summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-04-13cpufreq: Don't unregister cpufreq cooling on CPU hotplugViresh Kumar1-6/+11
[ Upstream commit c4d61a529db788d2e52654f5b02c8d1de4952c5b ] Offlining a CPU and bringing it back online is a common operation and it happens frequently during system suspend/resume, where the non-boot CPUs are hotplugged out during suspend and brought back at resume. The cpufreq core already tries to make this path as fast as possible as the changes are only temporary in nature and full cleanup of resources isn't required in this case. For example the drivers can implement online()/offline() callbacks to avoid a lot of tear down of resources. On similar lines, there is no need to unregister the cpufreq cooling device during suspend / resume, but only while the policy is getting removed. Moreover, unregistering the cpufreq cooling device is resulting in an unwanted outcome, where the system suspend is eventually aborted in the process. Currently, during system suspend the cpufreq core unregisters the cooling device, which in turn removes a kobject using device_del() and that generates a notification to the userspace via uevent broadcast. This causes system suspend to abort in some setups. This was also earlier reported (indirectly) by Roman [1]. Maybe there is another way around to fixing that problem properly, but this change makes sense anyways. Move the registering and unregistering of the cooling device to policy creation and removal times onlyy. Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218521 Reported-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <quic_manafm@quicinc.com> Reported-by: Roman Stratiienko <r.stratiienko@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20220710164026.541466-1-r.stratiienko@gmail.com/ [1] Tested-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <quic_manafm@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-04-03cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: fix up "add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return ↵Greg Kroah-Hartman1-2/+3
value" In commit e72160cb6e23 ("cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return value"), build warnings occur because a variable is created after some logic, resulting in: drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c: In function 'brcm_avs_cpufreq_get': drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:486:9: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement] 486 | struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data; | ^~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:552: drivers/cpufreq] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make: *** [Makefile:1907: drivers] Error 2 Fix this up. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e114d9e5-26af-42be-9baa-72c3a6ec8fe5@oracle.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240327015023.GC7502@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net/T/#m15bff0fe96986ef780e848b4fff362bf8ea03f08 Reported-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Fixes: e72160cb6e23 ("cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return value") Cc: Anastasia Belova <abelova@astralinux.ru> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-03cpufreq: dt: always allocate zeroed cpumaskMarek Szyprowski1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit d2399501c2c081eac703ca9597ceb83c7875a537 ] Commit 0499a78369ad ("ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512") changed the handling of cpumasks on ARM 64bit, what resulted in the strange issues and warnings during cpufreq-dt initialization on some big.LITTLE platforms. This was caused by mixing OPPs between big and LITTLE cores, because OPP-sharing information between big and LITTLE cores is computed on cpumask, which in turn was not zeroed on allocation. Fix this by switching to zalloc_cpumask_var() call. Fixes: dc279ac6e5b4 ("cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+ Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter (Ampere) <cl@linux.com> Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-04-03cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix min_perf assignment in amd_pstate_adjust_perf()Tor Vic1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit b26ffbf800ae3c8d01bdf90d9cd8a37e1606ff06 ] In the function amd_pstate_adjust_perf(), the 'min_perf' variable is set to 'highest_perf' instead of 'lowest_perf'. Fixes: 1d215f0319c2 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add fast switch function for AMD P-State") Reported-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name> Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tor Vic <torvic9@mailbox.org> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Cc: 6.1+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-26cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Don't error out if supply is not foundNícolas F. R. A. Prado1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit eaffb10b51bf74415c9252fd8fb4dd77122501ee ] devm_regulator_get_optional() returns -ENODEV if no supply can be found. By introducing its usage, commit 788715b5f21c ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Wait for CPU supplies before probing") caused the driver to fail probe if no supply was present in any of the CPU DT nodes. Use devm_regulator_get() instead since the CPUs do require supplies even if not described in the DT. It will gracefully return a dummy regulator if none is found in the DT node, allowing probe to succeed. Fixes: 788715b5f21c ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Wait for CPU supplies before probing") Reported-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> Closes: https://linux.kernelci.org/test/case/id/65b0b169710edea22852a3fa/ Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-26cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Wait for CPU supplies before probingNícolas F. R. A. Prado1-1/+18
[ Upstream commit 788715b5f21c6455264fe00a1779e61bec407fe2 ] Before proceeding with the probe and enabling frequency scaling for the CPUs, make sure that all supplies feeding the CPUs have probed. This fixes an issue observed on MT8195-Tomato where if the mediatek-cpufreq-hw driver enabled the hardware (by writing to REG_FREQ_ENABLE) before the SPMI controller driver (spmi-mtk-pmif), behind which lies the big CPU supply, probed the platform would hang shortly after with "rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks" being printed in the log. Fixes: 4855e26bcf4d ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW") Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-26cpufreq: Explicitly include correct DT includesRob Herring9-11/+7
[ Upstream commit a70eb93a2477371638ef481aaae7bb7b760d3004 ] The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus. As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to explicitly include the correct includes. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Stable-dep-of: 788715b5f21c ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Wait for CPU supplies before probing") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-26cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return valueAnastasia Belova1-0/+2
[ Upstream commit f661017e6d326ee187db24194cabb013d81bc2a6 ] cpufreq_cpu_get may return NULL. To avoid NULL-dereference check it and return 0 in case of error. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Fixes: de322e085995 ("cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: AVS CPUfreq driver for Broadcom STB SoCs") Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@astralinux.ru> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-06cpufreq: intel_pstate: fix pstate limits enforcement for adjust_perf call backDoug Smythies1-0/+3
[ Upstream commit f0a0fc10abb062d122db5ac4ed42f6d1ca342649 ] There is a loophole in pstate limit clamping for the intel_cpufreq CPU frequency scaling driver (intel_pstate in passive mode), schedutil CPU frequency scaling governor, HWP (HardWare Pstate) control enabled, when the adjust_perf call back path is used. Fix it. Fixes: a365ab6b9dfb cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-01-31cpufreq: intel_pstate: Refine computation of P-state for given frequencyRafael J. Wysocki1-21/+34
commit 192cdb1c907fd8df2d764c5bb17496e415e59391 upstream. On systems using HWP, if a given frequency is equal to the maximum turbo frequency or the maximum non-turbo frequency, the HWP performance level corresponding to it is already known and can be used directly without any computation. Accordingly, adjust the code to use the known HWP performance levels in the cases mentioned above. This also helps to avoid limiting CPU capacity artificially in some cases when the BIOS produces the HWP_CAP numbers using a different E-core-to-P-core performance scaling factor than expected by the kernel. Fixes: f5c8cf2a4992 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: hybrid: Use known scaling factor for P-cores") Cc: 6.1+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1+ Tested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-25cpufreq: scmi: process the result of devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider()Alexandra Diupina1-2/+5
