linux.git/tools/objtool, branch v5.18 Clone of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git Merge tag 'x86_urgent_for_v5.18_rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2022-05-01T17:03:36+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2022-05-01T17:03:36+00:00 b2da7df52e16110c8d8dda0602db81c15711e7ff Pull x86 fixes from Borislav Petkov: - A fix to disable PCI/MSI[-X] masking for XEN_HVM guests as that is solely controlled by the hypervisor - A build fix to make the function prototype (__warn()) as visible as the definition itself - A bunch of objtool annotation fixes which have accumulated over time - An ORC unwinder fix to handle bad input gracefully - Well, we thought the microcode gets loaded in time in order to restore the microcode-emulated MSRs but we thought wrong. So there's a fix for that to have the ordering done properly - Add new Intel model numbers - A spelling fix * tag 'x86_urgent_for_v5.18_rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/pci/xen: Disable PCI/MSI[-X] masking for XEN_HVM guests bug: Have __warn() prototype defined unconditionally x86/Kconfig: fix the spelling of 'becoming' in X86_KERNEL_IBT config objtool: Use offstr() to print address of missing ENDBR objtool: Print data address for "!ENDBR" data warnings x86/xen: Add ANNOTATE_NOENDBR to startup_xen() x86/uaccess: Add ENDBR to __put_user_nocheck*() x86/retpoline: Add ANNOTATE_NOENDBR for retpolines x86/static_call: Add ANNOTATE_NOENDBR to static call trampoline objtool: Enable unreachable warnings for CLANG LTO x86,objtool: Explicitly mark idtentry_body()s tail REACHABLE x86,objtool: Mark cpu_startup_entry() __noreturn x86,xen,objtool: Add UNWIND hint lib/strn*,objtool: Enforce user_access_begin() rules MAINTAINERS: Add x86 unwinding entry x86/unwind/orc: Recheck address range after stack info was updated x86/cpu: Load microcode during restore_processor_state() x86/cpu: Add new Alderlake and Raptorlake CPU model numbers 
Pull x86 fixes from Borislav Petkov:

 - A fix to disable PCI/MSI[-X] masking for XEN_HVM guests as that is
   solely controlled by the hypervisor

 - A build fix to make the function prototype (__warn()) as visible as
   the definition itself

 - A bunch of objtool annotation fixes which have accumulated over time

 - An ORC unwinder fix to handle bad input gracefully

 - Well, we thought the microcode gets loaded in time in order to
   restore the microcode-emulated MSRs but we thought wrong. So there's
   a fix for that to have the ordering done properly

