| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
It's uncertain whether idle cores exist or not if shared sched-
domains are not ready, so returning "no idle cores" usually
makes sense.
While __update_idle_core() is an exception, it checks status
of this core and set hint to shared sched-domain if necessary.
So the whole logic of this function depends on the existence
of shared sched-domain, and can certainly bail out early if
it is not available.
It's somehow a little tricky, and as Josh suggested that it
should be transient while the domain isn't ready. So remove
the self-defined default value to make things more clearer.
Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907112000.1854-5-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
|
|
The function select_idle_core() only gets called when has_idle_cores
is true which can be possible only when sched_smt_present is enabled.
This change also aligns select_idle_core() with select_idle_smt() in
the way that the caller do the check if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907112000.1854-4-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
|
|
The prev cpu is checked at the beginning of SIS, and it's unlikely
to be idle before the second check in select_idle_smt(). So we'd
better focus on its SMT siblings.
Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907112000.1854-3-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
|
|
If two cpus share LLC cache, then the two cores they belong to
are also in the same LLC domain.
Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907112000.1854-2-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
|
|
conversion commit
Merge in the BUG_ON() => WARN_ON_ONCE() conversion commit.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
post_init_entity_util_avg() init task util_avg according to the cpu util_avg
at the time of fork, which will decay when switched_to_fair() some time later,
we'd better to not set them at all in the case of !fair task.
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124805.601-10-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
|
|
When wake_up_new_task(), we use post_init_entity_util_avg() to init
util_avg/runnable_avg based on cpu's util_avg at that time, and
attach task sched_avg to cfs_rq.
Since enqueue_task_fair() -> enqueue_entity() -> update_load_avg()
loop will do attach, we can move this work to update_load_avg().
wake_up_new_task(p)
post_init_entity_util_avg(p)
attach_entity_cfs_rq() --> (1)
activate_task(rq, p)
enqueue_task() := enqueue_task_fair()
enqueue_entity() loop
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG | DO_ATTACH)
if (!se->avg.last_update_time && (flags & DO_ATTACH))
attach_entity_load_avg() --> (2)
This patch move attach from (1) to (2), update related comments too.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124805.601-9-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
|
|
commit 7dc603c9028e ("sched/fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks")
introduce a TASK_NEW state and an unnessary limitation that would fail
when changing cgroup of new forked task.
Because at that time, we can't handle task_change_group_fair() for new
forked fair task which hasn't been woken up by wake_up_new_task(),
which will cause detach on an unattached task sched_avg problem.
This patch delete this unnessary limitation by adding check before do
detach or attach in task_change_group_fair().
So cpu_cgrp_subsys.can_attach() has nothing to do for fair tasks,
only define it in #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124805.601-8-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
|
|
commit 7dc603c9028e ("sched/fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks")
fixed two load tracking problems for new task, including detach on
unattached new task problem.
There still left another detach on unattached task problem for the task
which has been woken up by try_to_wake_up() and waiting for actually
being woken up by sched_ttwu_pending().
try_to_wake_up(p)
cpu = select_task_rq(p)
if (task_cpu(p) != cpu)
set_task_cpu(p, cpu)
migrate_task_rq_fair()
remove_entity_load_avg() --> unattached
se->avg.last_update_time = 0;
__set_task_cpu()
ttwu_queue(p, cpu)
ttwu_queue_wakelist()
__ttwu_queue_wakelist()
task_change_group_fair()
detach_task_cfs_rq()
detach_entity_cfs_rq()
detach_entity_load_avg() --> detach on unattached task
set_task_rq()
attach_task_cfs_rq()
attach_entity_cfs_rq()
attach_entity_load_avg()
The reason of this problem is similar, we should check in detach_entity_cfs_rq()
that se->avg.last_update_time != 0, before do detach_entity_load_avg().
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124805.601-7-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
|
|
When we are migrating task out of the CPU, we can combine detach and
propagation into dequeue_entity() to save the detach_entity_cfs_rq()
in migrate_task_rq_fair().
This optimization is like combining DO_ATTACH in the enqueue_entity()
when migrating task to the CPU. So we don't have to traverse the CFS tree
extra time to do the detach_entity_cfs_rq() -> propagate_entity_cfs_rq(),
which wouldn't be called anymore with this patch's change.
detach_task()
deactivate_task()
dequeue_task_fair()
for_each_sched_entity(se)
dequeue_entity()
update_load_avg() /* (1) */
detach_entity_load_avg()
set_task_cpu()
migrate_task_rq_fair()
detach_entity_cfs_rq() /* (2) */
update_load_avg();
detach_entity_load_avg();
propagate_entity_cfs_rq();
for_each_sched_entity()
update_load_avg()
This patch save the detach_entity_cfs_rq() called in (2) by doing
the detach_entity_load_avg() for a CPU migrating task inside (1)
(the task being the first se in the loop)
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124805.601-6-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
|
|
When reading the sched_avg related code, I found the comments in
enqueue/dequeue_entity() are not updated with the current code.
