summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/bpf.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-12-06bpf: Fix prog_array_map_poke_run map poke updateJiri Olsa1-0/+3
Lee pointed out issue found by syscaller [0] hitting BUG in prog array map poke update in prog_array_map_poke_run function due to error value returned from bpf_arch_text_poke function. There's race window where bpf_arch_text_poke can fail due to missing bpf program kallsym symbols, which is accounted for with check for -EINVAL in that BUG_ON call. The problem is that in such case we won't update the tail call jump and cause imbalance for the next tail call update check which will fail with -EBUSY in bpf_arch_text_poke. I'm hitting following race during the program load: CPU 0 CPU 1 bpf_prog_load bpf_check do_misc_fixups prog_array_map_poke_track map_update_elem bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem prog_array_map_poke_run bpf_arch_text_poke returns -EINVAL bpf_prog_kallsyms_add After bpf_arch_text_poke (CPU 1) fails to update the tail call jump, the next poke update fails on expected jump instruction check in bpf_arch_text_poke with -EBUSY and triggers the BUG_ON in prog_array_map_poke_run. Similar race exists on the program unload. Fixing this by moving the update to bpf_arch_poke_desc_update function which makes sure we call __bpf_arch_text_poke that skips the bpf address check. Each architecture has slightly different approach wrt looking up bpf address in bpf_arch_text_poke, so instead of splitting the function or adding new 'checkip' argument in previous version, it seems best to move the whole map_poke_run update as arch specific code. [0] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=97a4fe20470e9bc30810 Fixes: ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT") Reported-by: syzbot+97a4fe20470e9bc30810@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206083041.1306660-2-jolsa@kernel.org
2023-11-15bpf: Do not allocate percpu memory at init stageYonghong Song1-1/+1
Kirill Shutemov reported significant percpu memory consumption increase after booting in 288-cpu VM ([1]) due to commit 41a5db8d8161 ("bpf: Add support for non-fix-size percpu mem allocation"). The percpu memory consumption is increased from 111MB to 969MB. The number is from /proc/meminfo. I tried to reproduce the issue with my local VM which at most supports upto 255 cpus. With 252 cpus, without the above commit, the percpu memory consumption immediately after boot is 57MB while with the above commit the percpu memory consumption is 231MB. This is not good since so far percpu memory from bpf memory allocator is not widely used yet. Let us change pre-allocation in init stage to on-demand allocation when verifier detects there is a need of percpu memory for bpf program. With this change, percpu memory consumption after boot can be reduced signicantly. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231109154934.4saimljtqx625l3v@box.shutemov.name/ Fixes: 41a5db8d8161 ("bpf: Add support for non-fix-size percpu mem allocation") Reported-and-tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231111013928.948838-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-11-09bpf: handle ldimm64 properly in check_cfg()Andrii Nakryiko1-2/+6
ldimm64 instructions are 16-byte long, and so have to be handled appropriately in check_cfg(), just like the rest of BPF verifier does. This has implications in three places: - when determining next instruction for non-jump instructions; - when determining next instruction for callback address ldimm64 instructions (in visit_func_call_insn()); - when checking for unreachable instructions, where second half of ldimm64 is expected to be unreachable; We take this also as an opportunity to report jump into the middle of ldimm64. And adjust few test_verifier tests accordingly. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Fixes: 475fb78fbf48 ("bpf: verifier (add branch/goto checks)") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110002638.4168352-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-10-20bpf: Use bpf_global_percpu_ma for per-cpu kptr in __bpf_obj_drop_impl()Hou Tao1-1/+1
The following warning was reported when running "./test_progs -t test_bpf_ma/percpu_free_through_map_free": ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 68 at kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:342 CPU: 1 PID: 68 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2+ #222 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred RIP: 0010:bpf_mem_refill+0x21c/0x2a0 ...... Call Trace: <IRQ> ? bpf_mem_refill+0x21c/0x2a0 irq_work_single+0x27/0x70 irq_work_run_list+0x2a/0x40 irq_work_run+0x18/0x40 __sysvec_irq_work+0x1c/0xc0 sysvec_irq_work+0x73/0x90 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_irq_work+0x1b/0x20 RIP: 0010:unit_free+0x50/0x80 ...... bpf_mem_free+0x46/0x60 __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0x40/0x90 bpf_obj_free_fields+0x17d/0x1a0 array_map_free+0x6b/0x170 bpf_map_free_deferred+0x54/0xa0 process_scheduled_works+0xba/0x370 worker_thread+0x16d/0x2e0 kthread+0x105/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x39/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The reason is simple: __bpf_obj_drop_impl() does not know the freeing field is a per-cpu pointer and it uses bpf_global_ma to free the pointer. Because bpf_global_ma is not a per-cpu allocator, so ksize() is used to select the corresponding cache. The bpf_mem_cache with 16-bytes unit_size will always be selected to do the unmatched free and it will trigger the warning in free_bulk() eventually. Because per-cpu kptr doesn't support list or rb-tree now, so fix the problem by only checking whether or not the type of kptr is per-cpu in bpf_obj_free_fields(), and using bpf_global_percpu_ma to these kptrs. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020133202.4043247-7-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-10-20bpf: Move the declaration of __bpf_obj_drop_impl() to bpf.hHou Tao1-0/+1