 - Add new Intel model numbers

 - A spelling fix

* tag 'x86_urgent_for_v5.18_rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/pci/xen: Disable PCI/MSI[-X] masking for XEN_HVM guests
  bug: Have __warn() prototype defined unconditionally
  x86/Kconfig: fix the spelling of 'becoming' in X86_KERNEL_IBT config
  objtool: Use offstr() to print address of missing ENDBR
  objtool: Print data address for "!ENDBR" data warnings
  x86/xen: Add ANNOTATE_NOENDBR to startup_xen()
  x86/uaccess: Add ENDBR to __put_user_nocheck*()
  x86/retpoline: Add ANNOTATE_NOENDBR for retpolines
  x86/static_call: Add ANNOTATE_NOENDBR to static call trampoline
  objtool: Enable unreachable warnings for CLANG LTO
  x86,objtool: Explicitly mark idtentry_body()s tail REACHABLE
  x86,objtool: Mark cpu_startup_entry() __noreturn
  x86,xen,objtool: Add UNWIND hint
  lib/strn*,objtool: Enforce user_access_begin() rules
  MAINTAINERS: Add x86 unwinding entry
  x86/unwind/orc: Recheck address range after stack info was updated
  x86/cpu: Load microcode during restore_processor_state()
  x86/cpu: Add new Alderlake and Raptorlake CPU model numbers
objtool: Fix code relocs vs weak symbols 2022-04-22T10:13:55+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2022-04-17T15:03:36+00:00 4abff6d48dbcea8200c7ea35ba70c242d128ebf3 Occasionally objtool driven code patching (think .static_call_sites .retpoline_sites etc..) goes sideways and it tries to patch an instruction that doesn't match. Much head-scatching and cursing later the problem is as outlined below and affects every section that objtool generates for us, very much including the ORC data. The below uses .static_call_sites because it's convenient for demonstration purposes, but as mentioned the ORC sections, .retpoline_sites and __mount_loc are all similarly affected. Consider: foo-weak.c: extern void __SCT__foo(void); __attribute__((weak)) void foo(void) { return __SCT__foo(); } foo.c: extern void __SCT__foo(void); extern void my_foo(void); void foo(void) { my_foo(); return __SCT__foo(); } These generate the obvious code (gcc -O2 -fcf-protection=none -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -c foo*.c): foo-weak.o: 0000000000000000 <foo>: 0: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 5 <foo+0x5> 1: R_X86_64_PLT32 __SCT__foo-0x4 foo.o: 0000000000000000 <foo>: 0: 48 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%rsp 4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 9 <foo+0x9> 5: R_X86_64_PLT32 my_foo-0x4 9: 48 83 c4 08 add $0x8,%rsp d: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 12 <foo+0x12> e: R_X86_64_PLT32 __SCT__foo-0x4 Now, when we link these two files together, you get something like (ld -r -o foos.o foo-weak.o foo.o): foos.o: 0000000000000000 <foo-0x10>: 0: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 5 <foo-0xb> 1: R_X86_64_PLT32 __SCT__foo-0x4 5: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1) f: 90 nop 0000000000000010 <foo>: 10: 48 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%rsp 14: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 19 <foo+0x9> 15: R_X86_64_PLT32 my_foo-0x4 19: 48 83 c4 08 add $0x8,%rsp 1d: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 22 <foo+0x12> 1e: R_X86_64_PLT32 __SCT__foo-0x4 Noting that ld preserves the weak function text, but strips the symbol off of it (hence objdump doing that funny negative offset thing). This does lead to 'interesting' unused code issues with objtool when ran on linked objects, but that seems to be working (fingers crossed). So far so good.. Now lets consider the objtool static_call output section (readelf output, old binutils): foo-weak.o: Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x2c8 contains 1 entry: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .text + 0 0000000000000004 0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1 foo.o: Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x310 contains 2 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .text + d 0000000000000004 0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1 foos.o: Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x430 contains 4 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000100000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .text + 0 0000000000000004 0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1 0000000000000008 0000000100000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .text + 1d 000000000000000c 0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1 So we have two patch sites, one in the dead code of the weak foo and one in the real foo. All is well. *HOWEVER*, when the toolchain strips unused section symbols it generates things like this (using new enough binutils): foo-weak.o: Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x2c8 contains 1 entry: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 foo + 0 0000000000000004 0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1 foo.o: Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x310 contains 2 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 foo + d 0000000000000004 0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1 foos.o: Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x430 contains 4 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000100000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 foo + 0 0000000000000004 0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1 0000000000000008 0000000100000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 foo + d 000000000000000c 0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1 And now we can see how that foos.o .static_call_sites goes side-ways, we now have _two_ patch sites in foo. One for the weak symbol at foo+0 (which is no longer a static_call site!) and one at foo+d which is in fact the right location. This seems to happen when objtool cannot find a section symbol, in which case it falls back to any other symbol to key off of, however in this case that goes terribly wrong! As such, teach objtool to create a section symbol when there isn't one. Fixes: 44f6a7c0755d ("objtool: Fix seg fault with Clang non-section symbols") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220419203807.655552918@infradead.org 
Occasionally objtool driven code patching (think .static_call_sites
.retpoline_sites etc..) goes sideways and it tries to patch an
instruction that doesn't match.

Much head-scatching and cursing later the problem is as outlined below
and affects every section that objtool generates for us, very much
including the ORC data. The below uses .static_call_sites because it's
convenient for demonstration purposes, but as mentioned the ORC
sections, .retpoline_sites and __mount_loc are all similarly affected.

