summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/inode.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-01-27btrfs: respect the max size in the header when activating swap fileFilipe Manana1-0/+11
commit c2f822635df873c510bda6fb7fd1b10b7c31be2d upstream. If we extended the size of a swapfile after its header was created (by the mkswap utility) and then try to activate it, we will map the entire file when activating the swap file, instead of limiting to the max size defined in the swap file's header. Currently test case generic/643 from fstests fails because we do not respect that size limit defined in the swap file's header. So fix this by not mapping file ranges beyond the max size defined in the swap header. This is the same type of bug that iomap used to have, and was fixed in commit 36ca7943ac18ae ("mm/swap: consider max pages in iomap_swapfile_add_extent"). Fixes: ed46ff3d423780 ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-and-tested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-18btrfs: wake up async_delalloc_pages waiters after submitJosef Bacik1-5/+5
commit ac98141d140444fe93e26471d3074c603b70e2ca upstream. We use the async_delalloc_pages mechanism to make sure that we've completed our async work before trying to continue our delalloc flushing. The reason for this is we need to see any ordered extents that were created by our delalloc flushing. However we're waking up before we do the submit work, which is before we create the ordered extents. This is a pretty wide race window where we could potentially think there are no ordered extents and thus exit shrink_delalloc prematurely. Fix this by waking us up after we've done the work to create ordered extents. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-03btrfs: fix race between marking inode needs to be logged and log syncingFilipe Manana1-3/+1
commit bc0939fcfab0d7efb2ed12896b1af3d819954a14 upstream. We have a race between marking that an inode needs to be logged, either at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() or at btrfs_page_mkwrite(), and between btrfs_sync_log(). The following steps describe how the race happens. 1) We are at transaction N; 2) Inode I was previously fsynced in the current transaction so it has: inode->logged_trans set to N; 3) The inode's root currently has: root->log_transid set to 1 root->last_log_commit set to 0 Which means only one log transaction was committed to far, log transaction 0. When a log tree is created we set ->log_transid and ->last_log_commit of its parent root to 0 (at btrfs_add_log_tree()); 4) One more range of pages is dirtied in inode I; 5) Some task A starts an fsync against some other inode J (same root), and so it joins log transaction 1. Before task A calls btrfs_sync_log()... 6) Task B starts an fsync against inode I, which currently has the full sync flag set, so it starts delalloc and waits for the ordered extent to complete before calling btrfs_inode_in_log() at btrfs_sync_file(); 7) During ordered extent completion we have btrfs_update_inode() called against inode I, which in turn calls btrfs_set_inode_last_trans(), which does the following: spin_lock(&inode->lock); inode->last_trans = trans->transaction->transid; inode->last_sub_trans = inode->root->log_transid; inode->last_log_commit = inode->root->last_log_commit; spin_unlock(&inode->lock); So ->last_trans is set to N and ->last_sub_trans set to 1. But before setting ->last_log_commit... 8) Task A is at btrfs_sync_log(): - it increments root->log_transid to 2 - starts writeback for all log tree extent buffers - waits for the writeback to complete - writes the super blocks - updates root->last_log_commit to 1 It's a lot of slow steps between updating root->log_transid and root->last_log_commit; 9) The task doing the ordered extent completion, currently at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans(), then finally runs: inode->last_log_commit = inode->root->last_log_commit; spin_unlock(&inode->lock); Which results in inode->last_log_commit being set to 1. The ordered extent completes; 10) Task B is resumed, and it calls btrfs_inode_in_log() which returns true because we have all the following conditions met: inode->logged_trans == N which matches fs_info->generation && inode->last_subtrans (1) <= inode->last_log_commit (1) && inode->last_subtrans (1) <= root->last_log_commit (1) && list inode->extent_tree.modified_extents is empty And as a consequence we return without logging the inode, so the existing logged version of the inode does not point to the extent that was written after the previous fsync. It should be impossible in practice for one task be able to do so much progress in btrfs_sync_log() while another task is at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() right after it reads root->log_transid and before it reads root->last_log_commit. Even if kernel preemption is enabled we know the task at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() can not be preempted because it is holding the inode's spinlock. However there is another place where we do the same without holding the spinlock, which is in the memory mapped write path at: vm_fault_t btrfs_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf) { (...) BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans = fs_info->generation; BTRFS_I(inode)->last_sub_trans = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->log_transid; BTRFS_I(inode)->last_log_commit = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->last_log_commit; (...) So with preemption happening after setting ->last_sub_trans and before setting ->last_log_commit, it is less of a stretch to have another task do enough progress at btrfs_sync_log() such that the task doing the memory mapped write ends up with ->last_sub_trans and ->last_log_commit set to the same value. It is still a big stretch to get there, as the task doing btrfs_sync_log() has to start writeback, wait for its completion and write the super blocks. So fix this in two different ways: 1) For btrfs_set_inode_last_trans(), simply set ->last_log_commit to the value of ->last_sub_trans minus 1; 2) For btrfs_page_mkwrite() only set the inode's ->last_sub_trans, just like we do for buffered and direct writes at btrfs_file_write_iter(), which is all we need to make sure multiple writes and fsyncs to an inode in the same transaction never result in an fsync missing that the inode changed and needs to be logged. Turn this into a helper function and use it both at btrfs_page_mkwrite() and at btrfs_file_write_iter() - this also fixes the problem that at btrfs_page_mkwrite() we were setting those fields without the protection of the inode's spinlock. This is an extremely unlikely race to happen in practice. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-03Revert "btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pages"Qu Wenruo1-1/+1
