBOL_DEF_USER which has been recalled by set_all_choice_values(),
which would be evaluated to 'y'.  But, in this case, CHOICE_VAL0 has
already been marked as SYMBOL_VALID, so this re-calculation does not
happen.  Then, =m from the conf_set_all_new_symbols() phase is written
out to the .config file.

Add a unit test for this naive case.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;yamada.masahiro@socionext.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson &lt;ulfalizer@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Commit fbe98bb9ed3d ("kconfig: Fix defconfig when one choice menu
selects options that another choice menu depends on") fixed defconfig
when two choices interact (i.e. calculating the visibility of a choice
requires to calculate another choice).

The test code in that commit log was based on the real world example,
and complicated.  So, I shrunk it down to the following:

defconfig.choice:
---8&lt;---
CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=y
---8&lt;---

---8&lt;---
config MODULES
        def_bool y
        option modules

choice
        prompt "Choice"

config CHOICE_VAL0
        tristate "Choice 0"

config CHOICE_VAL1
        tristate "Choice 1"

endchoice

choice
        prompt "Another choice"
        depends on CHOICE_VAL0

config DUMMY
        bool "dummy"

endchoice
---8&lt;---

Prior to commit fbe98bb9ed3d,

  $ scripts/kconfig/conf --defconfig=defconfig.choice Kconfig.choice

resulted in:

  CONFIG_MODULES=y
  CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=m
  # CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL1 is not set
  CONFIG_DUMMY=y

where the expected result would be:

  CONFIG_MODULES=y
  CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=y
  # CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL1 is not set
  CONFIG_DUMMY=y

Roughly, this weird behavior happened like this:

Symbols are calculated a couple of times.  First, all symbols are
calculated in conf_read().  The first 'choice' is evaluated to 'y'
due to the SYMBOL_DEF_USER flag, but sym_calc_choice() clears it
unless all of its choice values are explicitly set by the user.

conf_set_all_new_symbols() clears all SYMBOL_VALID flags.  Then, only
choices are calculated.  Here, the SYMBOL_DEF_USER for the first choice
has been forgotten, so it is evaluated to 'm'.  set_all_choice_values()
sets SYMBOL_DEF_USER again to choice symbols.

When calculating the second choice, due to 'depends on CHOICE_VAL0',
it triggers the calculation of CHOICE_VAL0.  As a result, SYMBOL_VALID
is set for CHOICE_VAL0.

Symbols except choices get the final chance of re-calculation in
conf_write().  In a normal case, CHOICE_VAL0 would be re-calculated,
then the first choice would be indirectly re-calculated with the
SYMBOL_DEF_USER which has been recalled by set_all_choice_values(),
which would be evaluated to 'y'.  But, in this case, CHOICE_VAL0 has
already been marked as SYMBOL_VALID, so this re-calculation does not
happen.  Then, =m from the conf_set_all_new_symbols() phase is written
out to the .config file.

Add a unit test for this naive case.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;yamada.masahiro@socionext.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson &lt;ulfalizer@gmail.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
