summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/hugetlb.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-06-03hugetlbfs: hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() cleanupMike Kravetz1-4/+4
commit 552546366a30d88bd1d6f5efe848b2ab50fd57e5 upstream. A new clang diagnostic (-Wsizeof-array-div) warns about the calculation to determine the number of u32's in an array of unsigned longs. Suppress warning by adding parentheses. While looking at the above issue, noticed that the 'address' parameter to hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash is no longer used. So, remove it from the definition and all callers. No functional change. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190919011847.18400-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@gmail.com> Cc: David Bolvansky <david.bolvansky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-07mm/hugetlb.c: fix unnecessary address expansion of pmd sharingLi Xinhai1-10/+12
commit a1ba9da8f0f9a37d900ff7eff66482cf7de8015e upstream. The current code would unnecessarily expand the address range. Consider one example, (start, end) = (1G-2M, 3G+2M), and (vm_start, vm_end) = (1G-4M, 3G+4M), the expected adjustment should be keep (1G-2M, 3G+2M) without expand. But the current result will be (1G-4M, 3G+4M). Actually, the range (1G-4M, 1G) and (3G, 3G+4M) would never been involved in pmd sharing. After this patch, we will check that the vma span at least one PUD aligned size and the start,end range overlap the aligned range of vma. With above example, the aligned vma range is (1G, 3G), so if (start, end) range is within (1G-4M, 1G), or within (3G, 3G+4M), then no adjustment to both start and end. Otherwise, we will have chance to adjust start downwards or end upwards without exceeding (vm_start, vm_end). Mike: : The 'adjusted range' is used for calls to mmu notifiers and cache(tlb) : flushing. Since the current code unnecessarily expands the range in some : cases, more entries than necessary would be flushed. This would/could : result in performance degradation. However, this is highly dependent on : the user runtime. Is there a combination of vma layout and calls to : actually hit this issue? If the issue is hit, will those entries : unnecessarily flushed be used again and need to be unnecessarily reloaded? Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210104081631.2921415-1-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com Fixes: 75802ca66354 ("mm/hugetlb: fix calculation of adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible") Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-07hugetlb: fix update_and_free_page contig page struct assumptionMike Kravetz1-2/+4
commit dbfee5aee7e54f83d96ceb8e3e80717fac62ad63 upstream. page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages. The routine update_and_free_page can encounter a gigantic page, yet it assumes page structs are contiguous when setting page flags in subpages. If update_and_free_page encounters non-contiguous page structs, we can see “BUG: Bad page state in process …” errors. Non-contiguous page structs are generally not an issue. However, they can exist with a specific kernel configuration and hotplug operations. For example: Configure the kernel with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM and !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. Then, hotplug add memory for the area where the gigantic page will be allocated. Zi Yan outlined steps to reproduce here [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/16F7C58B-4D79-41C5-9B64-A1A1628F4AF2@nvidia.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210217184926.33567-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: 944d9fec8d7a ("hugetlb: add support for gigantic page allocation at runtime") Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
2021-03-03mm: hugetlb: fix a race between freeing and dissolving the pageMuchun Song1-0/+39
commit 7ffddd499ba6122b1a07828f023d1d67629aa017 upstream There is a race condition between __free_huge_page() and dissolve_free_huge_page(). CPU0: CPU1: // page_count(page) == 1 put_page(page) __free_huge_page(page) dissolve_free_huge_page(page) spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) // PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page) update_and_free_page(page) // page is freed to the buddy spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) clear_page_huge_active(page) enqueue_huge_page(page) // It is wrong, the page is already freed spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) The race window is between put_page() and dissolve_free_huge_page(). We should make sure that the page is already on the free list when it is dissolved. As a result __free_huge_page would corrupt page(s) already in the buddy allocator. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: c8721bbbdd36 ("mm: memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage") Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [sudip: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-03mm/hugetlb: fix potential double free in hugetlb_register_node() error pathMiaohe Lin1-1/+3
