summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-11-28locking/ww_mutex/test: Fix potential workqueue corruptionJohn Stultz1-8/+12
[ Upstream commit bccdd808902f8c677317cec47c306e42b93b849e ] In some cases running with the test-ww_mutex code, I was seeing odd behavior where sometimes it seemed flush_workqueue was returning before all the work threads were finished. Often this would cause strange crashes as the mutexes would be freed while they were being used. Looking at the code, there is a lifetime problem as the controlling thread that spawns the work allocates the "struct stress" structures that are passed to the workqueue threads. Then when the workqueue threads are finished, they free the stress struct that was passed to them. Unfortunately the workqueue work_struct node is in the stress struct. Which means the work_struct is freed before the work thread returns and while flush_workqueue is waiting. It seems like a better idea to have the controlling thread both allocate and free the stress structures, so that we can be sure we don't corrupt the workqueue by freeing the structure prematurely. So this patch reworks the test to do so, and with this change I no longer see the early flush_workqueue returns. Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230922043616.19282-3-jstultz@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-11treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usageKees Cook1-3/+3
commit 3f649ab728cda8038259d8f14492fe400fbab911 upstream. Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining needless uses with the following script: git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \ xargs perl -pi -e \ 's/\buninitialized_var\(([^\)]+)\)/\1/g; s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;' drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid pathological white-space. No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0 for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64, alpha, and m68k. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # drivers/infiniband and mlx4/mlx5 Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> # IB Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> # wireless drivers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> # erofs Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-26locking/lockdep: Avoid RCU-induced noinstr failPeter Zijlstra1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit ce0b9c805dd66d5e49fd53ec5415ae398f4c56e6 ] vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: look_up_lock_class()+0xc7: call to rcu_read_lock_any_held() leaves .noinstr.text section Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095148.311980536@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-22locking/mutex: Fix HANDOFF conditionPeter Zijlstra1-10/+5
[ Upstream commit 048661a1f963e9517630f080687d48af79ed784c ] Yanfei reported that setting HANDOFF should not depend on recomputing @first, only on @first state. Which would then give: if (ww_ctx || !first) first = __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter); if (first) __mutex_set_flag(lock, MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF); But because 'ww_ctx || !first' is basically 'always' and the test for first is relatively cheap, omit that first branch entirely. Reported-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210630154114.896786297@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-05-26locking/mutex: clear MUTEX_FLAGS if wait_list is empty due to signalZqiang4-11/+17
[ Upstream commit 3a010c493271f04578b133de977e0e5dd2848cea ] When a interruptible mutex locker is interrupted by a signal without acquiring this lock and removed from the wait queue. if the mutex isn't contended enough to have a waiter put into the wait queue again, the setting of the WAITER bit will force mutex locker to go into the slowpath to acquire the lock every time, so if the wait queue is empty, the WAITER bit need to be clear. Fixes: 040a0a371005 ("mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210517034005.30828-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-04-28locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath()Ali Saidi1-3/+4
[ Upstream commit 84a24bf8c52e66b7ac89ada5e3cfbe72d65c1896 ] While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can acquire the lock without holding wait_lock. The writer side loops checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed successfully which isn’t ordered. This exposes the window between the acquire and the cmpxchg to an A-B-A problem which allows reads following the lock acquisition to observe values speculatively before the write lock is truly acquired. We've seen a problem in epoll where the reader does a xchg while holding the read lock, but the writer can see a value change out from under it. Writer | Reader -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ep_scan_ready_list() | |- write_lock_irq() | |- queued_write_lock_slowpath() | |- atomic_cond_read_acquire() | | read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags); --> (observes value before unlock) | chain_epi_lockless() | | epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi); | | read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags); | | | atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() | |-- READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist); | A core can order the read of the ovflist ahead of the atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(). Switching the cmpxchg to use acquire semantics addresses this issue at which point the atomic_cond_read can be switched to use relaxed semantics. Fixes: b519b56e378ee ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlock") Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com> [peterz: use try_cmpxchg()] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-04-28lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register ↵Tetsuo Handa1-1/+2
