summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
5 daysbtrfs: do not allow relocation of partially dropped subvolumesQu Wenruo1-0/+19
commit 4289b494ac553e74e86fed1c66b2bf9530bc1082 upstream. [BUG] There is an internal report that balance triggered transaction abort, with the following call trace: item 85 key (594509824 169 0) itemoff 12599 itemsize 33 extent refs 1 gen 197740 flags 2 ref#0: tree block backref root 7 item 86 key (594558976 169 0) itemoff 12566 itemsize 33 extent refs 1 gen 197522 flags 2 ref#0: tree block backref root 7 ... BTRFS error (device loop0): extent item not found for insert, bytenr 594526208 num_bytes 16384 parent 449921024 root_objectid 934 owner 1 offset 0 BTRFS error (device loop0): failed to run delayed ref for logical 594526208 num_bytes 16384 type 182 action 1 ref_mod 1: -117 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -117) WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6963 at ../fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2168 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xfa/0x110 [btrfs] And btrfs check doesn't report anything wrong related to the extent tree. [CAUSE] The cause is a little complex, firstly the extent tree indeed doesn't have the backref for 594526208. The extent tree only have the following two backrefs around that bytenr on-disk: item 65 key (594509824 METADATA_ITEM 0) itemoff 13880 itemsize 33 refs 1 gen 197740 flags TREE_BLOCK tree block skinny level 0 (176 0x7) tree block backref root CSUM_TREE item 66 key (594558976 METADATA_ITEM 0) itemoff 13847 itemsize 33 refs 1 gen 197522 flags TREE_BLOCK tree block skinny level 0 (176 0x7) tree block backref root CSUM_TREE But the such missing backref item is not an corruption on disk, as the offending delayed ref belongs to subvolume 934, and that subvolume is being dropped: item 0 key (934 ROOT_ITEM 198229) itemoff 15844 itemsize 439 generation 198229 root_dirid 256 bytenr 10741039104 byte_limit 0 bytes_used 345571328 last_snapshot 198229 flags 0x1000000000001(RDONLY) refs 0 drop_progress key (206324 EXTENT_DATA 2711650304) drop_level 2 level 2 generation_v2 198229 And that offending tree block 594526208 is inside the dropped range of that subvolume. That explains why there is no backref item for that bytenr and why btrfs check is not reporting anything wrong. But this also shows another problem, as btrfs will do all the orphan subvolume cleanup at a read-write mount. So half-dropped subvolume should not exist after an RW mount, and balance itself is also exclusive to subvolume cleanup, meaning we shouldn't hit a subvolume half-dropped during relocation. The root cause is, there is no orphan item for this subvolume. In fact there are 5 subvolumes from around 2021 that have the same problem. It looks like the original report has some older kernels running, and caused those zombie subvolumes. Thankfully upstream commit 8d488a8c7ba2 ("btrfs: fix subvolume/snapshot deletion not triggered on mount") has long fixed the bug. [ENHANCEMENT] For repairing such old fs, btrfs-progs will be enhanced. Considering how delayed the problem will show up (at run delayed ref time) and at that time we have to abort transaction already, it is too late. Instead here we reject any half-dropped subvolume for reloc tree at the earliest time, preventing confusion and extra time wasted on debugging similar bugs. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: fix iteration bug in __qgroup_excl_accounting()Boris Burkov1-2/+1
commit 7b632596188e1973c6b3ac1c9f8252f735e1039f upstream. __qgroup_excl_accounting() uses the qgroup iterator machinery to update the account of one qgroups usage for all its parent hierarchy, when we either add or remove a relation and have only exclusive usage. However, there is a small bug there: we loop with an extra iteration temporary qgroup called `cur` but never actually refer to that in the body of the loop. As a result, we redundantly account the same usage to the first qgroup in the list. This can be reproduced in the following way: mkfs.btrfs -f -O squota <dev> mount <dev> <mnt> btrfs subvol create <mnt>/sv dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/sv/f bs=1M count=1 sync btrfs qgroup create 1/100 <mnt> btrfs qgroup create 2/200 <mnt> btrfs qgroup assign 1/100 2/200 <mnt> btrfs qgroup assign 0/256 1/100 <mnt> btrfs qgroup show <mnt> and the broken result is (note the 2MiB on 1/100 and 0Mib on 2/100): Qgroupid Referenced Exclusive Path -------- ---------- --------- ---- 0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB <toplevel> 0/256 1.02MiB 1.02MiB sv Qgroupid Referenced Exclusive Path -------- ---------- --------- ---- 0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB <toplevel> 0/256 1.02MiB 1.02MiB sv 1/100 2.03MiB 2.03MiB 2/100<1 member qgroup> 2/100 0.00B 0.00B <0 member qgroups> With this fix, which simply re-uses `qgroup` as the iteration variable, we see the expected result: Qgroupid Referenced Exclusive Path -------- ---------- --------- ---- 0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB <toplevel> 0/256 1.02MiB 1.02MiB sv Qgroupid Referenced Exclusive Path -------- ---------- --------- ---- 0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB <toplevel> 0/256 1.02MiB 1.02MiB sv 1/100 1.02MiB 1.02MiB 2/100<1 member qgroup> 2/100 1.02MiB 1.02MiB <0 member qgroups> The existing fstests did not exercise two layer inheritance so this bug was missed. I intend to add that testing there, as well. Fixes: a0bdc04b0732 ("btrfs: qgroup: use qgroup_iterator in __qgroup_excl_accounting()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: fix wrong length parameter for btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents()Qu Wenruo1-1/+1