[ Upstream commit cc2205a67dec5a700227a693fc113441e73e4641 ] In hugetlb_sysfs_add_hstate(), we would do kobject_put() on hstate_kobjs when failed to create sysfs group but forget to set hstate_kobjs to NULL. Then in hugetlb_register_node() error path, we may free it again via hugetlb_unregister_node(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210107123249.36964-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: a3437870160c ("hugetlb: new sysfs interface") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-02-10mm: hugetlb: remove VM_BUG_ON_PAGE from page_huge_activeMuchun Song1-2/+1
commit ecbf4724e6061b4b01be20f6d797d64d462b2bc8 upstream. The page_huge_active() can be called from scan_movable_pages() which do not hold a reference count to the HugeTLB page. So when we call page_huge_active() from scan_movable_pages(), the HugeTLB page can be freed parallel. Then we will trigger a BUG_ON which is in the page_huge_active() when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is enabled. Just remove the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-6-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: 7e1f049efb86 ("mm: hugetlb: cleanup using paeg_huge_active()") Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-10mm: hugetlb: fix a race between isolating and freeing pageMuchun Song1-2/+2
commit 0eb2df2b5629794020f75e94655e1994af63f0d4 upstream. There is a race between isolate_huge_page() and __free_huge_page(). CPU0: CPU1: if (PageHuge(page)) put_page(page) __free_huge_page(page) spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) update_and_free_page(page) set_compound_page_dtor(page, NULL_COMPOUND_DTOR) spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) isolate_huge_page(page) // trigger BUG_ON VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page) spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) page_huge_active(page) // trigger BUG_ON VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHuge(page), page) spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) When we isolate a HugeTLB page on CPU0. Meanwhile, we free it to the buddy allocator on CPU1. Then, we can trigger a BUG_ON on CPU0, because it is already freed to the buddy allocator. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-5-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: c8721bbbdd36 ("mm: memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage") Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-02-10mm: hugetlbfs: fix cannot migrate the fallocated HugeTLB pageMuchun Song1-1/+1
commit 585fc0d2871c9318c949fbf45b1f081edd489e96 upstream. If a new hugetlb page is allocated during fallocate it will not be marked as active (set_page_huge_active) which will result in a later isolate_huge_page failure when the page migration code would like to move that page. Such a failure would be unexpected and wrong. Only export set_page_huge_active, just leave clear_page_huge_active as static. Because there are no external users. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: 70c3547e36f5 (hugetlbfs: add hugetlbfs_fallocate()) Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-01-23mm/hugetlb: fix potential missing huge page size infoMiaohe Lin1-1/+1
commit 0eb98f1588c2cc7a79816d84ab18a55d254f481c upstream. The huge page size is encoded for VM_FAULT_HWPOISON errors only. So if we return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON, huge page size would just be ignored. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210107123449.38481-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: aa50d3a7aa81 ("Encode huge page size for VM_FAULT_HWPOISON errors") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-12mm/hugetlb: fix a race between hugetlb sysctl handlersMuchun Song1-6/+20
commit 17743798d81238ab13050e8e2833699b54e15467 upstream. There is a race between the assignment of `table->data` and write value to the pointer of `table->data` in the __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax() on the other thread. CPU0: CPU1: proc_sys_write hugetlb_sysctl_handler proc_sys_call_handler hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common hugetlb_sysctl_handler table->data = &tmp; hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common table->data = &tmp; proc_doulongvec_minmax do_proc_doulongvec_minmax sysctl_head_finish __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax unuse_table i = table->data; *i = val; // corrupt CPU1's stack Fix this by duplicating the `table`, and only update the duplicate of it. And introduce a helper of proc_hugetlb_doulongvec_minmax() to simplify the