summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSteven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>2023-12-28 09:51:49 -0500
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2024-01-05 15:13:39 +0100
commit7fb264aedec94d6ed0b90d59687ed31651225cda (patch)
tree4da4e497c61bc51d62576abd6c2b35d8240bfa04
parentc73cb01af11f34086dc1e9588130eaa618a59259 (diff)
downloadlinux-7fb264aedec94d6ed0b90d59687ed31651225cda.tar.gz
linux-7fb264aedec94d6ed0b90d59687ed31651225cda.tar.bz2
linux-7fb264aedec94d6ed0b90d59687ed31651225cda.zip
tracing: Fix blocked reader of snapshot buffer
commit 39a7dc23a1ed0fe81141792a09449d124c5953bd upstream. If an application blocks on the snapshot or snapshot_raw files, expecting to be woken up when a snapshot occurs, it will not happen. Or it may happen with an unexpected result. That result is that the application will be reading the main buffer instead of the snapshot buffer. That is because when the snapshot occurs, the main and snapshot buffers are swapped. But the reader has a descriptor still pointing to the buffer that it originally connected to. This is fine for the main buffer readers, as they may be blocked waiting for a watermark to be hit, and when a snapshot occurs, the data that the main readers want is now on the snapshot buffer. But for waiters of the snapshot buffer, they are waiting for an event to occur that will trigger the snapshot and they can then consume it quickly to save the snapshot before the next snapshot occurs. But to do this, they need to read the new snapshot buffer, not the old one that is now receiving new data. Also, it does not make sense to have a watermark "buffer_percent" on the snapshot buffer, as the snapshot buffer is static and does not receive new data except all at once. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231228095149.77f5b45d@gandalf.local.home Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> Fixes: debdd57f5145f ("tracing: Make a snapshot feature available from userspace") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c3
-rw-r--r--kernel/trace/trace.c20
2 files changed, 19 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index e5935a5524bb..305978256825 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -964,7 +964,8 @@ void ring_buffer_wake_waiters(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
/* make sure the waiters see the new index */
smp_wmb();
- rb_wake_up_waiters(&rbwork->work);
+ /* This can be called in any context */
+ irq_work_queue(&rbwork->work);
}
/**
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index d1b7dbffbfe4..91ff118138c8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1837,6 +1837,9 @@ update_max_tr(struct trace_array *tr, struct task_struct *tsk, int cpu,
__update_max_tr(tr, tsk, cpu);
arch_spin_unlock(&tr->max_lock);
+
+ /* Any waiters on the old snapshot buffer need to wake up */
+ ring_buffer_wake_waiters(tr->array_buffer.buffer, RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS);
}
/**
@@ -1888,12 +1891,23 @@ update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array *tr, struct task_struct *tsk, int cpu)
static int wait_on_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter, int full)
{
+ int ret;
+
/* Iterators are static, they should be filled or empty */
if (trace_buffer_iter(iter, iter->cpu_file))
return 0;
- return ring_buffer_wait(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file,
- full);
+ ret = ring_buffer_wait(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file, full);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE
+ /*
+ * Make sure this is still the snapshot buffer, as if a snapshot were
+ * to happen, this would now be the main buffer.
+ */
+ if (iter->snapshot)
+ iter->array_buffer = &iter->tr->max_buffer;
+#endif
+ return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST
@@ -8383,7 +8397,7 @@ tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
wait_index = READ_ONCE(iter->wait_index);
- ret = wait_on_pipe(iter, iter->tr->buffer_percent);
+ ret = wait_on_pipe(iter, iter->snapshot ? 0 : iter->tr->buffer_percent);
if (ret)
goto out;