| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Currently, both __init_srcu_struct() in CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y kernels
and init_srcu_struct() in CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n kernel initialize
the srcu_struct structure's ->lock before the srcu_usage structure has
been allocated. This of course prevents the ->lock from being moved
to the srcu_usage structure, so this commit moves the initialization
into the init_srcu_struct_fields() after the srcu_usage structure has
been allocated.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
This commit moves the ->srcu_cb_mutex field from the srcu_struct structure
to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order
to improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
This commit moves the ->srcu_size_state field from the srcu_struct
structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former
in order to improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
This commit moves the ->level[] array from the srcu_struct structure to
the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to
improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
The current srcu_struct structure is on the order of 200 bytes in size
(depending on architecture and .config), which is much better than the
old-style 26K bytes, but still all too inconvenient when one is trying
to achieve good cache locality on a fastpath involving SRCU readers.
However, only a few fields in srcu_struct are used by SRCU readers.
The remaining fields could be offloaded to a new srcu_update
structure, thus shrinking the srcu_struct structure down to a few
tens of bytes. This commit begins this noble quest, a quest that is
complicated by open-coded initialization of the srcu_struct within the
srcu_notifier_head structure. This complication is addressed by updating
the srcu_notifier_head structure's open coding, given that there does
not appear to be a straightforward way of abstracting that initialization.
This commit moves only the ->node pointer to srcu_update. Later commits
will move additional fields.
[ paulmck: Fold in qiang1.zhang@intel.com's memory-leak fix. ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230320055751.4120251-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com/
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Further shrinking the srcu_struct structure is eased by requiring
that in-module srcu_struct structures rely more heavily on static
initialization. In particular, this preserves the property that
a module-load-time srcu_struct initialization can fail only due
to memory-allocation failure of the per-CPU srcu_data structures.
It might also slightly improve robustness by keeping the number of memory
allocations that must succeed down percpu_alloc() call.
This is in preparation for splitting an srcu_usage structure out
of the srcu_struct structure.
[ paulmck: Fold in qiang1.zhang@intel.com feedback. ]
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
The tasks_rcu_exit_srcu variable is used only by kernels built
with CONFIG_TASKS_RCU=y, but is defined for all kernesl with
CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC=y. Therefore, in kernels built with
CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC=y but CONFIG_TASKS_RCU=n, this gives
a "defined but not used" warning.
This commit therefore moves this variable under CONFIG_TASKS_RCU.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303191536.XzMSyzTl-lkp@intel.com/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Add a test number 3 that creates deadlock cycles involving one RCU
Tasks Trace step and L-1 SRCU steps. Please note that lockdep will not
detect these deadlocks until synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace() is marked
with lockdep's new "sync" annotation, which will probably not happen
until some time after these markings prove their worth on SRCU.
Please note that these tests are available only in kernels built with
CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU=y.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
|
|
In order to test the new SRCU-lockdep functionality, this commit adds
an rcutorture.test_srcu_lockdep module parameter that, when non-zero,
selects an SRCU deadlock scenario to execute. This parameter is a
five-digit number formatted as DNNL, where "D" is 1 to force a deadlock
and 0 to avoid doing so; "NN" is the test number, 0 for SRCU-based, 1
for SRCU/mutex-based, and 2 for SRCU/rwsem-based; and "L" is the number
of steps in the deadlock cycle.
Note that rcutorture.test_srcu_lockdep=1 will also force a hard hang.
If a non-zero value of rcutorture.test_srcu_lockdep does not select a
deadlock scenario, a console message is printed and testing continues.
[ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback, add rwsem support. ]
[ paulmck: Apply Dan Carpenter feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
|
|
Although all flavors of RCU readers are annotated correctly with
lockdep as recursive read locks, they do not set the lock_acquire
'check' parameter. This means that RCU read locks are not added to
the lockdep dependency graph, which in turn means that lockdep cannot
detect RCU-based deadlocks. This is not a problem for RCU flavors having
atomic read-side critical sections because context-based annotations can
catch these deadlocks, see for example the RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() statement
in synchronize_rcu(). But context-based annotations are not helpful
for sleepable RCU, especially given that it is perfectly legal to do
synchronize_srcu(&srcu1) within an srcu_read_lock(&srcu2).
