summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-03-26btrfs: zoned: don't skip block groups with 100% zone unusableJohannes Thumshirn1-1/+2
Commit f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon") changed the behaviour of deleting unused block-groups on zoned filesystems. Starting with this commit, we're using btrfs_space_info_used() to calculate the number of used bytes in a space_info. But btrfs_space_info_used() also accounts btrfs_space_info::bytes_zone_unusable as used bytes. So if a block group is 100% zone_unusable it is skipped from the deletion step. In order not to skip fully zone_unusable block-groups, also check if the block-group has bytes left that can be used on a zoned filesystem. Fixes: f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-05btrfs: mark btrfs_put_caching_control() staticLijuan Li1-1/+1
btrfs_put_caching_control() is only used in block-group.c, so mark it static. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Lijuan Li <lilijuan@iscas.ac.cn> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04btrfs: handle block group lookup error when it's being removedDavid Sterba1-1/+3
The unlikely case of lookup error in btrfs_remove_block_group() can be handled properly, in its caller this would lead to a transaction abort. We can't do anything else, a block group must have been loaded first. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04btrfs: add comment about list_is_singular() use at btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()Filipe Manana1-0/+7
At btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(), the use of the list_is_singular() check on a block group may not be immediately obvious. It is there to prevent losing raid profile information for a block group type (data, metadata or system), as that information is removed from fs_info->avail_[data|metadata|system]_alloc_bits when the last block group of a given type is deleted. So deleting the block group would later result in creating block groups of that type with a single profile (because fs_info->avail_*_alloc_bits would have a value of 0). This check was added in commit aefbe9a633b5 ("btrfs: Fix lost-data-profile caused by auto removing bg"). So add a comment mentioning the need for the check. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04btrfs: return errors from unpin_extent_range()David Sterba1-1/+1
Handle the lookup failure of the block group to unpin, this is a logic error as the block group must exist at this point. If not, something else must have freed it, like clean_pinned_extents() would do without locking the unused_bg_unpin_mutex. Push the errors to the callers, proper handling will be done in followup patches. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-02-09btrfs: add new unused block groups to the list of unused block groupsFilipe Manana1-0/+31
Space reservations for metadata are, most of the time, pessimistic as we reserve space for worst possible cases - where tree heights are at the maximum possible height (8), we need to COW every extent buffer in a tree path, need to split extent buffers, etc. For data, we generally reserve the exact amount of space we are going to allocate. The exception here is when using compression, in which case we reserve space matching the uncompressed size, as the compression only happens at writeback time and in the worst possible case we need that amount of space in case the data is not compressible. This means that when there's not available space in the corresponding space_info object, we may need to allocate a new block group, and then that block group might not be used after all. In this case the block group is never added to the list of unused block groups and ends up never being deleted - except if we unmount and mount again the fs, as when reading block groups from disk we add unused ones to the list of unused block groups (fs_info->unused_bgs). Otherwise a block group is only added to the list of unused block groups when we deallocate the last extent from it, so if no extent is ever allocated, the block group is kept around forever. This also means that if we have a bunch of tasks reserving space in parallel we can end up allocating many block groups that end up never being used or kept around for too long without being used, which has the potential to result in ENOSPC failures in case for example we over allocate too many metadata block groups and then end up in a state without enough unallocated space to allocate a new data block group. This is more likely to happen with metadata reservations as of kernel 6.7, namely since commit 28270e25c69a ("btrfs: always reserve space for delayed refs when starting transaction"), because we started to always reserve space for delayed references when starting a transaction handle for a non-zero number of items, and also to try to reserve space to fill the gap between the delayed block reserve's reserved space and its size. So to avoid this, when finishing the creation a new block group, add the block group to the list of unused block groups if it's still unused at that time. This way the next time the cleaner kthread runs, it will delete the block group if it's still unused and not needed to satisfy existing space reservations. Reported-by: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx@intelfx.name> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/9cdbf0ca9cdda1b4c84e15e548af7d7f9f926382.camel@intelfx.name/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.7+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-02-09btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soonFilipe Manana1-0/+46