commit deaf895212da74635a7f0a420e1ecf8f5eca1fe5 upstream. Inside nocow_one_range(), if the checksum cloning for data reloc inode failed, we call btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() to cleanup the just allocated ordered extents. But unlike extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(), btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() requires a length, not an inclusive end bytenr. This can be problematic, as the @end is normally way larger than @len. This means btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() can be called on folios out of the correct range, and if the out-of-range folio is under writeback, we can incorrectly clear the ordered flag of the folio, and trigger the DEBUG_WARN() inside btrfs_writepage_cow_fixup(). Fix the wrong parameter with correct length instead. Fixes: 94f6c5c17e52 ("btrfs: move ordered extent cleanup to where they are allocated") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.15+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: zoned: do not select metadata BG as finish targetNaohiro Aota1-1/+1
commit 3a931e9b39c7ff8066657042f5f00d3b7e6ad315 upstream. We call btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg() to zone finish one block group and make room to activate another block group. Currently, we can choose a metadata block group as a target. But, as we reserve an active metadata block group, we no longer want to select a metadata block group. So, skip it in the loop. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: error on missing block group when unaccounting log tree extent buffersFilipe Manana1-12/+7
commit fc5799986fbca957e2e3c0480027f249951b7bcf upstream. Currently we only log an error message if we can't find the block group for a log tree extent buffer when unaccounting it (while freeing a log tree). A missing block group means something is seriously wrong and we end up leaking space from the metadata space info. So return -ENOENT in case we don't find the block group. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: fix log tree replay failure due to file with 0 links and extentsFilipe Manana1-18/+30
commit 0a32e4f0025a74c70dcab4478e9b29c22f5ecf2f upstream. If we log a new inode (not persisted in a past transaction) that has 0 links and extents, then log another inode with an higher inode number, we end up with failing to replay the log tree with -EINVAL. The steps for this are: 1) create new file A 2) write some data to file A 3) open an fd on file A 4) unlink file A 5) fsync file A using the previously open fd 6) create file B (has higher inode number than file A) 7) fsync file B 8) power fail before current transaction commits Now when attempting to mount the fs, the log replay will fail with -ENOENT at replay_one_extent() when attempting to replay the first extent of file A. The failure comes when trying to open the inode for file A in the subvolume tree, since it doesn't exist. Before commit 5f61b961599a ("btrfs: fix inode lookup error handling during log replay"), the returned error was -EIO instead of -ENOENT, since we converted any errors when attempting to read an inode during log replay to -EIO. The reason for this is that the log replay procedure fails to ignore the current inode when we are at the stage LOG_WALK_REPLAY_ALL, our current inode has 0 links and last inode we processed in the previous stage has a non 0 link count. In other words, the issue is that at replay_one_extent() we only update wc->ignore_cur_inode if the current replay stage is LOG_WALK_REPLAY_INODES. Fix this by updating wc->ignore_cur_inode whenever we find an inode item regardless of the current replay stage. This is a simple solution and easy to backport, but later we can do other alternatives like avoid logging extents or inode items other than the inode item for inodes with a link count of 0. The problem with the wc->ignore_cur_inode logic has been around since commit f2d72f42d5fa ("Btrfs: fix warning when replaying log after fsync of a tmpfile") but it only became frequent to hit since the more recent commit 5e85262e542d ("btrfs: fix fsync of files with no hard links not persisting deletion"), because we stopped skipping inodes with a link count of 0 when logging, while before the problem would only be triggered if trying to replay a log tree created with an older kernel which has a logged inode with 0 links. A test case for fstests will be submitted soon. Reported-by: Peter Jung <ptr1337@cachyos.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/fce139db-4458-4788-bb97-c29acf6cb1df@cachyos.org/ Reported-by: burneddi <burneddi@protonmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/lh4W-Lwc0Mbk-QvBhhQyZxf6VbM3E8VtIvU3fPIQgweP_Q1n7wtlUZQc33sYlCKYd-o6rryJQfhHaNAOWWRKxpAXhM8NZPojzsJPyHMf2qY=@protonmail.com/#t Reported-by: Russell Haley <yumpusamongus@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/598ecc75-eb80-41b3-83c2-f2317fbb9864@gmail.com/ Fixes: f2d72f42d5fa ("Btrfs: fix warning when replaying log after fsync of a tmpfile") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: send: use fallocate for hole punching with send stream v2Filipe Manana1-0/+33
