summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>2025-10-30 11:27:55 +0800
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>2025-11-06 12:30:52 +0100
commit956dfda6a70885f18c0f8236a461aa2bc4f556ad (patch)
tree3583f1a2126deaebc81387fc25a5a93d10c00c03 /kernel
parent6146a0f1dfae5d37442a9ddcba012add260bceb0 (diff)
downloadlinux-956dfda6a70885f18c0f8236a461aa2bc4f556ad.tar.gz
linux-956dfda6a70885f18c0f8236a461aa2bc4f556ad.tar.bz2
linux-956dfda6a70885f18c0f8236a461aa2bc4f556ad.zip
sched/fair: Prevent cfs_rq from being unthrottled with zero runtime_remaining
When a cfs_rq is to be throttled, its limbo list should be empty and that's why there is a warn in tg_throttle_down() for non empty cfs_rq->throttled_limbo_list. When running a test with the following hierarchy: root / \ A* ... / | \ ... B / \ C* where both A and C have quota settings, that warn on non empty limbo list is triggered for a cfs_rq of C, let's call it cfs_rq_c(and ignore the cpu part of the cfs_rq for the sake of simpler representation). Debug showed it happened like this: Task group C is created and quota is set, so in tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(), cfs_rq_c is initialized with runtime_enabled set, runtime_remaining equals to 0 and *unthrottled*. Before any tasks are enqueued to cfs_rq_c, *multiple* throttled tasks can migrate to cfs_rq_c (e.g., due to task group changes). When enqueue_task_fair(cfs_rq_c, throttled_task) is called and cfs_rq_c is in a throttled hierarchy (e.g., A is throttled), these throttled tasks are directly placed into cfs_rq_c's limbo list by enqueue_throttled_task(). Later, when A is unthrottled, tg_unthrottle_up(cfs_rq_c) enqueues these tasks. The first enqueue triggers check_enqueue_throttle(), and with zero runtime_remaining, cfs_rq_c can be throttled in throttle_cfs_rq() if it can't get more runtime and enters tg_throttle_down(), where the warning is hit due to remaining tasks in the limbo list. I think it's a chaos to trigger throttle on unthrottle path, the status of a being unthrottled cfs_rq can be in a mixed state in the end, so fix this by granting 1ns to cfs_rq in tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(). This ensures cfs_rq_c has a positive runtime_remaining when initialized as unthrottled and cannot enter tg_unthrottle_up() with zero runtime_remaining. Also, update outdated comments in tg_throttle_down() since unthrottle_cfs_rq() is no longer called with zero runtime_remaining. While at it, remove a redundant assignment to se in tg_throttle_down(). Fixes: e1fad12dcb66 ("sched/fair: Switch to task based throttle model") Reviewed-By: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com> Suggested-by: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Tested-by: Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030032755.560-1-ziqianlu@bytedance.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched/core.c2
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched/fair.c15
2 files changed, 7 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f1ebf67b48e2..f754a60de848 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -9606,7 +9606,7 @@ static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg,
guard(rq_lock_irq)(rq);
cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = runtime_enabled;
- cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 0;
+ cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1;
if (cfs_rq->throttled)
unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 25970dbbb279..5b752324270b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6024,20 +6024,17 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
struct sched_entity *se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)];
/*
- * It's possible we are called with !runtime_remaining due to things
- * like user changed quota setting(see tg_set_cfs_bandwidth()) or async
- * unthrottled us with a positive runtime_remaining but other still
- * running entities consumed those runtime before we reached here.
+ * It's possible we are called with runtime_remaining < 0 due to things
+ * like async unthrottled us with a positive runtime_remaining but other
+ * still running entities consumed those runtime before we reached here.
*
- * Anyway, we can't unthrottle this cfs_rq without any runtime remaining
- * because any enqueue in tg_unthrottle_up() will immediately trigger a
- * throttle, which is not supposed to happen on unthrottle path.
+ * We can't unthrottle this cfs_rq without any runtime remaining because
+ * any enqueue in tg_unthrottle_up() will immediately trigger a throttle,
+ * which is not supposed to happen on unthrottle path.
*/
if (cfs_rq->runtime_enabled && cfs_rq->runtime_remaining <= 0)
return;
- se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)];
-
cfs_rq->throttled = 0;
update_rq_clock(rq);