| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
RFC 1034, for instance, describes that all intermediate CNAMEs should be
returned. As it is, CNAME do not return all found intermediate results
in the case of straightforward failure. It should be noted that in the
case of forwarding success, ALL intermediate paths are returned,
including the failure ones.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
The new tests show that single and multiple forwarders work as expected.
They also describe the behaviour encountered when the DNS server
encounters a CNAME from a forwarded request (which is not to pursue any
further).
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Pair-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Apr 18 07:40:07 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
|
|
These are independent from our client library and allow
testing of invalid pdus.
It can be used like this in standalone mode:
SMB_CONF_PATH=/dev/null SERVER=172.31.9.188 python/samba/tests/dcerpc/raw_protocol.py
or
SMB_CONF_PATH=/dev/null SERVER=172.31.9.188 python/samba/tests/dcerpc/raw_protocol.py -v -f TestDCERPC_BIND.test_invalid_auth_noctx
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11344
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
|
|
tests for DCERPC
These are independent from our client library and allow
testing of invalid pdus.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11344
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11616
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
|
|
Now that it is invoked as a normal script, there should be less of them.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This makes it easier to invoke, particularly against Windows.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This avoids any conflicts in this directory with the original toplevel
getopt.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Make sure that TXT entries stored via RPC come out the same in DNS.
This has one caveat in that adding over RPC in Windows eats slashes,
and so fails there.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This checks that TXT records added over DNS, look the same over RPC.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Both Samba and Windows returned NXRRSET
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This was on the client side, due the a strlen(NULL) on the previously
DOS-encoded TXT field. With a new IDL structure, this segfault no longer exists.
Note that both Samba and Windows return NXRRSET instead of FORMERR.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Two requests with identical parameters which are poorly formatted, can
non-deterministically return FORMERR or simply fail to give a response.
Setting the timeout to a number allows Windows to succeed.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
The new talloc.BaseObject allow us to hold a talloc context per
python object (there may be many referring to the same C object)
and the talloc context that the actual object pointer is under.
Another advantage is that talloc.BaseObject(), has less of
an ABI surface.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Based on patches by Adrian Cochrane
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Feb 25 07:58:55 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
|
|
No tests use this any more, hence we should not
parse the file anymore either. It is generated
directly from the parametersr.all.xml file.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Feb 3 11:42:29 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
|
|
A subnet name needs to be a valid CIDR address range -- that's the
ones that look like 10.9.8.0/22, where the number after the /
determines how many bits are in the address suffix. It can be IPv4 or
IPv6. There are a few odd constraints (see MS-ADTS v20150630
6.1.1.2.2.2.1 "Subnet Object") -- for example, with IPv4, the implied
bit mask can't equal the address. That is, you can't have a subnet
named "255.255.255.0/24" in a Windows subnet. This rule does not apply
to IPv6.
Windows and Samba both make some ensure that subnets have a unique
valid name, though unfortunately Windows 2008R2 is rather slack when
it comes to IPv6. We follow Windows 2012R2, which roughly follows
RFC5952 -- with one caveat: Windows will allow an address like
"::ffff:0:1:2", which translates to the IPv4 address "0.1.0.2" using
the SIIT translation scheme, and which inet_ntop() would render as
"::ffff:0:0.1.0.2". In the Samba implementation we use an inet_pton()/
inet_ntop() round-trip to establish canonicality, so these addresses
fail. Windows wisely does not allow the SIIT style addresses (the
acronym is widely agreed to be off-by-one in the second letter), and
it will regard "::ffff:0:1:2" as simply "::ffff:0:1:2" and allow it.
We would like to do that too.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This allows you to add, remove, or shift subnets.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This would help remove a DC that is a conflict record, for example
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
This object is not in standard AD, but Marc Muehlfeld
correctly notes that Samba creates it for BIND9_DLZ
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
This ensures that a different server is the one being demoted from the local database
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
This avoids needing to run the demote on the main replicated DB
of the selftest system
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
This is unused because we have already provided a database via import_ldif
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
This allows the creation of domain clones that have no secrets,
and so make it safer to examine databases that demonstrate issues
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
This command makes a clone of an existing AD Domain, but does not
join the domain. This allows us to test if the join would work
without adding objects to the target DC.
The server password will need to be reset for the clone to
be any use, see the source4/scripting/devel/chgtdcpass
(Based on patches written with Garming Sam)
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
This has been deprecated for a long time now
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11429
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 1 17:00:53 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11429
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Unknown attributeID values would cause an exception previously, and
unsorted attributes cause a failure to replicate with Samba 4.2.
In commit 61b978872fe86906611f64430b2608f5e7ea7ad8 we started
to sort these values correctly, but previous versions of Samba
did not sort them correctly (we sorted high-bit-set values as
negative), and then after 9c9df40220234cba973e84b4985d90da1334a1d1
we stoped accepting these.
To ensure we are allowed to make this unusual change to the
replPropertyMetaData, a new OID is allocated and checked
for in repl_meta_data.c
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10973
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This also documents an issue with our python bindings and lists, as changes to integers in a list
of integers are not preserved
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11429
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This will fail once our python bindings correctly check value ranges
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11429
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kai Blin <kai@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Kai Blin <kai@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 6 14:06:52 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
|
|
It is going to be removed for the generated table.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This reverts commit 380e0769ad3563dc762fb0c9ebe57d8131846519.
This is in preparation of the removal of the committed param_table_static.c
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This proves that the committed and the generated parameter tables
are identical (modulo order).
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|