code. The following oops was seen: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page Code: Bad RIP value. ... Call Trace: ? set_max_huge_pages+0x3da/0x4f0 ? alloc_pool_huge_page+0x150/0x150 ? proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x46/0x60 ? hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common+0x1c7/0x200 ? nr_hugepages_store+0x20/0x20 ? copy_fd_bitmaps+0x170/0x170 ? hugetlb_sysctl_handler+0x1e/0x20 ? proc_sys_call_handler+0x2f1/0x300 ? unregister_sysctl_table+0xb0/0xb0 ? __fd_install+0x78/0x100 ? proc_sys_write+0x14/0x20 ? __vfs_write+0x4d/0x90 ? vfs_write+0xef/0x240 ? ksys_write+0xc0/0x160 ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 ? __close_fd+0x129/0x150 ? __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50 ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x200 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fixes: e5ff215941d5 ("hugetlb: multiple hstates for multiple page sizes") Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200828031146.43035-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-26mm/hugetlb: fix calculation of adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possiblePeter Xu1-14/+11
commit 75802ca66354a39ab8e35822747cd08b3384a99a upstream. This is found by code observation only. Firstly, the worst case scenario should assume the whole range was covered by pmd sharing. The old algorithm might not work as expected for ranges like (1g-2m, 1g+2m), where the adjusted range should be (0, 1g+2m) but the expected range should be (0, 2g). Since at it, remove the loop since it should not be required. With that, the new code should be faster too when the invalidating range is huge. Mike said: : With range (1g-2m, 1g+2m) within a vma (0, 2g) the existing code will only : adjust to (0, 1g+2m) which is incorrect. : : We should cc stable. The original reason for adjusting the range was to : prevent data corruption (getting wrong page). Since the range is not : always adjusted correctly, the potential for corruption still exists. : : However, I am fairly confident that adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible : is only gong to be called in two cases: : : 1) for a single page : 2) for range == entire vma : : In those cases, the current code should produce the correct results. : : To be safe, let's just cc stable. Fixes: 017b1660df89 ("mm: migration: fix migration of huge PMD shared pages") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200730201636.74778-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-11mm: prevent get_user_pages() from overflowing page refcountLinus Torvalds1-1/+15
commit 8fde12ca79aff9b5ba951fce1a2641901b8d8e64 upstream. If the page refcount wraps around past zero, it will be freed while there are still four billion references to it. One of the possible avenues for an attacker to try to make this happen is by doing direct IO on a page multiple times. This patch makes get_user_pages() refuse to take a new page reference if there are already more than two billion references to the page. Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [ 4.4.y backport notes: Ajay: - Added local variable 'err' with-in follow_hugetlb_page() from 2be7cfed995e, to resolve compilation error - Added page_ref_count() - Added missing refcount overflow checks on x86 and s390 (Vlastimil, thanks for this change) Srivatsa: - Replaced call to get_page_foll() with try_get_page_foll() ] Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher <akaher@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-06-22hugetlbfs: on restore reserve error path retain subpool reservationMike Kravetz1-5/+16
[ Upstream commit 0919e1b69ab459e06df45d3ba6658d281962db80 ] When a huge page is allocated, PagePrivate() is set if the allocation consumed a reservation. When freeing a huge page, PagePrivate is checked. If set, it indicates the reservation should be restored. PagePrivate being set at free huge page time mostly happens on error paths. When huge page reservations are created, a check is made to determine if the mapping is associated with an explicitly mounted filesystem. If so, pages are also reserved within the filesystem. The default action when freeing a huge page is to decrement the usage count in any associated explicitly mounted filesystem. However, if the reservation is to be restored the reservation/use count within the filesystem should not be decrementd. Otherwise, a subsequent page allocation and free for the same mapping location will cause the file filesystem usage to go 'negative'. Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on nodev 4.0G -4.0M 4.1G - /opt/hugepool To fix, when freeing a huge page do not adjust filesystem usage if PagePrivate() is set to indicate the reservation should be restored. I did not cc stable as the problem has been around since reserves were added to hugetlbfs and nobody has noticed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190328234704.27083-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-06-11hugetlb: use same fault hash key for shared and private mappingsMike Kravetz1-14/+5
