| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
[ Upstream commit 1bba3900ca18bdae28d1b9fa10f16a8f8cb2ada1 ]
In the preparation stage of CPU online, if the corresponding
the rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread does not exist, will be created,
there is a situation where the rdp's rcuop kthreads creation fails,
and then de-offload this CPU's rdp, does not assign this CPU's
rdp->nocb_cb_kthread pointer, but this rdp's->nocb_gp_rdp and
rdp's->rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread is still valid.
This will cause the subsequent re-offload operation of this offline
CPU, which will pass the conditional check and the kthread_unpark()
will access invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer.
This commit therefore use rdp's->nocb_gp_kthread instead of
rdp_gp's->nocb_gp_kthread for safety check.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
[ Minor conflict resolved. ]
Signed-off-by: Jianqiang kang <jianqkang@sina.cn>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 90c09d57caeca94e6f3f87c49e96a91edd40cbfd ]
On kernels built with CONFIG_IRQ_WORK=y, when rcu_read_unlock() is
invoked within an interrupts-disabled region of code [1], it will invoke
rcu_read_unlock_special(), which uses an irq-work handler to force the
system to notice when the RCU read-side critical section actually ends.
That end won't happen until interrupts are enabled at the soonest.
In some kernels, such as those booted with rcutree.use_softirq=y, the
irq-work handler is used unconditionally.
The per-CPU rcu_data structure's ->defer_qs_iw_pending field is
updated by the irq-work handler and is both read and updated by
rcu_read_unlock_special(). This resulted in the following KCSAN splat:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler / rcu_read_unlock_special
read to 0xffff96b95f42d8d8 of 1 bytes by task 90 on cpu 8:
rcu_read_unlock_special+0x175/0x260
__rcu_read_unlock+0x92/0xa0
rt_spin_unlock+0x9b/0xc0
__local_bh_enable+0x10d/0x170
__local_bh_enable_ip+0xfb/0x150
rcu_do_batch+0x595/0xc40
rcu_cpu_kthread+0x4e9/0x830
smpboot_thread_fn+0x24d/0x3b0
kthread+0x3bd/0x410
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
write to 0xffff96b95f42d8d8 of 1 bytes by task 88 on cpu 8:
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler+0x1e/0x30
irq_work_single+0xaf/0x160
run_irq_workd+0x91/0xc0
smpboot_thread_fn+0x24d/0x3b0
kthread+0x3bd/0x410
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
no locks held by irq_work/8/88.
irq event stamp: 200272
hardirqs last enabled at (200272): [<ffffffffb0f56121>] finish_task_switch+0x131/0x320
hardirqs last disabled at (200271): [<ffffffffb25c7859>] __schedule+0x129/0xd70
softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0ee093f>] copy_process+0x4df/0x1cc0
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem is that irq-work handlers run with interrupts enabled, which
means that rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler() could be interrupted,
and that interrupt handler might contain an RCU read-side critical
section, which might invoke rcu_read_unlock_special(). In the strict
KCSAN mode of operation used by RCU, this constitutes a data race on
the ->defer_qs_iw_pending field.
This commit therefore disables interrupts across the portion of the
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler() that updates the ->defer_qs_iw_pending
field. This suffices because this handler is not a fast path.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 33b6a1f155d627f5bd80c7485c598ce45428f74f ]
Currently the call_rcu() API does not check whether a callback
pointer is NULL. If NULL is passed, rcu_core() will try to invoke
it, resulting in NULL pointer dereference and a kernel crash.
To prevent this and improve debuggability, this patch adds a check
for NULL and emits a kernel stack trace to help identify a faulty
caller.
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit fcf0e25ad4c8d14d2faab4d9a17040f31efce205 ]
rcu_read_unlock_strict() can be called with preemption enabled
which can make for an unstable rdp and a racy norm value.
Fix this by dropping the preempt-count in __rcu_read_unlock()
after the call to rcu_read_unlock_strict(), adjusting the
preempt-count check appropriately.
Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 83b28cfe796464ebbde1cf7916c126da6d572685 ]
With PREEMPT_RCU=n, cond_resched() provides urgently needed quiescent
states for read-side critical sections via rcu_all_qs().
One reason why this was needed: lacking preempt-count, the tick
handler has no way of knowing whether it is executing in a
read-side critical section or not.
With (PREEMPT_LAZY=y, PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=n), we get (PREEMPT_COUNT=y,
PREEMPT_RCU=n). In this configuration cond_resched() is a stub and
does not provide quiescent states via rcu_all_qs().
(PREEMPT_RCU=y provides this information via rcu_read_unlock() and
its nesting counter.)