commit 005b0a0c24e1628313e951516b675109a92cacfe upstream. Currently holes are sent as writes full of zeroes, which results in unnecessarily using disk space at the receiving end and increasing the stream size. In some cases we avoid sending writes of zeroes, like during a full send operation where we just skip writes for holes. But for some cases we fill previous holes with writes of zeroes too, like in this scenario: 1) We have a file with a hole in the range [2M, 3M), we snapshot the subvolume and do a full send. The range [2M, 3M) stays as a hole at the receiver since we skip sending write commands full of zeroes; 2) We punch a hole for the range [3M, 4M) in our file, so that now it has a 2M hole in the range [2M, 4M), and snapshot the subvolume. Now if we do an incremental send, we will send write commands full of zeroes for the range [2M, 4M), removing the hole for [2M, 3M) at the receiver. We could improve cases such as this last one by doing additional comparisons of file extent items (or their absence) between the parent and send snapshots, but that's a lot of code to add plus additional CPU and IO costs. Since the send stream v2 already has a fallocate command and btrfs-progs implements a callback to execute fallocate since the send stream v2 support was added to it, update the kernel to use fallocate for punching holes for V2+ streams. Test coverage is provided by btrfs/284 which is a version of btrfs/007 that exercises send stream v2 instead of v1, using fsstress with random operations and fssum to verify file contents. Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/1001 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: clear dirty status from extent buffer on error at insert_new_root()Filipe Manana1-0/+1
commit c0d013495a80cbb53e2288af7ae0ec4170aafd7c upstream. If we failed to insert the tree mod log operation, we are not removing the dirty status from the allocated and dirtied extent buffer before we free it. Removing the dirty status is needed for several reasons such as to adjust the fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes counter and remove the dirty status from the respective folios. So add the missing call to btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty(). Fixes: f61aa7ba08ab ("btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at insert_new_root()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: don't skip remaining extrefs if dir not found during log replayFilipe Manana1-4/+14
commit 24e066ded45b8147b79c7455ac43a5bff7b5f378 upstream. During log replay, at add_inode_ref(), if we have an extref item that contains multiple extrefs and one of them points to a directory that does not exist in the subvolume tree, we are supposed to ignore it and process the remaining extrefs encoded in the extref item, since each extref can point to a different parent inode. However when that happens we just return from the function and ignore the remaining extrefs. The problem has been around since extrefs were introduced, in commit f186373fef00 ("btrfs: extended inode refs"), but it's hard to hit in practice because getting extref items encoding multiple extref requires getting a hash collision when computing the offset of the extref's key. The offset if computed like this: key.offset = btrfs_extref_hash(dir_ino, name->name, name->len); and btrfs_extref_hash() is just a wrapper around crc32c(). Fix this by moving to next iteration of the loop when we don't find the parent directory that an extref points to. Fixes: f186373fef00 ("btrfs: extended inode refs") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: qgroup: fix qgroup create ioctl returning success after quotas disabledFilipe Manana2-5/+4
commit 08530d6e638427e7e1344bd67bacc03882ba95b9 upstream. When quotas are disabled qgroup ioctls are supposed to return -ENOTCONN, but the qgroup create ioctl stopped doing that when it races with a quota disable operation, returning 0 instead. This change of behaviour happened in commit 6ed05643ddb1 ("btrfs: create qgroup earlier in snapshot creation"). The issue happens as follows: 1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_create(), qgroups are enabled and so qgroup_enabled() returns true since fs_info->quota_root is not NULL; 2) Task B enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl() -> btrfs_quota_disable() and disables qgroups, so now fs_info->quota_root is NULL; 3) Task A enters btrfs_create_qgroup() and calls btrfs_qgroup_mode(), which returns BTRFS_QGROUP_MODE_DISABLED since quotas are disabled, and then btrfs_create_qgroup() returns 0 to the caller, which makes the ioctl return 0 instead of -ENOTCONN. The check for fs_info->quota_root and returning -ENOTCONN if it's NULL is made only after the call btrfs_qgroup_mode(). Fix this by moving the check for disabled quotas with btrfs_qgroup_mode() into transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(), so that we don't abort the transaction if btrfs_create_qgroup() returns -ENOTCONN and quotas are disabled. Fixes: 6ed05643ddb1 ("btrfs: create qgroup earlier in snapshot creation") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: don't skip accounting in early ENOTTY return in ↵Caleb Sander Mateos1-1/+2
