Kalle Valo says:

====================
pull-request: wireless-next-2022-10-28

First set of patches v6.2. mac80211 refactoring continues for Wi-Fi 7.
All mac80211 driver are now converted to use internal TX queues, this
might cause some regressions so we wanted to do this early in the
cycle.

Note: wireless tree was merged[1] to wireless-next to avoid some
conflicts with mac80211 patches between the trees. Unfortunately there
are still two smaller conflicts in net/mac80211/util.c which Stephen
also reported[2]. In the first conflict initialise scratch_len to
"params->scratch_len ?: 3 * params->len" (note number 3, not 2!) and
in the second conflict take the version which uses elems->scratch_pos.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-next.git/commit/?id=dfd2d876b3fda1790bc0239ba4c6967e25d16e91
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221020032340.5cf101c0@canb.auug.org.au/

mac80211
 - preparation for Wi-Fi 7 Multi-Link Operation (MLO) continues
 - add API to show the link STAs in debugfs
 - all mac80211 drivers are now using mac80211 internal TX queues (iTXQs)

rtw89
 - support 8852BE

rtl8xxxu
 - support RTL8188FU

brmfmac
 - support two station interfaces concurrently

bcma
 - support SPROM rev 11
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028132943.304ECC433B5@smtp.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

122 files changed, 35581 insertions, 1106 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c b/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
index 65fb9bad1577..5f90bac6bb09 100644
--- a/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ static void bcma_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
 	int gpio = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
 	u32 val = bcma_chipco_gpio_in(cc, BIT(gpio));
 
+	gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, gpio);
 	bcma_chipco_gpio_polarity(cc, BIT(gpio), val);
 	bcma_chipco_gpio_intmask(cc, BIT(gpio), BIT(gpio));
 }
@@ -93,12 +94,15 @@ static void bcma_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
 	int gpio = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
 
 	bcma_chipco_gpio_intmask(cc, BIT(gpio), 0);
+	gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, gpio);
 }
 
-static struct irq_chip bcma_gpio_irq_chip = {
+static const struct irq_chip bcma_gpio_irq_chip = {
 	.name		= "BCMA-GPIO",
 	.irq_mask	= bcma_gpio_irq_mask,
 	.irq_unmask	= bcma_gpio_irq_unmask,
+	.flags		= IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
+	GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
 };
 
 static irqreturn_t bcma_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
@@ -139,7 +143,7 @@ static int bcma_gpio_irq_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
 	bcma_chipco_gpio_intmask(cc, ~0, 0);
 	bcma_cc_set32(cc, BCMA_CC_IRQMASK, BCMA_CC_IRQ_GPIO);
 
-	girq->chip = &bcma_gpio_irq_chip;
+	gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &bcma_gpio_irq_chip);
 	/* This will let us handle the parent IRQ in the driver */
 	girq->parent_handler = NULL;
 	girq->num_parents = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/bcma/sprom.c b/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
index 3da01f173c63..e668ad7963fc 100644
--- a/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int bcma_sprom_valid(struct bcma_bus *bus, const u16 *sprom,
 		return err;
 
 	revision = sprom[words - 1] & SSB_SPROM_REVISION_REV;
-	if (revision != 8 && revision != 9 && revision != 10) {
+	if (revision < 8 || revision > 11) {
 		pr_err("Unsupported SPROM revision: %d\n", revision);