non-static key" message [ Upstream commit 3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77 ] Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g. kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()), suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing. [ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-04-07locking/ww_mutex: Simplify use_ww_ctx & ww_ctx handlingWaiman Long1-11/+14
[ Upstream commit 5de2055d31ea88fd9ae9709ac95c372a505a60fa ] The use_ww_ctx flag is passed to mutex_optimistic_spin(), but the function doesn't use it. The frequent use of the (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) combination is repetitive. In fact, ww_ctx should not be used at all if !use_ww_ctx. Simplify ww_mutex code by dropping use_ww_ctx from mutex_optimistic_spin() an clear ww_ctx if !use_ww_ctx. In this way, we can replace (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) by just (ww_ctx). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316153119.13802-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-01-30rtmutex: Remove unused argument from rt_mutex_proxy_unlock()Thomas Gleixner2-4/+2
commit 2156ac1934166d6deb6cd0f6ffc4c1076ec63697 upstream Nothing uses the argument. Remove it as preparation to use pi_state_update_owner(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-03locking/lockdep: Fix overflow in presentation of average lock-timeChris Wilson1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit a7ef9b28aa8d72a1656fa6f0a01bbd1493886317 ] Though the number of lock-acquisitions is tracked as unsigned long, this is passed as the divisor to div_s64() which interprets it as a s32, giving nonsense values with more than 2 billion acquisitons. E.g. acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2350439395 0.07 353.38 649647067.36 0.-32 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725185110.11588-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-23locktorture: Print ratio of acquisitions, not failuresPaul E. McKenney1-4/+4
commit 80c503e0e68fbe271680ab48f0fe29bc034b01b7 upstream. The __torture_print_stats() function in locktorture.c carefully initializes local variable "min" to statp[0].n_lock_acquired, but then compares it to statp[i].n_lock_fail. Given that the .n_lock_fail field should normally be zero, and given the initialization, it seems reasonable to display the maximum and minimum number acquisitions instead of miscomputing the maximum and minimum number of failures. This commit therefore switches from failures to acquisitions. And this turns out to be not only a day-zero bug, but entirely my own fault. I hate it when that happens! Fixes: 0af3fe1efa53 ("locktorture: Add a lock-torture kernel module") Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-04-17locking/lockdep: Avoid recursion in lockdep_count_{for,back}ward_deps()Boqun Feng1-0/+4
[ Upstream commit 25016bd7f4caf5fc983bbab7403d08e64cba3004 ] Qian Cai reported a bug when PROVE_RCU_LIST=y, and read on /proc/lockdep triggered a warning: [ ] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled) ... [ ] Call Trace: [ ] lock_is_held_type+0x5d/0x150 [ ] ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x64/0x80 [ ] rcu_read_lock_any_held+0xac/0x100 [ ] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0xc0/0xc0 [ ] ? __slab_free+0x421/0x540 [ ] ? kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 [ ] ? __kmalloc_node+0x1d7/0x320 [ ] ? kvmalloc_node+0x6f/0x80 [ ] __bfs+0x28a/0x3c0 [ ] ? class_equal+0x30/0x30 [ ] lockdep_count_forward_deps+0x11a/0x1a0 The warning got triggered because lockdep_count_forward_deps() call __bfs() without current->lockdep_recursion being set, as a result a lockdep internal function (__bfs()) is checked by lockdep, which is unexpected, and the inconsistency between the irq-off state and the state traced by lockdep caused the warning. Apart from this warning, lockdep internal functions like __bfs() should always be protected by current->lockdep_recursion to avoid potential deadlocks and data inconsistency, therefore add the current->lockdep_recursion on-and-off section to protect __bfs() in both lockdep_count_forward_deps() and lockdep_count_backward_deps() Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200312151258.128036-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-01-12locking/spinlock/debug: Fix various data racesMarco Elver1-16/+16