We don't add/subtract entity's runnable_avg from cfs_rq->runnable_avg
during enqueue/dequeue_entity(), those are done only for attach/detach.
This patch updates the comments to reflect the current code working.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124805.601-5-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
|
|
set_task_rq() -> set_task_rq_fair() will try to synchronize the blocked
task's sched_avg when migrate, which is not needed for already detached
task.
task_change_group_fair() will detached the task sched_avg from prev cfs_rq
first, so reset sched_avg last_update_time before set_task_rq() to avoid that.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124805.601-4-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
|
|
We use cpu_cgrp_subsys->fork() to set task group for the new fair task
in cgroup_post_fork().
Since commit b1e8206582f9 ("sched: Fix yet more sched_fork() races")
has already set_task_rq() for the new fair task in sched_cgroup_fork(),
so cpu_cgrp_subsys->fork() can be removed.
cgroup_can_fork() --> pin parent's sched_task_group
sched_cgroup_fork()
__set_task_cpu()
set_task_rq()
cgroup_post_fork()
ss->fork() := cpu_cgroup_fork()
sched_change_group(..., TASK_SET_GROUP)
task_set_group_fair()
set_task_rq() --> can be removed
After this patch's change, task_change_group_fair() only need to
care about task cgroup migration, make the code much simplier.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124805.601-3-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
|
|
Previously we only maintain task se depth in task_move_group_fair(),
if a !fair task change task group, its se depth will not be updated,
so commit eb7a59b2c888 ("sched/fair: Reset se-depth when task switched to FAIR")
fix the problem by updating se depth in switched_to_fair() too.
Then commit daa59407b558 ("sched/fair: Unify switched_{from,to}_fair()
and task_move_group_fair()") unified these two functions, moved se.depth
setting to attach_task_cfs_rq(), which further into attach_entity_cfs_rq()
with commit df217913e72e ("sched/fair: Factorize attach/detach entity").
This patch move task se depth maintenance from attach_entity_cfs_rq()
to set_task_rq(), which will be called when CPU/cgroup change, so its
depth will always be correct.
This patch is preparation for the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124805.601-2-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
|
|
There's no good reason to crash a user's system with a BUG_ON(),
chances are high that they'll never even see the crash message on
Xorg, and it won't make it into the syslog either.
By using a WARN_ON_ONCE() we at least give the user a chance to report
any bugs triggered here - instead of getting silent hangs.
None of these WARN_ON_ONCE()s are supposed to trigger, ever - so we ignore
cases where a NULL check is done via a BUG_ON() and we let a NULL
pointer through after a WARN_ON_ONCE().
There's one exception: WARN_ON_ONCE() arguments with side-effects,
such as locking - in this case we use the return value of the
WARN_ON_ONCE(), such as in:
- BUG_ON(!lock_task_sighand(p, &flags));
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!lock_task_sighand(p, &flags)))
+ return;
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YvSsKcAXISmshtHo@gmail.com
|
|
The load_balance_mask and select_rq_mask percpu variables are only used in
kernel/sched/fair.c.
Make them static and move their allocation into init_sched_fair_class().
Replace kzalloc_node() with zalloc_cpumask_var_node() to get rid of the
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK #ifdef and to align with per-cpu cpumask
allocation for RT (local_cpu_mask in init_sched_rt_class()) and DL
class (local_cpu_mask_dl in init_sched_dl_class()).
[ mingo: Tidied up changelog & touched up the code. ]
Signed-off-by: Bing Huang <huangbing@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220722213609.3901-1-huangbing775@126.com
|
|
After commit 7a82e5f52a35 ("sched/fair: Merge for each idle cpu loop of ILB"),
_nohz_idle_balance()'s 'idle' parameter is not used anymore, so we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220803130223.70419-1-jiahao.os@bytedance.com
|
|
Create an inline helper for conditional code to be only executed on
asymmetric CPU capacity systems. This makes these (currently ~10 and
future) conditions a lot more readable.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220729111305.1275158-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
|
|
The capacity of the CPU available for CFS tasks can be reduced because of
other activities running on the latter. In such case, it's worth trying to
move CFS tasks on a CPU with more available capacity.
The rework of the load balance has filtered the case when the CPU is
classified to be fully busy but its capacity is reduced.
