| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Specs don't say anything about UIP being cleared within 10ms. They
only say that UIP won't occur for another 244uS. If a long NMI occurs
while UIP is still updating it might not be possible to get valid
data in 10ms.
This has been observed in the wild that around s2idle some calls can
take up to 480ms before UIP is clear.
Adjust callers from outside an interrupt context to wait for up to a
1s instead of 10ms.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1.y
Fixes: ec5895c0f2d8 ("rtc: mc146818-lib: extract mc146818_avoid_UIP")
Reported-by: Carsten Hatger <xmb8dsv4@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217626
Tested-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Reviewed-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Acked-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231128053653.101798-5-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
The UIP timeout is hardcoded to 10ms for all RTC reads, but in some
contexts this might not be enough time. Add a timeout parameter to
mc146818_get_time() and mc146818_get_time_callback().
If UIP timeout is configured by caller to be >=100 ms and a call
takes this long, log a warning.
Make all callers use 10ms to ensure no functional changes.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1.y
Fixes: ec5895c0f2d8 ("rtc: mc146818-lib: extract mc146818_avoid_UIP")
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Tested-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Reviewed-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Acked-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231128053653.101798-4-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
When mc146818_avoid_UIP() fails to return a valid value, this is because
UIP didn't clear in the timeout period. Adjust the return code in this
case to -ETIMEDOUT.
Tested-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Reviewed-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Acked-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: cdedc45c579f ("rtc: cmos: avoid UIP when reading alarm time")
Fixes: cd17420ebea5 ("rtc: cmos: avoid UIP when writing alarm time")
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231128053653.101798-3-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
Intel systems > 2015 have been configured to use ACPI alarm instead
of HPET to avoid s2idle issues.
Having HPET programmed for wakeup causes problems on AMD systems with
s2idle as well.
One particular case is that the systemd "SuspendThenHibernate" feature
doesn't work properly on the Framework 13" AMD model. Switching to
using ACPI alarm fixes the issue.
Adjust the quirk to apply to AMD/Hygon systems from 2021 onwards.
This matches what has been tested and is specifically to avoid potential
risk to older systems.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1+
Reported-by: <alvin.zhuge@gmail.com>
Reported-by: <renzhamin@gmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/24279
Reported-by: Kelvie Wong <kelvie@kelvie.ca>
Closes: https://community.frame.work/t/systemd-suspend-then-hibernate-wakes-up-after-5-minutes/39392
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231106162310.85711-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
The alarm window supported by the cmos RTC depends on the chip
and its configuration. Report the limit to the RTC core.
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230817225537.4053865-5-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
Make cmos_do_remove() drop the ACPI RTC fixed event handler so as to
prevent it from operating on stale data in case the event triggers
after driver removal.
Fixes: 311ee9c151ad ("rtc: cmos: allow using ACPI for RTC alarm instead of HPET")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2224609.iZASKD2KPV@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
The names of rtc_wake_setup() and cmos_wake_setup() don't indicate
that these functions are ACPI-related, which is the case, and the
former doesn't really reflect the role of the function.
Rename them to acpi_rtc_event_setup() and acpi_cmos_wake_setup(),
respectively, to address this shortcoming.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3225614.44csPzL39Z@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
Reorder the ACPI-related code before cmos_do_probe() so as to eliminate
excessive forward declarations of some functions.
While at it, for consistency, add the inline modifier to the
definitions of empty stub static funtions and remove it from the
corresponding definitions of functions with non-empty bodies.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/13157911.uLZWGnKmhe@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
To reduce code duplication, move the invocation of rtc_wake_setup()
into cmos_do_probe() and simplify the callers of the latter.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2143522.irdbgypaU6@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
Notice that cmos_wake_setup() is the only user of acpi_rtc_info and it
can operate on the cmos_rtc variable directly, so it need not set the
platform_data pointer before cmos_do_probe() is called. Instead, it
can be called by cmos_do_probe() in the case when the platform_data
pointer is not set to implement the default behavior (which is to use
the FADT information as long as ACPI support is enabled).
Modify the code accordingly.