btrfs_uring_encoded_read() commit ea124ec327086325fc096abf42837dac471ac7ae upstream. btrfs_uring_encoded_read() returns early with -ENOTTY if the uring_cmd is issued with IO_URING_F_COMPAT but the kernel doesn't support compat syscalls. However, this early return bypasses the syscall accounting. Go to out_acct instead to ensure the syscall is counted. Fixes: 34310c442e17 ("btrfs: add io_uring command for encoded reads (ENCODED_READ ioctl)") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.15+ Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: populate otime when logging an inode itemQu Wenruo1-0/+3
commit 1ef94169db0958d6de39f9ea6e063ce887342e2d upstream. [TEST FAILURE WITH EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES] When running test case generic/508, the test case will fail with the new btrfs shutdown support: generic/508 - output mismatch (see /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad) # --- tests/generic/508.out 2022-05-11 11:25:30.806666664 +0930 # +++ /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad 2025-07-02 14:53:22.401824212 +0930 # @@ -1,2 +1,6 @@ # QA output created by 508 # Silence is golden # +Before: # +After : stat.btime = Thu Jan 1 09:30:00 1970 # +Before: # +After : stat.btime = Wed Jul 2 14:53:22 2025 # ... # (Run 'diff -u /home/adam/xfstests/tests/generic/508.out /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Ran: generic/508 Failures: generic/508 Failed 1 of 1 tests Please note that the test case requires shutdown support, thus the test case will be skipped using the current upstream kernel, as it doesn't have shutdown ioctl support. [CAUSE] The direct cause the 0 time stamp in the log tree: leaf 30507008 items 2 free space 16057 generation 9 owner TREE_LOG leaf 30507008 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 checksum stored e522548d checksum calced e522548d fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0 chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398 item 0 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 9 transid 9 size 0 nbytes 0 block group 0 mode 100644 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 1 flags 0x0(none) atime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) ctime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) mtime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) otime 0.0 (1970-01-01 09:30:00) <<< But the old fs tree has all the correct time stamp: btrfs-progs v6.12 fs tree key (FS_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0) leaf 30425088 items 2 free space 16061 generation 5 owner FS_TREE leaf 30425088 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 checksum stored 48f6c57e checksum calced 48f6c57e fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0 chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398 item 0 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 3 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 16384 block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 0 flags 0x0(none) atime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) ctime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) mtime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) otime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) <<< The root cause is that fill_inode_item() in tree-log.c is only populating a/c/m time, not the otime (or btime in statx output). Part of the reason is that, the vfs inode only has a/c/m time, no native btime support yet. [FIX] Thankfully btrfs has its otime stored in btrfs_inode::i_otime_sec and btrfs_inode::i_otime_nsec. So what we really need is just fill the otime time stamp in fill_inode_item() of tree-log.c There is another fill_inode_item() in inode.c, which is doing the proper otime population. Fixes: 94edf4ae43a5 ("Btrfs: don't bother committing delayed inode updates when fsyncing") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctlFilipe Manana1-7/+24
commit e1249667750399a48cafcf5945761d39fa584edf upstream. There's a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from the fs_info->qgroup_tree rbtree. This happens as follows: 1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -> btrfs_qgroup_rescan(); 2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that point fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn't set yet by task A); 3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups from fs_info->qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info->qgroup_lock; 4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating the fs_info->qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info->qgroup_lock, but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding the lock, resulting in a use-after-free. Fix this by taking fs_info->qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config(). Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don't start the rescan worker if quotas were already disabled. Reported-by: cen zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAFRLqsV+cMDETFuzqdKSHk_FDm6tneea45krsHqPD6B3FetLpQ@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: fix ssd_spread overallocationBoris Burkov1-16/+17