[ Upstream commit c4a5118a3ae1eadc687d84eef9431f9e13eb015c ] devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() may return an errno, so add a return value check Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Fixes: 8410e7f3b31e ("cpufreq: scmi: Fix OPP addition failure with a dummy clock provider") Signed-off-by: Alexandra Diupina <adiupina@astralinux.ru> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-01-25cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presenceRob Herring5-6/+6
[ Upstream commit b8f3a396a7ee43e6079176cc0fb8de2b95a23681 ] It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Stable-dep-of: c4a5118a3ae1 ("cpufreq: scmi: process the result of devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-12-08cpufreq: imx6q: Don't disable 792 Mhz OPP unnecessarilyChristoph Niedermaier1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 2e4e0984c7d696cc74cf2fd7e7f62997f0e9ebe6 ] For a 900MHz i.MX6ULL CPU the 792MHz OPP is disabled. There is no convincing reason to disable this OPP. If a CPU can run at 900MHz, it should also be able to cope with 792MHz. Looking at the voltage level of 792MHz in [1] (page 24, table 10. "Operating Ranges") the current defined OPP is above the minimum. So the voltage level shouldn't be a problem. However in [2] (page 24, table 10. "Operating Ranges"), it is not mentioned that 792MHz OPP isn't allowed. Change it to only disable 792MHz OPP for i.MX6ULL types below 792 MHz. [1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/IMX6ULLIEC.pdf [2] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/IMX6ULLCEC.pdf Fixes: 0aa9abd4c212 ("cpufreq: imx6q: check speed grades for i.MX6ULL") Signed-off-by: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> [ Viresh: Edited subject ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-12-08cpufreq: imx6q: don't warn for disabling a non-existing frequencyChristoph Niedermaier1-14/+16
[ Upstream commit 11a3b0ac33d95aa84be426e801f800997262a225 ] It is confusing if a warning is given for disabling a non-existent frequency of the operating performance points (OPP). In this case the function dev_pm_opp_disable() returns -ENODEV. Check the return value and avoid the output of a warning in this case. Avoid code duplication by using a separate function. Signed-off-by: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com> [ Viresh : Updated commit subject ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Stable-dep-of: 2e4e0984c7d6 ("cpufreq: imx6q: Don't disable 792 Mhz OPP unnecessarily") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-12-08cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix the return value of amd_pstate_fast_switch()Gautham R. Shenoy1-1/+3
commit bb87be267b8ee9b40917fb5bf51be5ddb33c37c2 upstream. cpufreq_driver->fast_switch() callback expects a frequency as a return value. amd_pstate_fast_switch() was returning the return value of amd_pstate_update_freq(), which only indicates a success or failure. Fix this by making amd_pstate_fast_switch() return the target_freq when the call to amd_pstate_update_freq() is successful, and return the current frequency from policy->cur when the call to amd_pstate_update_freq() is unsuccessful. Fixes: 4badf2eb1e98 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add ->fast_switch() callback") Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com> Cc: 6.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.4+ Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-11-28cpufreq: stats: Fix buffer overflow detection in trans_stats()Christian Marangi1-7/+7
[ Upstream commit ea167a7fc2426f7685c3735e104921c1a20a6d3f ] Commit 3c0897c180c6 ("cpufreq: Use scnprintf() for avoiding potential buffer overflow") switched from snprintf to the more secure scnprintf but never updated the exit condition for PAGE_SIZE. As the commit say and as scnprintf document, what scnprintf returns what is actually written not counting the '\0' end char. This results in the case of len exceeding the size, len set to PAGE_SIZE - 1, as it can be written at max PAGE_SIZE - 1 (as '\0' is not counted) Because of len is never set to PAGE_SIZE, the function never break early, never prints the warning and never return -EFBIG. Fix this by changing the condition to PAGE_SIZE - 1 to correctly trigger the error. Cc: 5.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10+ Fixes: 3c0897c180c6 ("cpufreq: Use scnprintf() for avoiding potential buffer overflow") Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-13cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Fix -Warray-bounds bugGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+5