commit 4e9655763b82a91e4c341835bb504a2b1590f984 upstream. This reverts commit f2165627319ffd33a6217275e5690b1ab5c45763. [BUG] It's no longer possible to create compressed inline extent after commit f2165627319f ("btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pages"). [CAUSE] For compression code, there are several possible reasons we have a range that needs to be compressed while it's no more than one page. - Compressed inline write The data is always smaller than one sector and the test lacks the condition to properly recognize a non-inline extent. - Compressed subpage write For the incoming subpage compressed write support, we require page alignment of the delalloc range. And for 64K page size, we can compress just one page into smaller sectors. For those reasons, the requirement for the data to be more than one page is not correct, and is already causing regression for compressed inline data writeback. The idea of skipping one page to avoid wasting CPU time could be revisited in the future. [FIX] Fix it by reverting the offending commit. Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/afa2742.c084f5d6.17b6b08dffc@tnonline.net Fixes: f2165627319f ("btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pages") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-26btrfs: prevent rename2 from exchanging a subvol with a directory from ↵NeilBrown1-2/+8
different parents [ Upstream commit 3f79f6f6247c83f448c8026c3ee16d4636ef8d4f ] Cross-rename lacks a check when that would prevent exchanging a directory and subvolume from different parent subvolume. This causes data inconsistencies and is caught before commit by tree-checker, turning the filesystem to read-only. Calling the renameat2 with RENAME_EXCHANGE flags like renameat2(AT_FDCWD, namesrc, AT_FDCWD, namedest, (1 << 1)) on two paths: namesrc = dir1/subvol1/dir2 namedest = subvol2/subvol3 will cause key order problem with following write time tree-checker report: [1194842.307890] BTRFS critical (device loop1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=27574272 slot=10 ino=258, invalid previous key objectid, have 257 expect 258 [1194842.322221] BTRFS info (device loop1): leaf 27574272 gen 8 total ptrs 11 free space 15444 owner 5 [1194842.331562] BTRFS info (device loop1): refs 2 lock_owner 0 current 26561 [1194842.338772] item 0 key (256 1 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 [1194842.338793] inode generation 3 size 16 mode 40755 [1194842.338801] item 1 key (256 12 256) itemoff 16111 itemsize 12 [1194842.338809] item 2 key (256 84 2248503653) itemoff 16077 itemsize 34 [1194842.338817] dir oid 258 type 2 [1194842.338823] item 3 key (256 84 2363071922) itemoff 16043 itemsize 34 [1194842.338830] dir oid 257 type 2 [1194842.338836] item 4 key (256 96 2) itemoff 16009 itemsize 34 [1194842.338843] item 5 key (256 96 3) itemoff 15975 itemsize 34 [1194842.338852] item 6 key (257 1 0) itemoff 15815 itemsize 160 [1194842.338863] inode generation 6 size 8 mode 40755 [1194842.338869] item 7 key (257 12 256) itemoff 15801 itemsize 14 [1194842.338876] item 8 key (257 84 2505409169) itemoff 15767 itemsize 34 [1194842.338883] dir oid 256 type 2 [1194842.338888] item 9 key (257 96 2) itemoff 15733 itemsize 34 [1194842.338895] item 10 key (258 12 256) itemoff 15719 itemsize 14 [1194842.339163] BTRFS error (device loop1): block=27574272 write time tree block corruption detected [1194842.339245] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1194842.443422] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 26561 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:449 csum_one_extent_buffer+0xed/0x100 [btrfs] [1194842.511863] CPU: 6 PID: 26561 Comm: kworker/u17:2 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc3-git+ #793 [1194842.511870] Hardware name: empty empty/S3993, BIOS PAQEX0-3 02/24/2008 [1194842.511876] Workqueue: btrfs-worker-high btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [1194842.511976] RIP: 0010:csum_one_extent_buffer+0xed/0x100 [btrfs] [1194842.512068] RSP: 0018:ffffa2c284d77da0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1194842.512074] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: ffff928867bd9978 [1194842.512078] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff928867bd9970 [1194842.512081] RBP: ffff92876b958000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00000000000c0003 [1194842.512085] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 [1194842.512088] R13: ffff92875f989f98 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [1194842.512092] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff928867a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1194842.512095] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1194842.512099] CR2: 000055f5384da1f0 CR3: 0000000102fe4000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [1194842.512103] Call Trace: [1194842.512128] ? run_one_async_free+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [1194842.631729] btree_csum_one_bio+0x1ac/0x1d0 [btrfs] [1194842.631837] run_one_async_start+0x18/0x30 [btrfs] [1194842.631938] btrfs_work_helper+0xd5/0x1d0 [btrfs] [1194842.647482] process_one_work+0x262/0x5e0 [1194842.647520] worker_thread+0x4c/0x320 [1194842.655935] ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [1194842.655946] kthread+0x135/0x160 [1194842.655953] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [1194842.655965] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [1194842.672465] irq event stamp: 1729 [1194842.672469] hardirqs last enabled at (1735): [<ffffffffbd1104f5>] console_trylock_spinning+0x185/0x1a0 [1194842.672477] hardirqs last disabled at (1740): [<ffffffffbd1104cc>] console_trylock_spinning+0x15c/0x1a0 [1194842.672482] softirqs last enabled at (1666): [<ffffffffbdc002e1>] __do_softirq+0x2e1/0x50a [1194842.672491] softirqs last disabled at (1651): [<ffffffffbd08aab7>] __irq_exit_rcu+0xa7/0xd0 The corrupted data will not be written, and filesystem can be unmounted and mounted again (all changes since the last commit will be lost). Add the missing check for new_ino so that all non-subvolumes must reside under the same parent subvolume. There's an exception allowing to exchange two subvolumes from any parents as the directory representing a subvolume is only a logical link and does not have any other structures related to the parent subvolume, unlike files, directories etc, that are always in the inode namespace of the parent subvolume. Fixes: cdd1fedf8261 ("btrfs: add support for RENAME_EXCHANGE and RENAME_WHITEOUT") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-07-14btrfs: don't clear page extent mapped if we're not invalidating the full pageQu Wenruo1-1/+13