Consider:

foo-weak.c:

  extern void __SCT__foo(void);

  __attribute__((weak)) void foo(void)
  {
	  return __SCT__foo();
  }

foo.c:

  extern void __SCT__foo(void);
  extern void my_foo(void);

  void foo(void)
  {
	  my_foo();
	  return __SCT__foo();
  }

These generate the obvious code
(gcc -O2 -fcf-protection=none -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -c foo*.c):

foo-weak.o:
0000000000000000 <foo>:
   0:   e9 00 00 00 00          jmpq   5 <foo+0x5>      1: R_X86_64_PLT32       __SCT__foo-0x4

foo.o:
0000000000000000 <foo>:
   0:   48 83 ec 08             sub    $0x8,%rsp
   4:   e8 00 00 00 00          callq  9 <foo+0x9>      5: R_X86_64_PLT32       my_foo-0x4
   9:   48 83 c4 08             add    $0x8,%rsp
   d:   e9 00 00 00 00          jmpq   12 <foo+0x12>    e: R_X86_64_PLT32       __SCT__foo-0x4

Now, when we link these two files together, you get something like
(ld -r -o foos.o foo-weak.o foo.o):

foos.o:
0000000000000000 <foo-0x10>:
   0:   e9 00 00 00 00          jmpq   5 <foo-0xb>      1: R_X86_64_PLT32       __SCT__foo-0x4
   5:   66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00   nopw   %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
   f:   90                      nop

0000000000000010 <foo>:
  10:   48 83 ec 08             sub    $0x8,%rsp
  14:   e8 00 00 00 00          callq  19 <foo+0x9>     15: R_X86_64_PLT32      my_foo-0x4
  19:   48 83 c4 08             add    $0x8,%rsp
  1d:   e9 00 00 00 00          jmpq   22 <foo+0x12>    1e: R_X86_64_PLT32      __SCT__foo-0x4

Noting that ld preserves the weak function text, but strips the symbol
off of it (hence objdump doing that funny negative offset thing). This
does lead to 'interesting' unused code issues with objtool when ran on
linked objects, but that seems to be working (fingers crossed).

So far so good.. Now lets consider the objtool static_call output
section (readelf output, old binutils):

foo-weak.o:

Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x2c8 contains 1 entry:
    Offset             Info             Type               Symbol's Value  Symbol's Name + Addend
0000000000000000  0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 .text + 0
0000000000000004  0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1

foo.o:

Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x310 contains 2 entries:
    Offset             Info             Type               Symbol's Value  Symbol's Name + Addend
0000000000000000  0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 .text + d
0000000000000004  0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1

foos.o:

Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x430 contains 4 entries:
    Offset             Info             Type               Symbol's Value  Symbol's Name + Addend
0000000000000000  0000000100000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 .text + 0
0000000000000004  0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1
0000000000000008  0000000100000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 .text + 1d
000000000000000c  0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1

So we have two patch sites, one in the dead code of the weak foo and one
in the real foo. All is well.

*HOWEVER*, when the toolchain strips unused section symbols it
generates things like this (using new enough binutils):

foo-weak.o:

Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x2c8 contains 1 entry:
    Offset             Info             Type               Symbol's Value  Symbol's Name + Addend
0000000000000000  0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 foo + 0
0000000000000004  0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1

foo.o:

Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x310 contains 2 entries:
    Offset             Info             Type               Symbol's Value  Symbol's Name + Addend
0000000000000000  0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 foo + d
0000000000000004  0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1

foos.o:

Relocation section '.rela.static_call_sites' at offset 0x430 contains 4 entries:
    Offset             Info             Type               Symbol's Value  Symbol's Name + Addend
0000000000000000  0000000100000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 foo + 0
0000000000000004  0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1
0000000000000008  0000000100000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 foo + d
000000000000000c  0000000d00000002 R_X86_64_PC32          0000000000000000 __SCT__foo + 1

And now we can see how that foos.o .static_call_sites goes side-ways, we
now have _two_ patch sites in foo. One for the weak symbol at foo+0
(which is no longer a static_call site!) and one at foo+d which is in
fact the right location.

This seems to happen when objtool cannot find a section symbol, in which
case it falls back to any other symbol to key off of, however in this
case that goes terribly wrong!

As such, teach objtool to create a section symbol when there isn't
one.