So, use the availability of preempt_count() to report quiescent states
in rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq().
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()"
This reverts commit 224fd631c41b81697aa622d38615bfbf446b91cf which is
commit fd70e9f1d85f5323096ad313ba73f5fe3d15ea41 upstream.
It is reported to cause problems in testing, so revert it for now.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216-comic-handling-3bcf108cc465@wendy
Reported-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
CC: Zhixu Liu <zhixu.liu@gmail.com>
Cc: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Xiangyu Chen <xiangyu.chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()
commit fd70e9f1d85f5323096ad313ba73f5fe3d15ea41 upstream.
For kernels built with CONFIG_FORCE_NR_CPUS=y, the nr_cpu_ids is
defined as NR_CPUS instead of the number of possible cpus, this
will cause the following system panic:
smpboot: Allowing 4 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
...
setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:512 nr_cpumask_bits:512 nr_cpu_ids:512 nr_node_ids:1
...
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff9911c8c8
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: rcu_tasks_trace Tainted: G W
6.6.21 #1 5dc7acf91a5e8e9ac9dcfc35bee0245691283ea6
RIP: 0010:rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
RSP: 0018:ffffa371c00a3e60 EFLAGS: 00010082
CR2: ffffffff9911c8c8 CR3: 000000040fa20005 CR4: 00000000001706f0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die+0x23/0x80
? page_fault_oops+0xa4/0x180
? exc_page_fault+0x152/0x180
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x40
? rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
? __pfx_rcu_tasks_kthread+0x40/0x40
rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x69/0x180
rcu_tasks_kthread+0x94/0xc0
kthread+0xe8/0x140
? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x34/0x80
? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x80
</TASK>
Considering that there may be holes in the CPU numbers, use the
maximum possible cpu number, instead of nr_cpu_ids, for configuring
enqueue and dequeue limits.
[ neeraj.upadhyay: Fix htmldocs build error reported by Stephen Rothwell ]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CALMA0xaTSMN+p4xUXkzrtR5r6k7hgoswcaXx7baR_z9r5jjskw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
Reported-by: Zhixu Liu <zhixu.liu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[Xiangyu: BP to fix CVE:CVE-2024-49926, minor conflict resolution]
Signed-off-by: Xiangyu Chen <xiangyu.chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 11377947b5861fa59bf77c827e1dd7c081842cc9 ]
Currently, if the rcuscale module's async module parameter is specified
for RCU implementations that do not have async primitives such as RCU
Tasks Rude (which now lacks a call_rcu_tasks_rude() function), there
will be a series of splats due to calls to a NULL pointer. This commit
therefore warns of this situation, but switches to non-async testing.
Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 9139f93209d1ffd7f489ab19dee01b7c3a1a43d2 ]
After a CPU is marked offline and until it reaches its final trip to
idle, rcuo has several opportunities to be woken up, either because
a callback has been queued in the meantime or because
rcutree_report_cpu_dead() has issued the final deferred NOCB wake up.
If RCU-boosting is enabled, RCU kthreads are set to SCHED_FIFO policy.
And if RT-bandwidth is enabled, the related hrtimer might be armed.
However this then happens after hrtimers have been migrated at the
CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING stage, which is broken as reported by the
following warning:
Call trace:
enqueue_hrtimer+0x7c/0xf8
hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x2b8/0x300
enqueue_task_rt+0x298/0x3f0
enqueue_task+0x94/0x188
ttwu_do_activate+0xb4/0x27c
try_to_wake_up+0x2d8/0x79c
wake_up_process+0x18/0x28
__wake_nocb_gp+0x80/0x1a0
do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common+0x3c/0xcc
rcu_report_dead+0x68/0x1ac
cpuhp_report_idle_dead+0x48/0x9c
do_idle+0x288/0x294
cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x3c
secondary_start_kernel+0x138/0x158
Fix this with waking up rcuo using an IPI if necessary. Since the
existing API to deal with this situation only handles swait queue, rcuo
is only woken up from offline CPUs if it's not already waiting on a
grace period. In the worst case some callbacks will just wait for a
grace period to complete before being assigned to a subsequent one.
Reported-by: "Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)" <Cheng-Jui.Wang@mediatek.com>
Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit e4f78057291608f6968a6789c5ebb3bde7d95504 ]
The bypass lock contention mitigation assumes there can be at most
2 contenders on the bypass lock, following this scheme:
1) One kthread takes the bypass lock
2) Another one spins on it and increment the contended counter
3) A third one (a bypass enqueuer) sees the contended counter on and
busy loops waiting on it to decrement.