[ Upstream commit 1a365e822372ba24c9da0822bc583894f6f3d821 ] This fixes various data races in spinlock_debug. By testing with KCSAN, it is observable that the console gets spammed with data races reports, suggesting these are extremely frequent. Example data race report: read to 0xffff8ab24f403c48 of 4 bytes by task 221 on cpu 2: debug_spin_lock_before kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:85 [inline] do_raw_spin_lock+0x9b/0x210 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:112 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x39/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] get_partial_node.isra.0.part.0+0x32/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:1873 get_partial_node mm/slub.c:1870 [inline] <snip> write to 0xffff8ab24f403c48 of 4 bytes by task 167 on cpu 3: debug_spin_unlock kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:103 [inline] do_raw_spin_unlock+0xc9/0x1a0 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:138 __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:159 [inline] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:191 spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock.h:393 [inline] free_debug_processing+0x1b3/0x210 mm/slub.c:1214 __slab_free+0x292/0x400 mm/slub.c:2864 <snip> As a side-effect, with KCSAN, this eventually locks up the console, most likely due to deadlock, e.g. .. -> printk lock -> spinlock_debug -> KCSAN detects data race -> kcsan_print_report() -> printk lock -> deadlock. This fix will 1) avoid the data races, and 2) allow using lock debugging together with KCSAN. Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191120155715.28089-1-elver@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-10-11Revert "locking/pvqspinlock: Don't wait if vCPU is preempted"Wanpeng Li1-1/+1
commit 89340d0935c9296c7b8222b6eab30e67cb57ab82 upstream. This patch reverts commit 75437bb304b20 (locking/pvqspinlock: Don't wait if vCPU is preempted). A large performance regression was caused by this commit. on over-subscription scenarios. The test was run on a Xeon Skylake box, 2 sockets, 40 cores, 80 threads, with three VMs of 80 vCPUs each. The score of ebizzy -M is reduced from 13000-14000 records/s to 1700-1800 records/s: Host Guest score vanilla w/o kvm optimizations upstream 1700-1800 records/s vanilla w/o kvm optimizations revert 13000-14000 records/s vanilla w/ kvm optimizations upstream 4500-5000 records/s vanilla w/ kvm optimizations revert 14000-15500 records/s Exit from aggressive wait-early mechanism can result in premature yield and extra scheduling latency. Actually, only 6% of wait_early events are caused by vcpu_is_preempted() being true. However, when one vCPU voluntarily releases its vCPU, all the subsequently waiters in the queue will do the same and the cascading effect leads to bad performance. kvm optimizations: [1] commit d73eb57b80b (KVM: Boost vCPUs that are delivering interrupts) [2] commit 266e85a5ec9 (KVM: X86: Boost queue head vCPU to mitigate lock waiter preemption) Tested-by: loobinliu@tencent.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Cc: loobinliu@tencent.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 75437bb304b20 (locking/pvqspinlock: Don't wait if vCPU is preempted) Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-10-01locking/lockdep: Add debug_locks check in __lock_downgrade()Waiman Long1-0/+3
[ Upstream commit 71492580571467fb7177aade19c18ce7486267f5 ] Tetsuo Handa had reported he saw an incorrect "downgrading a read lock" warning right after a previous lockdep warning. It is likely that the previous warning turned off lock debugging causing the lockdep to have inconsistency states leading to the lock downgrade warning. Fix that by add a check for debug_locks at the beginning of __lock_downgrade(). Debugged-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Reported-by: syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547093005-26085-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-07-31locking/lockdep: Hide unused 'class' variableArnd Bergmann1-1/+2
[ Upstream commit 68037aa78208f34bda4e5cd76c357f718b838cbb ] The usage is now hidden in an #ifdef, so we need to move the variable itself in there as well to avoid this warning: kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:203:21: error: unused variable 'class' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Cc: frederic@kernel.org Fixes: 68d41d8c94a3 ("locking/lockdep: Fix lock used or unused stats error") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190715092809.736834-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-07-31locking/lockdep: Fix lock used or unused stats errorYuyang Du1-2/+3
[ Upstream commit 68d41d8c94a31dfb8233ab90b9baf41a2ed2da68 ] The stats variable nr_unused_locks is incremented every time a new lock class is register and decremented when the lock is first used in __lock_acquire(). And after all, it is shown and checked in lockdep_stats. However, under configurations that either CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not defined: The commit: 091806515124b20 ("locking/lockdep: Consolidate lock usage bit initialization") missed marking the LOCK_USED flag at IRQ usage initialization because as mark_usage() is not called. And the commit: 886532aee3cd42d ("locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") further made mark_lock() not defined such that the LOCK_USED cannot be marked at all when the lock is first acquired. As a result, we fix this by not showing and checking the stats under such configurations for lockdep_stats. Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: arnd@arndb.de Cc: frederic@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709101522.9117-1-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-07-26locking/lockdep: Fix merging of hlocks with non-zero referencesImre Deak1-9/+9