both syscall.c and helpers.c have the declaration of __bpf_obj_drop_impl(), so just move it to a common header file. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020133202.4043247-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-10-17net, bpf: Add a warning if NAPI cb missed xdp_do_flush().Sebastian Andrzej Siewior1-0/+3
A few drivers were missing a xdp_do_flush() invocation after XDP_REDIRECT. Add three helper functions each for one of the per-CPU lists. Return true if the per-CPU list is non-empty and flush the list. Add xdp_do_check_flushed() which invokes each helper functions and creates a warning if one of the functions had a non-empty list. Hide everything behind CONFIG_DEBUG_NET. Suggested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231016125738.Yt79p1uF@linutronix.de
2023-10-16Merge tag 'for-netdev' of ↵Jakub Kicinski1-2/+18
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2023-10-16 We've added 90 non-merge commits during the last 25 day(s) which contain a total of 120 files changed, 3519 insertions(+), 895 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Add missed stats for kprobes to retrieve the number of missed kprobe executions and subsequent executions of BPF programs, from Jiri Olsa. 2) Add cgroup BPF sockaddr hooks for unix sockets. The use case is for systemd to reimplement the LogNamespace feature which allows running multiple instances of systemd-journald to process the logs of different services, from Daan De Meyer. 3) Implement BPF CPUv4 support for s390x BPF JIT, from Ilya Leoshkevich. 4) Improve BPF verifier log output for scalar registers to better disambiguate their internal state wrt defaults vs min/max values matching, from Andrii Nakryiko. 5) Extend the BPF fib lookup helpers for IPv4/IPv6 to support retrieving the source IP address with a new BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_SRC flag, from Martynas Pumputis. 6) Add support for open-coded task_vma iterator to help with symbolization for BPF-collected user stacks, from Dave Marchevsky. 7) Add libbpf getters for accessing individual BPF ring buffers which is useful for polling them individually, for example, from Martin Kelly. 8) Extend AF_XDP selftests to validate the SHARED_UMEM feature, from Tushar Vyavahare. 9) Improve BPF selftests cross-building support for riscv arch, from Björn Töpel. 10) Add the ability to pin a BPF timer to the same calling CPU, from David Vernet. 11) Fix libbpf's bpf_tracing.h macros for riscv to use the generic implementation of PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS() to access syscall arguments, from Alexandre Ghiti. 12) Extend libbpf to support symbol versioning for uprobes, from Hengqi Chen. 13) Fix bpftool's skeleton code generation to guarantee that ELF data is 8 byte aligned, from Ian Rogers. 14) Inherit system-wide cpu_mitigations_off() setting for Spectre v1/v4 security mitigations in BPF verifier, from Yafang Shao. 15) Annotate struct bpf_stack_map with __counted_by attribute to prepare BPF side for upcoming __counted_by compiler support, from Kees Cook. * tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (90 commits) bpf: Ensure proper register state printing for cond jumps bpf: Disambiguate SCALAR register state output in verifier logs selftests/bpf: Make align selftests more robust selftests/bpf: Improve missed_kprobe_recursion test robustness selftests/bpf: Improve percpu_alloc test robustness selftests/bpf: Add tests for open-coded task_vma iter bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs selftests/bpf: Rename bpf_iter_task_vma.c to bpf_iter_task_vmas.c bpf: Don't explicitly emit BTF for struct btf_iter_num bpf: Change syscall_nr type to int in struct syscall_tp_t net/bpf: Avoid unused "sin_addr_len" warning when CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF is not set bpf: Avoid unnecessary audit log for CPU security mitigations selftests/bpf: Add tests for cgroup unix socket address hooks selftests/bpf: Make sure mount directory exists documentation/bpf: Document cgroup unix socket address hooks bpftool: Add support for cgroup unix socket address hooks libbpf: Add support for cgroup unix socket address hooks bpf: Implement cgroup sockaddr hooks for unix sockets bpf: Add bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path() to allow writing unix sockaddr from bpf bpf: Propagate modified uaddrlen from cgroup sockaddr programs ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016204803.30153-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-10-13bpf: Avoid unnecessary audit log for CPU security mitigationsYafang Shao1-2/+2