[ Upstream commit bcd77455d590eaa0422a5e84ae852007cfce574a ] [BUG] With current btrfs subpage rw support, the following script can lead to fs hang: $ mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev $ mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt $ fsstress -w -n 100 -p 1 -s 1608140256 -v -d $mnt The fs will hang at btrfs_start_ordered_extent(). [CAUSE] In above test case, btrfs_invalidate() will be called with the following parameters: offset = 0 length = 53248 page dirty = 1 subpage dirty bitmap = 0x2000 Since @offset is 0, btrfs_invalidate() will try to invalidate the full page, and finally call clear_page_extent_mapped() which will detach subpage structure from the page. And since the page no longer has subpage structure, the subpage dirty bitmap will be cleared, preventing the dirty range from being written back, thus no way to wake up the ordered extent. [FIX] Just follow other filesystems, only to invalidate the page if the range covers the full page. There are cases like truncate_setsize() which can call btrfs_invalidatepage() with offset == 0 and length != 0 for the last page of an inode. Although the old code will still try to invalidate the full page, we are still safe to just wait for ordered extent to finish. So it shouldn't cause extra problems. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-07-14btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pagesDavid Sterba1-1/+1
commit f2165627319ffd33a6217275e5690b1ab5c45763 upstream. The early check if we should attempt compression does not take into account the number of input pages. It can happen that there's only one page, eg. a tail page after some ranges of the BTRFS_MAX_UNCOMPRESSED have been processed, or an isolated page that won't be converted to an inline extent. The single page would be compressed but a later check would drop it again because the result size must be at least one block shorter than the input. That can never work with just one page. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-06-10btrfs: abort in rename_exchange if we fail to insert the second refJosef Bacik1-1/+6
commit dc09ef3562726cd520c8338c1640872a60187af5 upstream. Error injection stress uncovered a problem where we'd leave a dangling inode ref if we failed during a rename_exchange. This happens because we insert the inode ref for one side of the rename, and then for the other side. If this second inode ref insert fails we'll leave the first one dangling and leave a corrupt file system behind. Fix this by aborting if we did the insert for the first inode ref. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-06-10btrfs: mark ordered extent and inode with error if we fail to finishJosef Bacik1-0/+12
commit d61bec08b904cf171835db98168f82bc338e92e4 upstream. While doing error injection testing I saw that sometimes we'd get an abort that wouldn't stop the current transaction commit from completing. This abort was coming from finish ordered IO, but at this point in the transaction commit we should have gotten an error and stopped. It turns out the abort came from finish ordered io while trying to write out the free space cache. It occurred to me that any failure inside of finish_ordered_io isn't actually raised to the person doing the writing, so we could have any number of failures in this path and think the ordered extent completed successfully and the inode was fine. Fix this by marking the ordered extent with BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR, and marking the mapping of the inode with mapping_set_error, so any callers that simply call fdatawait will also get the error. With this we're seeing the IO error on the free space inode when we fail to do the finish_ordered_io. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-26btrfs: avoid RCU stalls while running delayed iputsJosef Bacik1-0/+1
commit 71795ee590111e3636cc3c148289dfa9fa0a5fc3 upstream. Generally a delayed iput is added when we might do the final iput, so usually we'll end up sleeping while processing the delayed iputs naturally. However there's no guarantee of this, especially for small files. In production we noticed 5 instances of RCU stalls while testing a kernel release overnight across 1000 machines, so this is relatively common: host count: 5 rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: ....: (20998 ticks this GP) idle=59e/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=12333372/12333372 fqs=3208 (t=21031 jiffies g=27810193 q=41075) NMI backtrace for cpu 1 CPU: 1 PID: 1713 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.6.13-0_fbk12_rc1_5520_gec92bffc1ec9 #1 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0x50/0x70 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold.6+0x30/0x65 ? lapic_can_unplug_cpu.cold.30+0x40/0x40 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0xba/0xca rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x99/0xc7 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold.90+0x1b2/0x3a3 ? trigger_load_balance+0x5c/0x200 ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x60/0x60 ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x60/0x60 update_process_times+0x24/0x50 tick_sched_timer+0x37/0x70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0xfe/0x270 hrtimer_interrupt+0xf4/0x210 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5e/0x120 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> RIP: 0010:queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x17d/0x1b0 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000da5fe48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff889fa81d0cd8 RCX: 0000000000000029 RDX: ffff889fff86c0c0 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: ffff88bfc2da7200 RBP: ffff888f2dcdd768 R08: 0000000001040000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffffff82a55560 R12: ffff88bfc2da7200 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88bff6c2a360 R15: ffffffff814bd870 ? kzalloc.constprop.57+0x30/0x30 list_lru_add+0x5a/0x100 inode_lru_list_add+0x20/0x40 iput+0x1c1/0x1f0 run_delayed_iput_locked+0x46/0x90 btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x3f/0x60 cleaner_kthread+0xf2/0x120 kthread+0x10b/0x130 Fix this by adding a cond_resched_lock() to the loop processing delayed iputs so we can avoid these sort of stalls. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-25btrfs: fix slab cache flags for free space tree bitmapDavid Sterba1-1/+1
commit 34e49994d0dcdb2d31d4d2908d04f4e9ce57e4d7 upstream. The free space tree bitmap slab cache is created with SLAB_RED_ZONE but that's a debugging flag and not always enabled. Also the other slabs are created with at least SLAB_MEM_SPREAD that we want as well to average the memory placement cost. Reported-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Fixes: 3acd48507dc4 ("btrfs: fix allocation of free space cache v1 bitmap pages") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-11btrfs: don't flush from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadataNikolay Borisov1-1/+1
commit 4d14c5cde5c268a2bc26addecf09489cb953ef64 upstream Calling btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata can result in flushing delalloc while holding a transaction and delayed node locks. This is deadlock prone. In the past multiple commits: * ae5e070eaca9 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't try to wait flushing if we're already holding a transaction") * 6f23277a49e6 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already hold the handle") Tried to solve various aspects of this but this was always a whack-a-mole game. Unfortunately those 2 fixes don't solve a deadlock scenario involving btrfs_delayed_node::mutex. Namely, one thread can call btrfs_dirty_inode as a result of reading a file and modifying its atime: PID: 6963 TASK: ffff8c7f3f94c000 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "test" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_timeout at ffffffffa52a1bdd #3 wait_for_completion at ffffffffa529eeea <-- sleeps with delayed node mutex held #4 start_delalloc_inodes at ffffffffc0380db5 #5 btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot at ffffffffc0393836 #6 try_flush_qgroup at ffffffffc03f04b2 #7 __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta at ffffffffc03f5bb6 <-- tries to reserve space and starts delalloc inodes. #8 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e31aa <-- acquires delayed node mutex #9 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 #10 btrfs_dirty_inode at ffffffffc038627b <-- TRANSACTIION OPENED #11 touch_atime at ffffffffa4cf0000 #12 generic_file_read_iter at ffffffffa4c1f123 #13 new_sync_read at ffffffffa4ccdc8a #14 vfs_read at ffffffffa4cd0849 #15 ksys_read at ffffffffa4cd0bd1 #16 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa4a052eb #17 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa540008c This will cause an asynchronous work to flush the delalloc inodes to happen which can try to acquire the same delayed_node mutex: PID: 455 TASK: ffff8c8085fa4000 CPU: 5 COMMAND: "kworker/u16:30" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa529e80a #3 __mutex_lock at ffffffffa529fdcb <-- goes to sleep, never wakes up. #4 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e3143 <-- tries to acquire the mutex #5 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 <-- this is the same inode that pid 6963 is holding #6 cow_file_range_inline.constprop.78 at ffffffffc0386be7 #7 cow_file_range at ffffffffc03879c1 #8 btrfs_run_delalloc_range at ffffffffc038894c #9 writepage_delalloc at ffffffffc03a3c8f #10 __extent_writepage at ffffffffc03a4c01 #11 extent_write_cache_pages at ffffffffc03a500b #12 extent_writepages at ffffffffc03a6de2 #13 do_writepages at ffffffffa4c277eb #14 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffa4c1e5bb #15 btrfs_run_delalloc_work at ffffffffc0380987 <-- starts running delayed nodes #16 normal_work_helper at ffffffffc03b706c #17 process_one_work at ffffffffa4aba4e4 #18 worker_thread at ffffffffa4aba6fd #19 kthread at ffffffffa4ac0a3d #20 ret_from_fork at ffffffffa54001ff To fully address those cases the complete fix is to never issue any flushing while holding the transaction or the delayed node lock. This patch achieves it by calling qgroup_reserve_meta directly which will either succeed without flushing or will fail and return -EDQUOT. In the latter case that return value is going to be propagated to btrfs_dirty_inode which will fallback to start a new transaction. That's fine as the majority of time we expect the inode will have BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY flag set which will result in directly copying the in-memory state. Fixes: c53e9653605d ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [sudip: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-09btrfs: fix race between swap file activation and snapshot creationFilipe Manana1-2/+19
