summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/amd
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-02-17drm/amdkfd: only flush the validate MES contexPrike Liang1-2/+5
commit 9078a5bfa21e78ae68b6d7c365d1b92f26720c55 upstream. The following page fault was observed duringthe KFD process release. In this particular error case, the HIP test (./MemcpyPerformance -h) does not require the queue. As a result, the process_context_addr was not assigned when the KFD process was released, ultimately leading to this page fault during the execution of the function kfd_process_dequeue_from_all_devices(). [345962.294891] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: [gfxhub] page fault (src_id:0 ring:153 vmid:0 pasid:0) [345962.295333] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: in page starting at address 0x0000000000000000 from client 10 [345962.295775] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: GCVM_L2_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS:0x00000B33 [345962.296097] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Faulty UTCL2 client ID: CPC (0x5) [345962.296394] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: MORE_FAULTS: 0x1 [345962.296633] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: WALKER_ERROR: 0x1 [345962.296876] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: PERMISSION_FAULTS: 0x3 [345962.297135] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: MAPPING_ERROR: 0x1 [345962.297377] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: RW: 0x0 [345962.297682] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: [gfxhub] page fault (src_id:0 ring:169 vmid:0 pasid:0) Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/amdgpu: change the config of cgcg on gfx12Kenneth Feng1-11/+0
commit 5cda56bd86c455341087dca29c65dc7c87f84340 upstream. change the config of cgcg on gfx12 Signed-off-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Wang <kevinyang.wang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/pm: Mark MM activity as unsupportedLijo Lazar1-1/+0
commit 819bf6662b93a5a8b0c396d2c7e7fab6264c9808 upstream. Aldebaran doesn't support querying MM activity percentage. Keep the field as 0xFFs to mark it as unsupported. Signed-off-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/display: Optimize cursor position updatesAric Cyr4-12/+19
commit 024771f3fb75dc817e9429d5763f1a6eb84b6f21 upstream. [why] Updating the cursor enablement register can be a slow operation and accumulates when high polling rate cursors cause frequent updates asynchronously to the cursor position. [how] Since the cursor enable bit is cached there is no need to update the enablement register if there is no change to it. This removes the read-modify-write from the cursor position programming path in HUBP and DPP, leaving only the register writes. Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Sung Lee <sung.lee@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/display: Limit Scaling Ratio on DCN3.01Gabe Teeger1-4/+4
[ Upstream commit abc0ad6d08440761b199988c329ad7ac83f41c9b ] [why] Underflow and flickering was occuring due to high scaling ratios when resizing videos. [how] Limit the scaling ratios by increasing the max scaling factor Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Teeger <Gabe.Teeger@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/display: Increase sanitizer frame larger than limit when compile ↵Nathan Chancellor1-0/+4
testing with clang [ Upstream commit e4479aecf6581af81bc0908575447878d2a07e01 ] Commit 24909d9ec7c3 ("drm/amd/display: Overwriting dualDPP UBF values before usage") added a new warning in dml2/display_mode_core.c when building allmodconfig with clang: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml2/display_mode_core.c:6268:13: error: stack frame size (3128) exceeds limit (3072) in 'dml_prefetch_check' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 6268 | static void dml_prefetch_check(struct display_mode_lib_st *mode_lib) | ^ Commit be4e3509314a ("drm/amd/display: DML21 Reintegration For Various Fixes") introduced one in dml2_core/dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.c with the same configuration: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml2/dml21/src/dml2_core/dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.c:7236:13: error: stack frame size (3256) exceeds limit (3072) in 'dml_core_mode_support' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 7236 | static bool dml_core_mode_support(struct dml2_core_calcs_mode_support_ex *in_out_params) | ^ In the case of the first warning, the stack usage was already at the limit at the parent change, so the offending change was rather innocuous. In the case of the second warning, there was a rather dramatic