However this assumption is wrong. There can be only one CPU to find the
lock contended because call_rcu() (the bypass enqueuer) is the only
bypass lock acquire site that may not already hold the NOCB lock
beforehand, all the other sites must first contend on the NOCB lock.
Therefore step 2) is impossible.
The other problem is that the mitigation assumes that contenders all
belong to the same rdp CPU, which is also impossible for a raw spinlock.
In theory the warning could trigger if the enqueuer holds the bypass
lock and another CPU flushes the bypass queue concurrently but this is
prevented from all flush users:
1) NOCB kthreads only flush if they successfully _tried_ to lock the
bypass lock. So no contention management here.
2) Flush on callbacks migration happen remotely when the CPU is offline.
No concurrency against bypass enqueue.
3) Flush on deoffloading happen either locally with IRQs disabled or
remotely when the CPU is not yet online. No concurrency against
bypass enqueue.
4) Flush on barrier entrain happen either locally with IRQs disabled or
remotely when the CPU is offline. No concurrency against
bypass enqueue.
For those reasons, the bypass lock contention mitigation isn't needed
and is even wrong. Remove it but keep the warning reporting a contended
bypass lock on a remote CPU, to keep unexpected contention awareness.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 0ae9942f03d0d034fdb0a4f44fc99f62a3107987 ]
When using rcutorture as a module, there are a number of conditions that
can abort the modprobe operation, for example, when attempting to run
both RCU CPU stall warning tests and forward-progress tests. This can
cause rcu_torture_cleanup() to be invoked on the unwind path out of
rcu_rcu_torture_init(), which will mean that rcu_gp_slow_unregister()
is invoked without a matching rcu_gp_slow_register(). This will cause
a splat because rcu_gp_slow_unregister() is passed rcu_fwd_cb_nodelay,
which does not match a NULL pointer.
This commit therefore forgives a mismatch involving a NULL pointer, thus
avoiding this false-positive splat.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 2cbc482d325ee58001472c4359b311958c4efdd1 ]
When a structure containing an RCU callback rhp is (incorrectly) freed
and reallocated after rhp is passed to call_rcu(), it is not unusual for
rhp->func to be set to NULL. This defeats the debugging prints used by
__call_rcu_common() in kernels built with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y,
which expect to identify the offending code using the identity of this
function.
And in kernels build without CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y, things
are even worse, as can be seen from this splat:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0
... ...
PC is at 0x0
LR is at rcu_do_batch+0x1c0/0x3b8
... ...
(rcu_do_batch) from (rcu_core+0x1d4/0x284)
(rcu_core) from (__do_softirq+0x24c/0x344)
(__do_softirq) from (__irq_exit_rcu+0x64/0x108)
(__irq_exit_rcu) from (irq_exit+0x8/0x10)
(irq_exit) from (__handle_domain_irq+0x74/0x9c)
(__handle_domain_irq) from (gic_handle_irq+0x8c/0x98)
(gic_handle_irq) from (__irq_svc+0x5c/0x94)
(__irq_svc) from (arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0x3c)
(arch_cpu_idle) from (default_idle_call+0x4c/0x78)
(default_idle_call) from (do_idle+0xf8/0x150)
(do_idle) from (cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x20)
(cpu_startup_entry) from (0xc01530)
This commit therefore adds calls to mem_dump_obj(rhp) to output some
information, for example:
slab kmalloc-256 start ffff410c45019900 pointer offset 0 size 256
This provides the rough size of the memory block and the offset of the
rcu_head structure, which as least provides at least a few clues to help
locate the problem. If the problem is reproducible, additional slab
debugging can be enabled, for example, CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y, which can
provide significantly more information.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 55d4669ef1b76823083caecfab12a8bd2ccdcf64 ]
When rcu_barrier() calls rcu_rdp_cpu_online() and observes a CPU off
rnp->qsmaskinitnext, it means that all accesses from the offline CPU
preceding the CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU are visible to RCU barrier, including
callbacks expiration and counter updates.
However interrupts can still fire after stop_machine() re-enables
interrupts and before rcutree_report_cpu_dead(). The related accesses
happening between CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU and rnp->qsmaskinitnext clearing
are _NOT_ guaranteed to be seen by rcu_barrier() without proper
ordering, especially when callbacks are invoked there to the end, making
rcutree_migrate_callback() bypass barrier_lock.