Check cpu_mitigations_off() first to avoid calling capable() if it is off. This can avoid unnecessary audit log. Fixes: bc5bc309db45 ("bpf: Inherit system settings for CPU security mitigations") Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4Bza6UVUWqcWQ-66weZ-nMDr+TFU3Mtq=dumZFD-pSqU7Ow@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231013083916.4199-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com
2023-10-06bpf: Inherit system settings for CPU security mitigationsYafang Shao1-2/+2
Currently, there exists a system-wide setting related to CPU security mitigations, denoted as 'mitigations='. When set to 'mitigations=off', it deactivates all optional CPU mitigations. Therefore, if we implement a system-wide 'mitigations=off' setting, it should inherently bypass Spectre v1 and Spectre v4 in the BPF subsystem. Please note that there is also a more specific 'nospectre_v1' setting on x86 and ppc architectures, though it is not currently exported. For the time being, let's disregard more fine-grained options. This idea emerged during our discussion about potential Spectre v1 attacks with Luis [0]. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/b4fc15f7-b204-767e-ebb9-fdb4233961fb@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Gerhorst <gerhorst@cs.fau.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231005084123.1338-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com
2023-10-05Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski1-1/+1
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR. No conflicts (or adjacent changes of note). Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-09-25bpf: Count missed stats in trace_call_bpfJiri Olsa1-0/+16
Increase misses stats in case bpf array execution is skipped because of recursion check in trace_call_bpf. Adding bpf_prog_inc_misses_counters that increase misses counts for all bpf programs in bpf_prog_array. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Tested-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230920213145.1941596-5-jolsa@kernel.org
2023-09-19bpf: Fix tr dereferencingLeon Hwang1-1/+1
Fix 'tr' dereferencing bug when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned off. When CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned off, 'bpf_trampoline_get()' returns NULL, which is same as the cases when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned on. Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309131936.5Nc8eUD0-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: f7b12b6fea00 ("bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id()") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230917153846.88732-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
2023-09-16bpf: Add support for custom exception callbacksKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-1/+3
By default, the subprog generated by the verifier to handle a thrown exception hardcodes a return value of 0. To allow user-defined logic and modification of the return value when an exception is thrown, introduce the 'exception_callback:' declaration tag, which marks a callback as the default exception handler for the program. The format of the declaration tag is 'exception_callback:<value>', where <value> is the name of the exception callback. Each main program can be tagged using this BTF declaratiion tag to associate it with an exception callback. In case the tag is absent, the default callback is used. As such, the exception callback cannot be modified at runtime, only set during verification. Allowing modification of the callback for the current program execution at runtime leads to issues when the programs begin to nest, as any per-CPU state maintaing this information will have to be saved and restored. We don't want it to stay in bpf_prog_aux as this takes a global effect for all programs. An alternative solution is spilling the callback pointer at a known location on the program stack on entry, and then passing this location to bpf_throw as a parameter. However, since exceptions are geared more towards a use case where they are ideally never invoked, optimizing for this use case and adding to the complexity has diminishing returns. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-7-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-16bpf: Implement BPF exceptionsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+3