increase in stack usage compared to the parent: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml2/dml21/src/dml2_core/dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.c:7032:13: error: stack frame size (2696) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml_core_mode_support' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 7032 | static bool dml_core_mode_support(struct dml2_core_calcs_mode_support_ex *in_out_params) | ^ This is an unfortunate interaction between an issue with stack slot reuse in LLVM that gets exacerbated by sanitization (which gets enabled with all{mod,yes}config) and function calls using a much higher number of parameters than is typical in the kernel, necessitating passing most of these values on the stack. While it is possible that there should be source code changes to address these warnings, this code is difficult to modify for various reasons, as has been noted in other changes that have occurred for similar reasons, such as commit 6740ec97bcdb ("drm/amd/display: Increase frame warning limit with KASAN or KCSAN in dml2"). Increase the frame larger than limit when compile testing with clang and the sanitizers enabled to avoid this breakage in all{mod,yes}config, as they are commonly used and valuable testing targets. While it is not the best to hide this issue, it is not really relevant when compile testing, as the sanitizers are commonly stressful on optimizations and they are only truly useful at runtime, which COMPILE_TEST states will not occur with the current build. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412121748.chuX4sap-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-17drm/amdkfd: Queue interrupt work to different CPUPhilip Yang3-33/+20
[ Upstream commit 34db5a32617d102e8042151bb87590e43c97132e ] For CPX mode, each KFD node has interrupt worker to process ih_fifo to send events to user space. Currently all interrupt workers of same adev queue to same CPU, all workers execution are actually serialized and this cause KFD ih_fifo overflow when CPU usage is high. Use per-GPU unbounded highpri queue with number of workers equals to number of partitions, let queue_work select the next CPU round robin among the local CPUs of same NUMA. Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-17drm/amdgpu: Don't enable sdma 4.4.5 CTXEMPTY interruptPhilip Yang1-3/+5
[ Upstream commit b4b7271e5ca95b581f2fcc4ae852c4079215e92d ] The sdma context empty interrupt is dropped in amdgpu_irq_dispatch as unregistered interrupt src_id 243, this interrupt accounts to 1/3 of total interrupts and causes IH primary ring overflow when running stressful benchmark application. Disable this interrupt has no side effect found. Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/display: Fix Mode Cutoff in DSC Passthrough to DP2.1 MonitorFangzhi Zuo1-3/+3
[ Upstream commit e56ad45e991128bf4db160b75a1d9f647a341d8f ] Source --> DP2.1 MST hub --> DP1.4/2.1 monitor When change from DP1.4 to DP2.1 from monitor manual, modes higher than 4k120 are all cutoff by mode validation. Switch back to DP1.4 gets all the modes up to 4k240 available to be enabled by dsc passthrough. [why] Compared to DP1.4 link from hub to monitor, DP2.1 link has larger full_pbn value that causes overflow in the process of doing conversion from pbn to kbps. [how] Change the data type accordingly to fit into the data limit during conversion calculation. Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/display: use eld_mutex to protect access to connector->eldDmitry Baryshkov1-0/+2
[ Upstream commit 819bee01eea06282d7bda17d46caf29cae4f6d84 ] Reading access to connector->eld can happen at the same time the drm_edid_to_eld() updates the data. Take the newly added eld_mutex in order to protect connector->eld from concurrent access. Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241206-drm-connector-eld-mutex-v2-4-c9bce1ee8bea@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/display: Overwriting dualDPP UBF values before usageAusef Yousof2-18/+18
[ Upstream commit 24909d9ec7c3afa8da2f3c9afa312e7a4a61f250 ] [WHY] Right now in dml2 mode validation we are calculating UBF parameters for prefetch calculation for single and dual DPP scenarios. Data structure to store such values are just 1D arrays, the single DPP values are overwritten by the dualDPP values, and we end up using dualDPP for prefetch calculations twice (once in place of singleDPP support check and again for dual). This naturally leads to many problems, one of which validating a mode in "singleDPP" (when we used dual DPP parameters) and sending the singleDPP parameters to mode programming, if we cannot support then we observe the corruption as described in the ticket. [HOW] UBF values need to have 2d arrays to store values specific to single and dual DPP states to avoid single DPP values being overwritten. Other parameters are recorded on a per state basis such as prefetch UBF values but they are in the same loop used for calculation and at that point its fine to overwrite them, its not the case for plain UBF values. Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ausef Yousof <Ausef.Yousof@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/display: Populate chroma prefetch parameters, DET buffer fixAusef Yousof2-11/+29
