diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-04-24 12:02:25 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-04-24 12:02:25 -0700 |
| commit | 60eb45074234b90333b6241b4fd8d196aa2dfd98 (patch) | |
| tree | e4843847c30bf2e6e3176edaaff73439de706829 /tools/memory-model | |
| parent | 406037351e08dea03735178bf11046da85f00125 (diff) | |
| parent | cc4a29819b0df9f3a2e7e0d5dee0830a3072d5aa (diff) | |
| download | linux-60eb45074234b90333b6241b4fd8d196aa2dfd98.tar.gz linux-60eb45074234b90333b6241b4fd8d196aa2dfd98.tar.bz2 linux-60eb45074234b90333b6241b4fd8d196aa2dfd98.zip | |
Merge tag 'lkmm-scripting.2023.04.07a' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu
Pull Linux Kernel Memory Model scripting updates from Paul McKenney:
"This improves litmus-test documentation and improves the ability to do
before/after tests on the https://github.com/paulmckrcu/litmus repo"
* tag 'lkmm-scripting.2023.04.07a' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu: (32 commits)
tools/memory-model: Remove out-of-date SRCU documentation
tools/memory-model: Document LKMM test procedure
tools/memory-model: Use "grep -E" instead of "egrep"
tools/memory-model: Use "-unroll 0" to keep --hw runs finite
tools/memory-model: Make judgelitmus.sh handle scripted Result: tag
tools/memory-model: Add data-race capabilities to judgelitmus.sh
tools/memory-model: Add checktheselitmus.sh to run specified litmus tests
tools/memory-model: Repair parseargs.sh header comment
tools/memory-model: Add "--" to parseargs.sh for additional arguments
tools/memory-model: Make history-check scripts use mselect7
tools/memory-model: Make checkghlitmus.sh use mselect7
tools/memory-model: Fix scripting --jobs argument
tools/memory-model: Implement --hw support for checkghlitmus.sh
tools/memory-model: Add -v flag to jingle7 runs
tools/memory-model: Make runlitmus.sh check for jingle errors
tools/memory-model: Allow herd to deduce CPU type
tools/memory-model: Keep assembly-language litmus tests
tools/memory-model: Move from .AArch64.litmus.out to .litmus.AArch.out
tools/memory-model: Make runlitmus.sh generate .litmus.out for --hw
tools/memory-model: Split runlitmus.sh out of checklitmus.sh
...
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/memory-model')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/memory-model/Documentation/litmus-tests.txt | 27 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/memory-model/Documentation/locking.txt | 298 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/.gitignore | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/memory-model/scripts/README | 48 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/checkalllitmus.sh | 29 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/checkghlitmus.sh | 15 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmus.sh | 25 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmushist.sh | 2 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/checktheselitmus.sh | 43 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/cmplitmushist.sh | 49 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/hwfnseg.sh | 20 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/initlitmushist.sh | 2 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/judgelitmus.sh | 120 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/newlitmushist.sh | 4 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/parseargs.sh | 21 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/runlitmus.sh | 80 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/runlitmushist.sh | 29 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/memory-model/scripts/simpletest.sh | 35 |
18 files changed, 733 insertions, 116 deletions
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/litmus-tests.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/litmus-tests.txt index 26554b1c5575..acac527328a1 100644 --- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/litmus-tests.txt +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/litmus-tests.txt @@ -1028,32 +1028,7 @@ Limitations of the Linux-kernel memory model (LKMM) include: additional call_rcu() process to the site of the emulated rcu-barrier(). - e. Although sleepable RCU (SRCU) is now modeled, there - are some subtle differences between its semantics and - those in the Linux kernel. For example, the kernel - might interpret the following sequence as two partially - overlapping SRCU read-side critical sections: - - 1 r1 = srcu_read_lock(&my_srcu); - 2 do_something_1(); - 3 r2 = srcu_read_lock(&my_srcu); - 4 do_something_2(); - 5 srcu_read_unlock(&my_srcu, r1); - 6 do_something_3(); - 7 srcu_read_unlock(&my_srcu, r2); - - In contrast, LKMM will interpret this as a nested pair of - SRCU read-side critical sections, with the outer critical - section spanning lines 1-7 and the inner critical section - spanning lines 3-5. - - This difference would be more of a concern had anyone - identified a reasonable use case for partially overlapping - SRCU read-side critical sections. For more information - on the trickiness of such overlapping, please see: - https://paulmck.livejournal.com/40593.html - - f. Reader-writer locking is not modeled. It can be + e. Reader-writer locking is not modeled. It can be emulated in litmus tests using atomic read-modify-write operations. diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/locking.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/locking.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..65c898c64a93 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/locking.txt @@ -0,0 +1,298 @@ +Locking +======= + +Locking is well-known and the common use cases are straightforward: Any +CPU holding a given lock sees any changes previously seen or made by any +CPU before it previously released that same lock. This last sentence +is the only part of this document that most developers will need to read. + +However, developers who would like to also access lock-protected shared +variables outside of their corresponding locks should continue reading. + + +Locking and Prior Accesses +-------------------------- + +The basic rule of locking is worth repeating: + + Any CPU holding a given lock sees any changes previously seen + or made by any CPU before it previously released that same lock. + +Note that this statement is a bit stronger than "Any CPU holding a +given lock sees all changes made by any CPU during the time that CPU was +previously holding this same lock". For example, consider the following +pair of code fragments: + + /* See MP+polocks.litmus. */ + void CPU0(void) + { + WRITE_ONCE(x, 1); + spin_lock(&mylock); + WRITE_ONCE(y, 1); + spin_unlock(&mylock); + } + + void CPU1(void) + { + spin_lock(&mylock); + r0 = READ_ONCE(y); + spin_unlock(&mylock); + r1 = READ_ONCE(x); + } + +The basic rule guarantees that if CPU0() acquires mylock before CPU1(), +then both r0 and r1 must be set to the value 1. This also has the +consequence that if the final value of r0 is equal to 1, then the final +value of r1 must also be equal to 1. In contrast, the weaker rule would +say nothing about the final value of r1. + + +Locking and Subsequent Accesses +------------------------------- + +The converse to the basic rule also holds: Any CPU holding a given +lock will not see any changes that will be made by any CPU after it +subsequently acquires this same lock. This converse statement is +illustrated by the following litmus test: + + /* See MP+porevlocks.litmus. */ + void CPU0(void) + { + r0 = READ_ONCE(y); + spin_lock(&mylock); + r1 = READ_ONCE(x); + spin_unlock(&mylock); + } + + void CPU1(void) + { + spin_lock(&mylock); + WRITE_ONCE(x, 1); + spin_unlock(&mylock); + WRITE_ONCE(y, 1); + } + +This converse to the basic rule guarantees that if CPU0() acquires +mylock before CPU1(), then both r0 and r1 must be set to the value 0. +This also has the consequence that if the final value of r1 is equal +to 0, then the final value of r0 must also be equal to 0. In contrast, +the weaker rule would say nothing about the final value of r0. + +These examples show only a single pair of CPUs, but the effects of the +locking basic rule extend across multiple acquisitions of a given lock +across multiple CPUs. + + +Double-Checked Locking +---------------------- + +It is well known that more than just a lock is required to make +double-checked locking work correctly, This litmus test illustrates +one incorrect approach: + + /* See Documentation/litmus-tests/locking/DCL-broken.litmus. */ + void CPU0(void) + { + r0 = READ_ONCE(flag); + if (r0 == 0) { + spin_lock(&lck); + r1 = READ_ONCE(flag); + if (r1 == 0) { + WRITE_ONCE(data, 1); + WRITE_ONCE(flag, 1); + } + spin_unlock(&lck); + } + r2 = READ_ONCE(data); + } + /* CPU1() is the exactly the same as CPU0(). */ + +There are two problems. First, there is no ordering between the first +READ_ONCE() of "flag" and the READ_ONCE() of "data". Second, there