Fixes: 44f6a7c0755d ("objtool: Fix seg fault with Clang non-section symbols")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220419203807.655552918@infradead.org
objtool: Fix type of reloc::addend 2022-04-22T10:13:55+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2022-04-17T15:03:40+00:00 c087c6e7b551b7f208c0b852304f044954cf2bb3 Elf{32,64}_Rela::r_addend is of type: Elf{32,64}_Sword, that means that our reloc::addend needs to be long or face tuncation issues when we do elf_rebuild_reloc_section(): - 107: 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 movabs $0x0,%rax 109: R_X86_64_64 level4_kernel_pgt+0x80000067 + 107: 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 movabs $0x0,%rax 109: R_X86_64_64 level4_kernel_pgt-0x7fffff99 Fixes: 627fce14809b ("objtool: Add ORC unwind table generation") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220419203807.596871927@infradead.org 
Elf{32,64}_Rela::r_addend is of type: Elf{32,64}_Sword, that means
that our reloc::addend needs to be long or face tuncation issues when
we do elf_rebuild_reloc_section():

  - 107:  48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   movabs $0x0,%rax        109: R_X86_64_64        level4_kernel_pgt+0x80000067
  + 107:  48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   movabs $0x0,%rax        109: R_X86_64_64        level4_kernel_pgt-0x7fffff99

Fixes: 627fce14809b ("objtool: Add ORC unwind table generation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220419203807.596871927@infradead.org
objtool: Fix function fallthrough detection for vmlinux 2022-04-19T19:58:53+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com 2022-04-11T23:10:32+00:00 08feafe8d1958febf3a9733a3d1564d8fc23340e Objtool's function fallthrough detection only works on C objects. The distinction between C and assembly objects no longer makes sense with objtool running on vmlinux.o. Now that copy_user_64.S has been fixed up, and an objtool sibling call detection bug has been fixed, the asm code is in "compliance" and this hack is no longer needed. Remove it. Fixes: ed53a0d97192 ("x86/alternative: Use .ibt_endbr_seal to seal indirect calls") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b434cff98eca3a60dcc64c620d7d5d405a0f441c.1649718562.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com 
Objtool's function fallthrough detection only works on C objects.
The distinction between C and assembly objects no longer makes sense
with objtool running on vmlinux.o.

Now that copy_user_64.S has been fixed up, and an objtool sibling call
detection bug has been fixed, the asm code is in "compliance" and this
hack is no longer needed.  Remove it.

Fixes: ed53a0d97192 ("x86/alternative: Use .ibt_endbr_seal to seal indirect calls")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b434cff98eca3a60dcc64c620d7d5d405a0f441c.1649718562.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
objtool: Fix sibling call detection in alternatives 2022-04-19T19:58:53+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com 2022-04-11T23:10:31+00:00 34c861e806478ac2ea4032721defbf1d6967df08 In add_jump_destinations(), sibling call detection requires 'insn->func' to be valid. But alternative instructions get their 'func' set in handle_group_alt(), which runs *after* add_jump_destinations(). So sibling calls in alternatives code don't get properly detected. Fix that by changing the initialization order: call add_special_section_alts() *before* add_jump_destinations(). This also means the special case for a missing 'jump_dest' in add_jump_destinations() can be removed, as it has already been dealt with. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c02e0a0a2a4286b5f848d17c77fdcb7e0caf709c.1649718562.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com 
In add_jump_destinations(), sibling call detection requires 'insn->func'
to be valid.  But alternative instructions get their 'func' set in
handle_group_alt(), which runs *after* add_jump_destinations().  So
sibling calls in alternatives code don't get properly detected.

Fix that by changing the initialization order: call
add_special_section_alts() *before* add_jump_destinations().

