badblocks: use sector_t instead of int to avoid truncation of badblocks length

[ Upstream commit d301f164c3fbff611bd71f57dfa553b9219f0f5e ]

There is a truncation of badblocks length issue when set badblocks as
follow:

echo "2055 4294967299" > bad_blocks
cat bad_blocks
2055 3

Change 'sectors' argument type from 'int' to 'sector_t'.

This change avoids truncation of badblocks length for large sectors by
replacing 'int' with 'sector_t' (u64), enabling proper handling of larger
disk sizes and ensuring compatibility with 64-bit sector addressing.

Fixes: 9e0e252a048b ("badblocks: Add core badblock management code")
Signed-off-by: Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227075507.151331-13-zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c
index 753250a04c3f..dc147c017961 100644
--- a/block/badblocks.c
+++ b/block/badblocks.c
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static bool try_adjacent_combine(struct badblocks *bb, int prev)
 }
 
 /* Do exact work to set bad block range into the bad block table */
-static bool _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
+static bool _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, sector_t sectors,
 			   int acknowledged)
 {
 	int len = 0, added = 0;
@@ -960,8 +960,6 @@ update_sectors:
 	if (sectors > 0)
 		goto re_insert;
 
-	WARN_ON(sectors < 0);
-
 	/*
 	 * Check whether the following already set range can be
 	 * merged. (prev < 0) condition is not handled here,
@@ -1052,7 +1050,7 @@ static int front_splitting_clear(struct badblocks *bb, int prev,
 }
 
 /* Do the exact work to clear bad block range from the bad block table */
-static bool _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
+static bool _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, sector_t sectors)
 {
 	struct badblocks_context bad;
 	int prev = -1, hint = -1;
@@ -1175,8 +1173,6 @@ update_sectors:
 	if (sectors > 0)
 		goto re_clear;
 
-	WARN_ON(sectors < 0);
-
 	if (cleared) {
 		badblocks_update_acked(bb);
 		set_changed(bb);
@@ -1191,8 +1187,8 @@ update_sectors:
 }
 
 /* Do the exact work to check bad blocks range from the bad block table */
-static int _badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
-			    sector_t *first_bad, int *bad_sectors)
+static int _badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, sector_t sectors,
+			    sector_t *first_bad, sector_t *bad_sectors)
 {
 	int prev = -1, hint = -1, set = 0;
 	struct badblocks_context bad;
@@ -1302,8 +1298,8 @@ update_sectors:
  * -1: there are bad blocks which have not yet been acknowledged in metadata.
  * plus the start/length of the first bad section we overlap.
  */
-int badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
-			sector_t *first_bad, int *bad_sectors)
+int badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, sector_t sectors,
+			sector_t *first_bad, sector_t *bad_sectors)
 {
 	unsigned int seq;
 	int rv;
@@ -1345,7 +1341,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badblocks_check);
  *  false: failed to set badblocks (out of space). Parital setting will be
  *  treated as failure.
  */
-bool badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
+bool badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, sector_t sectors,
 		   int acknowledged)
 {
 	return _badblocks_set(bb, s, sectors, acknowledged);
@@ -1366,7 +1362,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badblocks_set);
  *  true: success
  *  false: failed to clear badblocks
  */
-bool badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
+bool badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, sector_t sectors)
 {
 	return _badblocks_clear(bb, s, sectors);
 }