commit 1b426bac66e6cc83c9f2d92b96e4e72acf43419a upstream. hugetlb uses a fault mutex hash table to prevent page faults of the same pages concurrently. The key for shared and private mappings is different. Shared keys off address_space and file index. Private keys off mm and virtual address. Consider a private mappings of a populated hugetlbfs file. A fault will map the page from the file and if needed do a COW to map a writable page. Hugetlbfs hole punch uses the fault mutex to prevent mappings of file pages. It uses the address_space file index key. However, private mappings will use a different key and could race with this code to map the file page. This causes problems (BUG) for the page cache remove code as it expects the page to be unmapped. A sample stack is: page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapped(page)) kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:169! ... RIP: 0010:unaccount_page_cache_page+0x1b8/0x200 ... Call Trace: __delete_from_page_cache+0x39/0x220 delete_from_page_cache+0x45/0x70 remove_inode_hugepages+0x13c/0x380 ? __add_to_page_cache_locked+0x162/0x380 hugetlbfs_fallocate+0x403/0x540 ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30 ? __inode_security_revalidate+0x5d/0x70 ? selinux_file_permission+0x100/0x130 vfs_fallocate+0x13f/0x270 ksys_fallocate+0x3c/0x80 __x64_sys_fallocate+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 There seems to be another potential COW issue/race with this approach of different private and shared keys as noted in commit 8382d914ebf7 ("mm, hugetlb: improve page-fault scalability"). Since every hugetlb mapping (even anon and private) is actually a file mapping, just use the address_space index key for all mappings. This results in potentially more hash collisions. However, this should not be the common case. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190328234704.27083-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190412165235.t4sscoujczfhuiyt@linux-r8p5 Fixes: b5cec28d36f5 ("hugetlbfs: truncate_hugepages() takes a range of pages") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-03-23hugetlbfs: fix races and page leaks during migrationMike Kravetz1-2/+12
commit cb6acd01e2e43fd8bad11155752b7699c3d0fb76 upstream. hugetlb pages should only be migrated if they are 'active'. The routines set/clear_page_huge_active() modify the active state of hugetlb pages. When a new hugetlb page is allocated at fault time, set_page_huge_active is called before the page is locked. Therefore, another thread could race and migrate the page while it is being added to page table by the fault code. This race is somewhat hard to trigger, but can be seen by strategically adding udelay to simulate worst case scheduling behavior. Depending on 'how' the code races, various BUG()s could be triggered. To address this issue, simply delay the set_page_huge_active call until after the page is successfully added to the page table. Hugetlb pages can also be leaked at migration time if the pages are associated with a file in an explicitly mounted hugetlbfs filesystem. For example, consider a two node system with 4GB worth of huge pages available. A program mmaps a 2G file in a hugetlbfs filesystem. It then migrates the pages associated with the file from one node to another. When the program exits, huge page counts are as follows: node0 1024 free_hugepages 1024 nr_hugepages node1 0 free_hugepages 1024 nr_hugepages Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on nodev 4.0G 2.0G 2.0G 50% /var/opt/hugepool That is as expected. 2G of huge pages are taken from the free_hugepages counts, and 2G is the size of the file in the explicitly mounted filesystem. If the file is then removed, the counts become: node0 1024 free_hugepages 1024 nr_hugepages node1 1024 free_hugepages 1024 nr_hugepages Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on nodev 4.0G 2.0G 2.0G 50% /var/opt/hugepool Note that the filesystem still shows 2G of pages used, while there actually are no huge pages in use. The only way to 'fix' the filesystem accounting is to unmount the filesystem If a hugetlb page is associated with an explicitly mounted filesystem, this information in contained in the page_private field. At migration time, this information is not preserved. To fix, simply transfer page_private from old to new page at migration time if necessary. There is a related race with removing a huge page from a file and migration. When a huge page is removed from the pagecache, the page_mapping() field is cleared, yet page_private remains set until the page is actually freed by free_huge_page(). A page could be migrated while in this state. However, since page_mapping() is not set the hugetlbfs specific routine to transfer page_private is not called and we leak the page count in the filesystem. To fix that, check for this condition before migrating a huge page. If the condition is detected, return EBUSY for the page. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/74510272-7319-7372-9ea6-ec914734c179@oracle.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190212221400.3512-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: bcc54222309c ("mm: hugetlb: introduce page_huge_active") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: v2] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/7534d322-d782-8ac6-1c8d-a8dc380eb3ab@oracle.com [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: update comment and changelog] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/420bcfd6-158b-38e4-98da-26d0cd85bd01@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-12-17hugetlbfs: check for pgoff value overflowMike Kravetz1-0/+8
commit 63489f8e821144000e0bdca7e65a8d1cc23a7ee7 upstream. A vma with vm_pgoff large enough to overflow a loff_t type when converted to a byte offset can be passed via the remap_file_pages system call. The hugetlbfs mmap routine uses the byte offset to calculate reservations and file size. A sequence such as: mmap(0x20a00000, 0x600000, 0, 0x66033, -1, 0); remap_file_pages(0x20a00000, 0x600000, 0, 0x20000000000000, 0); will result in the following when task exits/file closed, kernel BUG at mm/hugetlb.c:749! Call Trace: hugetlbfs_evict_inode+0x2f/0x40 evict+0xcb/0x190 __dentry_kill+0xcb/0x150 __fput+0x164/0x1e0 task_work_run+0x84/0xa0 exit_to_usermode_loop+0x7d/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x18b/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2 The overflowed pgoff value causes hugetlbfs to try to set up a mapping with a negative range (end < start) that leaves invalid state which causes the BUG. The previous overflow fix to this code was incomplete and did not take the remap_file_pages system call into account. [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180309002726.7248-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include mmdebug.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix -ve left shift count on sh] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308210502.15952-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: 045c7a3f53d9 ("hugetlbfs: fix offset overflow in hugetlbfs mmap") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reported-by: Nic Losby <blurbdust@gmail.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [bwh: Backported to 4.4: Use a conditional WARN() instead of VM_WARN()] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-12-17mm/hugetlb.c: don't call region_abort if region_chg failsMike Kravetz1-1/+3
commit ff8c0c53c47530ffea82c22a0a6df6332b56c957 upstream. Changes to hugetlbfs reservation maps is a two step process. The first step is a call to region_chg to determine what needs to be changed, and prepare that change. This should be followed by a call to call to region_add to commit the change, or region_abort to abort the change. The error path in hugetlb_reserve_pages called region_abort after a failed call to region_chg. As a result, the adds_in_progress counter in the reservation map is off by 1. This is caught by a VM_BUG_ON in resv_map_release when the reservation map is freed. syzkaller fuzzer (when using an injected kmalloc failure) found this bug, that resulted in the following: kernel BUG at mm/hugetlb.c:742! Call Trace: hugetlbfs_evict_inode+0x7b/0xa0 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:493 evict+0x481/0x920 fs/inode.c:553 iput_final fs/inode.c:1515 [inline] iput+0x62b/0xa20 fs/inode.c:1542 hugetlb_file_setup+0x593/0x9f0 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:1306 newseg+0x422/0xd30 ipc/shm.c:575 ipcget_new ipc/util.c:285 [inline] ipcget+0x21e/0x580 ipc/util.c:639 SYSC_shmget ipc/shm.c:673 [inline] SyS_shmget+0x158/0x230 ipc/shm.c:657 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2 RIP: resv_map_release+0x265/0x330 mm/hugetlb.c:742 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1490821682-23228-1-git-send-email-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-11-21mm: migration: fix migration of huge PMD shared pagesMike Kravetz1-2/+35