Before deleting a block group that is in the list of unused block groups (fs_info->unused_bgs), we check if the block group became used before deleting it, as extents from it may have been allocated after it was added to the list. However even if the block group was not yet used, there may be tasks that have only reserved space and have not yet allocated extents, and they might be relying on the availability of the unused block group in order to allocate extents. The reservation works first by increasing the "bytes_may_use" field of the corresponding space_info object (which may first require flushing delayed items, allocating a new block group, etc), and only later a task does the actual allocation of extents. For metadata we usually don't end up using all reserved space, as we are pessimistic and typically account for the worst cases (need to COW every single node in a path of a tree at maximum possible height, etc). For data we usually reserve the exact amount of space we're going to allocate later, except when using compression where we always reserve space based on the uncompressed size, as compression is only triggered when writeback starts so we don't know in advance how much space we'll actually need, or if the data is compressible. So don't delete an unused block group if the total size of its space_info object minus the block group's size is less then the sum of used space and space that may be used (space_info->bytes_may_use), as that means we have tasks that reserved space and may need to allocate extents from the block group. In this case, besides skipping the deletion, re-add the block group to the list of unused block groups so that it may be reconsidered later, in case the tasks that reserved space end up not needing to allocate extents from it. Allowing the deletion of the block group while we have reserved space, can result in tasks failing to allocate metadata extents (-ENOSPC) while under a transaction handle, resulting in a transaction abort, or failure during writeback for the case of data extents. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-02-09btrfs: add and use helper to check if block group is usedFilipe Manana1-2/+1
Add a helper function to determine if a block group is being used and make use of it at btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(). This helper will also be used in future code changes. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-12-15btrfs: fix typos found by codespellDavid Sterba1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-12-15btrfs: remove stripe size local variable from insert_dev_extents()Filipe Manana1-4/+1
It's not needed to have a local variable to store the stripe size at insert_dev_extents(), we can just take from the chunk map as it's only used once and typing 'map->stripe_size' is not much more verbose than simply typing 'stripe_size'. So remove the local variable. This was added before the recent addition of a dedicated structure for chunk mappings because the stripe size was encoded in the 'orig_block_len' field of an extent_map structure, so the use of the local variable made things more readable. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-12-15btrfs: use a dedicated data structure for chunk mapsFilipe Manana1-97/+68
Currently we abuse the extent_map structure for two purposes: 1) To actually represent extents for inodes; 2) To represent chunk mappings. This is odd and has several disadvantages: 1) To create a chunk map, we need to do two memory allocations: one for an extent_map structure and another one for a map_lookup structure, so more potential for an allocation failure and more complicated code to manage and link two structures; 2) For a chunk map we actually only use 3 fields (24 bytes) of the respective extent map structure: the 'start' field to have the logical start address of the chunk, the 'len' field to have the chunk's size, and the 'orig_block_len' field to contain the chunk's stripe size. Besides wasting a memory, it's also odd and not intuitive at all to have the stripe size in a field named 'orig_block_len'. We are also using 'block_len' of the extent_map structure to contain the chunk size, so we have 2 fields for the same value, 'len' and 'block_len', which is pointless; 3) When an extent map is associated to a chunk mapping, we set the bit EXTENT_FLAG_FS_MAPPING on its flags and then make its member named 'map_lookup' point to the associated map_lookup structure. This means that for an extent map associated to an inode extent, we are not using this 'map_lookup' pointer, so wasting 8 bytes (on a 64 bits platform); 4) Extent maps associated to a chunk mapping are never merged or split so it's pointless to use the existing extent map infrastructure. So add a dedicated data structure named 'btrfs_chunk_map' to represent chunk mappings, this is basically the existing map_lookup structure with some extra fields: 1) 'start' to contain the chunk logical address; 2) 'chunk_len' to contain the chunk's length; 3) 'stripe_size' for the stripe size; 4) 'rb_node' for insertion into a rb tree; 5) 'refs' for reference counting. This way we do a single memory allocation for chunk mappings and we don't waste memory for them with unused/unnecessary fields from an extent_map. We also save 8 bytes from the extent_map structure by removing the 'map_lookup' pointer, so the size of struct extent_map is reduced from 144 bytes down to 136 bytes, and we can now have 30 extents map per 4K page instead of 28. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-12-15btrfs: split assert into two different asserts when removing block groupFilipe Manana1-1/+2