This patch implements BPF exceptions, and introduces a bpf_throw kfunc to allow programs to throw exceptions during their execution at runtime. A bpf_throw invocation is treated as an immediate termination of the program, returning back to its caller within the kernel, unwinding all stack frames. This allows the program to simplify its implementation, by testing for runtime conditions which the verifier has no visibility into, and assert that they are true. In case they are not, the program can simply throw an exception from the other branch. BPF exceptions are explicitly *NOT* an unlikely slowpath error handling primitive, and this objective has guided design choices of the implementation of the them within the kernel (with the bulk of the cost for unwinding the stack offloaded to the bpf_throw kfunc). The implementation of this mechanism requires use of add_hidden_subprog mechanism introduced in the previous patch, which generates a couple of instructions to move R1 to R0 and exit. The JIT then rewrites the prologue of this subprog to take the stack pointer and frame pointer as inputs and reset the stack frame, popping all callee-saved registers saved by the main subprog. The bpf_throw function then walks the stack at runtime, and invokes this exception subprog with the stack and frame pointers as parameters. Reviewers must take note that currently the main program is made to save all callee-saved registers on x86_64 during entry into the program. This is because we must do an equivalent of a lightweight context switch when unwinding the stack, therefore we need the callee-saved registers of the caller of the BPF program to be able to return with a sane state. Note that we have to additionally handle r12, even though it is not used by the program, because when throwing the exception the program makes an entry into the kernel which could clobber r12 after saving it on the stack. To be able to preserve the value we received on program entry, we push r12 and restore it from the generated subprogram when unwinding the stack. For now, bpf_throw invocation fails when lingering resources or locks exist in that path of the program. In a future followup, bpf_throw will be extended to perform frame-by-frame unwinding to release lingering resources for each stack frame, removing this limitation. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-5-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-16bpf: Implement support for adding hidden subprogsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+1
Introduce support in the verifier for generating a subprogram and include it as part of a BPF program dynamically after the do_check phase is complete. The first user will be the next patch which generates default exception callbacks if none are set for the program. The phase of invocation will be do_misc_fixups. Note that this is an internal verifier function, and should be used with instruction blocks which uphold the invariants stated in check_subprogs. Since these subprogs are always appended to the end of the instruction sequence of the program, it becomes relatively inexpensive to do the related adjustments to the subprog_info of the program. Only the fake exit subprogram is shifted forward, making room for our new subprog. This is useful to insert a new subprogram, get it JITed, and obtain its function pointer. The next patch will use this functionality to insert a default exception callback which will be invoked after unwinding the stack. Note that these added subprograms are invisible to userspace, and never reported in BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_ID etc. For now, only a single subprogram is supported, but more can be easily supported in the future. To this end, two function counts are introduced now, the existing func_cnt, and real_func_cnt, the latter including hidden programs. This allows us to conver the JIT code to use the real_func_cnt for management of resources while syscall path continues working with existing func_cnt. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-16bpf: Use bpf_is_subprog to check for subprogsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+5
We would like to know whether a bpf_prog corresponds to the main prog or one of the subprogs. The current JIT implementations simply check this using the func_idx in bpf_prog->aux->func_idx. When the index is 0, it belongs to the main program, otherwise it corresponds to some subprogram. This will also be necessary to halt exception propagation while walking the stack when an exception is thrown, so we add a simple helper function to check this, named bpf_is_subprog, and convert existing JIT implementations to also make use of it. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-12bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loopLeon Hwang1-0/+5
From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before. From commit e411901c0b775a3a ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64. From commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f8 ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs. How about combining them all together? 1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram. 2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram. 3. The tailcall calls the subprogram's caller. As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt the machine. As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack and rax register between BPF subprograms. So do in trampolines. Fixes: ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT") Fixes: e411901c0b77 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT") Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-08bpf: Add BPF_KPTR_PERCPU as a field typeYonghong Song1-6/+12