is +no ordering between the two WRITE_ONCE() calls. It should therefore be +no surprise that "r2" can be zero, and a quick herd7 run confirms this. + +One way to fix this is to use smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() +as shown in this corrected version: + + /* See Documentation/litmus-tests/locking/DCL-fixed.litmus. */ + void CPU0(void) + { + r0 = smp_load_acquire(&flag); + if (r0 == 0) { + spin_lock(&lck); + r1 = READ_ONCE(flag); + if (r1 == 0) { + WRITE_ONCE(data, 1); + smp_store_release(&flag, 1); + } + spin_unlock(&lck); + } + r2 = READ_ONCE(data); + } + /* CPU1() is the exactly the same as CPU0(). */ + +The smp_load_acquire() guarantees that its load from "flags" will +be ordered before the READ_ONCE() from data, thus solving the first +problem. The smp_store_release() guarantees that its store will be +ordered after the WRITE_ONCE() to "data", solving the second problem. +The smp_store_release() pairs with the smp_load_acquire(), thus ensuring +that the ordering provided by each actually takes effect. Again, a +quick herd7 run confirms this. + +In short, if you access a lock-protected variable without holding the +corresponding lock, you will need to provide additional ordering, in +this case, via the smp_load_acquire() and the smp_store_release(). + + +Ordering Provided by a Lock to CPUs Not Holding That Lock +--------------------------------------------------------- + +It is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by locking will be +seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock. Consider this example: + + /* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */ + void CPU0(void) + { + spin_lock(&mylock); + WRITE_ONCE(x, 1); + WRITE_ONCE(y, 1); + spin_unlock(&mylock); + } + + void CPU1(void) + { + spin_lock(&mylock); + r0 = READ_ONCE(y); + WRITE_ONCE(z, 1); + spin_unlock(&mylock); + } + + void CPU2(void) + { + WRITE_ONCE(z, 2); + smp_mb(); + r1 = READ_ONCE(x); + } + +Counter-intuitive though it might be, it is quite possible to have +the final value of r0 be 1, the final value of z be 2, and the final +value of r1 be 0. The reason for this surprising outcome is that CPU2() +never acquired the lock, and thus did not fully benefit from the lock's +ordering properties. + +Ordering can be extended to CPUs not holding the lock by careful use +of smp_mb__after_spinlock(): + + /* See Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce.litmus. */ + void CPU0(void) + { + spin_lock(&mylock); + WRITE_ONCE(x, 1); + WRITE_ONCE(y, 1); + spin_unlock(&mylock); + } + + void CPU1(void) + { + spin_lock(&mylock); + smp_mb__after_spinlock(); + r0 = READ_ONCE(y); + WRITE_ONCE(z, 1); + spin_unlock(&mylock); + } + + void CPU2(void) + { + WRITE_ONCE(z, 2); + smp_mb(); + r1 = READ_ONCE(x); + } + +This addition of smp_mb__after_spinlock() strengthens the lock +acquisition sufficiently to rule out the counter-intuitive outcome. +In other words, the addition of the smp_mb__after_spinlock() prohibits +the counter-intuitive result where the final value of r0 is 1, the final +value of z is 2, and the final value of r1 is 0. + + +No Roach-Motel Locking! +----------------------- + +This example requires familiarity with the herd7 "filter" clause, so +please read up on that topic in litmus-tests.txt. + +It is tempting to allow memory-reference instructions to be pulled +into a critical section, but this cannot be allowed in the general case. +For example, consider a spin loop preceding a lock-based critical section. +Now, herd7 does not model spin loops, but we can emulate one with two +loads, with a "filter" clause to constrain the first to return the +initial value and the second to return the updated value, as shown below: + + /* See Documentation/litmus-tests/locking/RM-fixed.litmus. */ + void CPU0(void) + { + spin_lock(&lck); + r2 = atomic_inc_return(&y); + WRITE_ONCE(x, 1); + spin_unlock(&lck); + } + + void CPU1(void) + { + r0 = READ_ONCE(x); + r1 = READ_ONCE(x); + spin_lock(&lck); + r2 = atomic_inc_return(&y); + spin_unlock(&lck); + } + + filter (1:r0=0 /\ 1:r1=1) + exists (1:r2=1) + +The variable "x" is the control variable for the emulated spin loop. +CPU0() sets it to "1" while holding the lock, and CPU1() emulates the +spin loop by reading it twice, first into "1:r0" (which should get the +initial value "0") and then into "1:r1" (which should get the updated +value "1"). + +The "filter" clause takes this into account, constraining "1:r0" to +equal "0" and "1:r1" to equal 1. + +Then the "exists" clause checks to see if CPU1() acquired its lock first, +which should not happen given the filter clause because CPU0() updates +"x" while holding the lock. And herd7 confirms this. + +But suppose that the compiler was permitted to reorder the spin loop +into CPU1()'s critical section, like this: + + /* See Documentation/litmus-tests/locking/RM-broken.litmus. */ + void CPU0(void) + { + int r2; + + spin_lock(&lck); + r2 = atomic_inc_return(&y); + WRITE_ONCE(x, 1); + spin_unlock(&lck); + } + + void CPU1(void) + { + spin_lock(&lck); + r0 = READ_ONCE(x); + r1 = READ_ONCE(x); + r2 = atomic_inc_return(&y); + spin_unlock(&lck); + } + + filter (1:r0=0 /\ 1:r1=1) + exists (1:r2=1) + +If "1:r0" is equal to "0", "1:r1" can never equal "1" because CPU0() +cannot update "x" while CPU1() holds the lock. And herd7 confirms this, +showing zero executions matching the "filter" criteria. + +And this is why Linux-kernel lock and unlock primitives must prevent +code from entering critical sections. It is not sufficient to only +prevent code from leaving them. diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/.gitignore b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/.gitignore index c492a1ddad91..19c379cf069d 100644 --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/.gitignore +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/.gitignore @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only -*.litmus.out +*.litmus.* diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/README b/tools/memory-model/scripts/README index 095c7eb36f9f..fb39bd0fd1b9 100644 --- a/tools/memory-model/scripts/README +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/README @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ checklitmushist.sh checklitmus.sh Check a single litmus test against its "Result:" expected result. + Not intended to for manual use. + +checktheselitmus.sh + + Check the specified list of litmus tests against their "Result:" + expected results. This takes optional parseargs.sh arguments, + followed by "--" followed by pathnames starting from the current + directory. cmplitmushist.sh @@ -43,10 +51,10 @@ initlitmushist.sh judgelitmus.sh - Given a .litmus file and its .litmus.out herd7 output, check the - .litmus.out file against the .litmus file's "Result:" comment to - judge whether the test ran correctly. Not normally run manually, - provided instead for use by other scripts. + Given a .litmus file and its herd7 output, check the output file + against the .litmus file's "Result:" comment to judge whether + the test ran correctly. Not normally run manually, provided + instead for use by other scripts. newlitmushist.sh @@ -68,3 +76,35 @@ runlitmushist.sh README This file + +Testing a change to LKMM might go as follows: + + # Populate expected results without that change, and + # runs for about an hour on an 8-CPU x86 system: + scripts/initlitmushist.sh --timeout 10m --procs 10 + # Incorporate the change: + git am -s -3 /path/to/patch # Or whatever it takes. + + # Test the new version of LKMM as follows... + + # Runs in seconds, good smoke test: + scripts/checkalllitmus.sh + + # Compares results to those produced by initlitmushist.sh, + # and runs for about an hour on an 8-CPU x86 system: + scripts/checklitmushist.sh --timeout 10m --procs 10 + + # Checks results against Result tags, runs in minutes: + scripts/checkghlitmus.sh --timeout 10m --procs 10 + +The checkghlitmus.sh should not report errors in cases where the +checklitmushist.sh script did not also report a change. However, +this check is nevertheless valuable because it can find errors in the +original version of LKMM. Note however, that given the above procedure, +an error in the original LKMM version that is fixed by the patch will +be reported both as a mismatch by checklitmushist.sh and as an error +by checkghlitmus.sh. One exception to this rule of thumb is when the +test fails completely on the original version of LKMM and passes on the +new version. In this case, checklitmushist.sh will report a mismatch +and checkghlitmus.sh will report success. This happens when the change +to LKMM introduces a new primitive for which litmus tests already existed. diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/checkalllitmus.sh b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checkalllitmus.sh index 3c0c7fbbd223..2d3ee850a839 100755 --- a/tools/memory-model/scripts/checkalllitmus.sh +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checkalllitmus.sh @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#!/bin/sh +#!/bin/bash # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ # # Run herd7 tests on all .litmus files in the litmus-tests directory @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ # "^^^". It also outputs verification results to a file whose name is # that of the specified litmus test, but with ".out" appended. # +# If the --hw argument is specified, this script translates the .litmus +# C-language file to the specified type of assembly and verifies that. +# But in this case, litmus tests using complex synchronization (such as +# locking, RCU, and SRCU) are cheerfully ignored. +# # Usage: # checkalllitmus.sh # @@ -17,7 +22,7 @@ # # Copyright IBM Corporation, 2018 # -# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> +# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> . scripts/parseargs.sh @@ -30,29 +35,23 @@ else exit 255 fi -# Create any new directories that have appeared in the github litmus -# repo since the last run. +# Create any new directories that have appeared in the litmus-tests +# directory since the last run. if test "$LKMM_DESTDIR" != "." then find $litmusdir -type d -print | ( cd "$LKMM_DESTDIR"; sed -e 's/^/mkdir -p /' | sh ) fi -# Find the checklitmus script. If it is not where we expect it, then -# assume that the caller has the PATH environment variable set -# appropriately. -if test -x scripts/checklitmus.sh -then - clscript=scripts/checklitmus.sh -else - clscript=checklitmus.sh -fi - # Run the script on all the litmus tests in the specified directory ret=0 for i in $litmusdir/*.litmus do - if ! $clscript $i + if test -n "$LKMM_HW_MAP_FILE" && ! scripts/simpletest.sh $i + then + continue + fi + if ! scripts/checklitmus.sh $i then ret=1 fi diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/checkghlitmus.sh b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checkghlitmus.sh index 6589fbb6f653..d3dfb321259f 100755 --- a/tools/memory-model/scripts/checkghlitmus.sh +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checkghlitmus.sh @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ # parseargs.sh scripts for arguments. . scripts/parseargs.sh +. scripts/hwfnseg.sh T=/tmp/checkghlitmus.sh.$$ trap 'rm -rf $T' 0 @@ -32,19 +33,19 @@ then ( cd "$LKMM_DESTDIR"; sed -e 's/^/mkdir -p /' | sh ) fi -# Create a list of the C-language litmus tests previously run. -( cd $LKMM_DESTDIR; find litmus -name '*.litmus.out' -print ) | - sed -e 's/\.out$//' | - xargs -r egrep -l '^ \* Result: (Never|Sometimes|Always|DEADLOCK)' | +# Create a list of the specified litmus tests previously run. +( cd $LKMM_DESTDIR; find litmus -name "*.litmus${hwfnseg}.out" -print ) | + sed -e "s/${hwfnseg}"'\.out$//' | + xargs -r grep -E -l '^ \* Result: (Never|Sometimes|Always|DEADLOCK)' | xargs -r grep -L "^P${LKMM_PROCS}"> $T/list-C-already # Create a list of C-language litmus tests with "Result:" commands and # no more than the specified number of processes. -find litmus -name '*.litmus' -exec grep -l -m 1 "^C " {} \; > $T/list-C -xargs < $T/list-C -r egrep -l '^ \* Result: (Never|Sometimes|Always|DEADLOCK)' > $T/list-C-result +find litmus -name '*.litmus' -print | mselect7 -arch C > $T/list-C +xargs < $T/list-C -r grep -E -l '^ \* Result: (Never|Sometimes|Always|DEADLOCK)' > $T/list-C-result xargs < $T/list-C-result -r grep -L "^P${LKMM_PROCS}" > $T/list-C-result-short -# Form list of tests without corresponding .litmus.out files +# Form list of tests without corresponding .out files sort $T/list-C-already $T/list-C-result-short | uniq -u > $T/list-C-needed # Run any needed tests. diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmus.sh b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmus.sh index 11461ed40b5e..4c1d0cf0ddad 100755 --- a/tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmus.sh +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmus.sh @@ -1,10 +1,8 @@ #!