Check if CPU's capacity is reduced while gathering load balance statistic
and classify it group_misfit_task instead of group_fully_busy so we can
try to move the load on another CPU.
Reported-by: David Chen <david.chen@nutanix.com>
Reported-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: David Chen <david.chen@nutanix.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220708154401.21411-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
find_energy_efficient_cpu() integrates a margin to protect tasks from
bouncing back and forth from a CPU to another. This margin is set as being
6% of the total current energy estimated on the system. This however does
not work for two reasons:
1. The energy estimation is not a good absolute value:
compute_energy() used in feec() is a good estimation for task placement as
it allows to compare the energy with and without a task. The computed
delta will give a good overview of the cost for a certain task placement.
It, however, doesn't work as an absolute estimation for the total energy
of the system. First it adds the contribution to idle CPUs into the
energy, second it mixes util_avg with util_est values. util_avg contains
the near history for a CPU usage, it doesn't tell at all what the current
utilization is. A system that has been quite busy in the near past will
hold a very high energy and then a high margin preventing any task
migration to a lower capacity CPU, wasting energy. It even creates a
negative feedback loop: by holding the tasks on a less efficient CPU, the
margin contributes in keeping the energy high.
2. The margin handicaps small tasks:
On a system where the workload is composed mostly of small tasks (which is
often the case on Android), the overall energy will be high enough to
create a margin none of those tasks can cross. On a Pixel4, a small
utilization of 5% on all the CPUs creates a global estimated energy of 140
joules, as per the Energy Model declaration of that same device. This
means, after applying the 6% margin that any migration must save more than
8 joules to happen. No task with a utilization lower than 40 would then be
able to migrate away from the biggest CPU of the system.
The 6% of the overall system energy was brought by the following patch:
(eb92692b2544 sched/fair: Speed-up energy-aware wake-ups)
It was previously 6% of the prev_cpu energy. Also, the following one
made this margin value conditional on the clusters where the task fits:
(8d4c97c105ca sched/fair: Only compute base_energy_pd if necessary)
We could simply revert that margin change to what it was, but the original
version didn't have strong grounds neither and as demonstrated in (1.) the
estimated energy isn't a good absolute value. Instead, removing it
completely. It is indeed, made possible by recent changes that improved
energy estimation comparison fairness (sched/fair: Remove task_util from
effective utilization in feec()) (PM: EM: Increase energy calculation
precision) and task utilization stabilization (sched/fair: Decay task
util_avg during migration)
Without a margin, we could have feared bouncing between CPUs. But running
LISA's eas_behaviour test coverage on three different platforms (Hikey960,
RB-5 and DB-845) showed no issue.
Removing the energy margin enables more energy-optimized placements for a
more energy efficient system.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-8-vdonnefort@google.com
|
|
The energy estimation in find_energy_efficient_cpu() (feec()) relies on
the computation of the effective utilization for each CPU of a perf domain
(PD). This effective utilization is then used as an estimation of the busy
time for this pd. The function effective_cpu_util() which gives this value,
scales the utilization relative to IRQ pressure on the CPU to take into
account that the IRQ time is hidden from the task clock. The IRQ scaling is
as follow:
effective_cpu_util = irq + (cpu_cap - irq)/cpu_cap * util
Where util is the sum of CFS/RT/DL utilization, cpu_cap the capacity of
the CPU and irq the IRQ avg time.
If now we take as an example a task placement which doesn't raise the OPP
on the candidate CPU, we can write the energy delta as:
delta = OPPcost/cpu_cap * (effective_cpu_util(cpu_util + task_util) -
effective_cpu_util(cpu_util))
= OPPcost/cpu_cap * (cpu_cap - irq)/cpu_cap * task_util
We end-up with an energy delta depending on the IRQ avg time, which is a
problem: first the time spent on IRQs by a CPU has no effect on the
additional energy that would be consumed by a task. Second, we don't want
to favour a CPU with a higher IRQ avg time value.
Nonetheless, we need to take the IRQ avg time into account. If a task
placement raises the PD's frequency, it will increase the energy cost for
the entire time where the CPU is busy. A solution is to only use
effective_cpu_util() with the CPU contribution part. The task contribution
is added separately and scaled according to prev_cpu's IRQ time.
No change for the FREQUENCY_UTIL component of the energy estimation. We
still want to get the actual frequency that would be selected after the
task placement.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-7-vdonnefort@google.com
|
|
The Perf Domain (PD) cpumask (struct em_perf_domain.cpus) stays
invariant after Energy Model creation, i.e. it is not updated after
CPU hotplug operations.