BPF_KPTR_PERCPU represents a percpu field type like below struct val_t { ... fields ... }; struct t { ... struct val_t __percpu_kptr *percpu_data_ptr; ... }; where #define __percpu_kptr __attribute__((btf_type_tag("percpu_kptr"))) While BPF_KPTR_REF points to a trusted kernel object or a trusted local object, BPF_KPTR_PERCPU points to a trusted local percpu object. This patch added basic support for BPF_KPTR_PERCPU related to percpu_kptr field parsing, recording and free operations. BPF_KPTR_PERCPU also supports the same map types as BPF_KPTR_REF does. Note that unlike a local kptr, it is possible that a BPF_KTPR_PERCPU struct may not contain any special fields like other kptr, bpf_spin_lock, bpf_list_head, etc. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827152739.1996391-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-08bpf: Add support for non-fix-size percpu mem allocationYonghong Song1-2/+2
This is needed for later percpu mem allocation when the allocation is done by bpf program. For such cases, a global bpf_global_percpu_ma is added where a flexible allocation size is needed. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827152734.1995725-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-08-31bpf: Annotate bpf_long_memcpy with data_raceDaniel Borkmann1-1/+1
syzbot reported a data race splat between two processes trying to update the same BPF map value via syscall on different CPUs: BUG: KCSAN: data-race in bpf_percpu_array_update / bpf_percpu_array_update write to 0xffffe8fffe7425d8 of 8 bytes by task 8257 on cpu 1: bpf_long_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:428 [inline] bpf_obj_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:441 [inline] copy_map_value_long include/linux/bpf.h:464 [inline] bpf_percpu_array_update+0x3bb/0x500 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c:380 bpf_map_update_value+0x190/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:175 generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1749 bpf_map_do_batch+0x2df/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4648 __sys_bpf+0x28a/0x780 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5241 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd write to 0xffffe8fffe7425d8 of 8 bytes by task 8268 on cpu 0: bpf_long_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:428 [inline] bpf_obj_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:441 [inline] copy_map_value_long include/linux/bpf.h:464 [inline] bpf_percpu_array_update+0x3bb/0x500 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c:380 bpf_map_update_value+0x190/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:175 generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1749 bpf_map_do_batch+0x2df/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4648 __sys_bpf+0x28a/0x780 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5241 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd value changed: 0x0000000000000000 -> 0xfffffff000002788 The bpf_long_memcpy is used with 8-byte aligned pointers, power-of-8 size and forced to use long read/writes to try to atomically copy long counters. It is best-effort only and no barriers are here since it _will_ race with concurrent updates from BPF programs. The bpf_long_memcpy() is called from bpf(2) syscall. Marco suggested that the best way to make this known to KCSAN would be to use data_race() annotation. Reported-by: syzbot+97522333291430dd277f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000d87a7f06040c970c@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/57628f7a15e20d502247c3b55fceb1cb2b31f266.1693342186.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
2023-08-25bpf: Consider non-owning refs to refcounted nodes RCU protectedDave Marchevsky1-1/+2
An earlier patch in the series ensures that the underlying memory of nodes with bpf_refcount - which can have multiple owners - is not reused until RCU grace period has elapsed. This prevents use-after-free with non-owning references that may point to recently-freed memory. While RCU read lock is held, it's safe to dereference such a non-owning ref, as by definition RCU GP couldn't have elapsed and therefore underlying memory couldn't have been reused. From the perspective of verifier "trustedness" non-owning refs to refcounted nodes are now trusted only in RCU CS and therefore should no longer pass is_trusted_reg, but rather is_rcu_reg. Let's mark them MEM_RCU in order to reflect this new state. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821193311.3290257-6-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-08-14bpf: Document struct bpf_struct_ops fieldsDavid Vernet1-0/+47
Subsystems that want to implement a struct bpf_struct_ops structure to enable struct_ops maps must currently reverse engineer how the structure works. Given that this is meant to be a way for subsystem maintainers to extend their subsystems using BPF, let's document it to make it a bit easier on them. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814185908.700553-3-void@manifault.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-08-11bpf: Remove unused declaration bpf_link_new_file()Yue Haibing1-1/+0
Commit a3b80e107894 ("bpf: Allocate ID for bpf_link") removed the implementation but not the declaration. Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809140556.45836-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-08-07bpf: Add support for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe programJiri Olsa1-2/+7