[ Upstream commit 70fec46519fca859aa209f5f02e7e0a0123aca4a ] [WHY] Soft hang/lag observed during 10bit playback + moving cursor, corruption observed in other tickets for same reason, also failing MPO. 1. Currently, we are always running calculate_lowest_supported_state_for_temp_read which is only necessary on dGPU 2. Fast validate path does not apply DET buffer allocation policy 3. Prefetch UrgBFactor chroma parameter not populated in prefetch calculation [HOW] 1. Add a check to see if we are on APU, if so, skip the code 2. Add det buffer alloc policy checks to fast validate path 3. Populate UrgentBurstChroma param in call to calculate UrgBChroma prefetch values -revision commits: small formatting/brackets/null check addition + remove test change + dGPU code Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ausef Yousof <Ausef.Yousof@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Fangzhi Zuo <jerry.zuo@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-17drm/amd/display: Add support for minimum backlight quirkThomas Weißschuh2-0/+7
[ Upstream commit c2753b2471c65955de18cbc58530641447e5bfe9 ] Not all platforms provide the full range of PWM backlight capabilities supported by the hardware through ATIF. Use the generic drm panel minimum backlight quirk infrastructure to override the capabilities where necessary. Testing the backlight quirk together with the "panel_power_savings" sysfs file has not shown any negative impact. One quirk seems to be that 0% at panel_power_savings=0 seems to be slightly darker than at panel_power_savings=4. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Tested-by: Dustin L. Howett <dustin@howett.net> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241111-amdgpu-min-backlight-quirk-v7-2-f662851fda69@weissschuh.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-08drm/amd/display: Add hubp cache reset when powergatingAric Cyr14-2/+33
commit 01130f5260e5868fb6b15ab8c00dbc894139f48e upstream. [Why] When HUBP is power gated, the SW state can get out of sync with the hardware state causing cursor to not be programmed correctly. [How] Similar to DPP, add a HUBP reset function which is called wherever HUBP is initialized or powergated. This function will clear the cursor position and attribute cache allowing for proper programming when the HUBP is brought back up. Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Sung Lee <sung.lee@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-02-08drm/amd/display: restore invalid MSA timing check for freesyncMelissa Wen1-4/+8
commit 7f2b5237e313e39008a85b33ca94ab503a8fdff9 upstream. This restores the original behavior that gets min/max freq from EDID and only set DP/eDP connector as freesync capable if "sink device is capable of rendering incoming video stream without MSA timing parameters", i.e., `allow_invalid_MSA_timing_params` is true. The condition was mistakenly removed by 0159f88a99c9 ("drm/amd/display: remove redundant freesync parser for DP"). CC: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> CC: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3915 Fixes: 0159f88a99c9 ("drm/amd/display: remove redundant freesync parser for DP") Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-02-08drm/amdgpu: fix gpu recovery disable with per queue resetJonathan Kim1-0/+6
[ Upstream commit 86bde64cb7957be393f84e5d35fb8dfc91e4ae7e ] Per queue reset should be bypassed when gpu recovery is disabled with module parameter. Fixes: ee0a469cf917 ("drm/amdkfd: support per-queue reset on gfx9") Signed-off-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-08drm/amdgpu: tear down ttm range manager for doorbell in amdgpu_ttm_fini()Jiang Liu1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit 60a2c0c12b644450e420ffc42291d1eb248bacb7 ] Tear down ttm range manager for doorbell in function amdgpu_ttm_fini(), to avoid memory leakage. Fixes: 792b84fb9038 ("drm/amdgpu: initialize ttm for doorbells") Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <gerry@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Russell <kent.russell@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-08drm/amdgpu: Fix shift type in amdgpu_debugfs_sdma_sched_mask_set()Dan Carpenter1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit 6ec6cd9acbaa844391a1f75a824a3a9d18978fcb ] The "mask" and "val" variables are type u64. The problem is that the BIT() macros are type unsigned long which is just 32 bits on 32bit systems. It's unlikely that people will be using this driver on 32bit kernels and even if they did we only use the lower AMDGPU_MAX_SDMA_INSTANCES (16) bits. So this bug does not affect anything in real life. Still, for correctness sake, u64 bit masks should use BIT_ULL(). Fixes: d2e3961ae371 ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_sdma_sched_mask debugfs") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d39a9325-87a4-4543-b6ec-1c61fca3a6fc@stanley.mountain Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-08drm/amdgpu: Fix potential integer overflow in scheduler mask calculationsKarol Przybylski1-4/+4
[ Upstream commit 34c4eb7d4e0cd443399a0f114d467d2b3ff05419 ] The use of 1 << i in scheduler mask calculations can result in an unintentional integer overflow due to the expression being evaluated as a 32-bit signed integer. This patch replaces 1 << i with 1ULL << i to ensure the operation is performed as a 64-bit unsigned integer, preventing overflow Discovered in coverity scan, CID 1636393, 1636175, 1636007, 1635853 Fixes: c5c63d9cb5d3 ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_gfx_sched_mask and amdgpu_compute_sched_mask debugfs") Signed-off-by: Karol Przybylski <karprzy7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-08drm/amdgpu/vcn: reset fw_shared under SRIOVBokun Zhang1-0/+2
[ Upstream commit 3676f37a88432132bcff55a17dc48911239b6d98 ] - The previous patch only considered the case for baremetal and is not applicable for SRIOV code path. We also need to init fw_share for SRIOV VF Fixes: 928cd772e18f ("drm/amdgpu/vcn: reset fw_shared when VCPU buffers corrupted on vcn v4.0.3") Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Bokun Zhang <bokun.zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-08drm/amdgpu: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in ↵Ivan Stepchenko1-0/+2
atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table [ Upstream commit 357445e28ff004d7f10967aa93ddb4bffa5c3688 ] The function atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table() does not check the return value of smu_atom_get_data_table(). If smu_atom_get_data_table() fails to retrieve SMU_Info table, it returns NULL which is later dereferenced. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. In practice this should never happen as this code only gets called on polaris chips and the vbios data table will always be present on those chips. Fixes: a23eefa2f461 ("drm/amd/powerplay: enable dpm for baffin.") Signed-off-by: Ivan Stepchenko <sid@itb.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-08drm/amd/pm: Fix an error handling path in ↵Christophe JAILLET1-2/+3
vega10_enable_se_edc_force_stall_config() [ Upstream commit a3300782d5375e280ba7040f323d01960bfe3396 ] In case of error after a amdgpu_gfx_rlc_enter_safe_mode() call, it is not balanced by a corresponding amdgpu_gfx_rlc_exit_safe_mode() call. Add the missing call. Fixes: 9b7b8154cdb8 ("drm/amd/powerplay: added didt support for vega10") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: fix fw attestation for MP0_14_0_{2/3}Gui Chengming1-0/+4
FW attestation was disabled on MP0_14_0_{2/3}. V2: Move check into is_fw_attestation_support func. (Frank) Remove DRM_WARN log info. (Alex) Fix format. (Christian) Signed-off-by: Gui Chengming <Jack.Gui@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Frank.Min <Frank.Min@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <Christian.Koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 62952a38d9bcf357d5ffc97615c48b12c9cd627c) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: always sync the GFX pipe on ctx switchChristian König1-2/+2
That is needed to enforce isolation between contexts. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit def59436fb0d3ca0f211d14873d0273d69ebb405) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: disable gfxoff with the compute workload on gfx12Kenneth Feng1-2/+3
Disable gfxoff with the compute workload on gfx12. This is a workaround for the opencl test failure. Signed-off-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 2affe2bbc997b3920045c2c434e480c81a5f9707) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: Fix Circular Locking Dependency in AMDGPU GFX IsolationSrinivasan Shanmugam1-2/+10
