summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>2022-06-21 02:53:44 +0300
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-06-20 17:40:52 -0700
commit0e1bf9ed2000c16fa8e0703e255a23d64a4adb27 (patch)
tree08ba017f0e2d9b36b1ed98b1e324536be50e83a5 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
parentf8acfdd04410d26b096a7082444cdc402df10f89 (diff)
downloadlinux-0e1bf9ed2000c16fa8e0703e255a23d64a4adb27.tar.gz
linux-0e1bf9ed2000c16fa8e0703e255a23d64a4adb27.tar.bz2
linux-0e1bf9ed2000c16fa8e0703e255a23d64a4adb27.zip
selftests/bpf: BPF test_prog selftests for bpf_loop inlining
Two new test BPF programs for test_prog selftests checking bpf_loop behavior. Both are corner cases for bpf_loop inlinig transformation: - check that bpf_loop behaves correctly when callback function is not a compile time constant - check that local function variables are not affected by allocating additional stack storage for registers spilled by loop inlining Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220620235344.569325-6-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c62
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
index 380d7a2072e3..4cd8a25afe68 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
@@ -120,6 +120,64 @@ static void check_nested_calls(struct bpf_loop *skel)
bpf_link__destroy(link);
}
+static void check_non_constant_callback(struct bpf_loop *skel)
+{
+ struct bpf_link *link =
+ bpf_program__attach(skel->progs.prog_non_constant_callback);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "link"))
+ return;
+
+ skel->bss->callback_selector = 0x0F;
+ usleep(1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->g_output, 0x0F, "g_output #1");
+
+ skel->bss->callback_selector = 0xF0;
+ usleep(1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->g_output, 0xF0, "g_output #2");
+
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+}
+
+static void check_stack(struct bpf_loop *skel)
+{
+ struct bpf_link *link = bpf_program__attach(skel->progs.stack_check);
+ const int max_key = 12;
+ int key;
+ int map_fd;
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "link"))
+ return;
+
+ map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.map1);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(map_fd, 0, "bpf_map__fd"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (key = 1; key <= max_key; ++key) {
+ int val = key;
+ int err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &val, BPF_NOEXIST);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ usleep(1);
+
+ for (key = 1; key <= max_key; ++key) {
+ int val;
+ int err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &key, &val);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
+ goto out;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(val, key + 1, "bad value in the map"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+out:
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+}
+
void test_bpf_loop(void)
{
struct bpf_loop *skel;
@@ -140,6 +198,10 @@ void test_bpf_loop(void)
check_invalid_flags(skel);
if (test__start_subtest("check_nested_calls"))
check_nested_calls(skel);
+ if (test__start_subtest("check_non_constant_callback"))
+ check_non_constant_callback(skel);
+ if (test__start_subtest("check_stack"))
+ check_stack(skel);
bpf_loop__destroy(skel);
}