When starting a transaction to remove a block group we have one ASSERT that checks we found an extent map and that the extent map's start offset matches the desired chunk offset. In case one of the conditions fails, we get a stack trace that point to the respective line of code, however we can't tell which condition failed: either there's no extent map or we got one with an unexpected start offset. To make such an issue easier to debug and analyse, split the assertion into two, one for each condition. This was actually triggered during development of another upcoming change. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: stop reserving excessive space for block group item insertionsFilipe Manana1-3/+2
Space for block group item insertions, necessary after allocating a new block group, is reserved in the delayed refs block reserve. Currently we do this by incrementing the transaction handle's delayed_ref_updates counter and then calling btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv(), which will increase the size of the delayed refs block reserve by an amount that corresponds to the same amount we use for delayed refs, given by btrfs_calc_delayed_ref_bytes(). That is an excessive amount because it corresponds to the amount of space needed to insert one item in a btree (btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size()) times 2 when the free space tree feature is enabled. All we need is an amount as given by btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(), since we only need to insert a block group item in the extent tree (or block group tree if this feature is enabled). By using btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size() we will need to reserve 2 times less space when using the free space tree, putting less pressure on space reservation. So use helpers to reserve and release space for block group item insertions that use btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size() for calculation of the space. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: stop reserving excessive space for block group item updatesFilipe Manana1-5/+7
Space for block group item updates, necessary after allocating or deallocating an extent from a block group, is reserved in the delayed refs block reserve. Currently we do this by incrementing the transaction handle's delayed_ref_updates counter and then calling btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv(), which will increase the size of the delayed refs block reserve by an amount that corresponds to the same amount we use for delayed refs, given by btrfs_calc_delayed_ref_bytes(). That is an excessive amount because it corresponds to the amount of space needed to insert one item in a btree (btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size()) times 2 when the free space tree feature is enabled. All we need is an amount as given by btrfs_calc_metadata_size(), since we only need to update an existing block group item in the extent tree (or block group tree if this feature is enabled). By using btrfs_calc_metadata_size() we will need to reserve 4 times less space when using the free space tree and 2 times less space when not using it, putting less pressure on space reservation. So use helpers to reserve and release space for block group item updates that use btrfs_calc_metadata_size() for calculation of the space. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: remove redundant root argument from btrfs_update_inode()Filipe Manana1-2/+1
The root argument for btrfs_update_inode() always matches the root of the given inode, so remove the root argument and get it from the inode argument. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: merge ordered work callbacks in btrfs_work into oneDavid Sterba1-1/+1
There are two callbacks defined in btrfs_work but only two actually make use of them, otherwise there are NULLs. We can get rid of the freeing callback making it a special case of the normal work. This reduces the size of btrfs_work by 8 bytes, final layout: struct btrfs_work { btrfs_func_t func; /* 0 8 */ btrfs_ordered_func_t ordered_func; /* 8 8 */ struct work_struct normal_work; /* 16 32 */ struct list_head ordered_list; /* 48 16 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ struct btrfs_workqueue * wq; /* 64 8 */ long unsigned int flags; /* 72 8 */ /* size: 80, cachelines: 2, members: 6 */ /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */ }; This in turn reduces size of other structures (on a release config): - async_chunk 160 -> 152 - async_submit_bio 152 -> 144 - btrfs_async_delayed_work 104 -> 96 - btrfs_caching_control 176 -> 168 - btrfs_delalloc_work 144 -> 136 - btrfs_fs_info 3608 -> 3600 - btrfs_ordered_extent 440 -> 424 - btrfs_writepage_fixup 104 -> 96 Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: remove pointless loop from btrfs_update_block_group()Filipe Manana1-80/+67