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order. - The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`, leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is held, it can create a circular dependency. By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue: [ 606.297333] ====================================================== [ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 Tainted: G OE [ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock: [ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.297413] but task is already holding lock: [ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.297725] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 606.297738] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 606.297749] -> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.298929] -> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu] [ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.299236] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.300416] other info that might help us debug this: [ 606.300428] Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex [ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1 [ 606.300476] ---- ---- [ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex); [ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)); [ 606.300536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825: [ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 606.300577] #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 606.300600] #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300837] #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301062] #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610 [ 606.301083] stack backtrace: [ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 [ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024 [ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] [ 606.301140] Call Trace: [ 606.301146] <TASK> [ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340 [ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490 [ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 [ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched] [ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.303512] </TASK> v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex) - Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing `enforce_isolation_mutex`. - This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock. - The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward. - This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order. Fixes: afefd6f24502 ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization") Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com> Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 0b6b2dd38336d5fd49214f0e4e6495e658e3ab44) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-13drm/amd/display: Disable replay and psr while VRR is enabledTom Chung3-4/+6
[Why] Replay and PSR will cause some video corruption while VRR is enabled. [How] 1. Disable the Replay and PSR while VRR is enabled. 2. Change the amdgpu_dm_crtc_vrr_active() parameter to const. Because the function will only read data from dm_crtc_state. Reviewed-by: Sun peng Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit d7879340e987b3056b8ae39db255b6c19c170a0d) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-13drm/amd/display: Fix PSR-SU not support but still call the amdgpu_dm_psr_enableTom Chung1-1/+1
[Why] The enum DC_PSR_VERSION_SU_1 of psr_version is 1 and DC_PSR_VERSION_UNSUPPORTED is 0xFFFFFFFF. The original code may has chance trigger the amdgpu_dm_psr_enable() while psr version is set to DC_PSR_VERSION_UNSUPPORTED. [How] Modify the condition to psr->psr_version == DC_PSR_VERSION_SU_1 Reviewed-by: Sun peng Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit f765e7ce0417f8dc38479b4b495047c397c16902) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-10drm/amd/display: Initialize denominator defaults to 1Alex Hung1-2/+2
[WHAT & HOW] Variables, used as denominators and maybe not assigned to other values, should be initialized to non-zero to avoid DIVIDE_BY_ZERO, as reported by Coverity. Reviewed-by: Austin Zheng <austin.zheng@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit e2c4c6c10542ccfe4a0830bb6c9fd5b177b7bbb7)
2025-01-10drm/amd/display: Use HW lock mgr for PSR1Tom Chung1-1/+2
[Why] Without the dmub hw lock, it may cause the lock timeout issue while do modeset on PSR1 eDP panel. [How] Allow dmub hw lock for PSR1. Reviewed-by: Sun peng Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit a2b5a9956269f4c1a09537177f18ab0229fe79f7)
2025-01-10drm/amd/display: Remove unnecessary eDP power downYiling Chen1-6/+6
[why] When first time of link training is fail, eDP would be powered down and would not be powered up for next retry link training. It causes that all of retry link linking would be fail. [how] We has extracted both power up and down sequence from enable/disable link output function before DCN32. We remov eDP power down in dcn32_disable_link_output(). Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Yiling Chen <yi-ling.chen2@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit f5860c88cdfe7300d08c1aef881bba0cac369e34)