However, we can detect SRCU-based by: (1) Making srcu_read_lock() a
'check'ed recursive read lock and (2) Making synchronize_srcu() a empty
write lock critical section. Even better, with the newly introduced
lock_sync(), we can avoid false positives about irq-unsafe/safe.
This commit therefore makes it so.
Note that NMI-safe SRCU read side critical sections are currently not
annotated, but might be annotated in the future.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ boqun: Add comments for annotation per Waiman's suggestion ]
[ boqun: Fix comment warning reported by Stephen Rothwell ]
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
|
|
The ref_scale_shutdown() kthread/function uses wait_event() to wait for
the refscale test to complete. However, although the read-side tests
are normally extremely fast, there is no law against specifying a very
large value for the refscale.loops module parameter or against having
a slow read-side primitive. Either way, this might well trigger the
hung-task timeout.
This commit therefore replaces those wait_event() calls with calls to
wait_event_idle(), which do not trigger the hung-task timeout.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
|
|
The rcu_scale_shutdown() and kfree_scale_shutdown() kthreads/functions
use wait_event() to wait for the rcuscale test to complete. However,
each updater thread in such a test waits for at least 100 grace periods.
If each grace period takes more than 1.2 seconds, which is long, but
not insanely so, this can trigger the hung-task timeout.
This commit therefore replaces those wait_event() calls with calls to
wait_event_idle(), which do not trigger the hung-task timeout.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Reported-by: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
|
|
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y kernels
Given a non-zero rcutorture.nocbs_nthreads module parameter, the specified
number of nocb kthreads will be created, regardless of whether or not
the RCU implementation under test is capable of offloading callbacks.
Please note that even vanilla RCU is incapable of offloading in kernels
built with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n. And when the RCU implementation is
incapable of offloading callbacks, there is no point in creating those
kthreads.
This commit therefore checks the cur_ops.torture_type module parameter and
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU Kconfig option in order to avoid creating unnecessary
nocb tasks.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ boqun: Fix checkpatch warning ]
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
|
|
After commit 8b700983de82 ("sched: Remove sched_set_*() return value"),
this variable is not used anymore. So eliminate it entirely.
Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
|
|
This commit adds a test_nmis module parameter to generate the
specified number of NMI stack backtraces 15 seconds apart. This module
parameter can be used to test NMI delivery and accompanying diagnostics.
Note that this parameter is ignored when rcutorture is a module rather
than built into the kernel. This could be changed with the addition of
an EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().
[ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
|
|
stall.2023.01.09a: RCU CPU stall-warning updates.
|
|
'srcu.2023.01.03a', 'srcu-always.2023.02.02a', 'tasks.2023.01.03a', 'torture.2023.01.05a' and 'torturescript.2023.01.03a' into HEAD
doc.2023.01.05a: Documentation update.
fixes.2023.01.23a: Miscellaneous fixes.
kvfree.2023.01.03a: kvfree_rcu() updates.
srcu.2023.01.03a: SRCU updates.
srcu-always.2023.02.02a: Finish making SRCU be unconditionally available.
tasks.2023.01.03a: Tasks-RCU updates.
torture.2023.01.05a: Torture-test updates.
torturescript.2023.01.03a: Torture-test scripting updates.
|
|
During suspend, we see failures to suspend 1 in 300-500 suspends.
Looking closer, it appears that asynchronous RCU callbacks are being
queued as lazy even though synchronous callbacks are expedited. These
delays appear to not be very welcome by the suspend/resume code as
evidenced by these occasional suspend failures.
This commit modifies call_rcu() to check if rcu_async_should_hurry(),
which will return true if we are in suspend or in-kernel boot.