commit dd0734f2a866f9d619d4abf97c3d71bcdee40ea9 upstream. When creating a snapshot we check if the current number of swap files, in the root, is non-zero, and if it is, we error out and warn that we can not create the snapshot because there are active swap files. However this is racy because when a task started activation of a swap file, another task might have started already snapshot creation and might have seen the counter for the number of swap files as zero. This means that after the swap file is activated we may end up with a snapshot of the same root successfully created, and therefore when the first write to the swap file happens it has to fall back into COW mode, which should never happen for active swap files. Basically what can happen is: 1) Task A starts snapshot creation and enters ioctl.c:create_snapshot(). There it sees that root->nr_swapfiles has a value of 0 so it continues; 2) Task B enters btrfs_swap_activate(). It is not aware that another task started snapshot creation but it did not finish yet. It increments root->nr_swapfiles from 0 to 1; 3) Task B checks that the file meets all requirements to be an active swap file - it has NOCOW set, there are no snapshots for the inode's root at the moment, no file holes, no reflinked extents, etc; 4) Task B returns success and now the file is an active swap file; 5) Task A commits the transaction to create the snapshot and finishes. The swap file's extents are now shared between the original root and the snapshot; 6) A write into an extent of the swap file is attempted - there is a snapshot of the file's root, so we fall back to COW mode and therefore the physical location of the extent changes on disk. So fix this by taking the snapshot lock during swap file activation before locking the extent range, as that is the order in which we lock these during buffered writes. Fixes: ed46ff3d42378 ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-09btrfs: fix race between writes to swap files and scrubFilipe Manana1-1/+18
commit 195a49eaf655eb914896c92cecd96bc863c9feb3 upstream. When we active a swap file, at btrfs_swap_activate(), we acquire the exclusive operation lock to prevent the physical location of the swap file extents to be changed by operations such as balance and device replace/resize/remove. We also call there can_nocow_extent() which, among other things, checks if the block group of a swap file extent is currently RO, and if it is we can not use the extent, since a write into it would result in COWing the extent. However we have no protection against a scrub operation running after we activate the swap file, which can result in the swap file extents to be COWed while the scrub is running and operating on the respective block group, because scrub turns a block group into RO before it processes it and then back again to RW mode after processing it. That means an attempt to write into a swap file extent while scrub is processing the respective block group, will result in COWing the extent, changing its physical location on disk. Fix this by making sure that block groups that have extents that are used by active swap files can not be turned into RO mode, therefore making it not possible for a scrub to turn them into RO mode. When a scrub finds a block group that can not be turned to RO due to the existence of extents used by swap files, it proceeds to the next block group and logs a warning message that mentions the block group was skipped due to active swap files - this is the same approach we currently use for balance. Fixes: ed46ff3d42378 ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-04btrfs: fix double accounting of ordered extent for subpage case in ↵Qu Wenruo1-1/+2
btrfs_invalidapge [ Upstream commit 951c80f83d61bd4b21794c8aba829c3c1a45c2d0 ] Commit dbfdb6d1b369 ("Btrfs: Search for all ordered extents that could span across a page") make btrfs_invalidapage() to search all ordered extents. The offending code looks like this: again: start = page_start; ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(inode, start, page_end - start + 1); if (ordred) { end = min(page_end, ordered->file_offset + ordered->num_bytes - 1); /* Do the cleanup */ start = end + 1; if (start < page_end) goto again; } The behavior is indeed necessary for the incoming subpage support, but when it iterates through all the ordered extents, it also resets the search range @start. This means, for the following cases, we can double account the ordered extents, causing its bytes_left underflow: Page offset 0 16K 32K |<--- OE 1 --->|<--- OE 2 ---->| As the first iteration will find ordered extent (OE) 1, which doesn't cover the full page, thus after cleanup code, we need to retry again. But again label will reset start to page_start, and we got OE 1 again, which causes double accounting on OE 1, and cause OE 1's byte_left to underflow. This problem can only happen for subpage case, as for regular sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE case, we will always find a OE ends at or after page end, thus no way to trigger the problem. Move the again label after start = page_start. There will be more comprehensive rework to convert the open coded loop to a proper while loop for subpage support. Fixes: dbfdb6d1b369 ("Btrfs: Search for all ordered extents that could span across a page") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-02-23btrfs: fix crash after non-aligned direct IO write with O_DSYNCFilipe Manana1-1/+5
Whenever we attempt to do a non-aligned direct IO write with O_DSYNC, we end up triggering an assertion and crashing. Example reproducer: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV > /dev/null mount $DEV $MNT # Do a direct IO write with O_DSYNC into a non-aligned range... xfs_io -f -d -s -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 64K 1111 64K" $MNT/foobar umount $MNT When running the reproducer an assertion fails and produces the following trace: [ 2418.403134] assertion failed: !current->journal_info || flush != BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_DATA, in fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1467 [ 2418.403745] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2418.404306] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3286! [ 2418.404862] invalid opcode: 0000 [#2] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [ 2418.405451] CPU: 1 PID: 64705 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G D 5.10.15-btrfs-next-87 #1 [ 2418.406026] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 2418.407228] RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x26 [btrfs] [ 2418.407835] Code: e6 48 c7 (...) [ 2418.409078] RSP: 0018:ffffb06080d13c98 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 2418.409696] RAX: 000000000000006c RBX: ffff994c1debbf08 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 2418.410302] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 2418.410904] RBP: ffff994c21770000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 2418.411504] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000010000 [ 2418.412111] R13: ffff994c22198400 R14: ffff994c21770000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 2418.412713] FS: 00007f54fd7aff00(0000) GS:ffff994d35200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 2418.413326] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 2418.413933] CR2: 000056549596d000 CR3: 000000010b928003 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [ 2418.414528] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 2418.415109] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 2418.415669] Call Trace: [ 2418.416254] btrfs_reserve_data_bytes.cold+0x22/0x22 [btrfs] [ 2418.416812] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs] [ 2418.417380] btrfs_buffered_write+0x1b0/0x7f0 [btrfs] [ 2418.418315] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x2a9/0x770 [btrfs] [ 2418.418920] new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1c0 [ 2418.419430] vfs_write+0x2bb/0x3b0 [ 2418.419972] __x64_sys_pwrite64+0x90/0xc0 [ 2418.420486] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [ 2418.420979] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 2418.421486] RIP: 0033:0x7f54fda0b986 [ 2418.421981] Code: 48 c7 c0 (...) [ 2418.423019] RSP: 002b:00007ffc40569c38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000012 [ 2418.423547] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f54fda0b986 [ 2418.424075] RDX: 0000000000010000 RSI: 000056549595e000 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 2418.424596] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000400 [ 2418.425119] R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000ffffffff [ 2418.425644] R13: 0000000000000400 R14: 0000000000010000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 2418.426148] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic (...) [ 2418.429540] ---[ end trace ef2aeb44dc0afa34 ]--- 1) At btrfs_file_write_iter() we set current->journal_info to BTRFS_DIO_SYNC_STUB; 2) We then call __btrfs_direct_write(), which calls btrfs_direct_IO(); 3) We can't do the direct IO write because it starts at a non-aligned offset (1111). So at btrfs_direct_IO() we return -EINVAL (coming from check_direct_IO() which does the alignment check), but we leave current->journal_info set to BTRFS_DIO_SYNC_STUB - we only clear it at btrfs_dio_iomap_begin(), because we assume we always get there; 4) Then at __btrfs_direct_write() we see that the attempt to do the direct IO write was not successful, 0 bytes written, so we fallback to a buffered write by calling btrfs_buffered_write(); 5) There we call btrfs_check_data_free_space() which in turn calls btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand() and that calls btrfs_reserve_data_bytes() with flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_DATA; 6) Then at btrfs_reserve_data_bytes() we have current->journal_info set to BTRFS_DIO_SYNC_STUB, therefore not NULL, and flush has the value BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_DATA, triggering the second assertion: int btrfs_reserve_data_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytes, enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush) { struct btrfs_space_info *data_sinfo = fs_info->data_sinfo; int ret; ASSERT(flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_DATA || flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_FREE_SPACE_INODE); ASSERT(!current->journal_info || flush != BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_DATA); (...) So fix that by setting the journal to NULL whenever check_direct_IO() returns a failure. This bug only affects 5.10 kernels, and the regression was introduced in 5.10-rc1 by commit 0eb79294dbe328 ("btrfs: dio iomap DSYNC workaround"). The bug does not exist in 5.11 kernels due to commit ecfdc08b8cc65d ("btrfs: remove dio iomap DSYNC workaround"), which depends on a large patchset that went into the merge window for 5.11. So this is a fix only for 5.10.x stable kernels, as there are people hitting this bug. Fixes: 0eb79294dbe328 ("btrfs: dio iomap DSYNC workaround") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10 (and only 5.10) Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181605 Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-01-17btrfs: shrink delalloc pages instead of full inodesJosef Bacik1-17/+43
[ Upstream commit e076ab2a2ca70a0270232067cd49f76cd92efe64 ] Commit 38d715f494f2 ("btrfs: use btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in shrink_delalloc") cleaned up how we do delalloc shrinking by utilizing some infrastructure we have in place to flush inodes that we use for device replace and snapshot. However this introduced a pretty serious performance regression. To reproduce the user untarred the source tarball of Firefox (360MiB xz compressed/1.5GiB uncompressed), and would see it take anywhere from 5 to 20 times as long to untar in 5.10 compared to 5.9. This was observed on fast devices (SSD and better) and not on HDD. The root cause is because before we would generally use the normal writeback path to reclaim delalloc space, and for this we would provide it with the number of pages we wanted to flush. The referenced commit changed this to flush that many inodes, which drastically increased the amount of space we were flushing in certain cases, which severely affected performance. We cannot revert this patch unfortunately because of 3d45f221ce62 ("btrfs: fix deadlock when cloning inline extent and low on free metadata space") which requires the ability to skip flushing inodes that are being cloned in certain scenarios, which means we need to keep using our flushing infrastructure or risk re-introducing the deadlock. Instead to fix this problem we can go back to providing btrfs_start_delalloc_roots with a number of pages to flush, and then set up a writeback_control and utilize sync_inode() to handle the flushing for us. This gives us the same behavior we had prior to the fix, while still allowing us to avoid the deadlock that was fixed by Filipe. I redid the users original test and got the following results on one of our test machines (256GiB of ram, 56 cores, 2TiB Intel NVMe drive) 5.9 0m54.258s 5.10 1m26.212s 5.10+patch 0m38.800s 5.10+patch is significantly faster than plain 5.9 because of my patch series "Change data reservations to use the ticketing infra" which contained the patch that introduced the regression, but generally improved the overall ENOSPC flushing mechanisms. Additional testing on consumer-grade SSD (8GiB ram, 8 CPU) confirm the results: 5.10.5 4m00s 5.10.5+patch 1m08s 5.11-rc2 5m14s 5.11-rc2+patch 1m30s Reported-by: René Rebe <rene@exactcode.de> Fixes: 38d715f494f2 ("btrfs: use btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in shrink_delalloc") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10 Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add my test results ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-01-17btrfs: fix deadlock when cloning inline extent and low on free metadata spaceFilipe Manana1-4/+11
