<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/tools/testing/kunit, branch v5.18</title>
<subtitle>Clone of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest</title>
<updated>2022-03-23T19:56:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-23T19:56:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=d51b1b33c51d147b757f042b4d336603b699f362'/>
<id>d51b1b33c51d147b757f042b4d336603b699f362</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:

 - changes to decrease macro layering string, integer, EQ/NE asserts

 - remove unused macros

 - several cleanups and fixes

 - new list tests for list_del_init_careful(), list_is_head() and
   list_entry_is_head()

* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest:
  list: test: Add a test for list_entry_is_head()
  list: test: Add a test for list_is_head()
  list: test: Add test for list_del_init_careful()
  kunit: cleanup assertion macro internal variables
  kunit: factor out str constants from binary assertion structs
  kunit: consolidate KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT macros
  kunit: remove va_format from kunit_assert
  kunit: tool: drop mostly unused KunitResult.result field
  kunit: decrease macro layering for EQ/NE asserts
  kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts
  kunit: reduce layering in string assertion macros
  kunit: drop unused intermediate macros for ptr inequality checks
  kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() use KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(), etc.
  kunit: drop unused assert_type from kunit_assert and clean up macros
  kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const
  kunit: factor out kunit_base_assert_format() call into kunit_fail()
  kunit: drop unused kunit* field in kunit_assert
  kunit: move check if assertion passed into the macros
  kunit: add example test case showing off all the expect macros
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:

 - changes to decrease macro layering string, integer, EQ/NE asserts

 - remove unused macros

 - several cleanups and fixes

 - new list tests for list_del_init_careful(), list_is_head() and
   list_entry_is_head()

* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest:
  list: test: Add a test for list_entry_is_head()
  list: test: Add a test for list_is_head()
  list: test: Add test for list_del_init_careful()
  kunit: cleanup assertion macro internal variables
  kunit: factor out str constants from binary assertion structs
  kunit: consolidate KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT macros
  kunit: remove va_format from kunit_assert
  kunit: tool: drop mostly unused KunitResult.result field
  kunit: decrease macro layering for EQ/NE asserts
  kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts
  kunit: reduce layering in string assertion macros
  kunit: drop unused intermediate macros for ptr inequality checks
  kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() use KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(), etc.
  kunit: drop unused assert_type from kunit_assert and clean up macros
  kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const
  kunit: factor out kunit_base_assert_format() call into kunit_fail()
  kunit: drop unused kunit* field in kunit_assert
  kunit: move check if assertion passed into the macros
  kunit: add example test case showing off all the expect macros
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: fix missing f in f-string in run_checks.py</title>
<updated>2022-02-02T18:12:15+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Latypov</name>
<email>dlatypov@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-01-27T22:17:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=de4d73b16d5d9c3e5d03a66046e5410e1e74f903'/>
<id>de4d73b16d5d9c3e5d03a66046e5410e1e74f903</id>
<content type='text'>
We're missing the `f` prefix to have python do string interpolation, so
we'd never end up printing what the actual "unexpected" error is.

Fixes: ee92ed38364e ("kunit: add run_checks.py script to validate kunit changes")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
We're missing the `f` prefix to have python do string interpolation, so
we'd never end up printing what the actual "unexpected" error is.

Fixes: ee92ed38364e ("kunit: add run_checks.py script to validate kunit changes")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: tool: drop mostly unused KunitResult.result field</title>
<updated>2022-01-31T18:55:18+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Latypov</name>
<email>dlatypov@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-01-18T19:09:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=95dcbc55fe4ffe262795bea02a42695c85a22dc4'/>
<id>95dcbc55fe4ffe262795bea02a42695c85a22dc4</id>
<content type='text'>
This field is only used to pass along the parsed Test object from
parse_tests().
Everywhere else the `result` field is ignored.