While at it, drop a comment that doesn't really match the code it is
supposed to be describing.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4803444.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
Now that rtc_wake_setup is called outside of cmos_wake_setup, it also need
to be defined on non-ACPI platforms.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018203512.2532407-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
Commit 4919d3eb2ec0 ("rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration
ordering issue") overlooked the fact that cmos_do_probe() depended
on the preparations carried out by cmos_wake_setup() and the wake
alarm stopped working after the ordering of them had been changed.
Address this by partially reverting commit 4919d3eb2ec0 so that
cmos_wake_setup() is called before cmos_do_probe() again and moving
the rtc_wake_setup() invocation from cmos_wake_setup() directly to the
callers of cmos_do_probe() where it will happen after a successful
completion of the latter.
Fixes: 4919d3eb2ec0 ("rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue")
Reported-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reported-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5887691.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
Because acpi_install_fixed_event_handler() enables the event
automatically on success, it is incorrect to call it before the
handler routine passed to it is ready to handle events.
Unfortunately, the rtc-cmos driver does exactly the incorrect thing
by calling cmos_wake_setup(), which passes rtc_handler() to
acpi_install_fixed_event_handler(), before cmos_do_probe(), because
rtc_handler() uses dev_get_drvdata() to get to the cmos object
pointer and the driver data pointer is only populated in
cmos_do_probe().
This leads to a NULL pointer dereference in rtc_handler() on boot
if the RTC fixed event happens to be active at the init time.
To address this issue, change the initialization ordering of the
driver so that cmos_wake_setup() is always called after a successful
cmos_do_probe() call.
While at it, change cmos_pnp_probe() to call cmos_do_probe() after
the initial if () statement used for computing the IRQ argument to
be passed to cmos_do_probe() which is cleaner than calling it in
each branch of that if () (local variable "irq" can be of type int,
because it is passed to that function as an argument of type int).
Note that commit 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check
ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0") caused this issue to affect a larger number
of systems, because previously it only affected systems with
ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 set, but it is present regardless of that
commit.
Fixes: 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0")
Fixes: a474aaedac99 ("rtc-cmos: move wake setup from ACPI glue into RTC driver")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20221010141630.zfzi7mk7zvnmclzy@techsingularity.net/
Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5629262.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
The ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag merely means that it is better to
use low-power S0 idle on the given platform than S3 (provided that
the latter is supported) and it doesn't preclude using either of
them (which of them will be used depends on the choices made by user
space).
For this reason, there is no benefit from checking that flag in
use_acpi_alarm_quirks().
First off, it cannot be a bug to do S3 with use_acpi_alarm set,
because S3 can be used on systems with ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 and it
must work if really supported, so the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 check is
not needed to protect the S3-capable systems from failing.
Second, suspend-to-idle can be carried out on a system with
ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 unset and it is expected to work, so if setting
use_acpi_alarm is needed to handle that case correctly, it should be
set regardless of the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 value.
Accordingly, drop the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 check from
use_acpi_alarm_quirks().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/12054246.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher
|
|
Some Intel chipsets disconnect the time and date RTC registers when the
clock update is in progress: during this time reads may return bogus
values and writes fail silently. This includes the RTC alarm registers.
[1]
cmos_set_alarm() did not take account for that, fix it.
[1] 7th Generation Intel ® Processor Family I/O for U/Y Platforms [...]
Datasheet, Volume 1 of 2 (Intel's Document Number: 334658-006)
Page 208
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/7th-and-8th-gen-core-family-mobile-u-y-processor-lines-i-o-datasheet-vol-1.pdf
"If a RAM read from the ten time and date bytes is attempted
during an update cycle, the value read do not necessarily
represent the true contents of those locations. Any RAM writes
under the same conditions are ignored."
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210200131.153887-10-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl
|
|
Some Intel chipsets disconnect the time and date RTC registers when the
clock update is in progress: during this time reads may return bogus
values and writes fail silently. This includes the RTC alarm registers.
[1]
cmos_read_alarm() did not take account for that, which caused alarm time
reads to sometimes return bogus values. This can be shown with a test
patch that I am attaching to this patch series.
Fix this, by using mc146818_avoid_UIP().
[1] 7th Generation Intel ® Processor Family I/O for U/Y Platforms [...]