[ Upstream commit 3d45f221ce627d13e2e6ef3274f06750c84a6542 ] When cloning an inline extent there are cases where we can not just copy the inline extent from the source range to the target range (e.g. when the target range starts at an offset greater than zero). In such cases we copy the inline extent's data into a page of the destination inode and then dirty that page. However, after that we will need to start a transaction for each processed extent and, if we are ever low on available metadata space, we may need to flush existing delalloc for all dirty inodes in an attempt to release metadata space - if that happens we may deadlock: * the async reclaim task queued a delalloc work to flush delalloc for the destination inode of the clone operation; * the task executing that delalloc work gets blocked waiting for the range with the dirty page to be unlocked, which is currently locked by the task doing the clone operation; * the async reclaim task blocks waiting for the delalloc work to complete; * the cloning task is waiting on the waitqueue of its reservation ticket while holding the range with the dirty page locked in the inode's io_tree; * if metadata space is not released by some other task (like delalloc for some other inode completing for example), the clone task waits forever and as a consequence the delalloc work and async reclaim tasks will hang forever as well. Releasing more space on the other hand may require starting a transaction, which will hang as well when trying to reserve metadata space, resulting in a deadlock between all these tasks. When this happens, traces like the following show up in dmesg/syslog: [87452.323003] INFO: task kworker/u16:11:1810830 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [87452.323644] Tainted: G B W 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 [87452.324248] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [87452.324852] task:kworker/u16:11 state:D stack: 0 pid:1810830 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [87452.325520] Workqueue: btrfs-flush_delalloc btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [87452.326136] Call Trace: [87452.326737] __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 [87452.327390] schedule+0x45/0xe0 [87452.328174] lock_extent_bits+0x1e6/0x2d0 [btrfs] [87452.328894] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [87452.329474] btrfs_invalidatepage+0x32c/0x390 [btrfs] [87452.330133] ? __mod_memcg_state+0x8e/0x160 [87452.330738] __extent_writepage+0x2d4/0x400 [btrfs] [87452.331405] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b2/0x500 [btrfs] [87452.332007] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 [87452.332557] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xf0 [87452.333127] extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] [87452.333653] ? lock_acquire+0x1a3/0x490 [87452.334177] do_writepages+0x43/0xe0 [87452.334699] ? __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xa4/0x100 [87452.335720] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xc5/0x100 [87452.336500] btrfs_run_delalloc_work+0x17/0x40 [btrfs] [87452.337216] btrfs_work_helper+0xf1/0x600 [btrfs] [87452.337838] process_one_work+0x24e/0x5e0 [87452.338437] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [87452.339137] ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [87452.339884] kthread+0x153/0x170 [87452.340507] ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 [87452.341153] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [87452.341806] INFO: task kworker/u16:1:2426217 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [87452.342487] Tainted: G B W 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 [87452.343274] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [87452.344049] task:kworker/u16:1 state:D stack: 0 pid:2426217 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [87452.344974] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs] [87452.345655] Call Trace: [87452.346305] __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 [87452.346947] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [87452.347676] ? wait_for_completion+0x81/0x110 [87452.348389] schedule+0x45/0xe0 [87452.349077] schedule_timeout+0x30c/0x580 [87452.349718] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [87452.350340] ? lock_acquire+0x1a3/0x490 [87452.351006] ? try_to_wake_up+0x7a/0xa20 [87452.351541] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 [87452.352040] ? lock_acquired+0x199/0x490 [87452.352517] ? wait_for_completion+0x81/0x110 [87452.353000] wait_for_completion+0xab/0x110 [87452.353490] start_delalloc_inodes+0x2af/0x390 [btrfs] [87452.353973] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x12d/0x250 [btrfs] [87452.354455] flush_space+0x24f/0x660 [btrfs] [87452.355063] btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x1bb/0x480 [btrfs] [87452.355565] process_one_work+0x24e/0x5e0 [87452.356024] worker_thread+0x20f/0x3b0 [87452.356487] ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [87452.356973] kthread+0x153/0x170 [87452.357434] ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 [87452.357880] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 (...) < stack traces of several tasks waiting for the locks of the inodes of the clone operation > (...) [92867.444138] RSP: 002b:00007ffc3371bbe8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000052 [92867.444624] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc3371bea0 RCX: 00007f61efe73f97 [92867.445116] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000560fbd5d7a40 RDI: 0000560fbd5d8960 [92867.445595] RBP: 00007ffc3371beb0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 [92867.446070] R10: 00007ffc3371b996 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [92867.446820] R13: 000000000000001f R14: 00007ffc3371bea0 R15: 00007ffc3371beb0 [92867.447361] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:2508238 ppid:2508153 flags:0x00004000 [92867.447920] Call Trace: [92867.448435] __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 [92867.448934] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [92867.449423] schedule+0x45/0xe0 [92867.449916] __reserve_bytes+0x4a4/0xb10 [btrfs] [92867.450576] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [92867.451202] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x29/0x190 [btrfs] [92867.451815] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [92867.452412] start_transaction+0x2d1/0x760 [btrfs] [92867.453216] clone_copy_inline_extent+0x333/0x490 [btrfs] [92867.453848] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 [92867.454539] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x9a7/0xc30 [btrfs] [92867.455218] btrfs_clone+0x569/0x7e0 [btrfs] [92867.455952] btrfs_clone_files+0xf6/0x150 [btrfs] [92867.456588] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x324/0x3d0 [btrfs] [92867.457213] do_clone_file_range+0xd4/0x1f0 [92867.457828] vfs_clone_file_range+0x4d/0x230 [92867.458355] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 [92867.458890] ioctl_file_clone+0x8f/0xc0 [92867.459377] do_vfs_ioctl+0x342/0x750 [92867.459913] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x62/0xb0 [92867.460377] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [92867.460842] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 (...) < stack traces of more tasks blocked on metadata reservation like the clone task above, because the async reclaim task has deadlocked > (...) Another thing to notice is that the worker task that is deadlocked when trying to flush the destination inode of the clone operation is at btrfs_invalidatepage(). This is simply because the clone operation has a destination offset greater than the i_size and we only update the i_size of the destination file after cloning an extent (just like we do in the buffered write path). Since the async reclaim path uses btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() to trigger the flushing of delalloc for all inodes that have delalloc, add a runtime flag to an inode to signal it should not be flushed, and for inodes with that flag set, start_delalloc_inodes() will simply skip them. When the cloning code needs to dirty a page to copy an inline extent, set that flag on the inode and then clear it when the clone operation finishes. This could be sporadically triggered with test case generic/269 from fstests, which exercises many fsstress processes running in parallel with several dd processes filling up the entire filesystem. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9+ Fixes: 05a5a7621ce6 ("Btrfs: implement full reflink support for inline extents") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-11-13btrfs: fix missing delalloc new bit for new delalloc rangesFilipe Manana1-0/+58
When doing a buffered write, through one of the write family syscalls, we look for ranges which currently don't have allocated extents and set the 'delalloc new' bit on them, so that we can report a correct number of used blocks to the stat(2) syscall until delalloc is flushed and ordered extents complete. However there are a few other places where we can do a buffered write against a range that is mapped to a hole (no extent allocated) and where we do not set the 'new delalloc' bit. Those places are: - Doing a memory mapped write against a hole; - Cloning an inline extent into a hole starting at file offset 0; - Calling btrfs_cont_expand() when the i_size of the file is not aligned to the sector size and is located in a hole. For example when cloning to a destination offset beyond EOF. So after such cases, until the corresponding delalloc range is flushed and the respective ordered extents complete, we can report an incorrect number of blocks used through the stat(2) syscall. In some cases we can end up reporting 0 used blocks to stat(2), which is a particular bad value to report as it may mislead tools to think a file is completely sparse when its i_size is not zero, making them skip reading any data, an undesired consequence for tools such as archivers and other backup tools, as reported a long time ago in the following thread (and other past threads): https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2016-07/msg00001.html Example reproducer: $ cat reproducer.sh #!/bin/bash MNT=/mnt/sdi DEV=/dev/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV > /dev/null # mkfs.xfs -f $DEV > /dev/null # mkfs.ext4 -F $DEV > /dev/null # mkfs.f2fs -f $DEV > /dev/null mount $DEV $MNT xfs_io -f -c "truncate 64K" \ -c "mmap -w 0 64K" \ -c "mwrite -S 0xab 0 64K" \ -c "munmap" \ $MNT/foo blocks_used=$(stat -c %b $MNT/foo) echo "blocks used: $blocks_used" if [ $blocks_used -eq 0 ]; then echo "ERROR: blocks used is 0" fi umount $DEV $ ./reproducer.sh blocks used: 0 ERROR: blocks used is 0 So move the logic that decides to set the 'delalloc bit' bit into the function btrfs_set_extent_delalloc(), since that is what we use for all those missing cases as well as for the cases that currently work well. This change is also preparatory work for an upcoming patch that fixes other problems related to tracking and reporting the number of bytes used by an inode. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-10-16btrfs: fix relocation failure due to race with fallocateFilipe Manana1-1/+7
When doing a fallocate() we have a short time window, after reserving an extent and before starting a transaction, where if relocation for the block group containing the reserved extent happens, we can end up missing the extent in the data relocation inode causing relocation to fail later. This only happens when we don't pass a transaction to the internal fallocate function __btrfs_prealloc_file_range(), which is for all the cases where fallocate() is called from user space (the internal use cases include space cache extent allocation and relocation). When the race triggers the relocation failure, it produces a trace like the following: [200611.995995] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [200611.99