[ Upstream commit d9349850e188b8b59e5322fda17ff389a1c0cd7d ] The sequence static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(test_ww_class); struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_a; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_b; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_c; struct mutex lock_c; ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_c, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_c, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); (*) ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_c); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); (**) will trigger the following error in __lock_release() when calling mutex_release() at **: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0) The problem is that the hlock merging happening at * updates the references for test_ww_class incorrectly to 3 whereas it should've updated it to 4 (representing all the instances for ww_ctx and ww_lock_[abc]). Fix this by updating the references during merging correctly taking into account that we can have non-zero references (both for the hlock that we merge into another hlock or for the hlock we are merging into). Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Ville=20Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524201509.9199-2-imre.deak@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-05-22locking/rwsem: Prevent decrement of reader count before incrementWaiman Long1-14/+30
[ Upstream commit a9e9bcb45b1525ba7aea26ed9441e8632aeeda58 ] During my rwsem testing, it was found that after a down_read(), the reader count may occasionally become 0 or even negative. Consequently, a writer may steal the lock at that time and execute with the reader in parallel thus breaking the mutual exclusion guarantee of the write lock. In other words, both readers and writer can become rwsem owners simultaneously. The current reader wakeup code does it in one pass to clear waiter->task and put them into wake_q before fully incrementing the reader count. Once waiter->task is cleared, the corresponding reader may see it, finish the critical section and do unlock to decrement the count before the count is incremented. This is not a problem if there is only one reader to wake up as the count has been pre-incremented by 1. It is a problem if there are more than one readers to be woken up and writer can steal the lock. The wakeup was actually done in 2 passes before the following v4.9 commit: 70800c3c0cc5 ("locking/rwsem: Scan the wait_list for readers only once") To fix this problem, the wakeup is now done in two passes again. In the first pass, we collect the readers and count them. The reader count is then fully incremented. In the second pass, the waiter->task is then cleared and they are put into wake_q to be woken up later. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Fixes: 70800c3c0cc5 ("locking/rwsem: Scan the wait_list for readers only once") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190428212557.13482-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-04-27Revert "locking/lockdep: Add debug_locks check in __lock_downgrade()"Greg Kroah-Hartman1-3/+0
This reverts commit 0e0f7b30721233ce610bde2395a8e58ff7771475 which was commit 71492580571467fb7177aade19c18ce7486267f5 upstream. Tetsuo rightly points out that the backport here is incorrect, as it touches the __lock_set_class function instead of the intended __lock_downgrade function. Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-03-27locking/lockdep: Add debug_locks check in __lock_downgrade()Waiman Long1-0/+3
commit 71492580571467fb7177aade19c18ce7486267f5 upstream. Tetsuo Handa had reported he saw an incorrect "downgrading a read lock" warning right after a previous lockdep warning. It is likely that the previous warning turned off lock debugging causing the lockdep to have inconsistency states leading to the lock downgrade warning. Fix that by add a check for debug_locks at the beginning of __lock_downgrade(). Debugged-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Reported-by: syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547093005-26085-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-03-05locking/rwsem: Fix (possible) missed wakeupXie Yongji1-2/+9
[ Upstream commit e158488be27b157802753a59b336142dc0eb0380 ] Because wake_q_add() can imply an immediate wakeup (cmpxchg failure case), we must not rely on the wakeup being delayed. However, commit: e38513905eea ("locking/rwsem: Rework zeroing reader waiter->task") relies on exactly that behaviour in that the wakeup must not happen until after we clear waiter->task. [ peterz: Added changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: e38513905eea ("locking/rwsem: Rework zeroing reader waiter->task") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1543495830-2644-1-git-send-email-xieyongji@baidu.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-02-12futex: Handle early deadlock return correctlyThomas Gleixner1-5/+32
commit 1a1fb985f2e2b85ec0d3dc2e519ee48389ec2434 upstream. commit 56222b212e8e ("futex: Drop hb->lock before enqueueing on the rtmutex") changed the locking rules in the futex code so that the hash bucket lock is not longer held while the waiter is enqueued into the rtmutex wait list. This made the lock and the unlock path symmetric, but unfortunately the possible early exit from __rt_mutex_proxy_start() due to a detected deadlock was not updated accordingly. That allows a concurrent unlocker to observe inconsitent state which triggers the warning in the unlock path. futex_lock_pi() futex_unlock_pi() lock(hb->lock) queue(hb_waiter) lock(hb->lock) lock(rtmutex->wait_lock) unlock(hb->lock) // acquired hb->lock hb_waiter = futex_top_waiter() lock(rtmutex->wait_lock) __rt_mutex_proxy_start() ---> fail remove(rtmutex_waiter); ---> returns -EDEADLOCK unlock(rtmutex->wait_lock) // acquired wait_lock wake_futex_pi() rt_mutex_next_owner() --> returns NULL --> WARN lock(hb->lock) unqueue(hb_waiter) The problem is caused by the remove(rtmutex_waiter) in the failure case of __rt_mutex_proxy_start() as this lets the unlocker observe a waiter in the hash bucket but no waiter on the rtmutex, i.e. inconsistent state. The original commit handles this correctly for the other early return cases (timeout, signal) by delaying the removal of the rtmutex waiter until the returning task reacquired the hash bucket lock. Treat the failure case of __rt_mutex_proxy_start() in the same way and let the existing cleanup code handle the eventual handover of the rtmutex gracefully. The regular rt_mutex_proxy_start() gains the rtmutex waiter removal for the failure case, so that the other callsites are still operating correctly. Add proper comments to the code so all these details are fully documented. Thanks to Peter for helping with the analysis and writing the really valuable code comments. Fixes: 56222b212e8e ("futex: Drop hb->lock before enqueueing on the rtmutex") Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Co-developed-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1901292311410.1950@nanos.tec.linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-12-21locking/qspinlock, x86: Provide liveness guaranteePeter Zijlstra1-1/+16
commit 7aa54be2976550f17c11a1c3e3630002dea39303 upstream. On x86 we cannot do fetch_or() with a single instruction and thus end up using a cmpxchg loop, this reduces determinism. Replace the fetch_or() with a composite operation: tas-pending + load. Using two instructions of course opens a window we previously did not have. Consider the scenario: CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 1) lock trylock -> (0,0,1) 2) lock trylock /* fail */ 3) unlock -> (0,0,0) 4) lock trylock -> (0,0,1) 5) tas-pending -> (0,1,1) load-val <- (0,1,0) from 3 6) clear-pending-set-locked -> (0,0,1) FAIL: _2_ owners where 5) is our new composite operation. When we consider each part of the qspinlock state as a separate variable (as we can when _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8) then the above is entirely possible, because tas-pending will only RmW the pending byte, so the later load is able to observe prior tail and lock state (but not earlier than its own trylock, which operates on the whole word, due to coherence). To avoid this we need 2 things: - the load must come after the tas-pending (obviously, otherwise it can trivially observe prior state). - the tas-pending must be a full word RmW instruction, it cannot be an XCHGB for example, such that we cannot observe other state prior to setting pending. On x86 we can realize this by using "LOCK BTS m32, r32" for tas-pending followed by a regular load. Note that observing later state is not a problem: - if we fail to observe a later unlock, we'll simply spin-wait for that store to become visible. - if we observe a later xchg_tail(), there is no difference from that xchg_tail() having taken place before the tas-pending. Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Fixes: 59fb586b4a07 ("locking/qspinlock: Remove unbounded cmpxchg() loop from locking slowpath") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003130957.183726335@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> [bigeasy: GEN_BINARY_RMWcc macro redo] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2018-12-21locking/qspinlock: Re-order codePeter Zijlstra1-29/+27
commit 53bf57fab7321fb42b703056a4c80fc9d986d170 upstream. Flip the branch condition after atomic_fetch_or_acquire(_Q_PENDING_VAL) such that we loose the indent. This also result in a more natural code flow IMO. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003130257.156322446@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2018-11-13locking/lockdep: Fix debug_locks off performance problemWaiman Long1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit 9506a7425b094d2f1d9c877ed5a78f416669269b ] It was found that when debug_locks was turned off because of a problem found by the lockdep code, the system performance could drop quite significantly when the lock_stat code was also configured into the kernel. For instance, parallel kernel build time on a 4-socket x86-64 server nearly doubled. Further analysis into the cause of the slowdown traced back to the frequent call to debug_locks_off() from the __lock_acquired() function probably due to some inconsistent lockdep states with debug_locks off. The debug_locks_off() function did an unconditional atomic xchg to write a 0 value into debug_locks which had already been set to 0. This led to severe cacheline contention in the cacheline that held debug_locks. As debug_locks is being referenced in quite a few different places in the kernel, this greatly slow down the system performance. To prevent that trashing of debug_locks cacheline, lock_acquired() and lock_contended() now checks the state of debug_locks before proceeding. The debug_locks_off() function is also modified to check debug_locks before calling __debug_locks_off(). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1539913518-15598-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-10-03locking/ww_mutex: Fix runtime warning in the WW mutex selftestGuenter Roeck1-4/+6