That's why the PD mask is used in conjunction with the cpu_online_mask
(or Sched Domain cpumask). Thereby the cpu_online_mask is fetched
multiple times (in compute_energy()) during a run-queue selection
for a task.
cpu_online_mask may change during this time which can lead to wrong
energy calculations.
To be able to avoid this, use the select_rq_mask per-cpu cpumask to
create a cpumask out of PD cpumask and cpu_online_mask and pass it
through the function calls of the EAS run-queue selection path.
The PD cpumask for max_spare_cap_cpu/compute_prev_delta selection
(find_energy_efficient_cpu()) is now ANDed not only with the SD mask
but also with the cpu_online_mask. This is fine since this cpumask
has to be in syc with the one used for energy computation
(compute_energy()).
An exclusive cpuset setup with at least one asymmetric CPU capacity
island (hence the additional AND with the SD cpumask) is the obvious
exception here.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-6-vdonnefort@google.com
|
|
On 21/06/2022 11:04, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202206221253.ZVyGQvPX-lkp@intel.com discovered
that this patch doesn't build anymore (on tip sched/core or linux-next)
because of commit f5b2eeb499910 ("sched/fair: Consider CPU affinity when
allowing NUMA imbalance in find_idlest_group()").
New version of [PATCH v11 4/7] sched/fair: Rename select_idle_mask to
select_rq_mask below.
-- >8 --
Decouple the name of the per-cpu cpumask select_idle_mask from its usage
in select_idle_[cpu/capacity]() of the CFS run-queue selection
(select_task_rq_fair()).
This is to support the reuse of this cpumask in the Energy Aware
Scheduling (EAS) path (find_energy_efficient_cpu()) of the CFS run-queue
selection.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/250691c7-0e2b-05ab-bedf-b245c11d9400@arm.com
|
|
effective_cpu_util() already has a `int cpu' parameter which allows to
retrieve the CPU capacity scale factor (or maximum CPU capacity) inside
this function via an arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu).
A lot of code calling effective_cpu_util() (or the shim
sched_cpu_util()) needs the maximum CPU capacity, i.e. it will call
arch_scale_cpu_capacity() already.
But not having to pass it into effective_cpu_util() will make the EAS
wake-up code easier, especially when the maximum CPU capacity reduced
by the thermal pressure is passed through the EAS wake-up functions.
Due to the asymmetric CPU capacity support of arm/arm64 architectures,
arch_scale_cpu_capacity(int cpu) is a per-CPU variable read access via
per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu) on such a system.
On all other architectures it is a a compile-time constant
(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE).
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-4-vdonnefort@google.com
|
|
Before being migrated to a new CPU, a task sees its PELT values
synchronized with rq last_update_time. Once done, that same task will also
have its sched_avg last_update_time reset. This means the time between
the migration and the last clock update will not be accounted for in
util_avg and a discontinuity will appear. This issue is amplified by the
PELT clock scaling. It takes currently one tick after the CPU being idle
to let clock_pelt catching up clock_task.
This is especially problematic for asymmetric CPU capacity systems which
need stable util_avg signals for task placement and energy estimation.
Ideally, this problem would be solved by updating the runqueue clocks
before the migration. But that would require taking the runqueue lock
which is quite expensive [1]. Instead estimate the missing time and update
the task util_avg with that value.
To that end, we need sched_clock_cpu() but it is a costly function. Limit
the usage to the case where the source CPU is idle as we know this is when
the clock is having the biggest risk of being outdated.
See comment in migrate_se_pelt_lag() for more details about how the PELT
value is estimated. Notice though this estimation doesn't take into account
IRQ and Paravirt time.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709115759.10451-1-chris.redpath@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-3-vdonnefort@google.com
|
|
Introducing macro helpers u64_u32_{store,load}() to factorize lockless
accesses to u64 variables for 32-bits architectures.
Users are for now cfs_rq.min_vruntime and sched_avg.last_update_time. To
accommodate the later where the copy lies outside of the structure
(cfs_rq.last_udpate_time_copy instead of sched_avg.last_update_time_copy),
use the _copy() version of those helpers.
Those new helpers encapsulate smp_rmb() and smp_wmb() synchronization and
therefore, have a small penalty for 32-bits machines in set_task_rq_fair()
and init_cfs_rq().
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-2-vdonnefort@google.com
|
|
[Problem Statement]
select_idle_cpu() might spend too much time searching for an idle CPU,
when the system is overloaded.