The following theoretical race example can make rcu_barrier() hang:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
//cpu_down()
smpboot_park_threads()
//ksoftirqd is parked now
<IRQ>
rcu_sched_clock_irq()
invoke_rcu_core()
do_softirq()
rcu_core()
rcu_do_batch()
// callback storm
// rcu_do_batch() returns
// before completing all
// of them
// do_softirq also returns early because of
// timeout. It defers to ksoftirqd but
// it's parked
</IRQ>
stop_machine()
take_cpu_down()
rcu_barrier()
spin_lock(barrier_lock)
// observes rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist) != 0
<IRQ>
do_softirq()
rcu_core()
rcu_do_batch()
//completes all pending callbacks
//smp_mb() implied _after_ callback number dec
</IRQ>
rcutree_report_cpu_dead()
rnp->qsmaskinitnext &= ~rdp->grpmask;
rcutree_migrate_callback()
// no callback, early return without locking
// barrier_lock
//observes !rcu_rdp_cpu_online(rdp)
rcu_barrier_entrain()
rcu_segcblist_entrain()
// Observe rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(rsclp) == 0
// because no barrier between reading
// rnp->qsmaskinitnext and rsclp->len
rcu_segcblist_add_len()
smp_mb__before_atomic()
// will now observe the 0 count and empty
// list, but too late, we enqueue regardless
WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, rsclp->len + v);
// ignored barrier callback
// rcu barrier stall...
This could be solved with a read memory barrier, enforcing the message
passing between rnp->qsmaskinitnext and rsclp->len, matching the full
memory barrier after rsclp->len addition in rcu_segcblist_add_len()
performed at the end of rcu_do_batch().
However the rcu_barrier() is complicated enough and probably doesn't
need too many more subtleties. CPU down is a slowpath and the
barrier_lock seldom contended. Solve the issue with unconditionally
locking the barrier_lock on rcutree_migrate_callbacks(). This makes sure
that either rcu_barrier() sees the empty queue or its entrained
callback will be migrated.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 6040072f4774a575fa67b912efe7722874be337b ]
On powerpc systems, spinlock acquisition does not order prior stores
against later loads. This means that this statement:
rfcp->rfc_next = NULL;
Can be reordered to follow this statement:
WRITE_ONCE(*rfcpp, rfcp);
Which is then a data race with rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cr(), specifically,
this statement:
rfcpn = READ_ONCE(rfcp->rfc_next)
KCSAN located this data race, which represents a real failure on powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 399ced9594dfab51b782798efe60a2376cd5b724 ]
When RCU-TASKS-TRACE pre-gp takes a snapshot of the current task running
on all online CPUs, no explicit ordering synchronizes properly with a
context switch. This lack of ordering can permit the new task to miss
pre-grace-period update-side accesses. The following diagram, courtesy
of Paul, shows the possible bad scenario:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
// Pre-GP update side access
WRITE_ONCE(*X, 1);
smp_mb();
r0 = rq->curr;
RCU_INIT_POINTER(rq->curr, TASK_B)
spin_unlock(rq)
rcu_read_lock_trace()
r1 = X;
/* ignore TASK_B */
Either r0==TASK_B or r1==1 is needed but neither is guaranteed.
One possible solution to solve this is to wait for an RCU grace period
at the beginning of the RCU-tasks-trace grace period before taking the
current tasks snaphot. However this would introduce large additional
latencies to RCU-tasks-trace grace periods.
Another solution is to lock the target runqueue while taking the current
task snapshot. This ensures that the update side sees the latest context
switch and subsequent context switches will see the pre-grace-period
update side accesses.
This commit therefore adds runqueue locking to cpu_curr_snapshot().