Datasheet, Volume 1 of 2 (Intel's Document Number: 334658-006)
Page 208
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/7th-and-8th-gen-core-family-mobile-u-y-processor-lines-i-o-datasheet-vol-1.pdf
"If a RAM read from the ten time and date bytes is attempted
during an update cycle, the value read do not necessarily
represent the true contents of those locations. Any RAM writes
under the same conditions are ignored."
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210200131.153887-9-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl
|
|
To prevent an infinite loop in mc146818_get_time(),
commit 211e5db19d15 ("rtc: mc146818: Detect and handle broken RTCs")
added a check for RTC availability. Together with a later fix, it
checked if bit 6 in register 0x0d is cleared.
This, however, caused a false negative on a motherboard with an AMD
SB710 southbridge; according to the specification [1], bit 6 of register
0x0d of this chipset is a scratchbit. This caused a regression in Linux
5.11 - the RTC was determined broken by the kernel and not used by
rtc-cmos.c [3]. This problem was also reported in Fedora [4].
As a better alternative, check whether the UIP ("Update-in-progress")
bit is set for longer then 10ms. If that is the case, then apparently
the RTC is either absent (and all register reads return 0xff) or broken.
Also limit the number of loop iterations in mc146818_get_time() to 10 to
prevent an infinite loop there.
The functions mc146818_get_time() and mc146818_does_rtc_work() will be
refactored later in this patch series, in order to fix a separate
problem with reading / setting the RTC alarm time. This is done so to
avoid a confusion about what is being fixed when.
In a previous approach to this problem, I implemented a check whether
the RTC_HOURS register contains a value <= 24. This, however, sometimes
did not work correctly on my Intel Kaby Lake laptop. According to
Intel's documentation [2], "the time and date RAM locations (0-9) are
disconnected from the external bus" during the update cycle so reading
this register without checking the UIP bit is incorrect.
[1] AMD SB700/710/750 Register Reference Guide, page 308,
https://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/2012/10/43009_sb7xx_rrg_pub_1.00.pdf
[2] 7th Generation Intel ® Processor Family I/O for U/Y Platforms [...] Datasheet
Volume 1 of 2, page 209
Intel's Document Number: 334658-006,
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/7th-and-8th-gen-core-family-mobile-u-y-processor-lines-i-o-datasheet-vol-1.pdf
[3] Functions in arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c apparently were using it.
[4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936688
Fixes: 211e5db19d15 ("rtc: mc146818: Detect and handle broken RTCs")
Fixes: ebb22a059436 ("rtc: mc146818: Dont test for bit 0-5 in Register D")
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210200131.153887-5-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl
|
|
There are 4 users of mc146818_get_time() and none of them was checking
the return value from this function. Change this.
Print the appropriate warnings in callers of mc146818_get_time() instead
of in the function mc146818_get_time() itself, in order not to add
strings to rtc-mc146818-lib.c, which is kind of a library.
The callers of alpha_rtc_read_time() and cmos_read_time() may use the
contents of (struct rtc_time *) even when the functions return a failure
code. Therefore, set the contents of (struct rtc_time *) to 0x00,
which looks more sensible then 0xff and aligns with the (possibly
stale?) comment in cmos_read_time:
/*
* If pm_trace abused the RTC for storage, set the timespec to 0,
* which tells the caller that this RTC value is unusable.
*/
For consistency, do this in mc146818_get_time().
Note: hpet_rtc_interrupt() may call mc146818_get_time() many times a
second. It is very unlikely, though, that the RTC suddenly stops
working and mc146818_get_time() would consistently fail.
Only compile-tested on alpha.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210200131.153887-4-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl
|
|
Reading from the CMOS involves writing to the index register and then
reading from the data register. Therefore access to the CMOS has to be
serialized with rtc_lock. This invocation of CMOS_READ was not
serialized, which could cause trouble when other code is accessing CMOS
at the same time.
Use spin_lock_irq() like the rest of the function.