The following histogram is the time spent in select_idle_cpu(),
when running 224 instances of netperf on a system with 112 CPUs
per LLC domain:
@usecs:
[0] 533 | |
[1] 5495 | |
[2, 4) 12008 | |
[4, 8) 239252 | |
[8, 16) 4041924 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[16, 32) 12357398 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[32, 64) 14820255 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@|
[64, 128) 13047682 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[128, 256) 8235013 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[256, 512) 4507667 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[512, 1K) 2600472 |@@@@@@@@@ |
[1K, 2K) 927912 |@@@ |
[2K, 4K) 218720 | |
[4K, 8K) 98161 | |
[8K, 16K) 37722 | |
[16K, 32K) 6715 | |
[32K, 64K) 477 | |
[64K, 128K) 7 | |
netperf latency usecs:
=======
case load Lat_99th std%
TCP_RR thread-224 257.39 ( 0.21)
The time spent in select_idle_cpu() is visible to netperf and might have a negative
impact.
[Symptom analysis]
The patch [1] from Mel Gorman has been applied to track the efficiency
of select_idle_sibling. Copy the indicators here:
SIS Search Efficiency(se_eff%):
A ratio expressed as a percentage of runqueues scanned versus
idle CPUs found. A 100% efficiency indicates that the target,
prev or recent CPU of a task was idle at wakeup. The lower the
efficiency, the more runqueues were scanned before an idle CPU
was found.
SIS Domain Search Efficiency(dom_eff%):
Similar, except only for the slower SIS
patch.
SIS Fast Success Rate(fast_rate%):
Percentage of SIS that used target, prev or
recent CPUs.
SIS Success rate(success_rate%):
Percentage of scans that found an idle CPU.
The test is based on Aubrey's schedtests tool, including netperf, hackbench,
schbench and tbench.
Test on vanilla kernel:
schedstat_parse.py -f netperf_vanilla.log
case load se_eff% dom_eff% fast_rate% success_rate%
TCP_RR 28 threads 99.978 18.535 99.995 100.000
TCP_RR 56 threads 99.397 5.671 99.964 100.000
TCP_RR 84 threads 21.721 6.818 73.632 100.000
TCP_RR 112 threads 12.500 5.533 59.000 100.000
TCP_RR 140 threads 8.524 4.535 49.020 100.000
TCP_RR 168 threads 6.438 3.945 40.309 99.999
TCP_RR 196 threads 5.397 3.718 32.320 99.982
TCP_RR 224 threads 4.874 3.661 25.775 99.767
UDP_RR 28 threads 99.988 17.704 99.997 100.000
UDP_RR 56 threads 99.528 5.977 99.970 100.000
UDP_RR 84 threads 24.219 6.992 76.479 100.000
UDP_RR 112 threads 13.907 5.706 62.538 100.000
UDP_RR 140 threads 9.408 4.699 52.519 100.000
UDP_RR 168 threads 7.095 4.077 44.352 100.000
UDP_RR 196 threads 5.757 3.775 35.764 99.991
UDP_RR 224 threads 5.124 3.704 28.748 99.860
schedstat_parse.py -f schbench_vanilla.log
(each group has 28 tasks)
case load se_eff% dom_eff% fast_rate% success_rate%
normal 1 mthread 99.152 6.400 99.941 100.000
normal 2 mthreads 97.844 4.003 99.908 100.000
normal 3 mthreads 96.395 2.118 99.917 99.998
normal 4 mthreads 55.288 1.451 98.615 99.804
normal 5 mthreads 7.004 1.870 45.597 61.036
normal 6 mthreads 3.354 1.346 20.777 34.230
normal 7 mthreads 2.183 1.028 11.257 21.055
normal 8 mthreads 1.653 0.825 7.849 15.549
schedstat_parse.py -f hackbench_vanilla.log
(each group has 28 tasks)
case load se_eff% dom_eff% fast_rate% success_rate%
process-pipe 1 group 99.991 7.692 99.999 100.000
process-pipe 2 groups 99.934 4.615 99.997 100.000
process-pipe 3 groups 99.597 3.198 99.987 100.000
process-pipe 4 groups 98.378 2.464 99.958 100.000
process-pipe 5 groups 27.474 3.653 89.811 99.800
process-pipe 6 groups 20.201 4.098 82.763 99.570
process-pipe 7 groups 16.423 4.156 77.398 99.316
process-pipe 8 groups 13.165 3.920 72.232 98.828
process-sockets 1 group 99.977 5.882 99.999 100.000
process-sockets 2 groups 99.927 5.505 99.996 100.000
process-sockets 3 groups 99.397 3.250 99.980 100.000
process-sockets 4 groups 79.680 4.258 98.864 99.998
process-sockets 5 groups 7.673 2.503 63.659 92.115
process-sockets 6 groups 4.642 1.584 58.946 88.048
process-sockets 7 groups 3.493 1.379 49.816 81.164
process-sockets 8 groups 3.015 1.407 40.845 75.500
threads-pipe 1 group 99.997 0.000 100.000 100.000
threads-pipe 2 groups 99.894 2.932 99.997 100.000
threads-pipe 3 groups 99.611 4.117 99.983 100.000
threads-pipe 4 groups 97.703 2.624 99.937 100.000
threads-pipe 5 groups 22.919 3.623 87.150 99.764
threads-pipe 6 groups 18.016 4.038 80.491 99.557
threads-pipe 7 groups 14.663 3.991 75.239 99.247
