diff options
| author | Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> | 2025-04-24 16:28:06 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-05-12 23:50:33 -0700 |
| commit | 7d709f49babc28907b0ac60228f522d2e6216add (patch) | |
| tree | 91a64b10cdb6b772b69a499a281f689e2c7bd9d9 /mm/vmscan.c | |
| parent | 8adce0857769d596c5b000d118119e3bb1d63a32 (diff) | |
| download | linux-7d709f49babc28907b0ac60228f522d2e6216add.tar.gz linux-7d709f49babc28907b0ac60228f522d2e6216add.tar.bz2 linux-7d709f49babc28907b0ac60228f522d2e6216add.zip | |
vmscan,cgroup: apply mems_effective to reclaim
It is possible for a reclaimer to cause demotions of an lruvec belonging
to a cgroup with cpuset.mems set to exclude some nodes. Attempt to apply
this limitation based on the lruvec's memcg and prevent demotion.
Notably, this may still allow demotion of shared libraries or any memory
first instantiated in another cgroup. This means cpusets still cannot
cannot guarantee complete isolation when demotion is enabled, and the docs
have been updated to reflect this.
This is useful for isolating workloads on a multi-tenant system from
certain classes of memory more consistently - with the noted exceptions.
Note on locking:
The cgroup_get_e_css reference protects the css->effective_mems, and calls
of this interface would be subject to the same race conditions associated
with a non-atomic access to cs->effective_mems.
So while this interface cannot make strong guarantees of correctness, it
can therefore avoid taking a global or rcu_read_lock for performance.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250424202806.52632-3-gourry@gourry.net
Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Suggested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 41 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index ceffb20bb8c9..a4fbd52a82d4 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -342,16 +342,22 @@ static void flush_reclaim_state(struct scan_control *sc) } } -static bool can_demote(int nid, struct scan_control *sc) +static bool can_demote(int nid, struct scan_control *sc, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { + int demotion_nid; + if (!numa_demotion_enabled) return false; if (sc && sc->no_demotion) return false; - if (next_demotion_node(nid) == NUMA_NO_NODE) + + demotion_nid = next_demotion_node(nid); + if (demotion_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) return false; - return true; + /* If demotion node isn't in the cgroup's mems_allowed, fall back */ + return mem_cgroup_node_allowed(memcg, demotion_nid); } static inline bool can_reclaim_anon_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, @@ -376,7 +382,7 @@ static inline bool can_reclaim_anon_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, * * Can it be reclaimed from this node via demotion? */ - return can_demote(nid, sc); + return can_demote(nid, sc, memcg); } /* @@ -1096,7 +1102,8 @@ static bool may_enter_fs(struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp_mask) */ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc, - struct reclaim_stat *stat, bool ignore_references) + struct reclaim_stat *stat, bool ignore_references, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { struct folio_batch free_folios; LIST_HEAD(ret_folios); @@ -1109,7 +1116,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, folio_batch_init(&free_folios); memset(stat, 0, sizeof(*stat)); cond_resched(); - do_demote_pass = can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc); + do_demote_pass = can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc, memcg); retry: while (!list_empty(folio_list)) { @@ -1658,7 +1665,7 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone, */ noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save(); nr_reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&clean_folios, zone->zone_pgdat, &sc, - &stat, true); + &stat, true, NULL); memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag); list_splice(&clean_folios, folio_list); @@ -2029,7 +2036,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, if (nr_taken == 0) return 0; - nr_reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&folio_list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false); + nr_reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&folio_list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false, + lruvec_memcg(lruvec)); spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock); move_folios_to_lru(lruvec, &folio_list); @@ -2212,7 +2220,7 @@ static unsigned int reclaim_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, .no_demotion = 1, }; - nr_reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(folio_list, pgdat, &sc, &stat, true); + nr_reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(folio_list, pgdat, &sc, &stat, true, NULL); while (!list_empty(folio_list)) { folio = lru_to_folio(folio_list); list_del(&folio->lru); @@ -2644,7 +2652,7 @@ out: * Anonymous LRU management is a waste if there is * ultimately no way to reclaim the memory. */ -static bool can_age_anon_pages(struct pglist_data *pgdat, +static bool can_age_anon_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) { /* Aging the anon LRU is valuable if swap is present: */ @@ -2652,7 +2660,8 @@ static bool can_age_anon_pages(struct pglist_data *pgdat, return true; /* Also valuable if anon pages can be demoted: */ - return can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc); + return can_demote(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->node_id, sc, + lruvec_memcg(lruvec)); } #ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN @@ -2730,7 +2739,7 @@ static int get_swappiness(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) if (!sc->may_swap) return 0; - if (!can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc) && + if (!can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc, memcg) && mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(memcg) < MIN_LRU_BATCH) return 0; @@ -4693,7 +4702,7 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap if (list_empty(&list)) return scanned; retry: - reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false); + reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false, memcg); sc->nr.unqueued_dirty += stat.nr_unqueued_dirty; sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed; trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id, @@ -5848,7 +5857,7 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio. */ - if (can_age_anon_pages(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec), sc) && + if (can_age_anon_pages(lruvec, sc) && inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec, sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON); @@ -6679,10 +6688,10 @@ static void kswapd_age_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) return; } - if (!can_age_anon_pages(pgdat, sc)) + lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat); + if (!can_age_anon_pages(lruvec, sc)) return; - lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat); if (!inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) return; |