Nothing in kernel modifies the RTC_DM_BINARY bit, so there could be a
separate pair of spin_lock_irq() / spin_unlock_irq() before doing the
math.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210200131.153887-2-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl
|
|
As previously noted in commit 66e4f4a9cc38 ("rtc: cmos: Use
spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"):
<4>[ 254.192378] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
<4>[ 254.192384] 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1 Not tainted
<4>[ 254.192396] --------------------------------
<4>[ 254.192400] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
<4>[ 254.192409] rtcwake/5309 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
<4>[ 254.192429] ffffffff8263c5f8 (rtc_lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[ 254.192481] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
<4>[ 254.192488] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0
<4>[ 254.192504] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
<4>[ 254.192519] cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[ 254.192536] rtc_handler+0x1f/0xc0
<4>[ 254.192553] acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect+0x109/0x13c
<4>[ 254.192574] acpi_ev_sci_xrupt_handler+0xb/0x28
<4>[ 254.192596] acpi_irq+0x13/0x30
<4>[ 254.192620] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0
<4>[ 254.192641] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0x70
<4>[ 254.192661] handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50
<4>[ 254.192680] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x9e/0x150
<4>[ 254.192693] __common_interrupt+0x76/0x140
<4>[ 254.192715] common_interrupt+0x96/0xc0
<4>[ 254.192732] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
<4>[ 254.192750] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x60
<4>[ 254.192767] resume_irqs+0xba/0xf0
<4>[ 254.192786] dpm_resume_noirq+0x245/0x3d0
<4>[ 254.192811] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x230/0xaa0
<4>[ 254.192835] pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a
<4>[ 254.192859] state_store+0x7b/0xe0
<4>[ 254.192879] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0
<4>[ 254.192899] new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0
<4>[ 254.192916] vfs_write+0x265/0x390
<4>[ 254.192933] ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0
<4>[ 254.192949] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
<4>[ 254.192965] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
<4>[ 254.192986] irq event stamp: 43775
<4>[ 254.192994] hardirqs last enabled at (43775): [<ffffffff81c00c42>] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
<4>[ 254.193023] hardirqs last disabled at (43774): [<ffffffff81aa691a>] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0xb0
<4>[ 254.193049] softirqs last enabled at (42548): [<ffffffff81e00342>] __do_softirq+0x342/0x48e
<4>[ 254.193074] softirqs last disabled at (42543): [<ffffffff810b45fd>] irq_exit_rcu+0xad/0xd0
<4>[ 254.193101]
other info that might help us debug this:
<4>[ 254.193107] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4>[ 254.193112] CPU0
<4>[ 254.193117] ----
<4>[ 254.193121] lock(rtc_lock);
<4>[ 254.193137] <Interrupt>
<4>[ 254.193142] lock(rtc_lock);
<4>[ 254.193156]
*** DEADLOCK ***
<4>[ 254.193161] 6 locks held by rtcwake/5309:
<4>[ 254.193174] #0: ffff888104861430 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0
<4>[ 254.193232] #1: ffff88810f823288 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xe7/0x1c0
<4>[ 254.193282] #2: ffff888100cef3c0 (kn->active#285
<7>[ 254.192706] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_modeset_setup_hw_state [i915]] [CRTC:51:pipe A] hw state readout: disabled
<4>[ 254.193307] ){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf0/0x1c0
<4>[ 254.193333] #3: ffffffff82649fa8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend.cold.8+0xce/0x34a
<4>[ 254.193387] #4: ffffffff827a2108 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x47/0x70
<4>[ 254.193433] #5: ffff8881019ea178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_resume+0x68/0x1e0
<4>[ 254.193485]
stack backtrace:
<4>[ 254.193492] CPU: 1 PID: 5309 Comm: rtcwake Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1
<4>[ 254.193514] Hardware name: Google Soraka/Soraka, BIOS MrChromebox-4.10 08/25/2019
<4>[ 254.193524] Call Trace:
<4>[ 254.193536] dump_stack+0x7f/0xad
<4>[ 254.193567] mark_lock.part.47+0x8ca/0xce0
<4>[ 254.193604] __lock_acquire+0x39b/0x2590
<4>[ 254.193626] ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
<4>[ 254.193660] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0
<4>[ 254.193677] ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[ 254.193716] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
<4>[ 254.193735] ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[ 254.193758] cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
<4>[ 254.193785] cmos_resume+0x2ac/0x2d0
<4>[ 254.193813] ? acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup+0x1f/0x110
<4>[ 254.193842] ? pnp_bus_suspend+0x10/0x10
<4>[ 254.193864] pnp_bus_resume+0x5e/0x90
<4>[ 254.193885] dpm_run_callback+0x5f/0x240