When an extent is allocated or freed, we call btrfs_update_block_group() to update its block group and space info. An extent always belongs to a single block group, it can never span multiple block groups, so the loop we have at btrfs_update_block_group() is pointless, as it always has a single iteration. The loop was added in the very early days, 2007, when the block group code was added in commit 9078a3e1e4e4 ("Btrfs: start of block group code"), but even back then it seemed pointless. So remove the loop and assert the block group containing the start offset of the extent also contains the whole extent. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: abort transaction on generation mismatch when marking eb as dirtyFilipe Manana1-2/+2
When marking an extent buffer as dirty, at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), we check if its generation matches the running transaction and if not we just print a warning. Such mismatch is an indicator that something really went wrong and only printing a warning message (and stack trace) is not enough to prevent a corruption. Allowing a transaction to commit with such an extent buffer will trigger an error if we ever try to read it from disk due to a generation mismatch with its parent generation. So abort the current transaction with -EUCLEAN if we notice a generation mismatch. For this we need to pass a transaction handle to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() which is always available except in test code, in which case we can pass NULL since it operates on dummy extent buffers and all test roots have a single node/leaf (root node at level 0). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: stop doing excessive space reservation for csum deletionFilipe Manana1-4/+4
Currently when reserving space for deleting the csum items for a data extent, when adding or updating a delayed ref head, we determine how many leaves of csum items we can have and then pass that number to the helper btrfs_calc_delayed_ref_bytes(). This helper is used for calculating space for all tree modifications we need when running delayed references, however the amount of space it computes is excessive for deleting csum items because: 1) It uses btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size() which is excessive because we only need to delete csum items from the csum tree, we don't need to insert any items, so btrfs_calc_metadata_size() is all we need (as it computes space needed to delete an item); 2) If the free space tree is enabled, it doubles the amount of space, which is pointless for csum deletion since we don't need to touch the free space tree or any other tree other than the csum tree. So improve on this by tracking how many csum deletions we have and using a new helper to calculate space for csum deletions (just a wrapper around btrfs_calc_metadata_size() with a comment). This reduces the amount of space we need to reserve for csum deletions by a factor of 4, and it helps reduce the number of times we have to block space reservations and have the reclaim task enter the space flushing algorithm (flush delayed items, flush delayed refs, etc) in order to satisfy tickets. For example this results in a total time decrease when unlinking (or truncating) files with many extents, as we end up having to block on space metadata reservations less often. Example test: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nullb0 MNT=/mnt/test umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV # Use compression to quickly create files with a lot of extents # (each with a size of 128K). mount -o compress=lzo $DEV $MNT # 100G gives at least 983040 extents with a size of 128K. xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 1M 0 120G" $MNT/foobar # Flush all delalloc and clear all metadata from memory. umount $MNT mount -o compress=lzo $DEV $MNT start=$(date +%s%N) rm -f $MNT/foobar end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo "rm took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Before this change rm took: 7504 milliseconds After this change rm took: 6574 milliseconds (-12.4%) Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: allow to run delayed refs by bytes to be released instead of countFilipe Manana1-2/+1
When running delayed references, through btrfs_run_delayed_refs(), we can specify how many to run, run all existing delayed references and keep running delayed references while we can find any. This is controlled with the value of the 'count' argument, where a value of 0 means to run all delayed references that exist by the time btrfs_run_delayed_refs() is called, (unsigned long)-1 means to keep running delayed references while we are able find any, and any other value to run that exact number of delayed references. Typically a specific value other than 0 or -1 is used when flushing space to try to release a certain amount of bytes for a ticket. In this case we just simply calculate how many delayed reference heads correspond to a specific amount of bytes, with calc_delayed_refs_nr(). However that only takes into account the