commit e520d0b6be950ce3738cf4b9bd3b392be818f1dc upstream. Allocate extra space for terminating element at: drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c: 449 table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; and add code comment to make this clear. This fixes the following -Warray-bounds warning seen after building ARM with multi_v7_defconfig (GCC 13): In function 'brcm_avs_get_freq_table', inlined from 'brcm_avs_cpufreq_init' at drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:623:15: drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:449:28: warning: array subscript 5 is outside array bounds of 'void[60]' [-Warray-bounds=] 449 | table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; In file included from include/linux/node.h:18, from include/linux/cpu.h:17, from include/linux/cpufreq.h:12, from drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:44: In function 'devm_kmalloc_array', inlined from 'devm_kcalloc' at include/linux/device.h:328:9, inlined from 'brcm_avs_get_freq_table' at drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:437:10, inlined from 'brcm_avs_cpufreq_init' at drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:623:15: include/linux/device.h:323:16: note: at offset 60 into object of size 60 allocated by 'devm_kmalloc' 323 | return devm_kmalloc(dev, bytes, flags); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally enabling -Warray-bounds. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/324 Fixes: de322e085995 ("cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: AVS CPUfreq driver for Broadcom STB SoCs") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-13cpufreq: Fix the race condition while updating the transition_task of policyLiao Chang1-0/+2
[ Upstream commit 61bfbf7951ba561dcbdd5357702d3cbc2d447812 ] The field 'transition_task' of policy structure is used to track the task which is performing the frequency transition. Using this field to print a warning once detect a case where the same task is calling _begin() again before completing the preivous frequency transition via the _end(). However, there is a potential race condition in _end() and _begin() APIs while updating the field 'transition_task' of policy, the scenario is depicted below: Task A Task B /* 1st freq transition */ Invoke _begin() { ... ... } /* 2nd freq transition */ Invoke _begin() { ... //waiting for A to ... //clear ... //transition_ongoing ... //in _end() for ... //the 1st transition | Change the frequency | | Invoke _end() { | ... | ... | transition_ongoing = false; V transition_ongoing = true; transition_task = current; transition_task = NULL; ... //A overwrites the task ... //performing the transition ... //result in error warning. } To fix this race condition, the transition_lock of policy structure is now acquired before updating policy structure in _end() API. Which ensure that only one task can update the 'transition_task' field at a time. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b3c61d8a-d52d-3136-fbf0-d1de9f1ba411@huawei.com/ Fixes: ca654dc3a93d ("cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end") Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-13cpufreq: powernow-k8: Use related_cpus instead of cpus in driver.exit()Liao Chang1-1/+2
[ Upstream commit 03997da042dac73c69e60d91942c727c76828b65 ] Since the 'cpus' field of policy structure will become empty in the cpufreq core API, it is better to use 'related_cpus' in the exit() callback of driver. Fixes: c3274763bfc3 ("cpufreq: powernow-k8: Initialize per-cpu data-structures properly") Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-13cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: Fix kernel panic when loading the driverSwapnil Sapkal1-8/+16
[ Upstream commit 60dd283804479c4a52f995b713f448e2cd65b8c8 ] After loading the amd-pstate-ut driver, amd_pstate_ut_check_perf() and amd_pstate_ut_check_freq() use cpufreq_cpu_get() to get the policy of the CPU and mark it as busy. In these functions, cpufreq_cpu_put() should be used to release the policy, but it is not, so any other entity trying to access the policy is blocked indefinitely. One such scenario is when amd_pstate mode is changed, leading to the following splat: [ 1332.103727] INFO: task bash:2929 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1332.110001] Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2-amd-pstate-ut #5 [ 1332.115315] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 1332.123140] task:bash state:D stack:0 pid:2929 ppid:2873 flags:0x00004006 [ 1332.123143] Call Trace: [ 1332.123145] <TASK> [ 1332.123148] __schedule+0x3c1/0x16a0 [ 1332.123154] ? _raw_read_lock_irqsave+0x2d/0x70 [ 1332.123157] schedule+0x6f/0x110 [ 1332.123160] schedule_timeout+0x14f/0x160 [ 1332.123162] ? preempt_count_add+0x86/0xd0 [ 1332.123165] __wait_for_common+0x92/0x190 [ 1332.123168] ? __pfx_schedule_timeout+0x10/0x10 [ 1332.123170] wait_for_completion+0x28/0x30 [ 1332.123173] cpufreq_policy_put_kobj+0x4d/0x90 [ 1332.123177] cpufreq_policy_free+0x157/0x1d0 [ 1332.123178] ? preempt_count_add+0x58/0xd0 [ 1332.123180] cpufreq_remove_dev+0xb6/0x100 [ 1332.123182] subsys_interface_unregister+0x114/0x120 [ 1332.123185] ? preempt_count_add+0x58/0xd0 [ 1332.123187] ? __pfx_amd_pstate_change_driver_mode+0x10/0x10 [ 1332.123190] cpufreq_unregister_driver+0x3b/0xd0 [ 1332.123192] amd_pstate_change_driver_mode+0x1e/0x50 [ 1332.123194] store_status+0xe9/0x180 [ 1332.123197] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x30 [ 1332.123199] sysfs_kf_write+0x42/0x50 [ 1332.123202] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x143/0x1d0 [ 1332.123204] vfs_write+0x2df/0x400 [ 1332.123208] ksys_write+0x6b/0xf0 [ 1332.123210] __x64_sys_write+0x1d/0x30 [ 1332.123213] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90 [ 1332.123216] ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x2e/0x50 [ 1332.123219] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x49/0x1a0 [ 1332.123223] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0xd/0x20 [ 1332.123225] ? irqentry_exit+0x3f/0x50 [ 1332.123226] ? exc_page_fault+0x8e/0x190 [ 1332.123228] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 [ 1332.123232] RIP: 0033:0x7fa74c514a37 [ 1332.123234] RSP: 002b:00007ffe31dd0788 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 1332.123238] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000008 RCX: 00007fa74c514a37 [ 1332.123239] RDX: 0000000000000008 RSI: 000055e27c447aa0 RDI: 0000000000000001 [ 1332.123241] RBP: 000055e27c447aa0 R08: 00007fa74c5d1460 R09: 000000007fffffff [ 1332.123242] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000008 [ 1332.123244] R13: 00007fa74c61a780 R14: 00007fa74c616600 R15: 00007fa74c615a00 [ 1332.123247] </TASK> Fix this by calling cpufreq_cpu_put() wherever necessary. Fixes: 14eb1c96e3a3 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add test module for amd-pstate driver") Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Suggested-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-13cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: Remove module parameter accessSwapnil Sapkal1-20/+2
[ Upstream commit 8d6e5e8268e89979d86501dbb8385ce2e6154de1 ] In amd-pstate-ut, shared memory-based systems call get_shared_mem() as part of amd_pstate_ut_check_enabled() function. This function was written when CONFIG_X86_AMD_PSTATE was tristate config and amd_pstate can be built as a module. Currently CONFIG_X86_AMD_PSTATE is a boolean config and module parameter shared_mem is removed. But amd-pstate-ut code still accesses this module parameter. Remove those accesses. Fixes: 456ca88d8a52 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: change amd-pstate driver to be built-in type") Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Suggested-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com> [ rjw: Subject edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-13cpufreq: intel_pstate: set stale CPU frequency to minimumDoug Smythies1-0/+5
commit d51847acb018d83186e4af67bc93f9a00a8644f7 upstream. The intel_pstate CPU frequency scaling driver does not use policy->cur and it is 0. When the CPU frequency is outdated arch_freq_get_on_cpu() will default to the nominal clock frequency when its call to cpufreq_quick_getpolicy_cur returns the never updated 0. Thus, the listed frequency might be outside of currently set limits. Some users are complaining about the high reported frequency, albeit stale, when their system is idle and/or it is above the reduced maximum they have set. This patch will maintain policy_cur for the intel_pstate driver at the current minimum CPU frequency. Reported-by: Yang Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217597 Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> [ rjw: White space damage fixes and comment adjustment ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-03cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ACPI _PSS states table patchingRafael J. Wysocki1-14/+0
commit e8a0e30b742f76ebd0f3b196973df4bf65d8fbbb upstream. After making acpi_processor_get_platform_limit() use the "no limit" value for its frequency QoS request when _PPC returns 0, it is not necessary to replace the frequency corresponding to the first _PSS return package entry with the maximum turbo frequency of the given CPU in intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits() any more, so drop the code doing that along with the comment explaining it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Hagar Hemdan <hagarhem@amazon.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-19cpufreq: mediatek: correct voltages for MT7622 and MT7623Daniel Golle1-3/+10
