From ce60f27bb62dfeb1bf827350520f34abc84e0933 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 05:09:58 +0100 Subject: mm: abstract moving to the next PFN In order to fix the L1TF vulnerability, x86 can invert the PTE bits for PROT_NONE VMAs, which means we cannot move from one PTE to the next by adding 1 to the PFN field of the PTE. This results in the BUG reported at [1]. Abstract advancing the PTE to the next PFN through a pte_next_pfn() function/macro. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230920040958.866520-1-willy@infradead.org Fixes: bcc6cc832573 ("mm: add default definition of set_ptes()") Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Reported-by: syzbot+55cc72f8cc3a549119df@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/000000000000d099fa0604f03351@google.com [1] Reviewed-by: Yin Fengwei Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) (limited to 'arch/x86/include') diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h index d6ad98ca1288..e02b179ec659 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -955,6 +955,14 @@ static inline int pte_same(pte_t a, pte_t b) return a.pte == b.pte; } +static inline pte_t pte_next_pfn(pte_t pte) +{ + if (__pte_needs_invert(pte_val(pte))) + return __pte(pte_val(pte) - (1UL << PFN_PTE_SHIFT)); + return __pte(pte_val(pte) + (1UL << PFN_PTE_SHIFT)); +} +#define pte_next_pfn pte_next_pfn + static inline int pte_present(pte_t a) { return pte_flags(a) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE); -- cgit v1.2.3