2025-01-10drm/amd/display: Do not elevate mem_type change to full updateLeo Li1-6/+23
[Why] There should not be any need to revalidate bandwidth on memory placement change, since the fb is expected to be pinned to DCN-accessable memory before scanout. For APU it's DRAM, and DGPU, it's VRAM. However, async flips + memory type change needs to be rejected. [How] Do not set lock_and_validation_needed on mem_type change. Instead, reject an async_flip request if the crtc's buffer(s) changed mem_type. This may fix stuttering/corruption experienced with PSR SU and PSR1 panels, if the compositor allocates fbs in both VRAM carveout and GTT and flips between them. Fixes: a7c0cad0dc06 ("drm/amd/display: ensure async flips are only accepted for fast updates") Reviewed-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 4caacd1671b7a013ad04cd8b6398f002540bdd4d) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-10drm/amd/display: Do not wait for PSR disable on vbl enableLeo Li6-17/+54
[Why] Outside of a modeset/link configuration change, we should not have to wait for the panel to exit PSR. Depending on the panel and it's state, it may take multiple frames for it to exit PSR. Therefore, waiting in all scenarios may cause perceived stuttering, especially in combination with faster vblank shutdown. [How] PSR1 disable is hooked up to the vblank enable event, and vice versa. In case of vblank enable, do not wait for panel to exit PSR, but still wait in all other cases. We also avoid a call to unnecessarily change power_opts on disable - this ends up sending another command to dmcub fw. When testing against IGT, some crc tests like kms_plane_alpha_blend and amd_hotplug were failing due to CRC timeouts. This was found to be caused by the early return before HW has fully exited PSR1. Fix this by first making sure we grab a vblank reference, then waiting for panel to exit PSR1, before programming hw for CRC generation. Fixes: 58a261bfc967 ("drm/amd/display: use a more lax vblank enable policy for older ASICs") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3743 Reviewed-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit aa6713fa2046f4c09bf3013dd1420ae15603ca6f) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-10Revert "drm/amd/display: Enable urgent latency adjustments for DCN35"Nicholas Susanto1-2/+2
Revert commit 284f141f5ce5 ("drm/amd/display: Enable urgent latency adjustments for DCN35") [Why & How] Urgent latency increase caused 2.8K OLED monitor caused it to block this panel support P0. Reverting this change does not reintroduce the netflix corruption issue which it fixed. Fixes: 284f141f5ce5 ("drm/amd/display: Enable urgent latency adjustments for DCN35") Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Susanto <Nicholas.Susanto@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit c7ccfc0d4241a834c25a9a9e1e78b388b4445d23) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-10drm/amd/display: Reduce accessing remote DPCD overheadWayne Lin2-9/+27
[Why] Observed frame rate get dropped by tool like glxgear. Even though the output to monitor is 60Hz, the rendered frame rate drops to 30Hz lower. It's due to code path in some cases will trigger dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode() to read out remote Link status to assess the available bandwidth for dsc maniplation. Overhead of keep reading remote DPCD is considerable. [How] Store the remote link BW in mst_local_bw and use end-to-end full_pbn as an indicator to decide whether update the remote link bw or not. Whenever we need the info to assess the BW, visit the stored one first. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3720 Fixes: fa57924c76d9 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()") Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jerry Zuo <jerry.zuo@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 4a9a918545455a5979c6232fcf61ed3d8f0db3ae) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-10drm/amd/display: Validate mdoe under MST LCT=1 case as wellWayne Lin1-5/+9
[Why & How] Currently in dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode(), when valdidating mode under dsc decoding at the last DP link config, we only validate the case when there is an UFP. However, if the MSTB LCT=1, there is no UFP. Under this case, use root_link_bw_in_kbps as the available bw to compare. Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3720 Fixes: fa57924c76d9 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()") Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jerry Zuo <jerry.zuo@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit a04d9534a8a75b2806c5321c387be450c364b55e) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-10drm/amdgpu/smu13: update powersave optimizationsAlex Deucher1-5/+6