[ Upstream commit f85534113f5ae90a52521cdb9e9977a43ee42626 ] The MT6380 regulator typically used together with MT7622 does not support the current maximum processor and SRAM voltage in the cpufreq driver (1360000uV). For MT7622 limit processor and SRAM supply voltages to 1350000uV to avoid having the tracking algorithm request unsupported voltages from the regulator. On MT7623 there is no separate SRAM supply and the maximum voltage used is 1300000uV. Create dedicated platform data for MT7623 to cover that case as well. Fixes: 0883426fd07e3 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Raise proc and sram max voltage for MT7622/7623") Suggested-by: Jia-wei Chang <Jia-wei.Chang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-07-19cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix energy_performance_preference for passiveTero Kristo1-0/+2
[ Upstream commit 03f44ffb3d5be2fceda375d92c70ab6de4df7081 ] If the intel_pstate driver is set to passive mode, then writing the same value to the energy_performance_preference sysfs twice will fail. This is caused by the wrong return value used (index of the matched energy_perf_string), instead of the length of the passed in parameter. Fix by forcing the internal return value to zero when the same preference is passed in by user. This same issue is not present when active mode is used for the driver. Fixes: f6ebbcf08f37 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled") Reported-by: Niklas Neronin <niklas.neronin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-06-05cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add ->fast_switch() callbackGautham R. Shenoy1-7/+30
commit 4badf2eb1e986bdbf34dd2f5d4c979553a86fe54 upstream. Schedutil normally calls the adjust_perf callback for drivers with adjust_perf callback available and fast_switch_possible flag set. However, when frequency invariance is disabled and schedutil tries to invoke fast_switch. So, there is a chance of kernel crash if this function pointer is not set. To protect against this scenario add fast_switch callback to amd_pstate driver. Fixes: 1d215f0319c2 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add fast switch function for AMD P-State") Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-06-05cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update policy->cur in amd_pstate_adjust_perf()Wyes Karny1-1/+7
commit 3bf8c6307bad5c0cc09cde982e146d847859b651 upstream. Driver should update policy->cur after updating the frequency. Currently amd_pstate doesn't update policy->cur when `adjust_perf` is used. Which causes /proc/cpuinfo to show wrong cpu frequency. Fix this by updating policy->cur with correct frequency value in adjust_perf function callback. - Before the fix: (setting min freq to 1.5 MHz) [root@amd]# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "cpu MHz" | sort | uniq --count 1 cpu MHz : 1777.016 1 cpu MHz : 1797.160 1 cpu MHz : 1797.270 189 cpu MHz : 400.000 - After the fix: (setting min freq to 1.5 MHz) [root@amd]# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "cpu MHz" | sort | uniq --count 1 cpu MHz : 1753.353 1 cpu MHz : 1756.838 1 cpu MHz : 1776.466 1 cpu MHz : 1776.873 1 cpu MHz : 1777.308 1 cpu MHz : 1779.900 183 cpu MHz : 1805.231 1 cpu MHz : 1956.815 1 cpu MHz : 2246.203 1 cpu MHz : 2259.984 Fixes: 1d215f0319c2 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add fast switch function for AMD P-State") Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> [ rjw: Subject edits ] Cc: 5.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.17+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-05-11cpufreq: use correct unit when verify cur freqSanjay Chandrashekara1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 44295af5019f1997d038ad2611086a2d1e2af167 ] cpufreq_verify_current_freq checks() if the frequency returned by the hardware has a slight delta with the valid frequency value last set and returns "policy->cur" if the delta is within "1 MHz". In the comparison, "policy->cur" is in "kHz" but it's compared against HZ_PER_MHZ. So, the comparison range becomes "1 GHz". Fix this by comparing against KHZ_PER_MHZ instead of HZ_PER_MHZ. Fixes: f55ae08c8987 ("cpufreq: Avoid unnecessary frequency updates due to mismatch") Signed-off-by: Sanjay Chandrashekara <sanjayc@nvidia.com> [ sumit gupta: Commit message update ] Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-05-11cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-hw: Revert adding cpufreq qosBjorn Andersson1-14/+0