Adding support for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe program to return probed address for both uprobe and return uprobe. We discussed this in [1] and agreed that uprobe can have special use of bpf_get_func_ip helper that differs from kprobe. The kprobe bpf_get_func_ip returns: - address of the function if probe is attach on function entry for both kprobe and return kprobe - 0 if the probe is not attach on function entry The uprobe bpf_get_func_ip returns: - address of the probe for both uprobe and return uprobe The reason for this semantic change is that kernel can't really tell if the probe user space address is function entry. The uprobe program is actually kprobe type program attached as uprobe. One of the consequences of this design is that uprobes do not have its own set of helpers, but share them with kprobes. As we need different functionality for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe, I'm adding the bool value to the bpf_trace_run_ctx, so the helper can detect that it's executed in uprobe context and call specific code. The is_uprobe bool is set as true in bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable, which is currently used only for executing bpf programs in uprobe. Renaming bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable to bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe to address that it's only used for uprobes and that it sets the run_ctx.is_uprobe as suggested by Yafang Shao. Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ=xLVkG5eurEuvLU79wAMtwho7ReR+XJAgwhFF4M-7Cg@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807085956.2344866-2-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-08-02bpf: fix bpf_probe_read_kernel prototype mismatchArnd Bergmann1-0/+12
bpf_probe_read_kernel() has a __weak definition in core.c and another definition with an incompatible prototype in kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c, when CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS is enabled. Since the two are incompatible, there cannot be a shared declaration in a header file, but the lack of a prototype causes a W=1 warning: kernel/bpf/core.c:1638:12: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_probe_read_kernel' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] On 32-bit architectures, the local prototype u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) passes arguments in other registers as the one in bpf_trace.c BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_kernel, void *, dst, u32, size, const void *, unsafe_ptr) which uses 64-bit arguments in pairs of registers. As both versions of the function are fairly simple and only really differ in one line, just move them into a header file as an inline function that does not add any overhead for the bpf_trace.c callers and actually avoids a function call for the other one. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac25cb0f-b804-1649-3afb-1dc6138c2716@iogearbox.net/ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801111449.185301-1-arnd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-07-18bpf: Add 'owner' field to bpf_{list,rb}_nodeDave Marchevsky1-0/+2
As described by Kumar in [0], in shared ownership scenarios it is necessary to do runtime tracking of {rb,list} node ownership - and synchronize updates using this ownership information - in order to prevent races. This patch adds an 'owner' field to struct bpf_list_node and bpf_rb_node to implement such runtime tracking. The owner field is a void * that describes the ownership state of a node. It can have the following values: NULL - the node is not owned by any data structure BPF_PTR_POISON - the node is in the process of being added to a data structure ptr_to_root - the pointee is a data structure 'root' (bpf_rb_root / bpf_list_head) which owns this node The field is initially NULL (set by bpf_obj_init_field default behavior) and transitions states in the following sequence: Insertion: NULL -> BPF_PTR_POISON -> ptr_to_root Removal: ptr_to_root -> NULL Before a node has been successfully inserted, it is not protected by any root's lock, and therefore two programs can attempt to add the same node to different roots simultaneously. For this reason the intermediate BPF_PTR_POISON state is necessary. For removal, the node is protected by some root's lock so this intermediate hop isn't necessary. Note that bpf_list_pop_{front,back} helpers don't need to check owner before removing as the node-to-be-removed is not passed in as input and is instead taken directly from the list. Do the check anyways and WARN_ON_ONCE in this unexpected scenario. Selftest changes in this patch are entirely mechanical: some BTF tests have hardcoded struct sizes for structs that contain bpf_{list,rb}_node fields, those were adjusted to account for the new sizes. Selftest additions to validate the owner field are added in a further patch in the series. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d7hyspcow5wtjcmw4fugdgyp3fwhljwuscp3xyut5qnwivyeru@ysdq543otzv2 Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Suggested-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718083813.3416104-4-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-07-18bpf: Introduce internal definitions for UAPI-opaque bpf_{rb,list}_nodeDave Marchevsky1-0/+10