space reserved for the reference heads themselves, and does not account for the space reserved for deleting checksums from the csum tree (see add_delayed_ref_head() and update_existing_head_ref()) in case we are going to delete a data extent. This means we may end up running more delayed references than necessary in case we process delayed references for deleting a data extent. So change the logic of btrfs_run_delayed_refs() to take a bytes argument to specify how many bytes of delayed references to run/release, using the special values of 0 to mean all existing delayed references and U64_MAX (or (u64)-1) to keep running delayed references while we can find any. This prevents running more delayed references than necessary, when we have delayed references for deleting data extents, but also makes the upcoming changes/patches simpler and it's preparatory work for them. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-09-08btrfs: fix race between finishing block group creation and its item updateFilipe Manana1-2/+10
Commit 675dfe1223a6 ("btrfs: fix block group item corruption after inserting new block group") fixed one race that resulted in not persisting a block group's item when its "used" bytes field decreases to zero. However there's another race that can happen in a much shorter time window that results in the same problem. The following sequence of steps explains how it can happen: 1) Task A creates a metadata block group X, its "used" and "commit_used" fields are initialized to 0; 2) Two extents are allocated from block group X, so its "used" field is updated to 32K, and its "commit_used" field remains as 0; 3) Transaction commit starts, by some task B, and it enters btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). There it tries to update the block group item for block group X, which currently has its "used" field with a value of 32K and its "commit_used" field with a value of 0. However that fails since the block group item was not yet inserted, so at update_block_group_item(), the btrfs_search_slot() call returns 1, and then we set 'ret' to -ENOENT. Before jumping to the label 'fail'... 4) The block group item is inserted by task A, when for example btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() is called when releasing its transaction handle. This results in insert_block_group_item() inserting the block group item in the extent tree (or block group tree), with a "used" field having a value of 32K and setting "commit_used", in struct btrfs_block_group, to the same value (32K); 5) Task B jumps to the 'fail' label and then resets the "commit_used" field to 0. At btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(), because -ENOENT was returned from update_block_group_item(), we add the block group again to the list of dirty block groups, so that we will try again in the critical section of the transaction commit when calling btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(); 6) Later the two extents from block group X are freed, so its "used" field becomes 0; 7) If no more extents are allocated from block group X before we get into btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(), then when we call update_block_group_item() again for block group X, we will not update the block group item to reflect that it has 0 bytes used, because the "used" and "commit_used" fields in struct btrfs_block_group have the same value, a value of 0. As a result after committing the transaction we have an empty block group with its block group item having a 32K value for its "used" field. This will trigger errors from fsck ("btrfs check" command) and after mounting again the fs, the cleaner kthread will not automatically delete the empty block group, since its "used" field is not 0. Possibly there are other issues due to this inconsistency. When this issue happens, the error reported by fsck is like this: [1/7] checking root items [2/7] checking extents block group [1104150528 1073741824] used 39796736 but extent items used 0 ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation (...) So fix this by not resetting the "commit_used" field of a block group when we don't find the block group item at update_block_group_item(). Fixes: 7248e0cebbef ("btrfs: skip update of block group item if used bytes are the same") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-21btrfs: zoned: don't activate non-DATA BG on allocationNaohiro Aota1-1/+1
Now that a non-DATA block group is activated at write time, don't activate it on allocation time. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-21btrfs: zoned: activate metadata block group on write timeNaohiro Aota1-0/+11
In the current implementation, block groups are activated at reservation time to ensure that all reserved bytes can be written to an active metadata block group. However, this approach has proven to be less efficient, as it activates block groups more frequently than necessary, putting pressure on the active zone resource and leading to potential issues such as early ENOSPC or hung_task. Another drawback of the current method is that it hampers metadata over-commit, and necessitates additional flush operations and block group allocations, resulting in decreased overall performance. To address these issues, this commit introduces a write-time activation of metadata and system block group. This involves reserving at least one active block group specifically for a metadata and system block group. Since metadata write-out is always allocated sequentially, when we need to write to a non-active block group, we can wait for the ongoing IOs to complete, activate a new block group, and then proceed with writing to the new block group. Fixes: b09315139136 ("btrfs: zoned: activate metadata block group on flush_space") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-21btrfs: move btrfs_free_excluded_extents() into block-group.cFilipe Manana1-0/+6