If CONFIG_WW_MUTEX_SELFTEST=y is enabled, booting an image in an arm64 virtual machine results in the following traceback if 8 CPUs are enabled: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner_task(owner) != current) WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 537 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:1033 __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x1a8/0x2e0 ... Call trace: __mutex_unlock_slowpath() ww_mutex_unlock() test_cycle_work() process_one_work() worker_thread() kthread() ret_from_fork() If requesting b_mutex fails with -EDEADLK, the error variable is reassigned to the return value from calling ww_mutex_lock on a_mutex again. If this call fails, a_mutex is not locked. It is, however, unconditionally unlocked subsequently, causing the reported warning. Fix the problem by using two error variables. With this change, the selftest still fails as follows: cyclic deadlock not resolved, ret[7/8] = -35 However, the traceback is gone. Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Fixes: d1b42b800e5d0 ("locking/ww_mutex: Add kselftests for resolving ww_mutex cyclic deadlocks") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1538516929-9734-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-09-10locking/ww_mutex: Fix spelling mistake "cylic" -> "cyclic"Colin Ian King1-1/+1
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in pr_err() error message Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180824112235.8842-1-colin.king@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-09-10locking/lockdep: Delete unnecessary #includeBen Hutchings1-1/+0
Commit: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") added the inclusion of <trace/events/preemptirq.h>. liblockdep doesn't have a stub version of that header so now fails to build. However, commit: bff1b208a5d1 ("tracing: Partial revert of "tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage"") removed the use of functions declared in that header. So delete the #include. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Fixes: bff1b208a5d1 ("tracing: Partial revert of "tracing: Centralize ...") Fixes: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints ...") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180828203315.GD18030@decadent.org.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-09-10locking/mutex: Fix mutex debug call and ww_mutex documentationThomas Hellstrom1-2/+1
The following commit: 08295b3b5bee ("Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes") introduced a reference in the documentation to a function that was removed in an earlier commit. It also forgot to remove a call to debug_mutex_add_waiter() which is now unconditionally called by __mutex_add_waiter(). Fix those bugs. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Fixes: 08295b3b5bee ("Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180903140708.2401-1-thellstrom@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-08-20Merge tag 'trace-v4.19' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-30/+5
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace Pull tracing updates from Steven Rostedt: - Restructure of lockdep and latency tracers This is the biggest change. Joel Fernandes restructured the hooks from irqs and preemption disabling and enabling. He got rid of a lot of the preprocessor #ifdef mess that they caused. He turned both lockdep and the latency tracers to use trace events inserted in the preempt/irqs disabling paths. But unfortunately, these started to cause issues in corner cases. Thus, parts of the code was reverted back to where lockdep and the latency tracers just get called directly (without using the trace events). But because the original change cleaned up the code very nicely we kept that, as well as the trace events for preempt and irqs disabling, but they are limited to not being called in NMIs. - Have trace events use SRCU for "rcu idle" calls. This was required for the preempt/irqs off trace events. But it also had to not allow them to be called in NMI context. Waiting till Paul makes an NMI safe SRCU API. - New notrace SRCU API to allow trace events to use SRCU. - Addition of mcount-nop option support - SPDX headers replacing GPL templates. - Various other fixes and clean ups. - Some fixes are marked for stable, but were not fully tested before the merge window opened. * tag 'trace-v4.19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace: (44 commits) tracing: Fix SPDX format headers to use C++ style comments tracing: Add SPDX License format tags to tracing files tracing: Add SPDX License format to bpf_trace.c blktrace: Add SPDX License format header s390/ftrace: Add -mfentry and -mnop-mcount support tracing: Add -mcount-nop option support tracing: Avoid calling cc-option -mrecord-mcount for every Makefile tracing: Handle CC_FLAGS_FTRACE more accurately Uprobe: Additional argument arch_uprobe to uprobe_write_opcode() Uprobes: Simplify uprobe_register() body tracepoints: Free early tracepoints after RCU is initialized uprobes: Use synchronize_rcu() not synchronize_sched() tracing: Fix synchronizing to event changes with tracepoint_synchronize_unregister() ftrace: Remove unused pointer ftrace_swapper_pid tracing: More reverting of "tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage" tracing/irqsoff: Handle preempt_count for different configs tracing: Partial revert of "tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage" tracing: irqsoff: Account for additional preempt_disable trace: Use rcu_dereference_raw for hooks from trace-event subsystem tracing/kprobes: Fix within_notrace_func() to check only notrace functions ...
