diff options
| author | Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> | 2024-08-16 16:32:51 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2024-12-05 14:01:11 +0100 |
| commit | 75d29dd7eb8da1c7d978a9f4d02eeeba7913b5a3 (patch) | |
| tree | 5d0a3943a76a0c5d450c515b8a5d1fd777ac1bda /tools/testing | |
| parent | 46c3c7d3bd4f667dee921c593a3260b0e8f3a3ce (diff) | |
| download | linux-75d29dd7eb8da1c7d978a9f4d02eeeba7913b5a3.tar.gz linux-75d29dd7eb8da1c7d978a9f4d02eeeba7913b5a3.tar.bz2 linux-75d29dd7eb8da1c7d978a9f4d02eeeba7913b5a3.zip | |
kselftest/arm64: mte: fix printf type warnings about longs
[ Upstream commit 96dddb7b9406259baace9a1831e8da155311be6f ]
When checking MTE tags, we print some diagnostic messages when the tests
fail. Some variables uses there are "longs", however we only use "%x"
for the format specifier.
Update the format specifiers to "%lx", to match the variable types they
are supposed to print.
Fixes: f3b2a26ca78d ("kselftest/arm64: Verify mte tag inclusion via prctl")
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240816153251.2833702-9-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c index 2b1425b92b69..a3d1e23fe02a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int check_single_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode) ptr = mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE); /* Check tag value */ if (MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr) == tag) { - ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%x with include mask=0x%x\n", + ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%lx with include mask=0x%x\n", MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr), MT_INCLUDE_VALID_TAG(tag)); result = KSFT_FAIL; @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int check_multiple_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode) ptr = mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE); /* Check tag value */ if (MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr) < tag) { - ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%x with include mask=0x%x\n", + ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%lx with include mask=0x%lx\n", MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr), MT_INCLUDE_VALID_TAGS(excl_mask)); result = KSFT_FAIL; |