Fixes: e386b6725798 ("rcu-tasks: Eliminate RCU Tasks Trace IPIs to online CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 668c0406d887467d53f8fe79261dda1d22d5b671 ]
When the torture_type is set srcu or srcud and cb_barrier is
non-zero, running the rcutorture test will trigger the
following warning:
[ 163.910989][ C1] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
[ 163.910994][ C1] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/1
[ 163.910999][ C1] preempt_count: 10001, expected: 0
[ 163.911002][ C1] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
[ 163.911005][ C1] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 163.911007][ C1] irq event stamp: 30964
[ 163.911010][ C1] hardirqs last enabled at (30963): [<ffffffffabc7df52>] do_idle+0x362/0x500
[ 163.911018][ C1] hardirqs last disabled at (30964): [<ffffffffae616eff>] sysvec_call_function_single+0xf/0xd0
[ 163.911025][ C1] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffabb6475f>] copy_process+0x16ff/0x6580
[ 163.911033][ C1] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 163.911038][ C1] Preemption disabled at:
[ 163.911039][ C1] [<ffffffffacf1964b>] stack_depot_save_flags+0x24b/0x6c0
[ 163.911063][ C1] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc4-rt4-yocto-preempt-rt+ #3 1e39aa9a737dd024a3275c4f835a872f673a7d3a
[ 163.911071][ C1] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 163.911075][ C1] Call Trace:
[ 163.911078][ C1] <IRQ>
[ 163.911080][ C1] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xd0
[ 163.911089][ C1] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[ 163.911095][ C1] __might_resched+0x36f/0x530
[ 163.911105][ C1] rt_spin_lock+0x82/0x1c0
[ 163.911112][ C1] spin_lock_irqsave_ssp_contention+0xb8/0x100
[ 163.911121][ C1] srcu_gp_start_if_needed+0x782/0xf00
[ 163.911128][ C1] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x70
[ 163.911136][ C1] ? debug_object_active_state+0x336/0x470
[ 163.911148][ C1] ? __pfx_srcu_gp_start_if_needed+0x10/0x10
[ 163.911156][ C1] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
[ 163.911165][ C1] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_barrier_cbf+0x10/0x10
[ 163.911188][ C1] __call_srcu+0x9f/0xe0
[ 163.911196][ C1] call_srcu+0x13/0x20
[ 163.911201][ C1] srcu_torture_call+0x1b/0x30
[ 163.911224][ C1] rcu_torture_barrier1cb+0x4a/0x60
[ 163.911247][ C1] __flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x267/0xca0
[ 163.911256][ C1] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_barrier1cb+0x10/0x10
[ 163.911281][ C1] generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[ 163.911288][ C1] __sysvec_call_function_single+0x7d/0x280
[ 163.911295][ C1] sysvec_call_function_single+0x93/0xd0
[ 163.911302][ C1] </IRQ>
[ 163.911304][ C1] <TASK>
[ 163.911308][ C1] asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x1b/0x20
[ 163.911313][ C1] RIP: 0010:default_idle+0x17/0x20
[ 163.911326][ C1] RSP: 0018:ffff888001997dc8 EFLAGS: 00000246
[ 163.911333][ C1] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: dffffc0000000000 RCX: ffffffffae618b51
[ 163.911337][ C1] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffaea80920 RDI: ffffffffaec2de80
[ 163.911342][ C1] RBP: ffff888001997dc8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed100d740cad
[ 163.911346][ C1] R10: ffffed100d740cac R11: ffff88806ba06563 R12: 0000000000000001
[ 163.911350][ C1] R13: ffffffffafe460c0 R14: ffffffffafe460c0 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 163.911358][ C1] ? ct_kernel_exit.constprop.3+0x121/0x160
[ 163.911369][ C1] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xc4/0x150
[ 163.911376][ C1] arch_cpu_idle+0x9/0x10
[ 163.911383][ C1] default_idle_call+0x7a/0xb0
[ 163.911390][ C1] do_idle+0x362/0x500
[ 163.911398][ C1] ? __pfx_do_idle+0x10/0x10
[ 163.911404][ C1] ? complete_with_flags+0x8b/0xb0
[ 163.911416][ C1] cpu_startup_entry+0x58/0x70
[ 163.911423][ C1] start_secondary+0x221/0x280
[ 163.911430][ C1] ? __pfx_start_secondary+0x10/0x10
[ 163.911440][ C1] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x17f/0x18b
[ 163.911455][ C1] </TASK>
This commit therefore use smp_call_on_cpu() instead of
smp_call_function_single(), make rcu_torture_barrier1cb() invoked
happens on task-context.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 431315a563015f259b28e34c5842f6166439e969 ]
When the rcutorture tests start to exit, the rcu_torture_cleanup() is
invoked to stop kthreads and release resources, if the stall-task
kthreads exist, cpu-stall has started and the rcutorture.stall_cpu
is set to a larger value, the rcu_torture_cleanup() will be blocked
for a long time and the hung-task may occur, this commit therefore
add kthread_should_stop() to the loop of cpu-stall operation, when
rcutorture tests ends, no need to wait for cpu-stall to end, exit
directly.
Use the following command to test:
insmod rcutorture.ko torture_type=srcu fwd_progress=0 stat_interval=4
stall_cpu_block=1 stall_cpu=200 stall_cpu_holdoff=10 read_exit_burst=0
object_debug=1
rmmod rcutorture
[15361.918610] INFO: task rmmod:878 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
[15361.918613] Tainted: G W
6.8.0-rc2-yoctodev-standard+ #25
[15361.918615] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disables this message.