commit 807d9023e75fc20bfd6dd2ac0408ce4af53f1648 upstream. If the ssd_spread mount option is enabled, then we run the so called clustered allocator for data block groups. In practice, this results in creating a btrfs_free_cluster which caches a block_group and borrows its free extents for allocation. Since the introduction of allocation size classes in 6.1, there has been a bug in the interaction between that feature and ssd_spread. find_free_extent() has a number of nested loops. The loop going over the allocation stages, stored in ffe_ctl->loop and managed by find_free_extent_update_loop(), the loop over the raid levels, and the loop over all the block_groups in a space_info. The size class feature relies on the block_group loop to ensure it gets a chance to see a block_group of a given size class. However, the clustered allocator uses the cached cluster block_group and breaks that loop. Each call to do_allocation() will really just go back to the same cached block_group. Normally, this is OK, as the allocation either succeeds and we don't want to loop any more or it fails, and we clear the cluster and return its space to the block_group. But with size classes, the allocation can succeed, then later fail, outside of do_allocation() due to size class mismatch. That latter failure is not properly handled due to the highly complex multi loop logic. The result is a painful loop where we continue to allocate the same num_bytes from the cluster in a tight loop until it fails and releases the cluster and lets us try a new block_group. But by then, we have skipped great swaths of the available block_groups and are likely to fail to allocate, looping the outer loop. In pathological cases like the reproducer below, the cached block_group is often the very last one, in which case we don't perform this tight bg loop but instead rip through the ffe stages to LOOP_CHUNK_ALLOC and allocate a chunk, which is now the last one, and we enter the tight inner loop until an allocation failure. Then allocation succeeds on the final block_group and if the next allocation is a size mismatch, the exact same thing happens again. Triggering this is as easy as mounting with -o ssd_spread and then running: mount -o ssd_spread $dev $mnt dd if=/dev/zero of=$mnt/big bs=16M count=1 &>/dev/null dd if=/dev/zero of=$mnt/med bs=4M count=1 &>/dev/null sync if you do the two writes + sync in a loop, you can force btrfs to spin an excessive amount on semi-successful clustered allocations, before ultimately failing and advancing to the stage where we force a chunk allocation. This results in 2G of data allocated per iteration, despite only using ~20M of data. By using a small size classed extent, the inner loop takes longer and we can spin for longer. The simplest, shortest term fix to unbreak this is to make the clustered allocator size_class aware in the dumbest way, where it fails on size class mismatch. This may hinder the operation of the clustered allocator, but better hindered than completely broken and terribly overallocating. Further re-design improvements are also in the works. Fixes: 52bb7a2166af ("btrfs: introduce size class to block group allocator") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: don't ignore inode missing when replaying log treeFilipe Manana1-2/+12
commit 7ebf381a69421a88265d3c49cd0f007ba7336c9d upstream. During log replay, at add_inode_ref(), we return -ENOENT if our current inode isn't found on the subvolume tree or if a parent directory isn't found. The error comes from btrfs_iget_logging() <- btrfs_iget() <- btrfs_read_locked_inode(). The single caller of add_inode_ref(), replay_one_buffer(), ignores an -ENOENT error because it expects that error to mean only that a parent directory wasn't found and that is ok. Before commit 5f61b961599a ("btrfs: fix inode lookup error handling during log replay") we were converting any error when getting a parent directory to -ENOENT and any error when getting the current inode to -EIO, so our caller would fail log replay in case we can't find the current inode. After that commit however in case the current inode is not found we return -ENOENT to the caller and therefore it ignores the critical fact that the current inode was not found in the subvolume tree. Fix this by converting -ENOENT to 0 when we don't find a parent directory, returning -ENOENT when we don't find the current inode and making the caller, replay_one_buffer(), not ignore -ENOENT anymore. Fixes: 5f61b961599a ("btrfs: fix inode lookup error handling during log replay") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.16 Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: qgroup: set quota enabled bit if quota disable fails flushing ↵Filipe Manana1-2/+5
reservations commit e41c75ca3189341e76e6af64b857c05b68a1d7db upstream. Before waiting for the rescan worker to finish and flushing reservations, we clear the BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED flag from fs_info. If we fail flushing reservations we leave with the flag not set which is not correct since quotas are still enabled - we must set back the flag on error paths, such as when we fail to start a transaction, except for error paths that abort a transaction. The reservation flushing happens very early before we do any operation that actually disables quotas and before we start a transaction, so set back BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED if it fails. Fixes: af0e2aab3b70 ("btrfs: qgroup: flush reservations during quota disable") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: zoned: do not remove unwritten non-data block groupNaohiro Aota1-2/+25