[ Upstream commit e2b47e585931a988c856fd4ba31e1296f749aee3 ] The OSM/EPSS hardware controls the frequency of each CPU cluster based on requests from the OS and various throttling events in the system. While throttling is in effect the related dcvs interrupt will be kept high. The purpose of the code handling this interrupt is to continuously report the thermal pressure based on the throttled frequency. The reasoning for adding QoS control to this mechanism is not entirely clear, but the introduction of commit 'c4c0efb06f17 ("cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-hw: Add cpufreq qos for LMh")' causes the scaling_max_frequncy to be set to the throttled frequency. On the next iteration of polling, the throttled frequency is above or equal to the newly requested frequency, so the polling is stopped. With cpufreq limiting the max frequency, the hardware no longer report a throttling state and no further updates to thermal pressure or qos state are made. The result of this is that scaling_max_frequency can only go down, and the system becomes slower and slower every time a thermal throttling event is reported by the hardware. Even if the logic could be improved, there is no reason for software to limit the max freqency in response to the hardware limiting the max frequency. At best software will follow the reported hardware state, but typically it will cause slower backoff of the throttling. This reverts commit c4c0efb06f17fa4a37ad99e7752b18a5405c76dc. Fixes: c4c0efb06f17 ("cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-hw: Add cpufreq qos for LMh") Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-05-11cpufreq: mediatek: Raise proc and sram max voltage for MT7622/7623AngeloGioacchino Del Regno1-2/+11
[ Upstream commit 0883426fd07e39355362e3f2eb9aee1a154dcaf6 ] During the addition of SRAM voltage tracking for CCI scaling, this driver got some voltage limits set for the vtrack algorithm: these were moved to platform data first, then enforced in a later commit 6a17b3876bc8 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()") using these as max values for the regulator_set_voltage() calls. In this case, the vsram/vproc constraints for MT7622 and MT7623 were supposed to be the same as MT2701 (and a number of other SoCs), but that turned out to be a mistake because the aforementioned two SoCs' maximum voltage for both VPROC and VPROC_SRAM is 1.36V. Fix that by adding new platform data for MT7622/7623 declaring the right {proc,sram}_max_volt parameter. Fixes: ead858bd128d ("cpufreq: mediatek: Move voltage limits to platform data") Fixes: 6a17b3876bc8 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()") Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-05-11cpufreq: mediatek: raise proc/sram max voltage for MT8516Jia-Wei Chang1-2/+11
[ Upstream commit d3296bb4cafd4bad4a5cf2eeab9d19cc94f9e30e ] Since the upper boundary of proc/sram voltage of MT8516 is 1300 mV, which is greater than the value of MT2701 1150 mV, we fix it by adding the corresponding platform data and specify proc/sram_max_volt to support MT8516. Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com> Fixes: ead858bd128d ("cpufreq: mediatek: Move voltage limits to platform data") Fixes: 6a17b3876bc8 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()") Reported-by: Nick Hainke <vincent@systemli.org> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-05-11cpufreq: mediatek: fix KP caused by handler usage after regulator_put/clk_putJia-Wei Chang1-32/+30
[ Upstream commit d51e106240bc755cbe59634b70d567c192b045b2 ] Any kind of failure in mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init() will lead to calling regulator_put() or clk_put() and the KP will occur since the regulator/clk handlers are used after released in mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release(). To prevent the usage after regulator_put()/clk_put(), the regulator/clk handlers are addressed in a way of "Free the Last Thing Style". Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com> Fixes: 4b9ceb757bbb ("cpufreq: mediatek: Enable clocks and regulators") Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-05-11cpufreq: mediatek: fix passing zero to 'PTR_ERR'Jia-Wei Chang1-5/+5
[ Upstream commit d51c63230994f167126d9d8381011b4cb2b0ad22 ] In order to prevent passing zero to 'PTR_ERR' in mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(), we fix the return value of of_get_cci() using error pointer by explicitly casting error number. Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com> Fixes: 0daa47325bae ("cpufreq: mediatek: Link CCI device to CPU") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10cpufreq: davinci: Fix clk use after freeUwe Kleine-König1-1/+3