threads-pipe 8 groups 12.242 3.808 70.651 98.644
threads-sockets 1 group 99.990 6.667 99.999 100.000
threads-sockets 2 groups 99.940 5.114 99.997 100.000
threads-sockets 3 groups 99.469 4.115 99.977 100.000
threads-sockets 4 groups 87.528 4.038 99.400 100.000
threads-sockets 5 groups 6.942 2.398 59.244 88.337
threads-sockets 6 groups 4.359 1.954 49.448 87.860
threads-sockets 7 groups 2.845 1.345 41.198 77.102
threads-sockets 8 groups 2.871 1.404 38.512 74.312
schedstat_parse.py -f tbench_vanilla.log
case load se_eff% dom_eff% fast_rate% success_rate%
loopback 28 threads 99.976 18.369 99.995 100.000
loopback 56 threads 99.222 7.799 99.934 100.000
loopback 84 threads 19.723 6.819 70.215 100.000
loopback 112 threads 11.283 5.371 55.371 99.999
loopback 140 threads 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
loopback 168 threads 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
loopback 196 threads 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
loopback 224 threads 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
According to the test above, if the system becomes busy, the
SIS Search Efficiency(se_eff%) drops significantly. Although some
benchmarks would finally find an idle CPU(success_rate% = 100%), it is
doubtful whether it is worth it to search the whole LLC domain.
[Proposal]
It would be ideal to have a crystal ball to answer this question:
How many CPUs must a wakeup path walk down, before it can find an idle
CPU? Many potential metrics could be used to predict the number.
One candidate is the sum of util_avg in this LLC domain. The benefit
of choosing util_avg is that it is a metric of accumulated historic
activity, which seems to be smoother than instantaneous metrics
(such as rq->nr_running). Besides, choosing the sum of util_avg
would help predict the load of the LLC domain more precisely, because
SIS_PROP uses one CPU's idle time to estimate the total LLC domain idle
time.
In summary, the lower the util_avg is, the more select_idle_cpu()
should scan for idle CPU, and vice versa. When the sum of util_avg
in this LLC domain hits 85% or above, the scan stops. The reason to
choose 85% as the threshold is that this is the imbalance_pct(117)
when a LLC sched group is overloaded.
Introduce the quadratic function:
y = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - p * x^2
and y'= y / SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
x is the ratio of sum_util compared to the CPU capacity:
x = sum_util / (llc_weight * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
y' is the ratio of CPUs to be scanned in the LLC domain,
and the number of CPUs to scan is calculated by:
nr_scan = llc_weight * y'
Choosing quadratic function is because:
[1] Compared to the linear function, it scans more aggressively when the
sum_util is low.
[2] Compared to the exponential function, it is easier to calculate.
[3] It seems that there is no accurate mapping between the sum of util_avg
and the number of CPUs to be scanned. Use heuristic scan for now.
For a platform with 112 CPUs per LLC, the number of CPUs to scan is:
sum_util% 0 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 86 ...
scan_nr 112 111 108 102 93 81 65 47 25 1 0 ...
For a platform with 16 CPUs per LLC, the number of CPUs to scan is:
sum_util% 0 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 86 ...
scan_nr 16 15 15 14 13 11 9 6 3 0 0 ...
Furthermore, to minimize the overhead of calculating the metrics in
select_idle_cpu(), borrow the statistics from periodic load balance.
As mentioned by Abel, on a platform with 112 CPUs per LLC, the
sum_util calculated by periodic load balance after 112 ms would
decay to about 0.5 * 0.5 * 0.5 * 0.7 = 8.75%, thus bringing a delay
in reflecting the latest utilization. But it is a trade-off.
Checking the util_avg in newidle load balance would be more frequent,
but it brings overhead - multiple CPUs write/read the per-LLC shared
variable and introduces cache contention. Tim also mentioned that,
it is allowed to be non-optimal in terms of scheduling for the
short-term variations, but if there is a long-term trend in the load
behavior, the scheduler can adjust for that.
When SIS_UTIL is enabled, the select_idle_cpu() uses the nr_scan
calculated by SIS_UTIL instead of the one from SIS_PROP. As Peter and
Mel suggested, SIS_UTIL should be enabled by default.