Structs bpf_rb_node and bpf_list_node are opaquely defined in uapi/linux/bpf.h, as BPF program writers are not expected to touch their fields - nor does the verifier allow them to do so. Currently these structs are simple wrappers around structs rb_node and list_head and linked_list / rbtree implementation just casts and passes to library functions for those data structures. Later patches in this series, though, will add an "owner" field to bpf_{rb,list}_node, such that they're not just wrapping an underlying node type. Moreover, the bpf linked_list and rbtree implementations will deal with these owner pointers directly in a few different places. To avoid having to do void *owner = (void*)bpf_list_node + sizeof(struct list_head) with opaque UAPI node types, add bpf_{list,rb}_node_kern struct definitions to internal headers and modify linked_list and rbtree to use the internal types where appropriate. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718083813.3416104-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-07-06bpf: add percpu stats for bpf_map elements insertions/deletionsAnton Protopopov1-0/+30
Add a generic percpu stats for bpf_map elements insertions/deletions in order to keep track of both, the current (approximate) number of elements in a map and per-cpu statistics on update/delete operations. To expose these stats a particular map implementation should initialize the counter and adjust it as needed using the 'bpf_map_*_elem_count' helpers provided by this commit. Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230706133932.45883-2-aspsk@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-05-23bpf: Support O_PATH FDs in BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commandsAndrii Nakryiko1-2/+2
Current UAPI of BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands of bpf() syscall forces users to specify pinning location as a string-based absolute or relative (to current working directory) path. This has various implications related to security (e.g., symlink-based attacks), forces BPF FS to be exposed in the file system, which can cause races with other applications. One of the feedbacks we got from folks working with containers heavily was that inability to use purely FD-based location specification was an unfortunate limitation and hindrance for BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands. This patch closes this oversight, adding path_fd field to BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET UAPI, following conventions established by *at() syscalls for dirfd + pathname combinations. This now allows interesting possibilities like working with detached BPF FS mount (e.g., to perform multiple pinnings without running a risk of someone interfering with them), and generally making pinning/getting more secure and not prone to any races and/or security attacks. This is demonstrated by a selftest added in subsequent patch that takes advantage of new mount APIs (fsopen, fsconfig, fsmount) to demonstrate creating detached BPF FS mount, pinning, and then getting BPF map out of it, all while never exposing this private instance of BPF FS to outside worlds. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523170013.728457-4-andrii@kernel.org
2023-05-15bpf: Remove bpf trampoline selectorYafang Shao1-1/+0
After commit e21aa341785c ("bpf: Fix fexit trampoline."), the selector is only used to indicate how many times the bpf trampoline image are updated and been displayed in the trampoline ksym name. After the trampoline is freed, the selector will start from 0 again. So the selector is a useless value to the user. We can remove it. If the user want to check whether the bpf trampoline image has been updated or not, the user can compare the address. Each time the trampoline image is updated, the address will change consequently. Jiri also pointed out another issue that perf is still using the old name "bpf_trampoline_%lu", so this change can fix the issue in perf. Fixes: e21aa341785c ("bpf: Fix fexit trampoline.") Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZFvOOlrmHiY9AgXE@krava Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230515130849.57502-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com
2023-04-27bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_sizeJoanne Koong1-1/+1
bpf_dynptr_size returns the number of usable bytes in a dynptr. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230420071414.570108-4-joannelkoong@gmail.com
2023-04-21bpf: add test_run support for netfilter program typeFlorian Westphal1-0/+3
add glue code so a bpf program can be run using userspace-provided netfilter state and packet/skb. Default is to use ipv4:output hook point, but this can be overridden by userspace. Userspace provided netfilter state is restricted, only hook and protocol families can be overridden and only to ipv4/ipv6. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421170300.24115-7-fw@strlen.de Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-04-15bpf: Centralize btf_field-specific initialization logicDave Marchevsky1-4/+29