The function btrfs_free_excluded_extents() is only used by block-group.c, so move it into block-group.c and make it static. Also removed unnecessary variables that are used only once. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-21btrfs: open code trivial btrfs_add_excluded_extent()Filipe Manana1-4/+6
The code for btrfs_add_excluded_extent() is trivial, it's just a set_extent_bit() call. However it's defined in extent-tree.c but it is only used (twice) in block-group.c. So open code it in block-group.c, reducing the need to export a trivial function. Also since the only caller btrfs_add_excluded_extent() is prepared to deal with errors, stop ignoring errors from the set_extent_bit() call. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-21btrfs: make find_first_extent_bit() return a booleanFilipe Manana1-5/+4
Currently find_first_extent_bit() returns a 0 if it found a range in the given io tree and 1 if it didn't find any. There's no need to return any errors, so make the return value a boolean and invert the logic to make more sense: return true if it found a range and false if it didn't find any range. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-21btrfs: rename add_new_free_space() to btrfs_add_new_free_space()Filipe Manana1-10/+10
Since add_new_free_space() is exported, used outside block-group.c, rename it to include the 'btrfs_' prefix. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-21btrfs: update documentation for add_new_free_space()Filipe Manana1-4/+11
The documentation for add_new_free_space() is stale and no longer correct: 1) It's no longer used only when caching a block group. It's also called when creating a block group (btrfs_make_block_group()), when reading a block group at mount time (read_one_block_group()) and when reading the free space tree for a block group (typically the first time we attempt to allocate from the block group); 2) It has nothing to do with pinned extents. It only deals with the excluded extents io tree, which is used to track the locations of super blocks in order to make sure we never add the location of a super block to the free space cache of a block group. So update the documention and also add a description of the arguments and return values. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-12Merge tag 'for-6.5-rc5-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+15
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: "More fixes, some of them going back to older releases and there are fixes for hangs in stress tests regarding space caching: - fixes and progress tracking for hangs in free space caching, found by test generic/475 - writeback fixes, write pages in integrity mode and skip writing pages that have been written meanwhile - properly clear end of extent range after an error - relocation fixes: - fix race betwen qgroup tree creation and relocation - detect and report invalid reloc roots" * tag 'for-6.5-rc5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: set cache_block_group_error if we find an error btrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump btrfs: exit gracefully if reloc roots don't match btrfs: avoid race between qgroup tree creation and relocation btrfs: properly clear end of the unreserved range in cow_file_range btrfs: don't wait for writeback on clean pages in extent_write_cache_pages btrfs: don't stop integrity writeback too early btrfs: wait for actual caching progress during allocation
2023-08-10btrfs: wait for actual caching progress during allocationJosef Bacik1-2/+15
Recently we've been having mysterious hangs while running generic/475 on the CI system. This turned out to be something like this: Task 1 dmsetup suspend --nolockfs -> __dm_suspend -> dm_wait_for_completion -> dm_wait_for_bios_completion -> Unable to complete because of IO's on a plug in Task 2 Task 2 wb_workfn -> wb_writeback -> blk_start_plug -> writeback_sb_inodes -> Infinite loop unable to make an allocation Task 3 cache_block_group ->read_extent_buffer_pages ->Waiting for IO to complete that can't be submitted because Task 1 suspended the DM device The problem here is that we need Task 2 to be scheduled completely for the blk plug to flush. Normally this would happen, we normally wait for the block group caching to finish (Task 3), and this schedule would result in the block plug flushing. However if there's enough free space available from the current caching to satisfy the allocation we won't actually wait for the caching to complete. This check however just checks that we have enough space, not that we can make the allocation. In this particular case we were trying to allocate 9MiB, and we had 10MiB of free space, but we didn't have 9MiB of contiguous