[15361.918616] task:rmmod state:D stack:0 pid:878
tgid:878 ppid:773 flags:0x00004002
[15361.918621] Call Trace:
[15361.918623] <TASK>
[15361.918626] __schedule+0xc0d/0x28f0
[15361.918631] ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10
[15361.918635] ? rcu_is_watching+0x19/0xb0
[15361.918638] ? schedule+0x1f6/0x290
[15361.918642] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
[15361.918645] ? schedule+0xc9/0x290
[15361.918648] ? schedule+0xc9/0x290
[15361.918653] ? trace_preempt_off+0x54/0x100
[15361.918657] ? schedule+0xc9/0x290
[15361.918661] schedule+0xd0/0x290
[15361.918665] schedule_timeout+0x56d/0x7d0
[15361.918669] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x1b/0x30
[15361.918672] ? rcu_is_watching+0x19/0xb0
[15361.918676] ? __pfx_schedule_timeout+0x10/0x10
[15361.918679] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x1b/0x30
[15361.918683] ? rcu_is_watching+0x19/0xb0
[15361.918686] ? wait_for_completion+0x179/0x4c0
[15361.918690] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
[15361.918693] ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x20
[15361.918696] ? wait_for_completion+0x9d/0x4c0
[15361.918700] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x36/0x50
[15361.918703] ? wait_for_completion+0x179/0x4c0
[15361.918707] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x36/0x50
[15361.918710] ? wait_for_completion+0x179/0x4c0
[15361.918714] ? trace_preempt_on+0x54/0x100
[15361.918718] ? wait_for_completion+0x179/0x4c0
[15361.918723] wait_for_completion+0x181/0x4c0
[15361.918728] ? __pfx_wait_for_completion+0x10/0x10
[15361.918738] kthread_stop+0x152/0x470
[15361.918742] _torture_stop_kthread+0x44/0xc0 [torture
7af7f9cbba28271a10503b653f9e05d518fbc8c3]
[15361.918752] rcu_torture_cleanup+0x2ac/0xe90 [rcutorture
f2cb1f556ee7956270927183c4c2c7749a336529]
[15361.918766] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_cleanup+0x10/0x10 [rcutorture
f2cb1f556ee7956270927183c4c2c7749a336529]
[15361.918777] ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x20
[15361.918781] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x17c/0x670
[15361.918789] ? __might_fault+0xcd/0x180
[15361.918793] ? find_module_all+0x104/0x1d0
[15361.918799] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x2a4/0x3f0
[15361.918803] ? __pfx___x64_sys_delete_module+0x10/0x10
[15361.918807] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x149/0x280
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 8b9b443fa860276822b25057cb3ff3b28734dec0 ]
The "pipe_count > RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN" check has a comment saying "Should
not happen, but...". This is only true when testing an RCU whose grace
periods are always long enough. This commit therefore fixes this comment.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wi7rJ-eGq+xaxVfzFEgbL9tdf6Kc8Z89rCpfcQOKm74Tw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 3758f7d9917bd7ef0482c4184c0ad673b4c4e069 ]
The rcuc-starvation output from print_cpu_stall_info() might overflow the
buffer if there is a huge difference in jiffies difference. The situation
might seem improbable, but computers sometimes get very confused about
time, which can result in full-sized integers, and, in this case,
buffer overflow.
Also, the unsigned jiffies difference is printed using %ld, which is
normally for signed integers. This is intentional for debugging purposes,
but it is not obvious from the code.
This commit therefore changes sprintf() to snprintf() and adds a
clarifying comment about intention of %ld format.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 245a62982502 ("rcu: Dump rcuc kthread status for CPUs not reporting quiescent state")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@ancud.ru>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit cc5645fddb0ce28492b15520306d092730dffa48 ]
There is a possibility of buffer overflow in
show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread() if counters, passed
to sprintf() are huge. Counter numbers, needed for this
are unrealistically high, but buffer overflow is still
possible.
Use snprintf() with buffer size instead of sprintf().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: edf3775f0ad6 ("rcu-tasks: Add count for idle tasks on offline CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@ancud.ru>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit e7539ffc9a770f36bacedcf0fbfb4bf2f244f4a5 ]
Just like is done for the kworker performing nodes initialization,
gracefully handle the possible allocation failure of the RCU expedited
grace period main kworker.
While at it perform a rename of the related checking functions to better
reflect the expedited specifics.
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Fixes: 9621fbee44df ("rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
recovery
[ Upstream commit a636c5e6f8fc34be520277e69c7c6ee1d4fc1d17 ]
Under CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD=y, the nodes initialization for expedited
grace periods is queued to a kworker. However if the allocation of that
kworker failed, the nodes initialization is performed synchronously by
the caller instead.
Now the check for kworker initialization failure relies on the kworker
pointer to be NULL while its value might actually encapsulate an
allocation failure error.
Make sure to handle this case.
