diff options
| author | Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2024-10-23 09:17:44 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2024-11-08 16:30:54 +0100 |
| commit | 2ccd5badadab2d586e91546bf5af3deda07fef1f (patch) | |
| tree | 24679a98d9bcc7cea1eff900bcb676ad3065a86d | |
| parent | 8af8294d369a871cdbcdbb4d13b87d2d6e490a1f (diff) | |
| download | linux-2ccd5badadab2d586e91546bf5af3deda07fef1f.tar.gz linux-2ccd5badadab2d586e91546bf5af3deda07fef1f.tar.bz2 linux-2ccd5badadab2d586e91546bf5af3deda07fef1f.zip | |
wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: fix 6 GHz scan construction
commit 7245012f0f496162dd95d888ed2ceb5a35170f1a upstream.
If more than 255 colocated APs exist for the set of all
APs found during 2.4/5 GHz scanning, then the 6 GHz scan
construction will loop forever since the loop variable
has type u8, which can never reach the number found when
that's bigger than 255, and is stored in a u32 variable.
Also move it into the loops to have a smaller scope.
Using a u32 there is fine, we limit the number of APs in
the scan list and each has a limit on the number of RNR
entries due to the frame size. With a limit of 1000 scan
results, a frame size upper bound of 4096 (really it's
more like ~2300) and a TBTT entry size of at least 11,
we get an upper bound for the number of ~372k, well in
the bounds of a u32.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: eae94cf82d74 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add support for 6GHz")
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219375
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241023091744.f4baed5c08a1.I8b417148bbc8c5d11c101e1b8f5bf372e17bf2a7@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/scan.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/scan.c index 3a9018595ea9..cfc50c7b2949 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/scan.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/scan.c @@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ iwl_mvm_umac_scan_cfg_channels_v7_6g(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, &cp->channel_config[ch_cnt]; u32 s_ssid_bitmap = 0, bssid_bitmap = 0, flags = 0; - u8 j, k, n_s_ssids = 0, n_bssids = 0; + u8 k, n_s_ssids = 0, n_bssids = 0; u8 max_s_ssids, max_bssids; bool force_passive = false, found = false, allow_passive = true, unsolicited_probe_on_chan = false, psc_no_listen = false; @@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@ iwl_mvm_umac_scan_cfg_channels_v7_6g(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, cfg->v5.iter_count = 1; cfg->v5.iter_interval = 0; - for (j = 0; j < params->n_6ghz_params; j++) { + for (u32 j = 0; j < params->n_6ghz_params; j++) { s8 tmp_psd_20; if (!(scan_6ghz_params[j].channel_idx == i)) @@ -1873,7 +1873,7 @@ iwl_mvm_umac_scan_cfg_channels_v7_6g(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, * SSID. * TODO: improve this logic */ - for (j = 0; j < params->n_6ghz_params; j++) { + for (u32 j = 0; j < params->n_6ghz_params; j++) { if (!(scan_6ghz_params[j].channel_idx == i)) continue; |