[ paulmck: Alphabetize local variables. ]
Ignoring the lazy hint makes the 3000 suspend/resume cycles pass
reliably on a 12th gen 12-core Intel CPU, and there is some evidence
that it also slightly speeds up boot performance.
Fixes: 3cb278e73be5 ("rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power")
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Boot and suspend/resume should not be slowed down in kernels built with
CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y. In particular, suspend can sometimes fail in such
kernels.
This commit therefore adds rcu_async_hurry(), rcu_async_relax(), and
rcu_async_should_hurry() functions that track whether or not either
a boot or a suspend/resume operation is in progress. This will
enable a later commit to refrain from laziness during those times.
Export rcu_async_should_hurry(), rcu_async_hurry(), and rcu_async_relax()
for later use by rcutorture.
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Steve Rostedt. ]
Fixes: 3cb278e73be5 ("rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power")
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
The rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity() function is invoked at
rcutree_online_cpu() and rcutree_offline_cpu() time, early in the online
timeline and late in the offline timeline, respectively. It is also
invoked from rcutree_dead_cpu(), however, in the absence of userspace
manipulations (for which userspace must take responsibility), this call
is redundant with that from rcutree_offline_cpu(). This redundancy can
be demonstrated by printing out the relevant cpumasks
This commit therefore removes the call to rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity()
from rcutree_dead_cpu().
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
|
|
The maximum value of RCU CPU stall-warning timeouts has historically been
five minutes (300 seconds). However, the recently introduced expedited
RCU CPU stall-warning timeout is instead limited to 21 seconds. This
causes problems for CI/fuzzing services such as syzkaller by obscuring
the issue in question with expedited RCU CPU stall-warning timeout splats.
This commit therefore sets the RCU_EXP_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT Kconfig options
upper bound to 300000 milliseconds, which is 300 seconds (AKA 5 minutes).
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Hillf Danton. ]
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Geert Uytterhoeven. ]
Reported-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Time stamps are added to the output in kernels built with
CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y, which causes misaligned output. Therefore,
replace pr_cont() with pr_err(), which fixes alignment and gets
rid of a couple of despised pr_cont() calls.
Before:
[ 37.567343] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
[ 37.567839] rcu: 0-....: (1500 ticks this GP) idle=***
[ 37.568270] (t=1501 jiffies g=4717 q=28 ncpus=4)
[ 37.568668] CPU: 0 PID: 313 Comm: test0 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4 #8
After:
[ 36.762074] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
[ 36.762543] rcu: 0-....: (1499 ticks this GP) idle=***
[ 36.763003] rcu: (t=1500 jiffies g=5097 q=27 ncpus=4)
[ 36.763522] CPU: 0 PID: 313 Comm: test0 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4 #9
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Because RCU CPU stall warnings are driven from the scheduling-clock
interrupt handler, a workload consisting of a very large number of
short-duration hardware interrupts can result in misleading stall-warning
messages. On systems supporting only a single level of interrupts,
that is, where interrupts handlers cannot be interrupted, this can
produce misleading diagnostics. The stack traces will show the
innocent-bystander interrupted task, not the interrupts that are
at the very least exacerbating the stall.
This situation can be improved by displaying the number of interrupts
and the CPU time that they have consumed. Diagnosing other types
of stalls can be eased by also providing the count of softirqs and
the CPU time that they consumed as well as the number of context
switches and the task-level CPU time consumed.
Consider the following output given this change:
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
rcu: 0-....: (1250 ticks this GP) <omitted>
rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system
rcu: number: 624 45 0
rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms)
This output shows that the number of hard and soft interrupts is small,
there are no context switches, and the system takes up a lot of time. This
indicates that the current task is looping with preemption disabled.
The impact on system performance is negligible because snapshot is
recorded only once for all continuous RCU stalls.