<4>[ 254.193914] device_resume+0xb2/0x1e0
<4>[ 254.193942] ? pm_dev_err+0x25/0x25
<4>[ 254.193974] dpm_resume+0xea/0x3f0
<4>[ 254.194005] dpm_resume_end+0x8/0x10
<4>[ 254.194030] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x29b/0xaa0
<4>[ 254.194066] pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a
<4>[ 254.194094] state_store+0x7b/0xe0
<4>[ 254.194124] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0
<4>[ 254.194151] new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0
<4>[ 254.194183] vfs_write+0x265/0x390
<4>[ 254.194207] ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0
<4>[ 254.194232] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
<4>[ 254.194251] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
<4>[ 254.194274] RIP: 0033:0x7f07d79691e7
<4>[ 254.194293] Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
<4>[ 254.194312] RSP: 002b:00007ffd9cc2c768 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
<4>[ 254.194337] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f07d79691e7
<4>[ 254.194352] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 0000556ebfc63590 RDI: 000000000000000b
<4>[ 254.194366] RBP: 0000556ebfc63590 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000004
<4>[ 254.194379] R10: 0000556ebf0ec2a6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004
which breaks S3-resume on fi-kbl-soraka presumably as that's slow enough
to trigger the alarm during the suspend.
Fixes: 6950d046eb6e ("rtc: cmos: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in hard IRQ")
References: 66e4f4a9cc38 ("rtc: cmos: Use spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"):
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210305122140.28774-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
It appears mc146818_get_time() and mc146818_set_time() now correctly
use the century register as specified in the ACPI FADT table. It is not
clear what else could be done here.
These comments were introduced by
commit 7be2c7c96aff ("[PATCH] RTC framework driver for CMOS RTCs")
in 2007, which originally referenced function get_rtc_time() in
include/asm-generic/rtc.h .
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210716210437.29622-1-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux
Pull RTC updates from Alexandre Belloni:
"Many cleanups and a few drivers removal this cycle.
Subsystem:
- Introduce features bitfield and the first feature: RTC_FEATURE_ALARM
Removed drivers:
- ab3100
- coh901331
- tx4939
- sirfsoc
Drivers:
- use rtc_lock and rtc_unlock instead of opencoding
- constify all struct rtc_class_ops
- quiet maybe-unused variable warning
- replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in hard IRQ
- pcf2127: disable Power-On Reset Override and run OTP refresh"
* tag 'rtc-5.12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux: (81 commits)
rtc: abx80x: Add utility function for writing configuration key
rtc: pcf2127: properly set flag WD_CD for rtc chips(pcf2129, pca2129)
rtc: pcf8563: Add NXP PCA8565 compatible
rtc: s3c: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: s3c: stop setting bogus time
rtc: sd3078: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: s35390a: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: rx8581: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: rx8010: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: rv8803: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: rv3032: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: rv3029: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: rv3028: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: rs5c372: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: pcf85363: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: pcf85063: quiet maybe-unused variable warnings
rtc: meson: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: m41t80: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: isl1208: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
rtc: ds3232: quiet maybe-unused variable warning
...
|
|
It is redundant to do irqsave and irqrestore in hardIRQ context, where
it has been in a irq-disabled context.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1612355981-6764-2-git-send-email-tanxiaofei@huawei.com
|
|
The recent change to validate the RTC turned out to be overly tight.
While it cures the problem on the reporters machine it breaks machines
with Intel chipsets which use bit 0-5 of the D register. So check only
for bit 6 being 0 which is the case on these Intel machines as well.
Fixes: 211e5db19d15 ("rtc: mc146818: Detect and handle broken RTCs")
Reported-by: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>
Reported-by: Dirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Dirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>
Tested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zh0nbnha.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
|
|
The recent fix for handling the UIP bit unearthed another issue in the RTC
code. If the RTC is advertised but the readout is straight 0xFF because
it's not available, the old code just proceeded with crappy values, but the
new code hangs because it waits for the UIP bit to become low.
