From d984457b31c4c53d2af374d5e78b3eb64debd483 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Clark Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:51:14 -0700 Subject: drm/msm: Add priv->mm_lock to protect active/inactive lists Rather than relying on the big dev->struct_mutex hammer, introduce a more specific lock for protecting the bo lists. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark Reviewed-by: Jordan Crouse Reviewed-by: Kristian H. Kristensen Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c index ee2e270f464c..64afbed89821 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c @@ -112,6 +112,11 @@ static int msm_gem_show(struct drm_device *dev, struct seq_file *m) { struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private; struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu; + int ret; + + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&priv->mm_lock); + if (ret) + return ret; if (gpu) { seq_printf(m, "Active Objects (%s):\n", gpu->name); @@ -121,6 +126,8 @@ static int msm_gem_show(struct drm_device *dev, struct seq_file *m) seq_printf(m, "Inactive Objects:\n"); msm_gem_describe_objects(&priv->inactive_list, m); + mutex_unlock(&priv->mm_lock); + return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3