This added debugging information is suppressed by default and can be
enabled by building the kernel with CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y or
by booting with rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime=1.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
The sparse __acquires() and __releases() annotations provide very
little value. The argument is ignored, so sparse cannot tell the
differences between acquiring one lock and releasing another on the one
hand and acquiring and releasing a given lock on the other. In addition,
lockdep annotations provide much more precision, for but one example,
actually knowing which lock is held.
This commit therefore removes the __acquires() and __releases()
annotations from rcutorture.
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
This commit adds three read-side-only tests of three use cases featuring
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU: One using per-object reference counting, one using
per-object locking, and one using per-object sequence locking.
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from kernel test robot. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Current tests all have init() functions that are guaranteed to succeed.
But upcoming tests will need to allocate memory, thus possibly failing.
This commit therefore handles init() function failure.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
The rcu_tasks_need_gpcb() determines whether or not: (1) There are
callbacks needing another grace period, (2) There are callbacks ready
to be invoked, and (3) It would be a good time to shrink back down to a
single-CPU callback list. This third case is interesting because some
other CPU might be adding new callbacks, which might suddenly make this
a very bad time to be shrinking.
This is currently handled by requiring call_rcu_tasks_generic() to
enqueue callbacks under the protection of rcu_read_lock() and requiring
rcu_tasks_need_gpcb() to wait for an RCU grace period to elapse before
finalizing the transition. This works well in practice.
Unfortunately, the current code assumes that a grace period whose end is
detected by the poll_state_synchronize_rcu() in the second "if" condition
actually ended before the earlier code counted the callbacks queued on
CPUs other than CPU 0 (local variable "ncbsnz"). Given the current code,
it is possible that a long-delayed call_rcu_tasks_generic() invocation
will queue a callback on a non-zero CPU after these CPUs have had their
callbacks counted and zero has been stored to ncbsnz. Such a callback
would trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE() in the second "if" statement.
To see this, consider the following sequence of events:
o CPU 0 invokes rcu_tasks_one_gp(), and counts fewer than
rcu_task_collapse_lim callbacks. It sees at least one
callback queued on some other CPU, thus setting ncbsnz
to a non-zero value.
o CPU 1 invokes call_rcu_tasks_generic() and loads 42 from
->percpu_enqueue_lim. It therefore decides to enqueue its
callback onto CPU 1's callback list, but is delayed.
o CPU 0 sees the rcu_task_cb_adjust is non-zero and that the number
of callbacks does not exceed rcu_task_collapse_lim. It therefore
checks percpu_enqueue_lim, and sees that its value is greater
than the value one. CPU 0 therefore starts the shift back
to a single callback list. It sets ->percpu_enqueue_lim to 1,
but CPU 1 has already read the old value of 42. It also gets
a grace-period state value from get_state_synchronize_rcu().
o CPU 0 sees that ncbsnz is non-zero in its second "if" statement,
so it declines to finalize the shrink operation.
o CPU 0 again invokes rcu_tasks_one_gp(), and counts fewer than
rcu_task_collapse_lim callbacks. It also sees that there are
no callback queued on any other CPU, and thus sets ncbsnz to zero.
o CPU 1 resumes execution and enqueues its callback onto its own
list. This invalidates the value of ncbsnz.
o CPU 0 sees the rcu_task_cb_adjust is non-zero and that the number
of callbacks does not exceed rcu_task_collapse_lim. It therefore
checks percpu_enqueue_lim, but sees that its value is already
unity. It therefore does not get a new grace-period state value.
o CPU 0 sees that rcu_task_cb_adjust is non-zero, ncbsnz is zero,
and that poll_state_synchronize_rcu() says that the grace period
has completed. it therefore finalizes the shrink operation,
setting ->percpu_dequeue_lim to the value one.
o CPU 0 does a debug check, scanning the other CPUs' callback lists.
It sees that CPU 1's list has a callback, so it (rightly)
triggers the WARN_ON_ONCE(). After all, the new value of
->percpu_dequeue_lim says to not bother looking at CPU 1's
callback list, which means that this callback will never be
invoked. This can result in hangs and maybe even OOMs.