space to allocate, and thus the allocation failed and we looped. We specifically don't cycle through the FFE loop until we stop finding cached block groups because we don't want to allocate new block groups just because we're caching, so we short circuit the normal loop once we hit LOOP_CACHING_WAIT and we found a caching block group. This is normally fine, except in this particular case where the caching thread can't make progress because the DM device has been suspended. Fix this by not only waiting for free space to >= the amount of space we want to allocate, but also that we make some progress in caching from the time we start waiting. This will keep us from busy looping when the caching is taking a while but still theoretically has enough space for us to allocate from, and fixes this particular case by forcing us to actually sleep and wait for forward progress, which will flush the plug. With this fix we're no longer hanging with generic/475. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-07-27Merge tag 'for-6.5-rc3-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-17/+34
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: - fix accounting of global block reserve size when block group tree is enabled - the async discard has been enabled in 6.2 unconditionally, but for zoned mode it does not make that much sense to do it asynchronously as the zones are reset as needed - error handling and proper error value propagation fixes * tag 'for-6.5-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: check for commit error at btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() btrfs: check if the transaction was aborted at btrfs_wait_for_commit() btrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in add_new_free_space() btrfs: account block group tree when calculating global reserve size btrfs: zoned: do not enable async discard
2023-07-24btrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in add_new_free_space()Filipe Manana1-17/+34
At add_new_free_space() we have these BUG_ON()'s that are there to deal with any failure to add free space to the in memory free space cache. Such failures are mostly -ENOMEM that should be very rare. However there's no need to have these BUG_ON()'s, we can just return any error to the caller and all callers and their upper call chain are already dealing with errors. So just make add_new_free_space() return any errors, while removing the BUG_ON()'s, and returning the total amount of added free space to an optional u64 pointer argument. Reported-by: syzbot+3ba856e07b7127889d8c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000e9cb8305ff4e8327@google.com/ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-07-20Merge tag 'for-6.5-rc2-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+12
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: "Stable fixes: - fix race between balance and cancel/pause - various iput() fixes - fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused - fix warning when putting transaction with qgroups enabled after abort - fix crash in subpage mode when page could be released between map and map read - when scrubbing raid56 verify the P/Q stripes unconditionally - fix minor memory leak in zoned mode when a block group with an unexpected superblock is found Regression fixes: - fix ordered extent split error handling when submitting direct IO - user irq-safe locking when adding delayed iputs" * tag 'for-6.5-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: fix warning when putting transaction with qgroups enabled after abort btrfs: fix ordered extent split error handling in btrfs_dio_submit_io btrfs: set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand btrfs: raid56: always verify the P/Q contents for scrub btrfs: use irq safe locking when running and adding delayed iputs btrfs: fix iput() on error pointer after error during orphan cleanup btrfs: fix double iput() on inode after an error during orphan cleanup btrfs: zoned: fix memory leak after finding block group with super blocks btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused btrfs: be a bit more careful when setting mirror_num_ret in btrfs_map_block btrfs: fix race between balance and cancel/pause
2023-07-18btrfs: zoned: fix memory leak after finding block group with super blocksFilipe Manana1-0/+1
At exclude_super_stripes(), if we happen to find a block group that has super blocks mapped to it and we are on a zoned filesystem, we error out as this is not supposed to happen, indicating either a bug or maybe some memory corruption for example. However we are exiting the function without freeing the memory allocated for the logical address of the super blocks. Fix this by freeing the logical address. Fixes: 12659251ca5d ("btrfs: implement log-structured superblock for ZONED mode") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-07-11btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unusedFilipe Manana1-2/+11