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Fixes: 9621fbee44df ("rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit e787644caf7628ad3269c1fbd321c3255cf51710 ]
When the CPU goes idle for the last time during the CPU down hotplug
process, RCU reports a final quiescent state for the current CPU. If
this quiescent state propagates up to the top, some tasks may then be
woken up to complete the grace period: the main grace period kthread
and/or the expedited main workqueue (or kworker).
If those kthreads have a SCHED_FIFO policy, the wake up can indirectly
arm the RT bandwith timer to the local offline CPU. Since this happens
after hrtimers have been migrated at CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING stage, the
timer gets ignored. Therefore if the RCU kthreads are waiting for RT
bandwidth to be available, they may never be actually scheduled.
This triggers TREE03 rcutorture hangs:
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
rcu: 4-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=9874/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=0/0 fqs=20 rcuc=21071 jiffies(starved)
rcu: (t=21035 jiffies g=938281 q=40787 ncpus=6)
rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 20964 jiffies! g938281 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=0
rcu: Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior.
rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
task:rcu_preempt state:R running task stack:14896 pid:14 tgid:14 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__schedule+0x2eb/0xa80
schedule+0x1f/0x90
schedule_timeout+0x163/0x270
? __pfx_process_timeout+0x10/0x10
rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x37c/0x5b0
? __pfx_rcu_gp_kthread+0x10/0x10
rcu_gp_kthread+0x17c/0x200
kthread+0xde/0x110
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>
The situation can't be solved with just unpinning the timer. The hrtimer
infrastructure and the nohz heuristics involved in finding the best
remote target for an unpinned timer would then also need to handle
enqueues from an offline CPU in the most horrendous way.
So fix this on the RCU side instead and defer the wake up to an online
CPU if it's too late for the local one.
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit e6c86c513f440bec5f1046539c7e3c6c653842da ]
As an accident of implementation, an RCU Tasks Trace grace period also
acts as an RCU grace period. However, this could change at any time.
This commit therefore creates an rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() that currently
returns true to codify this accident. Code relying on this accident
must call this function to verify that this accident is still happening.
Reported-by: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221014113946.965131-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 876673364161 ("bpf: Defer the free of inner map when necessary")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 4a8e65b0c348e42107c64381e692e282900be361 ]
SRCU callbacks acceleration might fail if the preceding callbacks
advance also fails. This can happen when the following steps are met:
1) The RCU_WAIT_TAIL segment has callbacks (say for gp_num 8) and the
RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL also has callbacks (say for gp_num 12).
2) The grace period for RCU_WAIT_TAIL is observed as started but not yet
completed so rcu_seq_current() returns 4 + SRCU_STATE_SCAN1 = 5.
3) This value is passed to rcu_segcblist_advance() which can't move
any segment forward and fails.
4) srcu_gp_start_if_needed() still proceeds with callback acceleration.
But then the call to rcu_seq_snap() observes the grace period for the
RCU_WAIT_TAIL segment (gp_num 8) as completed and the subsequent one
for the RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL segment as started
(ie: 8 + SRCU_STATE_SCAN1 = 9) so it returns a snapshot of the
next grace period, which is 16.
5) The value of 16 is passed to rcu_segcblist_accelerate() but the
freshly enqueued callback in RCU_NEXT_TAIL can't move to
RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL which already has callbacks for a previous grace
period (gp_num = 12). So acceleration fails.
6) Note in all these steps, srcu_invoke_callbacks() hadn't had a chance
to run srcu_invoke_callbacks().
Then some very bad outcome may happen if the following happens:
7) Some other CPU races and starts the grace period number 16 before the
CPU handling previous steps had a chance. Therefore srcu_gp_start()
isn't called on the latter sdp to fix the acceleration leak from
previous steps with a new pair of call to advance/accelerate.
8) The grace period 16 completes and srcu_invoke_callbacks() is finally
called. All the callbacks from previous grace periods (8 and 12) are
correctly advanced and executed but callbacks in RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL
still remain. Then rcu_segcblist_accelerate() is called with a
snaphot of 20.
9) Since nothing started the grace period number 20, callbacks stay
unhandled.
This has been reported in real load:
[3144162.608392] INFO: task kworker/136:12:252684 blocked for more
than 122 seconds.
[3144162.615986] Tainted: G O K 5.4.203-1-tlinux4-0011.1 #1
[3144162.623053] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disables this message.