2018-08-15Merge tag 'drm-next-2018-08-15' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drmLinus Torvalds3-85/+264
Pull drm updates from Dave Airlie: "This is the main drm pull request for 4.19. Rob has some new hardware support for new qualcomm hw that I'll send along separately. This has the display part of it, the remaining pull is for the acceleration engine. This also contains a wound-wait/wait-die mutex rework, Peter has acked it for merging via my tree. Otherwise mostly the usual level of activity. Summary: core: - Wound-wait/wait-die mutex rework - Add writeback connector type - Add "content type" property for HDMI - Move GEM bo to drm_framebuffer - Initial gpu scheduler documentation - GPU scheduler fixes for dying processes - Console deferred fbcon takeover support - Displayport support for CEC tunneling over AUX panel: - otm8009a panel driver fixes - Innolux TV123WAM and G070Y2-L01 panel driver - Ilitek ILI9881c panel driver - Rocktech RK070ER9427 LCD - EDT ETM0700G0EDH6 and EDT ETM0700G0BDH6 - DLC DLC0700YZG-1 - BOE HV070WSA-100 - newhaven, nhd-4.3-480272ef-atxl LCD - DataImage SCF0700C48GGU18 - Sharp LQ035Q7DB03 - p079zca: Refactor to support multiple panels tinydrm: - ILI9341 display panel New driver: - vkms - virtual kms driver to testing. i915: - Icelake: Display enablement DSI support IRQ support Powerwell support - GPU reset fixes and improvements - Full ppgtt support refactoring - PSR fixes and improvements - Execlist improvments - GuC related fixes amdgpu: - Initial amdgpu documentation - JPEG engine support on VCN - CIK uses powerplay by default - Move to using core PCIE functionality for gens/lanes - DC/Powerplay interface rework - Stutter mode support for RV - Vega12 Powerplay updates - GFXOFF fixes - GPUVM fault debugging - Vega12 GFXOFF - DC improvements - DC i2c/aux changes - UVD 7.2 fixes - Powerplay fixes for Polaris12, CZ/ST - command submission bo_list fixes amdkfd: - Raven support - Power management fixes udl: - Cleanups and fixes nouveau: - misc fixes and cleanups. msm: - DPU1 support display controller in sdm845 - GPU coredump support. vmwgfx: - Atomic modesetting validation fixes - Support for multisample surfaces armada: - Atomic modesetting support completed. exynos: - IPPv2 fixes - Move g2d to component framework - Suspend/resume support cleanups - Driver cleanups imx: - CSI configuration improvements - Driver cleanups - Use atomic suspend/resume helpers - ipu-v3 V4L2 XRGB32/XBGR32 support pl111: - Add Nomadik LCDC variant v3d: - GPU scheduler jobs management sun4i: - R40 display engine support - TCON TOP driver mediatek: - MT2712 SoC support rockchip: - vop fixes omapdrm: - Workaround for DRA7 errata i932 - Fix mm_list locking mali-dp: - Writeback implementation PM improvements - Internal error reporting debugfs tilcdc: - Single fix fo