If a task creates a new block group and that block group becomes unused before we finish its creation, at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), then when btrfs_mark_bg_unused() is called against the block group, we assume that the block group is currently in the list of block groups to reclaim, and we move it out of the list of new block groups and into the list of unused block groups. This has two consequences: 1) We move it out of the list of new block groups associated to the current transaction. So the block group creation is not finished and if we attempt to delete the bg because it's unused, we will not find the block group item in the extent tree (or the new block group tree), its device extent items in the device tree etc, resulting in the deletion to fail due to the missing items; 2) We don't increment the reference count on the block group when we move it to the list of unused block groups, because we assumed the block group was on the list of block groups to reclaim, and in that case it already has the correct reference count. However the block group was on the list of new block groups, in which case no extra reference was taken because it's local to the current task. This later results in doing an extra reference count decrement when removing the block group from the unused list, eventually leading the reference count to 0. This second case was caught when running generic/297 from fstests, which produced the following assertion failure and stack trace: [589.559] assertion failed: refcount_read(&block_group->refs) == 1, in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299 [589.559] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [589.559] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299! [589.560] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [589.560] CPU: 8 PID: 2819134 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1 [589.560] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [589.560] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.561] Code: 68 62 da c0 (...) [589.561] RSP: 0018:ffffa55a8c3b3d98 EFLAGS: 00010246 [589.561] RAX: 0000000000000058 RBX: ffff8f030d7f2000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [589.562] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff953f0878 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [589.562] RBP: ffff8f030d7f2088 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa55a8c3b3c50 [589.562] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8f05850b4c00 [589.562] R13: ffff8f030d7f2090 R14: ffff8f05850b4cd8 R15: dead000000000100 [589.563] FS: 00007f497fd2e840(0000) GS:ffff8f09dfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [589.563] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [589.563] CR2: 00007f497ff8ec10 CR3: 0000000271472006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [589.563] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [589.564] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [589.564] Call Trace: [589.564] <TASK> [589.565] ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60 [589.565] ? die+0x39/0x60 [589.565] ? do_trap+0xeb/0x110 [589.565] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.566] ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 [589.566] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.566] ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70 [589.566] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.567] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [589.567] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.567] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.567] close_ctree+0x35d/0x560 [btrfs] [589.568] ? fsnotify_sb_delete+0x13e/0x1d0 [589.568] ? dispose_list+0x3a/0x50 [589.568] ? evict_inodes+0x151/0x1a0 [589.568] generic_shutdown_super+0x73/0x1a0 [589.569] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [589.569] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [589.569] deactivate_locked_super+0x2e/0x70 [589.569] cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160 [589.570] task_work_run+0x56/0x90 [589.570] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x160/0x170 [589.570] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x22/0x50 [589.570] ? __x64_sys_umount+0x12/0x20 [589.571] do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90 [589.571] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc [589.571] RIP: 0033:0x7f497ff0a567 [589.571] Code: af 98 0e (...) [589.572] RSP: 002b:00007ffc98347358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [589.572] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f49800b8264 RCX: 00007f497ff0a567 [589.572] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000557f558abfa0 [589.573] RBP: 0000557f558a6ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffc98346100 [589.573] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [589.573] R13: 0000557f558abfa0 R14: 0000557f558a6cb0 R15: 0000557f558a6dd0 [589.573] </TASK> [589.574] Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_thin_pool (...) [589.576] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix this by adding a runtime flag to the block group to tell that the block group is still in the list of new block groups, and therefore it should not be moved to the list of unused block groups, at btrfs_mark_bg_unused(), until the flag is cleared, when we finish the creation of the block group at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). Fixes: a9f189716cf1 ("btrfs: move out now unused BG from the reclaim list") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-26Merge tag 'for-6.5-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-7/+40