This patch is based on the util_avg, which is very sensitive to the
CPU frequency invariance. There is an issue that, when the max frequency
has been clamp, the util_avg would decay insanely fast when
the CPU is idle. Commit addca285120b ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Handle no_turbo
in frequency invariance") could be used to mitigate this symptom, by adjusting
the arch_max_freq_ratio when turbo is disabled. But this issue is still
not thoroughly fixed, because the current code is unaware of the user-specified
max CPU frequency.
[Test result]
netperf and tbench were launched with 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150%
175% 200% of CPU number respectively. Hackbench and schbench were launched
by 1, 2 ,4, 8 groups. Each test lasts for 100 seconds and repeats 3 times.
The following is the benchmark result comparison between
baseline:vanilla v5.19-rc1 and compare:patched kernel. Positive compare%
indicates better performance.
Each netperf test is a:
netperf -4 -H 127.0.1 -t TCP/UDP_RR -c -C -l 100
netperf.throughput
=======
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
TCP_RR 28 threads 1.00 ( 0.34) -0.16 ( 0.40)
TCP_RR 56 threads 1.00 ( 0.19) -0.02 ( 0.20)
TCP_RR 84 threads 1.00 ( 0.39) -0.47 ( 0.40)
TCP_RR 112 threads 1.00 ( 0.21) -0.66 ( 0.22)
TCP_RR 140 threads 1.00 ( 0.19) -0.69 ( 0.19)
TCP_RR 168 threads 1.00 ( 0.18) -0.48 ( 0.18)
TCP_RR 196 threads 1.00 ( 0.16) +194.70 ( 16.43)
TCP_RR 224 threads 1.00 ( 0.16) +197.30 ( 7.85)
UDP_RR 28 threads 1.00 ( 0.37) +0.35 ( 0.33)
UDP_RR 56 threads 1.00 ( 11.18) -0.32 ( 0.21)
UDP_RR 84 threads 1.00 ( 1.46) -0.98 ( 0.32)
UDP_RR 112 threads 1.00 ( 28.85) -2.48 ( 19.61)
UDP_RR 140 threads 1.00 ( 0.70) -0.71 ( 14.04)
UDP_RR 168 threads 1.00 ( 14.33) -0.26 ( 11.16)
UDP_RR 196 threads 1.00 ( 12.92) +186.92 ( 20.93)
UDP_RR 224 threads 1.00 ( 11.74) +196.79 ( 18.62)
Take the 224 threads as an example, the SIS search metrics changes are
illustrated below:
vanilla patched
4544492 +237.5% 15338634 sched_debug.cpu.sis_domain_search.avg
38539 +39686.8% 15333634 sched_debug.cpu.sis_failed.avg
128300000 -87.9% 15551326 sched_debug.cpu.sis_scanned.avg
5842896 +162.7% 15347978 sched_debug.cpu.sis_search.avg
There is -87.9% less CPU scans after patched, which indicates lower overhead.
Besides, with this patch applied, there is -13% less rq lock contention
in perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock.raw_spin_rq_lock_nested
.try_to_wake_up.default_wake_function.woken_wake_function.
This might help explain the performance improvement - Because this patch allows
the waking task to remain on the previous CPU, rather than grabbing other CPUs'
lock.