Based on long experience with rcutorture, this is an extremely
low-probability race condition, but it really can happen, especially in
preemptible kernels or within guest OSes.
This commit therefore checks for completion of the grace period
before counting callbacks. With this change, in the above failure
scenario CPU 0 would know not to prematurely end the shrink operation
because the grace period would not have completed before the count
operation started.
[ paulmck: Adjust grace-period end rather than adding RCU reader. ]
[ paulmck: Avoid spurious WARN_ON_ONCE() with ->percpu_dequeue_lim check. ]
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
The synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude() function invokes rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp()
to wait one rude RCU-tasks grace period. The rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp()
function in turn checks if there is only a single online CPU. If so, it
will immediately return, because a call to synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude()
is by definition a grace period on a single-CPU system. (We could
have blocked!)
Unfortunately, this check uses num_online_cpus() without synchronization,
which can result in too-short grace periods. To see this, consider the
following scenario:
CPU0 CPU1 (going offline)
migration/1 task:
cpu_stopper_thread
-> take_cpu_down
-> _cpu_disable
(dec __num_online_cpus)
->cpuhp_invoke_callback
preempt_disable
access old_data0
task1
del old_data0 .....
synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude()
task1 schedule out
....
task2 schedule in
rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp()
->__num_online_cpus == 1
->return
....
task1 schedule in
->free old_data0
preempt_enable
When CPU1 decrements __num_online_cpus, its value becomes 1. However,
CPU1 has not finished going offline, and will take one last trip through
the scheduler and the idle loop before it actually stops executing
instructions. Because synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude() is mostly used for
tracing, and because both the scheduler and the idle loop can be traced,
this means that CPU0's prematurely ended grace period might disrupt the
tracing on CPU1. Given that this disruption might include CPU1 executing
instructions in memory that was just now freed (and maybe reallocated),
this is a matter of some concern.
This commit therefore removes that problematic single-CPU check from the
rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp() function. This dispenses with the single-CPU
optimization, but there is no evidence indicating that this optimization
is important. In addition, synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic() contains a
similar optimization (albeit only for early boot), which also splats.
(As in exactly why are you invoking synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude() so
early in boot, anyway???)
It is OK for the synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude() function's check to be
unsynchronized because the only times that this check can evaluate to
true is when there is only a single CPU running with preemption
disabled.
While in the area, this commit also fixes a minor bug in which a
call to synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude() would instead be attributed to
synchronize_rcu_tasks().
[ paulmck: Add "synchronize_" prefix and "()" suffix. ]
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
RCU Tasks and PID-namespace unshare can interact in do_exit() in a
complicated circular dependency:
1) TASK A calls unshare(CLONE_NEWPID), this creates a new PID namespace
that every subsequent child of TASK A will belong to. But TASK A
doesn't itself belong to that new PID namespace.
2) TASK A forks() and creates TASK B. TASK A stays attached to its PID
namespace (let's say PID_NS1) and TASK B is the first task belonging
to the new PID namespace created by unshare() (let's call it PID_NS2).
3) Since TASK B is the first task attached to PID_NS2, it becomes the
PID_NS2 child reaper.
4) TASK A forks() again and creates TASK C which get attached to PID_NS2.
Note how TASK C has TASK A as a parent (belonging to PID_NS1) but has
TASK B (belonging to PID_NS2) as a pid_namespace child_reaper.
5) TASK B exits and since it is the child reaper for PID_NS2, it has to
kill all other tasks attached to PID_NS2, and wait for all of them to
die before getting reaped itself (zap_pid_ns_process()).
6) TASK A calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() which leads to
synchronize_srcu(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu).
7) TASK B is waiting for TASK C to get reaped. But TASK B is under a
tasks_rcu_exit_srcu SRCU critical section (exit_notify() is between
exit_tasks_rcu_start() and exit_tasks_rcu_finish()), blocking TASK A.