Only apply when compute profile is selected. This is the only supported configuration. Selecting other profiles can lead to performane degradations. Reviewed-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit d477e39532d725b1cdb3c8005c689c74ffbf3b94) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x
2025-01-06drm/amdgpu: Add a lock when accessing the buddy trim functionArunpravin Paneer Selvam1-1/+1
When running YouTube videos and Steam games simultaneously, the tester found a system hang / race condition issue with the multi-display configuration setting. Adding a lock to the buddy allocator's trim function would be the solution. <log snip> [ 7197.250436] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000108 [ 7197.250447] RIP: 0010:__alloc_range+0x8b/0x340 [amddrm_buddy] [ 7197.250470] Call Trace: [ 7197.250472] <TASK> [ 7197.250475] ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80 [ 7197.250481] ? die_addr+0x37/0xa0 [ 7197.250483] ? exc_general_protection+0x1db/0x480 [ 7197.250488] ? drm_suballoc_new+0x13c/0x93d [drm_suballoc_helper] [ 7197.250493] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x27/0x30 [ 7197.250498] ? __alloc_range+0x8b/0x340 [amddrm_buddy] [ 7197.250501] ? __alloc_range+0x109/0x340 [amddrm_buddy] [ 7197.250506] amddrm_buddy_block_trim+0x1b5/0x260 [amddrm_buddy] [ 7197.250511] amdgpu_vram_mgr_new+0x4f5/0x590 [amdgpu] [ 7197.250682] amdttm_resource_alloc+0x46/0xb0 [amdttm] [ 7197.250689] ttm_bo_alloc_resource+0xe4/0x370 [amdttm] [ 7197.250696] amdttm_bo_validate+0x9d/0x180 [amdttm] [ 7197.250701] amdgpu_bo_pin+0x15a/0x2f0 [amdgpu] [ 7197.250831] amdgpu_dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0xb2/0x360 [amdgpu] [ 7197.251025] ? try_wait_for_completion+0x59/0x70 [ 7197.251030] drm_atomic_helper_prepare_planes.part.0+0x2f/0x1e0 [ 7197.251035] drm_atomic_helper_prepare_planes+0x5d/0x70 [ 7197.251037] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x84/0x160 [ 7197.251040] drm_atomic_nonblocking_commit+0x59/0x70 [ 7197.251043] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x720/0x850 [ 7197.251047] ? __pfx_drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [ 7197.251049] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb9/0x120 [ 7197.251053] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 7197.251056] drm_ioctl+0x2d4/0x550 [ 7197.251058] ? __pfx_drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [ 7197.251063] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x4e/0x90 [amdgpu] [ 7197.251186] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xa0/0xf0 [ 7197.251190] x64_sys_call+0x143b/0x25c0 [ 7197.251193] do_syscall_64+0x7f/0x180 [ 7197.251197] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 7197.251199] ? amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create+0x215/0x320 [amdgpu] [ 7197.251329] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0xb7/0x1a0 [ 7197.251332] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com> Fixes: 4a5ad08f5377 ("drm/amdgpu: Add address alignment support to DCC buffers") Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 3318ba94e56b9183d0304577c74b33b6b01ce516) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-06drm/amd/pm: fix BUG: scheduling while atomicKun Liu4-6/+10
atomic scheduling will be triggered in interrupt handler for AC/DC mode switch as following backtrace. Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl __schedule_bug __schedule schedule schedule_preempt_disabled __mutex_lock smu_cmn_send_smc_msg_with_param smu_v13_0_irq_process amdgpu_irq_dispatch amdgpu_ih_process amdgpu_irq_handler __handle_irq_event_percpu handle_irq_event handle_edge_irq __common_interrupt common_interrupt </IRQ> <TASK> asm_common_interrupt Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Kun Liu <Kun.Liu2@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 03cc84b102d1a832e8dfc59344346dedcebcdf42) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-06drm/amdkfd: wq_release signals dma_fence only when availableZhu Lingshan1-1/+2
kfd_process_wq_release() signals eviction fence by dma_fence_signal() which wanrs if dma_fence is NULL. kfd_process->ef is initialized by kfd_process_device_init_vm() through ioctl. That means the fence is NULL for a new created kfd_process, and close a kfd_process right after open it will trigger the warning. This commit conditionally signals the eviction fence in kfd_process_wq_release() only when it is available. [ 503.660882] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9 at drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:467 dma_fence_signal+0x74/0xa0 [ 503.782940] Workqueue: kfd_process_wq kfd_process_wq_release [