Each hackbench test is a:
hackbench -g $job --process/threads --pipe/sockets -l 1000000 -s 100
hackbench.throughput
=========
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
process-pipe 1 group 1.00 ( 1.29) +0.57 ( 0.47)
process-pipe 2 groups 1.00 ( 0.27) +0.77 ( 0.81)
process-pipe 4 groups 1.00 ( 0.26) +1.17 ( 0.02)
process-pipe 8 groups 1.00 ( 0.15) -4.79 ( 0.02)
process-sockets 1 group 1.00 ( 0.63) -0.92 ( 0.13)
process-sockets 2 groups 1.00 ( 0.03) -0.83 ( 0.14)
process-sockets 4 groups 1.00 ( 0.40) +5.20 ( 0.26)
process-sockets 8 groups 1.00 ( 0.04) +3.52 ( 0.03)
threads-pipe 1 group 1.00 ( 1.28) +0.07 ( 0.14)
threads-pipe 2 groups 1.00 ( 0.22) -0.49 ( 0.74)
threads-pipe 4 groups 1.00 ( 0.05) +1.88 ( 0.13)
threads-pipe 8 groups 1.00 ( 0.09) -4.90 ( 0.06)
threads-sockets 1 group 1.00 ( 0.25) -0.70 ( 0.53)
threads-sockets 2 groups 1.00 ( 0.10) -0.63 ( 0.26)
threads-sockets 4 groups 1.00 ( 0.19) +11.92 ( 0.24)
threads-sockets 8 groups 1.00 ( 0.08) +4.31 ( 0.11)
Each tbench test is a:
tbench -t 100 $job 127.0.0.1
tbench.throughput
======
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
loopback 28 threads 1.00 ( 0.06) -0.14 ( 0.09)
loopback 56 threads 1.00 ( 0.03) -0.04 ( 0.17)
loopback 84 threads 1.00 ( 0.05) +0.36 ( 0.13)
loopback 112 threads 1.00 ( 0.03) +0.51 ( 0.03)
loopback 140 threads 1.00 ( 0.02) -1.67 ( 0.19)
loopback 168 threads 1.00 ( 0.38) +1.27 ( 0.27)
loopback 196 threads 1.00 ( 0.11) +1.34 ( 0.17)
loopback 224 threads 1.00 ( 0.11) +1.67 ( 0.22)
Each schbench test is a:
schbench -m $job -t 28 -r 100 -s 30000 -c 30000
schbench.latency_90%_us
========
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
normal 1 mthread 1.00 ( 31.22) -7.36 ( 20.25)*
normal 2 mthreads 1.00 ( 2.45) -0.48 ( 1.79)
normal 4 mthreads 1.00 ( 1.69) +0.45 ( 0.64)
normal 8 mthreads 1.00 ( 5.47) +9.81 ( 14.28)
*Consider the Standard Deviation, this -7.36% regression might not be valid.
Also, a OLTP workload with a commercial RDBMS has been tested, and there
is no significant change.
There were concerns that unbalanced tasks among CPUs would cause problems.
For example, suppose the LLC domain is composed of 8 CPUs, and 7 tasks are
bound to CPU0~CPU6, while CPU7 is idle:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5 CPU6 CPU7
util_avg 1024 1024 1024 1024 1024 1024 1024 0
Since the util_avg ratio is 87.5%( = 7/8 ), which is higher than 85%,
select_idle_cpu() will not scan, thus CPU7 is undetected during scan.
But according to Mel, it is unlikely the CPU7 will be idle all the time
because CPU7 could pull some tasks via CPU_NEWLY_IDLE.
lkp(kernel test robot) has reported a regression on stress-ng.sock on a
very busy system. According to the sched_debug statistics, it might be caused
by SIS_UTIL terminates the scan and chooses a previous CPU earlier, and this
might introduce more context switch, especially involuntary preemption, which
impacts a busy stress-ng. This regression has shown that, not all benchmarks
in every scenario benefit from idle CPU scan limit, and it needs further
investigation.
Besides, there is slight regression in hackbench's 16 groups case when the
LLC domain has 16 CPUs. Prateek mentioned that we should scan aggressively
in an LLC domain with 16 CPUs. Because the cost to search for an idle one
among 16 CPUs is negligible. The current patch aims to propose a generic
solution and only considers the util_avg. Something like the below could
be applied on top of the current patch to fulfill the requirement:
if (llc_weight <= 16)
nr_scan = nr_scan * 32 / llc_weight;
For LLC domain with 16 CPUs, the nr_scan will be expanded to 2 times large.
The smaller the CPU number this LLC domain has, the larger nr_scan will be
expanded. This needs further investigation.
There is also ongoing work[2] from Abel to filter out the busy CPUs during
wakeup, to further speed up the idle CPU scan. And it could be a following-up
optimization on top of this change.
Suggested-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Tested-by: Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220612163428.849378-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com
|
|
" *" is redundant. so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220617181151.29980-2-zhangqiao22@huawei.com
|
|
While doing newidle load balancing, it is possible for new tasks to
arrive, such as with pending wakeups. newidle_balance() already accounts
for this by exiting the sched_domain load_balance() iteration if it
detects these cases. This is very important for minimizing wakeup
latency.
However, if we are already in load_balance(), we may stay there for a
while before returning back to newidle_balance(). This is most
exacerbated if we enter a 'goto redo' loop in the LBF_ALL_PINNED case. A
very straightforward workaround to this is to adjust should_we_balance()
to bail out if we're doing a CPU_NEWLY_IDLE balance and new tasks are
detected.
This was tested with the following reproduction:
- two threads that take turns sleeping and waking each other up are
affined to two cores
- a large number of threads with 100% utilization are pinned to all
other cores
Without this patch, wakeup latency was ~120us for the pair of threads,
almost entirely spent in load_balance(). With this patch, wakeup latency
is ~6us.
Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220609025515.2086253-1-joshdon@google.com
|