Add a sanity check in the RTC CMOS probe function which reads the RTC_VALID
register (Register D) which should have bit 0-6 cleared. If that's not the
case then fail to register the CMOS.
Add the same check to mc146818_get_time(), warn once when the condition
is true and invalidate the rtc_time data.
Reported-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tur3fx7w.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
|
|
Clear RTC_FEATURE_ALARM to signal that alarms are not available instead of
having a supplementary struct rtc_class_ops with a NULL .set_alarm.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210110231752.1418816-5-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux
Pull RTC updates from Alexandre Belloni:
"Subsystem:
- Remove nvram ABI. There was no complaints about the deprecation for
the last 3 years.
- Improve RTC device allocation and registration
- Now available for ARCH=um
Drivers:
- at91rm9200: correction and sam9x60 support
- ds1307: improve ACPI support
- mxc: now DT only
- pcf2127: watchdog support now needs the reset-source property
- pcf8523: set range
- rx6110: i2c support"
* tag 'rtc-5.11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux: (43 commits)
rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly available
dt-bindings: rtc: add reset-source property
rtc: fix RTC removal
rtc: s3c: Remove dead code related to periodic tick handling
rtc: s3c: Disable all enable (RTC, tick) bits in the probe
rtc: ep93xx: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ep93xx_rtc_read_time
rtc: test: remove debug message
rtc: mxc{,_v2}: enable COMPILE_TEST
rtc: enable RTC framework on ARCH=um
rtc: pcf8523: use BIT
rtc: pcf8523: set range
rtc: pcf8523: switch to devm_rtc_allocate_device
rtc: destroy mutex when releasing the device
rtc: shrink devm_rtc_allocate_device()
rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management
rtc: nvmem: emit an error message when nvmem registration fails
rtc: add devm_ prefix to rtc_nvmem_register()
rtc: nvmem: remove nvram ABI
Documentation: list RTC devres helpers in devres.rst
rtc: omap: use devm_pinctrl_register()
...
|
|
The current RTC set_offset_nsec value is not really intuitive to
understand.
tsched twrite(t2.tv_sec - 1) t2 (seconds increment)
The offset is calculated from twrite based on the assumption that t2 -
twrite == 1s. That means for the MC146818 RTC the offset needs to be
negative so that the write happens 500ms before t2.
It's easier to understand when the whole calculation is based on t2. That
avoids negative offsets and the meaning is obvious:
t2 - twrite: The time defined by the chip when seconds increment
after the write.
twrite - tsched: The time for the transport to the point where the chip
is updated.
==> set_offset_nsec = t2 - tsched
ttransport = twrite - tsched
tRTCinc = t2 - twrite
==> set_offset_nsec = ttransport + tRTCinc
tRTCinc is a chip property and can be obtained from the data sheet.
ttransport depends on how the RTC is connected. It is close to 0 for
directly accessible RTCs. For RTCs behind a slow bus, e.g. i2c, it's the
time required to send the update over the bus. This can be estimated or
even calibrated, but that's a different problem.
Adjust the implementation and update comments accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220542.263204937@linutronix.de
|
|
The offset for rtc_cmos must be -500ms to work correctly with the current
implementation of rtc_set_ntp_time() due to the following:
tsched twrite(t2.tv_sec - 1) t2 (seconds increment)
twrite - tsched is the transport time for the write to hit the device,
which is negligible for this chip because it's accessed directly.
t2 - twrite = 500ms according to the datasheet.
But rtc_set_ntp_time() calculation of tsched is:
tsched = t2 - 1sec - (t2 - twrite)
The default for the sync offset is 500ms which means that the write happens
at t2 - 1.5 seconds which is obviously off by a second for this device.
Make the offset -500ms so it works correct.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206220541.830517160@linutronix.de
|
|
rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.
This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.
While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
|
|
Some users check the return value of devm_rtc_nvmem_register() only in
order to emit an error message and then continue probing. This is fine
as an rtc can function without exposing nvmem but let's generalize it:
let's make the registration function emit the error message so that
users don't have to.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-7-brgl@bgdev.pl
|
|
rtc_nvmem_register() is a managed interface. It doesn't require any
release function to be called at driver detach. To avoid confusing
driver authors, let's rename it to devm_rtc_nvmem_register() and add it
to the list of managed interfaces in Documentation/.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-6-brgl@bgdev.pl
|
|
The nvram sysfs attributes have been deprecated at least since v4.13, more
than 3 years ago and nobody ever complained about the deprecation warning.