[3144162.631162] kworker/136:12 D 0 252684 2 0x90004000
[3144162.631189] Workqueue: kvm-irqfd-cleanup irqfd_shutdown [kvm]
[3144162.631192] Call Trace:
[3144162.631202] __schedule+0x2ee/0x660
[3144162.631206] schedule+0x33/0xa0
[3144162.631209] schedule_timeout+0x1c4/0x340
[3144162.631214] ? update_load_avg+0x82/0x660
[3144162.631217] ? raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
[3144162.631218] wait_for_completion+0x119/0x180
[3144162.631220] ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x80
[3144162.631224] __synchronize_srcu.part.19+0x81/0xb0
[3144162.631226] ? __bpf_trace_rcu_utilization+0x10/0x10
[3144162.631227] synchronize_srcu+0x5f/0xc0
[3144162.631236] irqfd_shutdown+0x3c/0xb0 [kvm]
[3144162.631239] ? __schedule+0x2f6/0x660
[3144162.631243] process_one_work+0x19a/0x3a0
[3144162.631244] worker_thread+0x37/0x3a0
[3144162.631247] kthread+0x117/0x140
[3144162.631247] ? process_one_work+0x3a0/0x3a0
[3144162.631248] ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40
[3144162.631250] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Fix this with taking the snapshot for acceleration _before_ the read
of the current grace period number.
The only side effect of this solution is that callbacks advancing happen
then _after_ the full barrier in rcu_seq_snap(). This is not a problem
because that barrier only cares about:
1) Ordering accesses of the update side before call_srcu() so they don't
bleed.
2) See all the accesses prior to the grace period of the current gp_num
The only things callbacks advancing need to be ordered against are
carried by snp locking.
Reported-by: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
Co-developed-by:: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Co-developed-by: Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/CANZk6aR+CqZaqmMWrC2eRRPY12qAZnDZLwLnHZbNi=xXMB401g@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: da915ad5cf25 ("srcu: Parallelize callback handling")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
commit 5f98fd034ca6fd1ab8c91a3488968a0e9caaabf6 upstream.
Since the actual slab freeing is deferred when calling kvfree_rcu(), so
is the kmemleak_free() callback informing kmemleak of the object
deletion. From the perspective of the kvfree_rcu() caller, the object is
freed and it may remove any references to it. Since kmemleak does not
scan RCU internal data storing the pointer, it will report such objects
as leaks during the grace period.
Tell kmemleak to ignore such objects on the kvfree_call_rcu() path. Note
that the tiny RCU implementation does not have such issue since the
objects can be tracked from the rcu_ctrlblk structure.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/F903A825-F05F-4B77-A2B5-7356282FBA2C@apple.com/
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit b96e7a5fa0ba9cda32888e04f8f4bac42d49a7f8 upstream.
There are instances where rcu_cpu_stall_reset() is called when jiffies
did not get a chance to update for a long time. Before jiffies is
updated, the CPU stall detector can go off triggering false-positives
where a just-started grace period appears to be ages old. In the past,
we disabled stall detection in rcu_cpu_stall_reset() however this got
changed [1]. This is resulting in false-positives in KGDB usecase [2].
Fix this by deferring the update of jiffies to the third run of the FQS
loop. This is more robust, as, even if rcu_cpu_stall_reset() is called
just before jiffies is read, we would end up pushing out the jiffies
read by 3 more FQS loops. Meanwhile the CPU stall detection will be
delayed and we will not get any false positives.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210521155624.174524-2-senozhatsky@chromium.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230814020045.51950-2-chenhuacai@loongson.cn/
Tested with rcutorture.cpu_stall option as well to verify stall behavior
with/without patch.
Tested-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Reported-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230814020045.51950-2-chenhuacai@loongson.cn/
Suggested-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: a80be428fbc1 ("rcu: Do not disable GP stall detection in rcu_cpu_stall_reset()")
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit d8d5b7bf6f2105883bbd91bbd4d5b67e4e3dff71 ]
The value of a bitwise expression 1 << (cpu - sdp->mynode->grplo)
is subject to overflow due to a failure to cast operands to a larger
data type before performing the bitwise operation.
The maximum result of this subtraction is defined by the RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
Kconfig option, which on 64-bit systems defaults to 16 (resulting in a
maximum shift of 15), but which can be set up as high as 64 (resulting
in a maximum shift of 63). A value of 31 can result in sign extension,
resulting in 0xffffffff80000000 instead of the desired 0x80000000.
A value of 32 or greater triggers undefined behavior per the C standard.
This bug has not been known to cause issues because almost all kernels
take the default CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=16. Furthermore, as long as a
given compiler gives a deterministic non-zero result for 1<<N for N>=32,
the code correctly invokes all SRCU callbacks, albeit wasting CPU time
along the way.
This commit therefore substitutes the correct 1UL for the buggy 1.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit e60c122a1614b4f65b29a7bef9d83b9fd30e937a ]
The rcuscale.holdoff module parameter can be used to delay the start
of rcu_scale_writer() kthread. How |