commit 3061801420469610c8fa6080a950e56770773ef1 upstream. There are some reports of "unable to find chunk map for logical 2147483648 length 16384" error message appears in dmesg. This means some IOs are occurring after a block group is removed. When a metadata tree node is cleaned on a zoned setup, we keep that node still dirty and write it out not to create a write hole. However, this can make a block group's used bytes == 0 while there is a dirty region left. Such an unused block group is moved into the unused_bg list and processed for removal. When the removal succeeds, the block group is removed from the transaction->dirty_bgs list, so the unused dirty nodes in the block group are not sent at the transaction commit time. It will be written at some later time e.g, sync or umount, and causes "unable to find chunk map" errors. This can happen relatively easy on SMR whose zone size is 256MB. However, calling do_zone_finish() on such block group returns -EAGAIN and keep that block group intact, which is why the issue is hidden until now. Fixes: afba2bc036b0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: zoned: requeue to unused block group list if zone finish failedNaohiro Aota1-1/+3
commit 62be7afcc13b2727bdc6a4c91aefed6b452e6ecc upstream. btrfs_zone_finish() can fail for several reason. If it is -EAGAIN, we need to try it again later. So, put the block group to the retry list properly. Failing to do so will keep the removable block group intact until remount and can causes unnecessary ENOSPC. Fixes: 74e91b12b115 ("btrfs: zoned: zone finish unused block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: abort transaction during log replay if walk_log_tree() failedFilipe Manana1-2/+5
commit 2a5898c4aac67494c2f0f7fe38373c95c371c930 upstream. If we failed walking a log tree during replay, we have a missing transaction abort to prevent committing a transaction where we didn't fully replay all the changes from a log tree and therefore can leave the respective subvolume tree in some inconsistent state. So add the missing transaction abort. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5 daysbtrfs: zoned: use filesystem size not disk size for reclaim decisionJohannes Thumshirn1-2/+1
commit 55f7c65b2f69c7e4cb7aa7c1654a228ccf734fd8 upstream. When deciding if a zoned filesystem is reaching the threshold to reclaim data block groups, look at the size of the filesystem not to potentially total available size of all drives in the filesystem. Especially if a filesystem was created with mkfs' -b option, constraining it to only a portion of the block device, the numbers won't match and potentially garbage collection is kicking in too late. Fixes: 3687fcb0752a ("btrfs: zoned: make auto-reclaim less aggressive") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
11 daysbtrfs: remove partial support for lowest level from btrfs_search_forward()Sun YangKai1-13/+5
[ Upstream commit 27260dd1904bb409cf84709928ba9bc5506fbe8e ] Commit 323ac95bce44 ("Btrfs: don't read leaf blocks containing only checksums during truncate") changed the condition from `level == 0` to `level == path->lowest_level`, while its original purpose was just to do some leaf node handling (calling btrfs_item_key_to_cpu()) and skip some code that doesn't fit leaf nodes. After changing the condition, the code path: 1. Also handles the non-leaf nodes when path->lowest_level is nonzero, which is wrong. However btrfs_search_forward() is never called with a nonzero path->lowest_level, which makes this bug not found before. 2. Makes the later if block with the same condition, which was originally used to handle non-leaf node (calling btrfs_node_key_to_cpu()) when lowest_level is not zero, dead code. Since btrfs_search_forward() is never called for a path with a lowest_level different from zero, just completely remove the partial support for a non-zero lowest_level, simplifying a bit the code, and assert that lowest_level is zero at the start of the function. Suggested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Fixes: 323ac95bce44 ("Btrfs: don't read leaf blocks containing only checksums during truncate") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-07-17btrfs: fix assertion when building free space treeFilipe Manana1-4/+12
[ Upstream commit 1961d20f6fa8903266ed9bd77c691924c22c8f02 ] When building the free space tree with the block group tree feature enabled, we can hit an assertion failure like this: BTRFS info (device loop0 state M): rebuilding free space tree assertion failed: ret == 0, in fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6592 Comm: syz-executor322 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-syzkaller-gd7fa1af5b33e #0 PREEMPT Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : populate_free_space_tree+0x514/0x518 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102 lr : populate_free_space_tree+0x514/0x518 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102 sp : ffff8000a4ce7600 x29: ffff8000a4ce76e0 x28: ffff0000c9bc6000 x27: ffff0000ddfff3d8 x26: ffff0000ddfff378 x25: dfff800000000000 x24: 0000000000000001 x23: ffff8000a4ce7660 x22: ffff70001499cecc x21: ffff0000e1d8c160 x20: ffff0000e1cb7800 x19: ffff0000e1d8c0b0 x18: 00000000ffffffff x17: ffff800092f39000 x16: ffff80008ad27e48 x15: ffff700011e740c0 x14: 1ffff00011e740c0 x13: 0000000000000004 x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: ffff700011e740c0 x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 94ef24f55d2dbc00 x8 : 94ef24f55d2dbc00 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffff8000a4ce6f98 x4 : ffff80008f415ba0 x3 : ffff800080548ef0 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000100000000 