Remove the sysfs attributes now.
[Bartosz: remove the declaration of rtc_nvmem_unregister()]
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-5-brgl@bgdev.pl
|
|
cmos_read_alarm() may leave certain fields of a struct rtc_wkalrm
untouched; therefore, these fields contain garbage if not properly
initialized, leading to inconsistent values when converting into
time64_t. This patch to zero initialize the struct before calling
cmos_read_alarm().
Note that this patch is not intended to produce a correct time64_t, it
is only to produce a consistent value. In the case of suspend/resume, a
correct time64_t is not necessary; a consistent value is sufficient to
correctly perform an equality test for t_current_expires and
t_saved_expires. Logic to deduce a correct time64_t is expensive and
hence should be avoided.
Signed-off-by: Victor Ding <victording@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200814191654.v2.1.Iaf7638a2f2a87ff68d85fcb8dec615e41340c97f@changeid
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux
Pull RTC updates from Alexandre Belloni:
"More cleanup this cycle, with the final goal of removing the
rtc_time_to_tm and rtc_tm_to_time wrappers. All the drivers that have
been modified for this now are ready for the end of times (whether it
happens in 2033, 2038, 2106, 2127 or even 4052). There is also a
single new driver and the usual fixes and features.
Summary:
Subsystem:
- The rtc_time_to_tm and rtc_tm_to_time wrappers have finally been
removed and only the 64bit version remain.
- hctosys now works with drivers compiled as modules
New driver:
- MediaTek MT2712 SoC based RTC
Drivers:
- set range for 88pm860x, au1xxx, cpcap, da9052, davinci, ds1305,
ds1374, mcp5121, pl030, pl031, pm8xxx, puv3, sa1100, sirfsoc,
starfire, sun6i
- ds1307: DS1388 oscillator failure detection and watchdog support
- jz4740: JZ4760 support
- pcf85063: clock out pin support
- sun6i: external 32k oscillator is now optional, the range is now
handled by the core, providing a solution for 2034"
* tag 'rtc-5.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux: (87 commits)
rtc: ds1307: check for failed memory allocation on wdt
rtc: class: remove redundant assignment to variable err
rtc: remove rtc_time_to_tm and rtc_tm_to_time
rtc: sun6i: let the core handle rtc range
rtc: sun6i: switch to rtc_time64_to_tm/rtc_tm_to_time64
rtc: ds1307: add support for watchdog timer on ds1388
rtc: da9052: switch to rtc_time64_to_tm/rtc_tm_to_time64
rtc: da9052: set range
rtc: da9052: convert to devm_rtc_allocate_device
rtc: imx-sc: Align imx sc msg structs to 4
rtc: fsl-ftm-alarm: report alarm to core
rtc: pcf85063: Add pcf85063 clkout control to common clock framework
rtc: make definitions in include/uapi/linux/rtc.h actually useful for user space
rtc: class: avoid unnecessary lookup in hctosys
dt-bindings: rtc: Convert and update jz4740-rtc doc to YAML
rtc: jz4740: Rename vendor-specific DT properties
rtc: jz4740: Add support for JZ4760 SoC
rtc: class: support hctosys from modular RTC drivers
rtc: pm8xxx: clear alarm register when alarm is not enabled
rtc: omap: drop unused dt-bindings header
...
|
|
Now the pnp_driver name is "const char *", there are no need to cast
driver_name.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
cmos_interrupt() isn't always called from hardirq context, so
we must use spin_lock_irqsave() & co.
================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.6.0-rc2-CI-CI_DRM_7981+ #1 Tainted: G U
--------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
rtcwake/4315 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
ffffffff82635198 (rtc_lock){?...}, at: cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100
rtc_handler+0x75/0xc0
acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect+0xf9/0x132
acpi_ev_sci_xrupt_handler+0xb/0x28
acpi_irq+0x13/0x30
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x41/0x2c0
handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0 |