commit 017b1660df89f5fb4bfe66c34e35f7d2031100c7 upstream. The page migration code employs try_to_unmap() to try and unmap the source page. This is accomplished by using rmap_walk to find all vmas where the page is mapped. This search stops when page mapcount is zero. For shared PMD huge pages, the page map count is always 1 no matter the number of mappings. Shared mappings are tracked via the reference count of the PMD page. Therefore, try_to_unmap stops prematurely and does not completely unmap all mappings of the source page. This problem can result is data corruption as writes to the original source page can happen after contents of the page are copied to the target page. Hence, data is lost. This problem was originally seen as DB corruption of shared global areas after a huge page was soft offlined due to ECC memory errors. DB developers noticed they could reproduce the issue by (hotplug) offlining memory used to back huge pages. A simple testcase can reproduce the problem by creating a shared PMD mapping (note that this must be at least PUD_SIZE in size and PUD_SIZE aligned (1GB on x86)), and using migrate_pages() to migrate process pages between nodes while continually writing to the huge pages being migrated. To fix, have the try_to_unmap_one routine check for huge PMD sharing by calling huge_pmd_unshare for hugetlbfs huge pages. If it is a shared mapping it will be 'unshared' which removes the page table entry and drops the reference on the PMD page. After this, flush caches and TLB. mmu notifiers are called before locking page tables, but we can not be sure of PMD sharing until page tables are locked. Therefore, check for the possibility of PMD sharing before locking so that notifiers can prepare for the worst possible case. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180823205917.16297-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: make _range_in_vma() a static inline] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6063f215-a5c8-2f0c-465a-2c515ddc952d@oracle.com Fixes: 39dde65c9940 ("shared page table for hugetlb page") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-11-21hugetlbfs: fix kernel BUG at fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:444!Mike Kravetz1-4/+19
commit 5e41540c8a0f0e98c337dda8b391e5dda0cde7cf upstream. This bug has been experienced several times by the Oracle DB team. The BUG is in remove_inode_hugepages() as follows: /* * If page is mapped, it was faulted in after being * unmapped in caller. Unmap (again) now after taking * the fault mutex. The mutex will prevent faults * until we finish removing the page. * * This race can only happen in the hole punch case. * Getting here in a truncate operation is a bug. */ if (unlikely(page_mapped(page))) { BUG_ON(truncate_op); In this case, the elevated map count is not the result of a race. Rather it was incorrectly incremented as the result of a bug in the huge pmd sharing code. Consider the following: - Process A maps a hugetlbfs file of sufficient size and alignment (PUD_SIZE) that a pmd page could be shared. - Process B maps the same hugetlbfs file with the same size and alignment such that a pmd page is shared. - Process B then calls mprotect() to change protections for the mapping with the shared pmd. As a result, the pmd is 'unshared'. - Process B then calls mprotect() again to chage protections for the mapping back to their original value. pmd remains unshared. - Process B then forks and process C is created. During the fork process, we do dup_mm -> dup_mmap -> copy_page_range to copy page tables. Copying page tables for hugetlb mappings is done in the routine copy_hugetlb_page_range. In copy_hugetlb_page_range(), the destination pte is obtained by: dst_pte = huge_pte_alloc(dst, addr, sz); If pmd sharing is possible, the returned pointer will be to a pte in an existing page table. In the situation above, process C could share with either process A or process B. Since process A is first in the list, the returned pte is a pointer to a pte in process A's page table. However, the check for pmd sharing in copy_hugetlb_page_range is: /* If the pagetables are shared don't copy or take references */ if (dst_pte == src_pte) continue; Since process C is sharing with process A instead of process B, the above test fails. The code in copy_hugetlb_page_range which follows assumes dst_pte points to a huge_pte_none pte. It copies the pte entry from src_pte to dst_pte and increments this map count of the associated page. This is how we end up with an elevated map count. To solve, check the dst_pte entry for huge_pte_none. If !none, this implies PMD sharing so do not copy. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105212315.14125-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: c5c99429fa57 ("fix hugepages leak due to pagetable page sharing") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-11-21hugetlbfs: dirty pages as they are added to pagecacheMike Kravetz1-0/+6
