summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/slice.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-04-25powerpc: use initializer for struct vm_unmapped_area_infoRick Edgecombe1-11/+9
Future changes will need to add a new member to struct vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each member manually, so if new members are added they will be uninitialized and the core code parsing the struct will see garbage in the new member. It could be possible to initialize the new member manually to 0 at each call site. This and a couple other options were discussed, and a working consensus (see links) was that in general the best way to accomplish this would be via static initialization with designated member initiators. Having some struct vm_unmapped_area_info instances not zero initialized will put those sites at risk of feeding garbage into vm_unmapped_area() if the convention is to zero initialize the struct and any new member addition misses a call site that initializes each member manually. It could be possible to leave the code mostly untouched, and just change the line: struct vm_unmapped_area_info info to: struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {}; However, that would leave cleanup for the members that are manually set to zero, as it would no longer be required. So to be reduce the chance of bugs via uninitialized members, instead simply continue the process to initialize the struct this way tree wide. This will zero any unspecified members. Move the member initializers to the struct declaration when they are known at that time. Leave the members out that were manually initialized to zero, as this would be redundant for designated initializers. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240326021656.202649-10-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202402280912.33AEE7A9CF@keescook/#t Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/j7bfvig3gew3qruouxrh7z7ehjjafrgkbcmg6tcghhfh3rhmzi@wzlcoecgy5rs/ Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-05powerpc/mm: Enable full randomisation of memory mappingsChristophe Leroy1-11/+7
Do like most other architectures and provide randomisation also to "legacy" memory mappings, by adding the random factor to mm->mmap_base in arch_pick_mmap_layout(). See commit 8b8addf891de ("x86/mm/32: Enable full randomization on i386 and X86_32") for all explanations and benefits of that mmap randomisation. At the moment, slice_find_area_bottomup() doesn't use mm->mmap_base but uses the fixed TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE instead. slice_find_area_bottomup() being used as a fallback to slice_find_area_topdown(), it can't use mm->mmap_base directly. Instead of always using TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE as base address, leave it to the caller. When called from slice_find_area_topdown() TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE is used. Otherwise mm->mmap_base is used. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/417fb10dde828534c73a03138b49621d74f4e5be.1649523076.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2022-05-05powerpc/mm: Move get_unmapped_area functions to slice.cChristophe Leroy1-0/+42
hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() is now identical to the generic version if only RADIX is enabled, so move it to slice.c and let it fallback on the generic one when HASH MMU is not compiled in. Do the same with arch_get_unmapped_area() and arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(). Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b5d9c124e82889e0cb115c150915a0c0d84eb960.1649523076.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2022-05-05powerpc/mm: Make slice specific to book3s/64Christophe Leroy1-0/+769
Since commit 555904d07eef ("powerpc/8xx: MM_SLICE is not needed anymore") only book3s/64 selects CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES. Move slice.c into mm/book3s64/ Move necessary stuff in asm/book3s/64/slice.h and remove asm/slice.h Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4a0d74ef1966a5902b5fd4ac4b513a760a6d675a.1649523076.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu