diff options
| author | Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> | 2024-11-13 12:00:08 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2024-12-05 14:01:21 +0100 |
| commit | e63f11b15db8e8226b72423936ba9890d44699d3 (patch) | |
| tree | 8444c2d9b446e8c64cfe69d344c3d54cd07cd2f9 /kernel | |
| parent | 96de23233f3ee0a07f3ba819ee37c0dcbfa119ef (diff) | |
| download | linux-e63f11b15db8e8226b72423936ba9890d44699d3.tar.gz linux-e63f11b15db8e8226b72423936ba9890d44699d3.tar.bz2 linux-e63f11b15db8e8226b72423936ba9890d44699d3.zip | |
rcuscale: Do a proper cleanup if kfree_scale_init() fails
[ Upstream commit 812a1c3b9f7c36d9255f0d29d0a3d324e2f52321 ]
A static analyzer for C, Smatch, reports and triggers below
warnings:
kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:1215 rcu_scale_init()
warn: inconsistent returns 'global &fullstop_mutex'.
The checker complains about, we do not unlock the "fullstop_mutex"
mutex, in case of hitting below error path:
<snip>
...
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start < 2 * HZ)) {
pr_alert("ERROR: call_rcu() CBs are not being lazy as expected!\n");
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return -1;
^^^^^^^^^^
...
<snip>
it happens because "-1" is returned right away instead of
doing a proper unwinding.
Fix it by jumping to "unwind" label instead of returning -1.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/ZxfTrHuEGtgnOYWp@pc636/T/
Fixes: 084e04fff160 ("rcuscale: Add laziness and kfree tests")
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c index 6d37596deb1f..d360fa44b234 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c @@ -890,13 +890,15 @@ kfree_scale_init(void) if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start < 2 * HZ)) { pr_alert("ERROR: call_rcu() CBs are not being lazy as expected!\n"); WARN_ON_ONCE(1); - return -1; + firsterr = -1; + goto unwind; } if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start > 3 * HZ)) { pr_alert("ERROR: call_rcu() CBs are being too lazy!\n"); WARN_ON_ONCE(1); - return -1; + firsterr = -1; + goto unwind; } } |