Instead make parse_tests() explicitly return a KunitResult and Test so
we can retire the `result` field.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This field is only used to pass along the parsed Test object from
parse_tests().
Everywhere else the `result` field is ignored.

Instead make parse_tests() explicitly return a KunitResult and Test so
we can retire the `result` field.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: tool: Import missing importlib.abc</title>
<updated>2022-01-25T19:59:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Michał Winiarski</name>
<email>michal.winiarski@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-01-12T23:36:57+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=235528072f28b3b0a1446279b7eaddda36dbf743'/>
<id>235528072f28b3b0a1446279b7eaddda36dbf743</id>
<content type='text'>
Python 3.10.0 contains:
9e09849d20 ("bpo-41006: importlib.util no longer imports typing (GH-20938)")

It causes importlib.util to no longer import importlib.abs, which leads
to the following error when trying to use kunit with qemu:
AttributeError: module 'importlib' has no attribute 'abc'. Did you mean: '_abc'?

Add the missing import.

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski &lt;michal.winiarski@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Python 3.10.0 contains:
9e09849d20 ("bpo-41006: importlib.util no longer imports typing (GH-20938)")

It causes importlib.util to no longer import importlib.abs, which leads
to the following error when trying to use kunit with qemu:
AttributeError: module 'importlib' has no attribute 'abc'. Did you mean: '_abc'?

Add the missing import.

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski &lt;michal.winiarski@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: tool: Default --jobs to number of CPUs</title>
<updated>2021-12-15T23:44:55+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Gow</name>
<email>davidgow@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-15T20:50:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=ad659ccb5412874c6a89d3588cb18857c00e9d0f'/>
<id>ad659ccb5412874c6a89d3588cb18857c00e9d0f</id>
<content type='text'>
The --jobs parameter for kunit_tool currently defaults to 8 CPUs,
regardless of the number available. For systems with significantly more
(or less), this is not as efficient. Instead, default --jobs to the
number of CPUs available to the process: while there are as many
superstitions as to exactly what the ideal jobs:CPU ratio is, this seems
sufficiently sensible to me.

A new helper function to get the default number of jobs is added:
get_default_jobs() -- this is used in kunit_tool_test instead of a
hardcoded value, or an explicit call to len(os.sched_getaffinity()), so
should be more flexible if this needs to change in the future.

Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The --jobs parameter for kunit_tool currently defaults to 8 CPUs,
regardless of the number available. For systems with significantly more
(or less), this is not as efficient. Instead, default --jobs to the
number of CPUs available to the process: while there are as many
superstitions as to exactly what the ideal jobs:CPU ratio is, this seems
sufficiently sensible to me.

A new helper function to get the default number of jobs is added:
get_default_jobs() -- this is used in kunit_tool_test instead of a
hardcoded value, or an explicit call to len(os.sched_getaffinity()), so
should be more flexible if this needs to change in the future.

Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: tool: fix newly introduced typechecker errors</title>
<updated>2021-12-15T23:44:49+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Latypov</name>
<email>dlatypov@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-15T20:39:23+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=85310a62ca4e415980e30d9d07f904444197cfc4'/>
<id>85310a62ca4e415980e30d9d07f904444197cfc4</id>
<content type='text'>
After upgrading mypy and pytype from pip, we see 2 new errors when
running ./tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py.

Error #1: mypy and pytype
They now deduce that importlib.util.spec_from_file_location() can return
None and note that we're not checking for this.

We validate that the arch is valid (i.e. the file exists) beforehand.
Add in an `asssert spec is not None` to appease the checkers.

Error #2: pytype bug https://github.com/google/pytype/issues/1057
It doesn't like `from datetime import datetime`, specifically that a
type shares a name with a module.

We can workaround this by either
* renaming the import or just using `import datetime`
* passing the new `--fix-module-collisions` flag to pytype.