8) TASK C exits and since TASK A is its parent, it waits for it to reap
TASK C, but it can't because TASK A waits for TASK B that waits for
TASK C.
Pid_namespace semantics can hardly be changed at this point. But the
coverage of tasks_rcu_exit_srcu can be reduced instead.
The current task is assumed not to be concurrently reapable at this
stage of exit_notify() and therefore tasks_rcu_exit_srcu can be
temporarily relaxed without breaking its constraints, providing a way
out of the deadlock scenario.
[ paulmck: Fix build failure by adding additional declaration. ]
Fixes: 3f95aa81d265 ("rcu: Make TASKS_RCU handle tasks that are almost done exiting")
Reported-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric W . Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Ever since the following commit:
5a41344a3d83 ("srcu: Simplify __srcu_read_unlock() via this_cpu_dec()")
SRCU doesn't rely anymore on preemption to be disabled in order to
modify the per-CPU counter. And even then it used to be done from the API
itself.
Therefore and after checking further, it appears to be safe to remove
the preemption disablement around __srcu_read_[un]lock() in
exit_tasks_rcu_start() and exit_tasks_rcu_finish()
Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Make sure we don't need to look again into the depths of git blame in
order not to miss a subtle part about how rcu-tasks is dealing with
exiting tasks.
Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently, test_rcu_tasks_callback() reads from the jiffies counter only
once when this function is invoked. This introduces inaccuracies because
of the latencies induced by the synchronize_rcu_tasks*() invocations.
This commit therefore re-reads the jiffies counter at the beginning
of each test, thus avoiding penalizing later tests for the latencies
induced by earlier tests.
Therefore, this commit at the start of each RCU Tasks test, re-fetch the
jiffies time as the runstart time.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Because there is not guaranteed to be a full memory barrier between
the ->srcu_unlock_count increment of an srcu_read_unlock() and the
->srcu_lock_count increment of the next srcu_read_lock(), this next
srcu_read_lock() is not guaranteed to see the effect of the index flip
just prior to this comment. However, this next srcu_read_lock() will
execute a full memory barrier, so the srcu_read_lock() after that is
guaranteed to see that index flip.
This guarantee is illustrated by the following diagram of events and
the litmus test following that.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
READER UPDATER
------------- ----------
// idx is initially 0.
srcu_flip() {
smp_mb();
// RSCS
srcu_read_unlock() {
smp_mb();
idx++; // P
smp_mb(); // QQ
}
srcu_readers_unlock_idx(0) {
,--counted------------ count all unlock[0]; // Q
|
unlock[0]++; // X
}
smp_mb();
srcu_read_lock() {
READ(idx) = 0; ,---- count all lock[0]; // contributes imbalance of 1.
lock[0]++; ----counted |
smp_mb(); // PP } |
} |
|
// RSCS not going to effect above scan
|
srcu_read_unlock() { |
smp_mb(); |
unlock[0]++; |
} |
/
/
srcu_read_lock() { |
READ(idx); // Y -----cannot be counted because of P (has to sample idx as 1)
lock[1]++;
...
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This makes it similar to the store buffer pattern. Using X, Y, P and Q
annotated above, we get:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
READER UPDATER
X (write) P (write)
smp_mb(); //PP smp_mb(); //QQ
Y (read) Q (read)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCII art courtesy of Joel Fernandes.
Reported-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
The comment in srcu_readers_active_idx_check() following the smp_mb()
is out of date, hailing from a simpler time when preemption was disabled
across the bulk of __srcu_read_lock(). The fact that preemption was
disabled meant that the number of tasks that had fetched the old index
but not yet incremented counters was limited by the number of CPUs.
In our more complex modern times, the number of CPUs is no longer a limit.
This commit therefore updates this comment, additionally giving more
memory-ordering detail.