This also means the special case for a missing 'jump_dest' in
add_jump_destinations() can be removed, as it has already been dealt
with.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c02e0a0a2a4286b5f848d17c77fdcb7e0caf709c.1649718562.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
objtool: Don't set 'jump_dest' for sibling calls 2022-04-19T19:58:53+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com 2022-04-11T23:10:30+00:00 26ff604102c98df79c3fe2614d1b9bb068d4c28c For most sibling calls, 'jump_dest' is NULL because objtool treats the jump like a call and sets 'call_dest'. But there are a few edge cases where that's not true. Make it consistent to avoid unexpected behavior. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8737d6b9d1691831aed73375f444f0f42da3e2c9.1649718562.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com 
For most sibling calls, 'jump_dest' is NULL because objtool treats the
jump like a call and sets 'call_dest'.  But there are a few edge cases
where that's not true.  Make it consistent to avoid unexpected behavior.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8737d6b9d1691831aed73375f444f0f42da3e2c9.1649718562.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
objtool: Use offstr() to print address of missing ENDBR 2022-04-19T19:58:50+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com 2022-04-18T16:50:30+00:00 1d08b92fa2c41c43e4efe9787413e9ac9a434f83 Fixes: 89bc853eae4a ("objtool: Find unused ENDBR instructions") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/95d12e800c736a3f7d08d61dabb760b2d5251a8e.1650300597.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com 
Fixes: 89bc853eae4a ("objtool: Find unused ENDBR instructions")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/95d12e800c736a3f7d08d61dabb760b2d5251a8e.1650300597.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
objtool: Print data address for "!ENDBR" data warnings 2022-04-19T19:58:50+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com 2022-04-18T16:50:29+00:00 4baae989e638e9bf4b7d29bc5e36b581fddcca52 When a "!ENDBR" warning is reported for a data section, objtool just prints the text address of the relocation target twice, without giving any clues about the location of the original data reference: vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: dcbnl_netdevice_event()+0x0: .text+0xb64680: data relocation to !ENDBR: dcbnl_netdevice_event+0x0 Instead, print the address of the data reference, in addition to the address of the relocation target. vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: dcbnl_nb+0x0: .data..read_mostly+0xe260: data relocation to !ENDBR: dcbnl_netdevice_event+0x0 Fixes: 89bc853eae4a ("objtool: Find unused ENDBR instructions") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/762e88d51300e8eaf0f933a5b0feae20ac033bea.1650300597.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com 
When a "!ENDBR" warning is reported for a data section, objtool just
prints the text address of the relocation target twice, without giving
any clues about the location of the original data reference:

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: dcbnl_netdevice_event()+0x0: .text+0xb64680: data relocation to !ENDBR: dcbnl_netdevice_event+0x0

Instead, print the address of the data reference, in addition to the
address of the relocation target.

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: dcbnl_nb+0x0: .data..read_mostly+0xe260: data relocation to !ENDBR: dcbnl_netdevice_event+0x0

Fixes: 89bc853eae4a ("objtool: Find unused ENDBR instructions")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/762e88d51300e8eaf0f933a5b0feae20ac033bea.1650300597.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
x86,objtool: Mark cpu_startup_entry() __noreturn 2022-04-19T19:58:48+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2022-04-08T09:45:55+00:00 d4e5268a08b211b536fed29beb24271ecd85187e GCC-8 isn't clever enough to figure out that cpu_start_entry() is a noreturn while objtool is. This results in code after the call in start_secondary(). Give GCC a hand so that they all agree on things. vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: start_secondary()+0x10e: unreachable Reported-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220408094718.383658532@infradead.org 
GCC-8 isn't clever enough to figure out that cpu_start_entry() is a
noreturn while objtool is. This results in code after the call in
start_secondary(). Give GCC a hand so that they all agree on things.

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: start_secondary()+0x10e: unreachable

Reported-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220408094718.383658532@infradead.org
objtool: Fix SLS validation for kcov tail-call replacement 2022-04-05T08:24:40+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2022-03-23T22:35:01+00:00 7a53f408902d913cd541b4f8ad7dbcd4961f5b82 Since not all compilers have a function attribute to disable KCOV instrumentation, objtool can rewrite KCOV instrumentation in noinstr functions as per commit: f56dae88a81f ("objtool: Handle __sanitize_cov*() tail calls") However, this has subtle interaction with the SLS validation from commit: 1cc1e4c8aab4 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation") In that when a tail-call instrucion is replaced with a RET an additional INT3 instruction is also written, but is not represented in the decoded instruction stream. This then leads to false positive missing INT3 objtool warnings in noinstr code. Instead of adding additional struct instruction objects, mark the RET instruction with retpoline_safe to suppress the warning (since we know there really is an INT3). Fixes: 1cc1e4c8aab4 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220323230712.GA8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net 
Since not all compilers have a function attribute to disable KCOV
instrumentation, objtool can rewrite KCOV instrumentation in noinstr
functions as per commit:

  f56dae88a81f ("objtool: Handle __sanitize_cov*() tail calls")

However, this has subtle interaction with the SLS validation from
commit:

  1cc1e4c8aab4 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation")

In that when a tail-call instrucion is replaced with a RET an
additional INT3 instruction is also written, but is not represented in
the decoded instruction stream.

This then leads to false positive missing INT3 objtool warnings in
noinstr code.

Instead of adding additional struct instruction objects, mark the RET
instruction with retpoline_safe to suppress the warning (since we know
there really is an INT3).

Fixes: 1cc1e4c8aab4 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220323230712.GA8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net