We pick the first option for now because
* the flag is quite new, only in the 2021.11.29 release.
* I'd prefer if people can just run `pytype &lt;file&gt;`

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
After upgrading mypy and pytype from pip, we see 2 new errors when
running ./tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py.

Error #1: mypy and pytype
They now deduce that importlib.util.spec_from_file_location() can return
None and note that we're not checking for this.

We validate that the arch is valid (i.e. the file exists) beforehand.
Add in an `asssert spec is not None` to appease the checkers.

Error #2: pytype bug https://github.com/google/pytype/issues/1057
It doesn't like `from datetime import datetime`, specifically that a
type shares a name with a module.

We can workaround this by either
* renaming the import or just using `import datetime`
* passing the new `--fix-module-collisions` flag to pytype.

We pick the first option for now because
* the flag is quite new, only in the 2021.11.29 release.
* I'd prefer if people can just run `pytype &lt;file&gt;`

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: tool: make `build` subcommand also reconfigure if needed</title>
<updated>2021-12-15T18:51:16+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Latypov</name>
<email>dlatypov@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-14T19:30:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=1ee2ba89bea86d6389509e426583b49ac19b86f2'/>
<id>1ee2ba89bea86d6389509e426583b49ac19b86f2</id>
<content type='text'>
If I created a kunitconfig file that was incomplete, then
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build --kunitconfig=my_kunitconfig
would silently drop all the options with unmet dependencies!

This is because it doesn't do the config check that `kunit.py config`
does.

So if I want to safely build a kernel for testing, I have to do
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config &lt;flags&gt;
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build &lt;flags, again&gt;

It seems unlikely that any user of kunit.py would want the current
`build` semantics.
So make it effectively do `kunit.py config` + `kunit.py build`.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
If I created a kunitconfig file that was incomplete, then
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build --kunitconfig=my_kunitconfig
would silently drop all the options with unmet dependencies!

This is because it doesn't do the config check that `kunit.py config`
does.

So if I want to safely build a kernel for testing, I have to do
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config &lt;flags&gt;
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build &lt;flags, again&gt;

It seems unlikely that any user of kunit.py would want the current
`build` semantics.
So make it effectively do `kunit.py config` + `kunit.py build`.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: tool: delete kunit_parser.TestResult type</title>
<updated>2021-12-15T18:50:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Latypov</name>
<email>dlatypov@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-14T19:26:12+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=e0cc8c052a3992b01f51df1d51eaae49e5b2710f'/>
<id>e0cc8c052a3992b01f51df1d51eaae49e5b2710f</id>
<content type='text'>
The `log` field is unused, and the `status` field is accessible via
`test.status`.

So it's simpler to just return the main `Test` object directly.

And since we're no longer returning a namedtuple, which has no type
annotations, this hopefully means typecheckers are better equipped to
find any errors.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The `log` field is unused, and the `status` field is accessible via
`test.status`.

So it's simpler to just return the main `Test` object directly.

And since we're no longer returning a namedtuple, which has no type
annotations, this hopefully means typecheckers are better equipped to
find any errors.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: tool: use dataclass instead of collections.namedtuple</title>
<updated>2021-12-15T18:50:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Latypov</name>
<email>dlatypov@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-14T19:26:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=db1679813f9f86b05bbbc6f05f4cdbe481d59352'/>
<id>db1679813f9f86b05bbbc6f05f4cdbe481d59352</id>
<content type='text'>
namedtuple is a terse way of defining a collection of fields.
However, it does not allow us to annotate the type of these fields.
It also doesn't let us have any sort of inheritance between types.

Since commit df4b0807ca1a ("kunit: tool: Assert the version
requirement"), kunit.py has asserted that it's running on python &gt;=3.7.

So in that case use a 3.7 feature, dataclasses, to replace these.