[ paulmck: Apply Nt->Nc feedback from Joel Fernandes. ]
Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reported-by: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
The srcu_gp_start_if_needed() function now read-holds the srcu_struct
whose grace period is being started, which means that the corresponding
SRCU grace period cannot end. This in turn means that the SRCU
grace-period sequence number returned by rcu_seq_snap() cannot expire
during this time. And that means that the calls to rcu_seq_done() in
srcu_funnel_exp_start() and srcu_funnel_gp_start() can never return true.
This commit therefore removes these rcu_seq_done() checks, but adds checks
in kernels built with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y that splats if rcu_seq_done()
does somehow return true.
[ paulmck: Rearrange checks to handle kernels built with lockdep. ]
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
This commit adds trivial test code for srcu_down_read() and
srcu_up_read().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
A grace-period sequence number contains two fields: counter and
state. SRCU_SNP_INIT_SEQ provides a guaranteed invalid value for
grace-period sequence numbers in newly allocated srcu_node structures'
->srcu_have_cbs[] and ->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp fields. The point of the
comparison in srcu_invl_snp_seq() is not to detect invalid grace-period
sequence numbers in general, but rather to detect a newly allocated
srcu_node structure whose ->srcu_have_cbs[] and ->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp
fields need to be brought into line with the srcu_struct structure's
->srcu_gp_seq field.
This commit therefore causes srcu_invl_snp_seq() to compare both fields
of the specified grace-period sequence number.
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Commit 994f706872e6 ("srcu: Make Tree SRCU able to operate without
snp_node array") assumes that cpu 0 is always online. However, there
really are situations when some other CPU is the boot CPU, for example,
when booting a kdump kernel with the maxcpus=1 boot parameter.
On PowerPC, the kdump kernel can hang as follows:
...
[ 1.740036] systemd[1]: Hostname set to <xyz.com>
[ 243.686240] INFO: task systemd:1 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
[ 243.686264] Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1 #1
[ 243.686272] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 243.686281] task:systemd state:D stack:0 pid:1 ppid:0 flags:0x00042000
[ 243.686296] Call Trace:
[ 243.686301] [c000000016657640] [c000000016657670] 0xc000000016657670 (unreliable)
[ 243.686317] [c000000016657830] [c00000001001dec0] __switch_to+0x130/0x220
[ 243.686333] [c000000016657890] [c000000010f607b8] __schedule+0x1f8/0x580
[ 243.686347] [c000000016657940] [c000000010f60bb4] schedule+0x74/0x140
[ 243.686361] [c0000000166579b0] [c000000010f699b8] schedule_timeout+0x168/0x1c0
[ 243.686374] [c000000016657a80] [c000000010f61de8] __wait_for_common+0x148/0x360
[ 243.686387] [c000000016657b20] [c000000010176bb0] __flush_work.isra.0+0x1c0/0x3d0
[ 243.686401] [c000000016657bb0] [c0000000105f2768] fsnotify_wait_marks_destroyed+0x28/0x40
[ 243.686415] [c000000016657bd0] [c0000000105f21b8] fsnotify_destroy_group+0x68/0x160
[ 243.686428] [c000000016657c40] [c0000000105f6500] inotify_release+0x30/0xa0
[ 243.686440] [c000000016657cb0] [c0000000105751a8] __fput+0xc8/0x350
[ 243.686452] [c000000016657d00] [c00000001017d524] task_work_run+0xe4/0x170
[ 243.686464] [c000000016657d50] [c000000010020e94] do_notify_resume+0x134/0x140
[ 243.686478] [c000000016657d80] [c00000001002eb18] interrupt_exit_user_prepare_main+0x198/0x270
[ 243.686493] [c000000016657de0] [c00000001002ec60] syscall_exit_prepare+0x70/0x180
[ 243.686505] [c000000016657e10] [c00000001000bf7c] system_call_vectored_common+0xfc/0x280