All btf_fields in an object are 0-initialized by memset in bpf_obj_init. This might not be a valid initial state for some field types, in which case kfuncs that use the type will properly initialize their input if it's been 0-initialized. Some BPF graph collection types and kfuncs do this: bpf_list_{head,node} and bpf_rb_node. An earlier patch in this series added the bpf_refcount field, for which the 0 state indicates that the refcounted object should be free'd. bpf_obj_init treats this field specially, setting refcount to 1 instead of relying on scattered "refcount is 0? Must have just been initialized, let's set to 1" logic in kfuncs. This patch extends this treatment to list and rbtree field types, allowing most scattered initialization logic in kfuncs to be removed. Note that bpf_{list_head,rb_root} may be inside a BPF map, in which case they'll be 0-initialized without passing through the newly-added logic, so scattered initialization logic must remain for these collection root types. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-9-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-04-15bpf: Support refcounted local kptrs in existing semanticsDave Marchevsky1-0/+3
A local kptr is considered 'refcounted' when it is of a type that has a bpf_refcount field. When such a kptr is created, its refcount should be initialized to 1; when destroyed, the object should be free'd only if a refcount decr results in 0 refcount. Existing logic always frees the underlying memory when destroying a local kptr, and 0-initializes all btf_record fields. This patch adds checks for "is local kptr refcounted?" and new logic for that case in the appropriate places. This patch focuses on changing existing semantics and thus conspicuously does _not_ provide a way for BPF programs in increment refcount. That follows later in the series. __bpf_obj_drop_impl is modified to do the right thing when it sees a refcounted type. Container types for graph nodes (list, tree, stashed in map) are migrated to use __bpf_obj_drop_impl as a destructor for their nodes instead of each having custom destruction code in their _free paths. Now that "drop" isn't a synonym for "free" when the type is refcounted it makes sense to centralize this logic. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-4-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-04-15bpf: Introduce opaque bpf_refcount struct and add btf_record plumbingDave Marchevsky1-0/+8
A 'struct bpf_refcount' is added to the set of opaque uapi/bpf.h types meant for use in BPF programs. Similarly to other opaque types like bpf_spin_lock and bpf_rbtree_node, the verifier needs to know where in user-defined struct types a bpf_refcount can be located, so necessary btf_record plumbing is added to enable this. bpf_refcount is sized to hold a refcount_t. Similarly to bpf_spin_lock, the offset of a bpf_refcount is cached in btf_record as refcount_off in addition to being in the field array. Caching refcount_off makes sense for this field because further patches in the series will modify functions that take local kptrs (e.g. bpf_obj_drop) to change their behavior if the type they're operating on is refcounted. So enabling fast "is this type refcounted?" checks is desirable. No such verifier behavior changes are introduced in this patch, just logic to recognize 'struct bpf_refcount' in btf_record. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-04-15bpf: Remove btf_field_offs, use btf_record's fields insteadDave Marchevsky1-25/+19
The btf_field_offs struct contains (offset, size) for btf_record fields, sorted by offset. btf_field_offs is always used in conjunction with btf_record, which has btf_field 'fields' array with (offset, type), the latter of which btf_field_offs' size is derived from via btf_field_type_size. This patch adds a size field to struct btf_field and sorts btf_record's fields by offset, making it possible to get rid of btf_field_offs. Less data duplication and less code complexity results. Since btf_field_offs' lifetime closely followed the btf_record used to populate it, most complexity wins are from removal of initialization code like: if (btf_record_successfully_initialized) { foffs = btf_parse_field_offs(rec); if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(foffs)) // free the btf_record and return err } Other changes in this patch are pretty mechanical: * foffs->field_off[i] -> rec->fields[i].offset * foffs->field_sz[i] -> rec->fields[i].size * Sort rec->fields in btf_parse_fields before returning * It's possible that this is necessary independently of other changes in this patch. btf_record_find in syscall.c expects btf_record's fields to be sorted by offset, yet there's no explicit sorting of them before this patch, record's fields are populated in the order they're read from BTF struct definition. BTF docs don't say anything about the sortedness of struct fields. * All functions taking struct btf_field_offs * input now instead take struct btf_record *. All callsites of these functions already have access to the correct btf_record. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-04-13bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncsIlya Leoshkevich1-0/+10
test_ksyms_module fails to emit a kfunc call targeting a m