commit 22146c3ce98962436e401f7b7016a6f664c9ffb5 upstream. Some test systems were experiencing negative huge page reserve counts and incorrect file block counts. This was traced to /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches removing clean pages from hugetlbfs file pagecaches. When non-hugetlbfs explicit code removes the pages, the appropriate accounting is not performed. This can be recreated as follows: fallocate -l 2M /dev/hugepages/foo echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches fallocate -l 2M /dev/hugepages/foo grep -i huge /proc/meminfo AnonHugePages: 0 kB ShmemHugePages: 0 kB HugePages_Total: 2048 HugePages_Free: 2047 HugePages_Rsvd: 18446744073709551615 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 2048 kB Hugetlb: 4194304 kB ls -lsh /dev/hugepages/foo 4.0M -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2.0M Oct 17 20:05 /dev/hugepages/foo To address this issue, dirty pages as they are added to pagecache. This can easily be reproduced with fallocate as shown above. Read faulted pages will eventually end up being marked dirty. But there is a window where they are clean and could be impacted by code such as drop_caches. So, just dirty them all as they are added to the pagecache. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b5be45b8-5afe-56cd-9482-28384699a049@oracle.com Fixes: 6bda666a03f0 ("hugepages: fold find_or_alloc_pages into huge_no_page()") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Mihcla Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-07-11mm: hugetlb: yield when prepping struct pagesCannon Matthews1-0/+1
commit 520495fe96d74e05db585fc748351e0504d8f40d upstream. When booting with very large numbers of gigantic (i.e. 1G) pages, the operations in the loop of gather_bootmem_prealloc, and specifically prep_compound_gigantic_page, takes a very long time, and can cause a softlockup if enough pages are requested at boot. For example booting with 3844 1G pages requires prepping (set_compound_head, init the count) over 1 billion 4K tail pages, which takes considerable time. Add a cond_resched() to the outer loop in gather_bootmem_prealloc() to prevent this lockup. Tested: Booted with softlockup_panic=1 hugepagesz=1G hugepages=3844 and no softlockup is reported, and the hugepages are reported as successfully setup. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180627214447.260804-1-cannonmatthews@google.com Signed-off-by: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com> Cc: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-04-08mm, hugetlb: use pte_present() instead of pmd_present() in follow_huge_pmd()Naoya Horiguchi1-2/+4
commit c9d398fa237882ea07167e23bcfc5e6847066518 upstream. I found the race condition which triggers the following bug when move_pages() and soft offline are called on a single hugetlb page concurrently. Soft offlining page 0x119400 at 0x700000000000 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea0011943820 IP: follow_huge_pmd+0x143/0x190 PGD 7ffd2067 PUD 7ffd1067 PMD 0 [61163.582052] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: binfmt_misc ppdev virtio_balloon parport_pc pcspkr i2c_piix4 parport i2c_core acpi_cpufreq ip_tables xfs libcrc32c ata_generic pata_acpi virtio_blk 8139too crc32c_intel ata_piix serio_raw libata virtio_pci 8139cp virtio_ring virtio mii floppy dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [last unloaded: cap_check] CPU: 0 PID: 22573 Comm: iterate_numa_mo Tainted: P OE 4.11.0-rc2-mm1+ #2 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:follow_huge_pmd+0x143/0x190 RSP: 0018:ffffc90004bdbcd0 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000465003e80 RBX: ffffea0004e34d30 RCX: 00003ffffffff000 RDX: 0000000011943800 RSI: 0000000000080001 RDI: 0000000465003e80 RBP: ffffc90004bdbd18 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff880138d34000 R10: ffffea0004650000 R11: 0000000000c363b0 R12: ffffea0011943800 R13: ffff8801b8d34000 R14: ffffea0000000000 R15: 000077ff80000000 FS: 00007fc977710740(0000) GS:ffff88007dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffea0011943820 CR3: 000000007a746000 CR4: 00000000001406f0 Call Trace: follow_page_mask+0x270/0x550 SYSC_move_pages+0x4ea/0x8f0 SyS_move_pages+0xe/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 RIP: 0033:0x7fc976e03949 RSP: 002b:00007ffe72221d88 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000117 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fc976e03949 RDX: 0000000000c22390 RSI: 0000000000001400 RDI: 0000000000005827 RBP: 00007ffe72221e00 R08: 0000000000c2c3a0 R09: 0000000000000004 R10: 0000000000c363b0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400650 R13: 00007ffe72221ee0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 Code: 81 e4 ff ff 1f 00 48 21 c2 49 c1 ec 0c 48 c1 ea 0c 4c 01 e2 49 bc 00 00 00 00 00 ea ff ff 48 c1 e2 06 49 01 d4 f6 45 bc 04 74 90 <49> 8b 7c 24 20 40 f6 c7 01 75 2b 4c 89 e7 8b 47 1c 85 c0 7e 2a RIP: follow_huge_pmd+0x143/0x190 RSP: ffffc90004bdbcd0 CR2: ffffea0011943820 ---[ end trace e4f81353a2d23232 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Kernel Offset: disabled This bug is triggered when pmd_present() returns true for non-present hugetlb, so fixing the present check in follow_huge_pmd() prevents it. Using pmd_present() to determine present/non-present for hugetlb is not correct, because pmd_present() checks multiple bits (not only _PAGE_PRESENT) for historical reason and it can misjudge hugetlb state. Fixes: e66f17ff7177 ("mm/hugetlb: take page table lock in follow_huge_pmd()") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1490149898-20231-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-01-19mm/hugetlb.c: fix reservation race when freeing surplus pagesMike Kravetz1-9/+28