x0 : 000000000000003e Call trace: populate_free_space_tree+0x514/0x518 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102 (P) btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0x14c/0x54c fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1337 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xa78/0xe10 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3074 btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1319 [inline] btrfs_reconfigure+0x828/0x2418 fs/btrfs/super.c:1543 reconfigure_super+0x1d4/0x6f0 fs/super.c:1083 do_remount fs/namespace.c:3365 [inline] path_mount+0xb34/0xde0 fs/namespace.c:4200 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4221 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4432 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4409 [inline] __arm64_sys_mount+0x3e8/0x468 fs/namespace.c:4409 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151 el0_svc+0x58/0x17c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:767 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x78/0x108 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:786 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:600 Code: f0047182 91178042 528089c3 9771d47b (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- This happens because we are processing an empty block group, which has no extents allocated from it, there are no items for this block group, including the block group item since block group items are stored in a dedicated tree when using the block group tree feature. It also means this is the block group with the highest start offset, so there are no higher keys in the extent root, hence btrfs_search_slot_for_read() returns 1 (no higher key found). Fix this by asserting 'ret' is 0 only if the block group tree feature is not enabled, in which case we should find a block group item for the block group since it's stored in the extent root and block group item keys are greater than extent item keys (the value for BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY is 192 and for BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY and BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY the values are 168 and 169 respectively). In case 'ret' is 1, we just need to add a record to the free space tree which spans the whole block group, and we can achieve this by making 'ret == 0' as the while loop's condition. Reported-by: syzbot+36fae25c35159a763a2a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6841dca8.a00a0220.d4325.0020.GAE@google.com/ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-07-10btrfs: use btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy() during rmdirFilipe Manana1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 157501b0469969fc1ba53add5049575aadd79d80 ] We are setting the parent directory's last_unlink_trans directly which may result in a concurrent task starting to log the directory not see the update and therefore can log the directory after we removed a child directory which had a snapshot within instead of falling back to a transaction commit. Replaying such a log tree would result in a mount failure since we can't currently delete snapshots (and subvolumes) during log replay. This is the type of failure described in commit 1ec9a1ae1e30 ("Btrfs: fix unreplayable log after snapshot delete + parent dir fsync"). Fix this by using btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy() which updates the last_unlink_trans field while holding the inode's log_mutex lock. Fixes: 44f714dae50a ("Btrfs: improve performance on fsync against new inode after rename/unlink") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-07-10btrfs: propagate last_unlink_trans earlier when doing a rmdirFilipe Manana1-18/+18
[ Upstream commit c466e33e729a0ee017d10d919cba18f503853c60 ] In case the removed directory had a snapshot that was deleted, we are propagating its inode's last_unlink_trans to the parent directory after we removed the entry from the parent directory. This leaves a small race window where someone can log the parent directory after we removed the entry and before we updated last_unlink_trans, and as a result if we ever try to replay such a log tree, we will fail since we will attempt to remove a snapshot during log replay, which is currently not possible and results in the log replay (and mount) to fail. This is the type of failure described in commit 1ec9a1ae1e30 ("Btrfs: fix unreplayable log after snapshot delete + parent dir fsync"). So fix this by propagating the last_unlink_trans to the parent directory before we remove the entry from it. Fixes: 44f714dae50a ("Btrfs: improve performance on fsync against new inode after rename/unlink") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-07-10btrfs: record new subvolume in parent dir earlier to avoid dir logging racesFilipe Manana2-2/+4
[ Upstream commit bf5bcf9a6fa070ec8a725b08db63fb1318f77366 ] Instead of recording that a new subvolume was created in a directory after we add the entry do the directory, record it before adding the entry. This is to avoid races where after creating the entry and before recording the new subvolume in the directory (the call to btrfs_record_new_subvolume()), another task logs the directory, so we end up with a log tree where we logged a directory that has an entry pointing to a root that was not yet committed, resulting in an invalid entry if the log is persisted and replayed later due to a power failure or crash. Also state this requirement in the function comment for btrfs_record_new_subvolume(), similar to what we do for the btrfs_record_unlink_dir() and btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy(). Fixes: 45c4102f0d82 ("btrfs: avoid transaction commit on any fsync after subvolume creation") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-07-10btrfs: fix inode lookup error handling during log replayFilipe Manana1-65/+62