Changes in detail:
* Make KunitExecRequest contain all the fields needed for exec_tests
* Use inheritance to dedupe fields
  * also allows us to e.g. pass a KUnitRequest in as a KUnitParseRequest
  * this has changed around the order of some fields
* Use named arguments when constructing all request objects in kunit.py
  * This is to prevent accidentally mixing up fields, etc.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
namedtuple is a terse way of defining a collection of fields.
However, it does not allow us to annotate the type of these fields.
It also doesn't let us have any sort of inheritance between types.

Since commit df4b0807ca1a ("kunit: tool: Assert the version
requirement"), kunit.py has asserted that it's running on python &gt;=3.7.

So in that case use a 3.7 feature, dataclasses, to replace these.

Changes in detail:
* Make KunitExecRequest contain all the fields needed for exec_tests
* Use inheritance to dedupe fields
  * also allows us to e.g. pass a KUnitRequest in as a KUnitParseRequest
  * this has changed around the order of some fields
* Use named arguments when constructing all request objects in kunit.py
  * This is to prevent accidentally mixing up fields, etc.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: tool: suggest using decode_stacktrace.sh on kernel crash</title>
<updated>2021-12-13T20:59:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Latypov</name>
<email>dlatypov@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-11-20T03:24:01+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.exis.tech/linux.git/commit/?id=7fa7ffcf9babaea2f0a81681b4ef460ee4b93278'/>
<id>7fa7ffcf9babaea2f0a81681b4ef460ee4b93278</id>
<content type='text'>
kunit.py isn't very clear that
1) it stashes a copy of the unparsed output in $BUILD_DIR/test.log
2) it sets $BUILD_DIR=.kunit by default

So it's trickier than it should be for a user to come up with the right
command to do so.

Make kunit.py print out a command for this if
a) we saw a test case crash
b) we only ran one kernel (test.log only contains output from the last)

Example suggested command:
$ scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh .kunit/vmlinux .kunit &lt; .kunit/test.log | tee .kunit/decoded.log | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse

Without debug info a user might see something like
[14:11:25] Call Trace:
[14:11:25] ? kunit_binary_assert_format (:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_try_run_case (test.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? __kthread_parkme (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] kthread (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] new_thread_handler (:?)
[14:11:25] [CRASHED]

`tee` is in GNU coreutils, so it seems fine to add that into the
pipeline by default, that way users can inspect the otuput in more
detail.

Note: to turn on debug info, users would need to do something like
$ echo -e 'CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y\nCONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y' &gt;&gt; .kunit/.kunitconfig
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
$ &lt;then run decode_stacktrace.sh now vmlinux is updated&gt;

This feels too clunky to include in the instructions.
With --kconfig_add [1], it would become a bit less painful.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211106013058.2621799-2-dlatypov@google.com/

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
kunit.py isn't very clear that
1) it stashes a copy of the unparsed output in $BUILD_DIR/test.log
2) it sets $BUILD_DIR=.kunit by default

So it's trickier than it should be for a user to come up with the right
command to do so.

Make kunit.py print out a command for this if
a) we saw a test case crash
b) we only ran one kernel (test.log only contains output from the last)

Example suggested command:
$ scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh .kunit/vmlinux .kunit &lt; .kunit/test.log | tee .kunit/decoded.log | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse

Without debug info a user might see something like
[14:11:25] Call Trace:
[14:11:25] ? kunit_binary_assert_format (:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_try_run_case (test.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? __kthread_parkme (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] kthread (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] new_thread_handler (:?)
[14:11:25] [CRASHED]

`tee` is in GNU coreutils, so it seems fine to add that into the
pipeline by default, that way users can inspect the otuput in more
detail.

Note: to turn on debug info, users would need to do something like
$ echo -e 'CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y\nCONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y' &gt;&gt; .kunit/.kunitconfig
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
$ &lt;then run decode_stacktrace.sh now vmlinux is updated&gt;

This feels too clunky to include in the instructions.
With --kconfig_add [1], it would become a bit less painful.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211106013058.2621799-2-dlatypov@google.com/

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendanhiggins@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