/bin/sh # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ # -# Run a herd7 test and invokes judgelitmus.sh to check the result against -# a "Result:" comment within the litmus test. It also outputs verification -# results to a file whose name is that of the specified litmus test, but -# with ".out" appended. +# Invokes runlitmus.sh and judgelitmus.sh on its arguments to run the +# specified litmus test and pass judgment on the results. # # Usage: # checklitmus.sh file.litmus @@ -15,20 +13,7 @@ # # Copyright IBM Corporation, 2018 # -# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> +# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> -litmus=$1 -herdoptions=${LKMM_HERD_OPTIONS--conf linux-kernel.cfg} - -if test -f "$litmus" -a -r "$litmus" -then - : -else - echo ' --- ' error: \"$litmus\" is not a readable file - exit 255 -fi - -echo Herd options: $herdoptions > $LKMM_DESTDIR/$litmus.out -/usr/bin/time $LKMM_TIMEOUT_CMD herd7 $herdoptions $litmus >> $LKMM_DESTDIR/$litmus.out 2>&1 - -scripts/judgelitmus.sh $litmus +scripts/runlitmus.sh $1 +scripts/judgelitmus.sh $1 diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmushist.sh b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmushist.sh index 1d210ffb7c8a..406ecfc0aee4 100755 --- a/tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmushist.sh +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checklitmushist.sh @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ # # Copyright IBM Corporation, 2018 # -# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> +# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> . scripts/parseargs.sh diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/checktheselitmus.sh b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checktheselitmus.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..10eeb5ecea6d --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/checktheselitmus.sh @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +# +# Invokes checklitmus.sh on its arguments to run the specified litmus +# test and pass judgment on the results. +# +# Usage: +# checktheselitmus.sh -- [ file1.litmus [ file2.litmus ... ] ] +# +# Run this in the directory containing the memory model, specifying the +# pathname of the litmus test to check. The usual parseargs.sh arguments +# can be specified prior to the "--". +# +# This script is intended for use with pathnames that start from the +# tools/memory-model directory. If some of the pathnames instead start at +# the root directory, they all must do so and the "--destdir /" parseargs.sh +# argument must be specified prior to the "--". Alternatively, some other +# "--destdir" argument can be supplied as long as the needed subdirectories +# are populated. +# +# Copyright IBM Corporation, 2018 +# +# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> + +. scripts/parseargs.sh + +ret=0 +for i in "$@" +do + if scripts/checklitmus.sh $i + then + : + else + ret=1 + fi +done +if test "$ret" -ne 0 +then + echo " ^^^ VERIFICATION MISMATCHES" 1>&2 +else + echo All litmus tests verified as was expected. 1>&2 +fi +exit $ret diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/cmplitmushist.sh b/tools/memory-model/scripts/cmplitmushist.sh index 0f498aeeccf5..ca1ac8b64614 100755 --- a/tools/memory-model/scripts/cmplitmushist.sh +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/cmplitmushist.sh @@ -12,12 +12,49 @@ trap 'rm -rf $T' 0 mkdir $T # comparetest oldpath newpath +badmacnam=0 +timedout=0 perfect=0 obsline=0 noobsline=0 obsresult=0 badcompare=0 comparetest () { + if grep -q ': Unknown macro ' $1 || grep -q ': Unknown macro ' $2 + then + if grep -q ': Unknown macro ' $1 + then + badname=`grep ': Unknown macro ' $1 | + sed -e 's/^.*: Unknown macro //' | + sed -e 's/ (User error).*$//'` + echo 'Current LKMM version does not know "'$badname'"' $1 + fi + if grep -q ': Unknown macro ' $2 + then + badname=`grep ': Unknown macro ' $2 | + sed -e 's/^.*: Unknown macro //' | + sed -e 's/ (User error).*$//'` + echo 'Current LKMM version does not know "'$badname'"' $2 + fi + badmacnam=`expr "$badmacnam" + 1` + return 0 + elif grep -q '^Command exited with non-zero status 124' $1 || + grep -q '^Command exited with non-zero status 124' $2 + then + if grep -q '^Command exited with non-zero status 124' $1 && + grep -q '^Command exited with non-zero status 124' $2 + then + echo Both runs timed out: $2 + elif grep -q '^Command exited with non-zero status 124' $1 + then + echo Old run timed out: $2 + elif grep -q '^Command exited with non-zero status 124' $2 + then + echo New run timed out: $2 + fi + timedout=`expr "$timedout" + 1` + return 0 + fi grep -v 'maxresident)k\|minor)pagefaults\|^Time' $1 > $T/oldout grep -v 'maxresident)k\|minor)pagefaults\|^Time' $2 > $T/newout if cmp -s $T/oldout $T/newout && grep -q '^Observation' $1 @@ -38,7 +75,7 @@ comparetest () { return 0 fi else - echo Missing Observation line "(e.g., herd7 timeout)": $2 + echo Missing Observation line "(e.g., syntax error)": $2 noobsline=`expr "$noobsline" + 1` return 0 fi @@ -72,12 +109,20 @@ then fi if test "$noobsline" -ne 0 then - echo Missing Observation line "(e.g., herd7 timeout)": $noobsline 1>&2 + echo Missing Observation line "(e.g., syntax error)": $noobsline 1>&2 fi if test "$obsresult" -ne 0 then echo Matching Observation Always/Sometimes/Never result: $obsresult 1>&2 fi +if test "$timedout" -ne 0 +then + echo "!!!" Timed out: $timedout 1>&2 +fi +if test "$badmacnam" -ne 0 +then + echo "!!!" Unknown primitive: $badmacnam 1>&2 +fi if test "$badcompare" -ne 0 then echo "!!!" Result changed: $badcompare 1>&2 diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/hwfnseg.sh b/tools/memory-model/scripts/hwfnseg.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..580c3281181c --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/hwfnseg.sh @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +# +# Generate the hardware extension to the litmus-test filename, or the +# empty string if this is an LKMM run. The extension is placed in +# the shell variable hwfnseg. +# +# Usage: +# . hwfnseg.sh +# +# Copyright IBM Corporation, 2019 +# +# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> + +if test -z "$LKMM_HW_MAP_FILE" +then + hwfnseg= +else + hwfnseg=".$LKMM_HW_MAP_FILE" +fi diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/initlitmushist.sh b/tools/memory-model/scripts/initlitmushist.sh index 956b6957484d..31ea782955d3 100755 --- a/tools/memory-model/scripts/initlitmushist.sh +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/initlitmushist.sh @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ fi # Create a list of the C-language litmus tests with no more than the # specified number of processes (per the --procs argument). -find litmus -name '*.litmus' -exec grep -l -m 1 "^C " {} \; > $T/list-C +find litmus -name '*.litmus' -print | mselect7 -arch C > $T/list-C xargs < $T/list-C -r grep -L "^P${LKMM_PROCS}" > $T/list-C-short scripts/runlitmushist.sh < $T/list-C-short diff --git a/tools/memory-model/scripts/judgelitmus.sh b/tools/memory-model/scripts/judgelitmus.sh index 0cc63875e395..1ec5d89fcfbb 100755 --- a/tools/memory-model/scripts/judgelitmus.sh +++ b/tools/memory-model/scripts/judgelitmus.sh @@ -1,9 +1,22 @@ #!/bin/sh # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ # -# Given a .litmus test and the corresponding .litmus.out file, check -# the .litmus.out file against the "Result:" comment to judge whether -# the test ran correctly. +# Given a .litmus test and the corresponding litmus output file, check +# the .litmus.out file against the "Result:" comment to judge whether the +# test ran correctly. If the --hw argument is omitted, check against the +# LKMM output, which is assumed to be in file.litmus.out. If either a +# "DATARACE" marker in the "Result:" comment or a "Flag data-race" marker +# in the LKMM output is present, the other must also be as well, at least +# for litmus tests having a "Result:" comment. In this case, a failure of +# the Always/Sometimes/Never portion of the "Result:" prediction will be +# noted, but forgiven. +# +# If the --hw argument is provided, this is assumed to be a hardware +# test, and the output is assumed to be in file.litmus.HW.out, where +# "HW" is the --hw argument. In addition, non-Sometimes verification +# results will be noted, but forgiven. Furthermore, if there is no +# "Result:" comment but there is an LKMM .litmus.out file, the observation +# in that file will be used to judge the assembly-language verification. # # Usage: # judgelitmus.sh file.litmus @@ -13,7 +26,7 @@ # # Copyright IBM Corporation, 2018 # -# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> +# Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> litmus=$1 @@ -24,55 +37,120 @@ else echo ' --- ' error: \"$litmus\" is not a readable file exit 255 fi -if test -f "$LKMM_DESTDIR/$litmus".out -a -r "$LKMM_DESTDIR/$litmus".out +if test -z "$LKMM_HW_MAP_FILE" +then + litmusout=$litmus.out + lkmmout= +else + litmusout="`echo $litmus | + sed -e 's/\.litmus$/.litmus.'${LKMM_HW_MAP_FILE}'/'`.out" + lkmmout=$litmus.out +fi +if test -f "$LKMM_DESTDIR/$litmusout" -a -r "$LKMM_DESTDIR/$litmusout" then : else - echo ' --- ' error: \"$LKMM_DESTDIR/$litmus\".out is not a readable file + echo ' --- ' error: \"$LKMM_DESTDIR/$litmusout is not a readable file exit 255 |