[ Upstream commit 5f61b961599acbd2bed028d3089105a1f7d224b8 ] When replaying log trees we use read_one_inode() to get an inode, which is just a wrapper around btrfs_iget_logging(), which in turn is a wrapper for btrfs_iget(). But read_one_inode() always returns NULL for any error that btrfs_iget_logging() / btrfs_iget() may return and this is a problem because: 1) In many callers of read_one_inode() we convert the NULL into -EIO, which is not accurate since btrfs_iget() may return -ENOMEM and -ENOENT for example, besides -EIO and other errors. So during log replay we may end up reporting a false -EIO, which is confusing since we may not have had any IO error at all; 2) When replaying directory deletes, at replay_dir_deletes(), we assume the NULL returned from read_one_inode() means that the inode doesn't exist and then proceed as if no error had happened. This is wrong because unless btrfs_iget() returned ERR_PTR(-ENOENT), we had an actual error and the target inode may exist in the target subvolume root - this may later result in the log replay code failing at a later stage (if we are "lucky") or succeed but leaving some inconsistency in the filesystem. So fix this by not ignoring errors from btrfs_iget_logging() and as a consequence remove the read_one_inode() wrapper and just use btrfs_iget_logging() directly. Also since btrfs_iget_logging() is supposed to be called only against subvolume roots, just like read_one_inode() which had a comment about it, add an assertion to btrfs_iget_logging() to check that the target root corresponds to a subvolume root. Fixes: 5d4f98a28c7d ("Btrfs: Mixed back reference (FORWARD ROLLING FORMAT CHANGE)") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-07-10btrfs: fix iteration of extrefs during log replayFilipe Manana1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit 54a7081ed168b72a8a2d6ef4ba3a1259705a2926 ] At __inode_add_ref() when processing extrefs, if we jump into the next label we have an undefined value of victim_name.len, since we haven't initialized it before we did the goto. This results in an invalid memory access in the next iteration of the loop since victim_name.len was not initialized to the length of the name of the current extref. Fix this by initializing victim_name.len with the current extref's name length. Fixes: e43eec81c516 ("btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen pairs") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-07-10btrfs: fix missing error handling when searching for inode refs during log ↵Filipe Manana1-1/+3
replay [ Upstream commit 6561a40ceced9082f50c374a22d5966cf9fc5f5c ] During log replay, at __add_inode_ref(), when we are searching for inode ref keys we totally ignore if btrfs_search_slot() returns an error. This may make a log replay succeed when there was an actual error and leave some metadata inconsistency in a subvolume tree. Fix this by checking if an error was returned from btrfs_search_slot() and if so, return it to the caller. Fixes: e02119d5a7b4 ("Btrfs: Add a write ahead tree log to optimize synchronous operations") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-07-10btrfs: fix failure to rebuild free space tree using multiple transactionsFilipe Manana2-0/+42
[ Upstream commit 1e6ed33cabba8f06f532f2e5851a102602823734 ] If we are rebuilding a free space tree, while modifying the free space tree we may need to allocate a new metadata block group. If we end up using multiple transactions for the rebuild, when we call btrfs_end_transaction() we enter btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() which calls add_block_group_free_space() to add items to the free space tree for the block group. Then later during the free space tree rebuild, at btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree(), we may find such new block groups and call populate_free_space_tree() for them, which fails with -EEXIST because there are already items in the free space tree. Then we abort the transaction with -EEXIST at btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree(). Notice that we say "may find" the new block groups because a new block group may be inserted in the block groups rbtree, which is being iterated by the rebuild process, before or after the current node where the rebuild process is currently at. Syzbot recently reported such case which produces a trace like the following: ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -17) WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7626 at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1341 btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0x470/0x54c fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1341 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 7626 Comm: syz.2.25 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-syzkaller-00085-gd7fa1af5b33e-dirty #0 PREEMPT Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0x470/0x54c