commit e5bbc8a6c992901058bc09e2ce01d16c111ff047 upstream. return_unused_surplus_pages() decrements the global reservation count, and frees any unused surplus pages that were backing the reservation. Commit 7848a4bf51b3 ("mm/hugetlb.c: add cond_resched_lock() in return_unused_surplus_pages()") added a call to cond_resched_lock in the loop freeing the pages. As a result, the hugetlb_lock could be dropped, and someone else could use the pages that will be freed in subsequent iterations of the loop. This could result in inconsistent global hugetlb page state, application api failures (such as mmap) failures or application crashes. When dropping the lock in return_unused_surplus_pages, make sure that the global reservation count (resv_huge_pages) remains sufficiently large to prevent someone else from claiming pages about to be freed. Analyzed by Paul Cassella. Fixes: 7848a4bf51b3 ("mm/hugetlb.c: add cond_resched_lock() in return_unused_surplus_pages()") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483991767-6879-1-git-send-email-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reported-by: Paul Cassella <cassella@cray.com> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-10-31mm/hugetlb: fix memory offline with hugepage size > memory block sizeGerald Schaefer1-6/+7
commit 2247bb335ab9c40058484cac36ea74ee652f3b7b upstream. Patch series "mm/hugetlb: memory offline issues with hugepages", v4. This addresses several issues with hugepages and memory offline. While the first patch fixes a panic, and is therefore rather important, the last patch is just a performance optimization. The second patch fixes a theoretical issue with reserved hugepages, while still leaving some ugly usability issue, see description. This patch (of 3): dissolve_free_huge_pages() will either run into the VM_BUG_ON() or a list corruption and addressing exception when trying to set a memory block offline that is part (but not the first part) of a "gigantic" hugetlb page with a size > memory block size. When no other smaller hugetlb page sizes are present, the VM_BUG_ON() will trigger directly. In the other case we will run into an addressing exception later, because dissolve_free_huge_page() will not work on the head page of the compound hugetlb page which will result in a NULL hstate from page_hstate(). To fix this, first remove the VM_BUG_ON() because it is wrong, and then use the compound head page in dissolve_free_huge_page(). This means that an unused pre-allocated gigantic page that has any part of itself inside the memory block that is going offline will be dissolved completely. Losing an unused gigantic hugepage is preferable to failing the memory offline, for example in the situation where a (possibly faulty) memory DIMM needs to go offline. Changes for v4.4 stable: - make it apply w/o commit c1470b33 "mm/hugetlb: fix incorrect hugepages count during mem hotplug" Fixes: c8721bbb ("mm: memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160926172811.94033-2-gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Rui Teng <rui.teng@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-09-07hugetlb: fix nr_pmds accounting with shared page tablesKirill A. Shutemov1-2/+1
commit c17b1f42594eb71b8d3eb5a6dfc907a7eb88a51d upstream. We account HugeTLB's shared page table to all processes who share it. The accounting happens during huge_pmd_share(). If somebody populates pud entry under us, we should decrease pagetable's refcount and decrease nr_pmds of the process. By mistake, I increase nr_pmds again in this case. :-/ It will lead to "BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 2" on process' exit. Let's fix this by increasing nr_pmds only when we're sure that the page table will be used. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160617122506.GC6534@node.shutemov.name Fixes: dc6c9a35b66b ("mm: account pmd page tables to the process") Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: zhongjiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-08-20mm/hugetlb: avoid soft lockup in set_max_huge_pages()Jia He1-0/+4
commit 649920c6ab93429b94bc7c1aa7c0e8395351be32 upstream. In powerpc servers with large memory(32TB), we watched several soft lockups for hugepage under stress tests. The call traces are as follows: 1. get_page_from_freelist+0x2d8/0xd50 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x180/0xc20 alloc_fresh_huge_page+0xb0/0x190 set_max_huge_pages+0x164/0x3b0 2. prep_new_huge_page+0x5c/0x100 alloc_fresh_huge_page+0xc8/0x190 set_max_huge_pages+0x164/0x3b0 This patc