[ 243.686520] --- interrupt: 3000 at 0x7fffa47d5ba4
[ 243.686528] NIP: 00007fffa47d5ba4 LR: 0000000000000000 CTR: 0000000000000000
[ 243.686538] REGS: c000000016657e80 TRAP: 3000 Not tainted (6.1.0-rc1)
[ 243.686548] MSR: 800000000000d033 <SF,EE,PR,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 42044440 XER: 00000000
[ 243.686572] IRQMASK: 0
[ 243.686572] GPR00: 0000000000000006 00007ffffa606710 00007fffa48e7200 0000000000000000
[ 243.686572] GPR04: 0000000000000002 000000000000000a 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
[ 243.686572] GPR08: 000001000c172dd0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[ 243.686572] GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007fffa4ff4bc0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[ 243.686572] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[ 243.686572] GPR20: 0000000132dfdc50 000000000000000e 0000000000189375 0000000000000000
[ 243.686572] GPR24: 00007ffffa606ae0 0000000000000005 000001000c185490 000001000c172570
[ 243.686572] GPR28: 000001000c172990 000001000c184850 000001000c172e00 00007fffa4fedd98
[ 243.686683] NIP [00007fffa47d5ba4] 0x7fffa47d5ba4
[ 243.686691] LR [0000000000000000] 0x0
[ 243.686698] --- interrupt: 3000
[ 243.686708] INFO: task kworker/u16:1:24 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
[ 243.686717] Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1 #1
[ 243.686724] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 243.686733] task:kworker/u16:1 state:D stack:0 pid:24 ppid:2 flags:0x00000800
[ 243.686747] Workqueue: events_unbound fsnotify_mark_destroy_workfn
[ 243.686758] Call Trace:
[ 243.686762] [c0000000166736e0] [c00000004fd91000] 0xc00000004fd91000 (unreliable)
[ 243.686775] [c0000000166738d0] [c00000001001dec0] __switch_to+0x130/0x220
[ 243.686788] [c000000016673930] [c000000010f607b8] __schedule+0x1f8/0x580
[ 243.686801] [c0000000166739e0] [c000000010f60bb4] schedule+0x74/0x140
[ 243.686814] [c000000016673a50] [c000000010f699b8] schedule_timeout+0x168/0x1c0
[ 243.686827] [c000000016673b20] [c000000010f61de8] __wait_for_common+0x148/0x360
[ 243.686840] [c000000016673bc0] [c000000010210840] __synchronize_srcu.part.0+0xa0/0xe0
[ 243.686855] [c000000016673c30] [c0000000105f2c64] fsnotify_mark_destroy_workfn+0xc4/0x1a0
[ 243.686868] [c000000016673ca0] [c000000010174ea8] process_one_work+0x2a8/0x570
[ 243.686882] [c000000016673d40] [c000000010175208] worker_thread+0x98/0x5e0
[ 243.686895] [c000000016673dc0] [c0000000101828d4] kthread+0x124/0x130
[ 243.686908] [c000000016673e10] [c00000001000cd40] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x64
[ 366.566274] INFO: task systemd:1 blocked for more than 245 seconds.
[ 366.566298] Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1 #1
[ 366.566305] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 366.566314] task:systemd state:D stack:0 pid:1 ppid:0 flags:0x00042000
[ 366.566329] Call Trace:
...
The above splat occurs because PowerPC really does use maxcpus=1
instead of nr_cpus=1 in the kernel command line. Consequently, the
(quite possibly non-zero) kdump CPU is the only online CPU in the kdump
kernel. SRCU unconditionally queues a sdp->work on cpu 0, for which no
worker thread has been created, so sdp->work will be never executed and
__synchronize_srcu() will never be completed.
This commit therefore replaces CPU ID 0 with get_boot_cpu_id() in key
places in Tree SRCU. Since the CPU indicated by get_boot_cpu_id()
is guaranteed to be online, this avoids the above splat.
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
|
|
Kernels built with the CONFIG_TREE_SRCU Kconfig option set and then
booted with rcupdate.rcu_self_test=1 and srcutree.convert_to_big=1 will
test Tree SRCU during early boot. The early_srcu structure's srcu_node
array will be allocated when init_srcu_struct_fields() is invoked,
but after the test |