[ Upstream commit 5d8f384a9b4fc50f6a18405f1c08e5a87a77b5b3 ] The remove function first frees the clks and only then calls cpufreq_unregister_driver(). If one of the cpufreq callbacks is called just before cpufreq_unregister_driver() is run, the freed clks might be used. Fixes: 6601b8030de3 ("davinci: add generic CPUFreq driver for DaVinci") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-02-14cpufreq: qcom-hw: Fix cpufreq_driver->get() for non-LMH systemsDouglas Anderson1-11/+13
[ Upstream commit 51be2fffd65d9f9cb427030ab0ee85d791b4437d ] On a sc7180-based Chromebook, when I go to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq I can see: cpuinfo_cur_freq:2995200 cpuinfo_max_freq:1804800 scaling_available_frequencies:300000 576000 ... 1708800 1804800 scaling_cur_freq:1804800 scaling_max_freq:1804800 As you can see the `cpuinfo_cur_freq` is bogus. It turns out that this bogus info started showing up as of commit c72cf0cb1d77 ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: Fix the frequency returned by cpufreq_driver->get()"). That commit seems to assume that everyone is on the LMH bandwagon, but sc7180 isn't. Let's go back to the old code in the case where LMH isn't used. Fixes: c72cf0cb1d77 ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: Fix the frequency returned by cpufreq_driver->get()") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> [ Viresh: Fixed the 'fixes' tag ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-02-01cpufreq: armada-37xx: stop using 0 as NULL pointerMiles Chen1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 08f0adb193c008de640fde34a2e00a666c01d77c ] Use NULL for NULL pointer to fix the following sparse warning: drivers/cpufreq/armada-37xx-cpufreq.c:448:32: sparse: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-02-01cpufreq: Add SM6375 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blocklistKonrad Dybcio1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit faf28e240dd118d9521c68aeb9388b9b8f02d9d0 ] The Qualcomm SM6375 platform uses the qcom-cpufreq-hw driver, so add it to the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver's blocklist. Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-02-01cpufreq: Add Tegra234 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blocklistSumit Gupta1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit 01c5bb0cc2a39fbc56ff9a5ef28b79447f0c2351 ] Tegra234 platform uses the tegra194-cpufreq driver, so add it to the blocklist in cpufreq-dt-platdev driver to avoid the cpufreq driver registration from there. Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-02-01cpufreq: CPPC: Add u64 casts to avoid overflowingPierre Gondois1-5/+6
[ Upstream commit f5f94b9c8b805d87ff185caf9779c3a4d07819e3 ] The fields of the _CPC object are unsigned 32-bits values. To avoid overflows while using _CPC's values, add 'u64' casts. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-01-18cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix kernel hang issue while amd-pstate unregisteringPerry Yuan1-0/+1
commit 4f3085f87b51a551a0647f218d4f324796ecb703 upstream. In the amd_pstate_adjust_perf(), there is one cpufreq_cpu_get() call to increase increments the kobject reference count of policy and make it as busy. Therefore, a corresponding call to cpufreq_cpu_put() is needed to decrement the kobject reference count back, it will resolve the kernel hang issue when unregistering the amd-pstate driver and register the `amd_pstate_epp` driver instance. Fixes: 1d215f0319 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add fast switch function for AMD P-State") Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Tested-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com> Cc: 5.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.17+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-01-07cpufreq: Init completion before kobject_init_and_add()Yongqiang Liu1-1/+1
commit 5c51054896bcce1d33d39fead2af73fec24f40b6 upstream. In cpufreq_policy_alloc(), it will call uninitialed completion in cpufreq_sysfs_release() when kobject_init_and_add() fails. And that will cause a crash such as the following page fault in complete: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8 [..] RIP: 0010:complete+0x98/0x1f0 [..] Call Trace: kobject_put+0x1be/0x4c0 cpufreq_online.cold+0xee/0x1fd cpufreq_add_dev+0x183/0x1e0 subsys_interface_register+0x3f5/0x4e0 cpufreq_register_driver+0x3b7/0x670 acpi_cpufreq_init+0x56c/0x1000 [acpi_cpufreq] do_one_initcall+0x13d/0x780 do_init_module+0x1c3/0x630 load_module+0x6e67/0x73b0 __do_sys_finit_module+0x181/0x240 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Fixes: 4ebe36c94aed ("cpufreq: Fix kobject memleak") Signed-off-b