| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
We have specialized code for this, why not use it...
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
|
|
Probably does not matter code-wise, but looks nicer to me.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
|
|
As with other object ACEs, if there is not a GUID to refer to the ACE
becomes the corresponding non-object ACE.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
*_CALLBACK_OBJECT types inherit like other _OBJECT types.
*_CALLBACK types do nothing, like other non-OBJECT types.
We also explicitly throw unused alarm callback types and
SEC_ACE_TYPE_SYSTEM_MANDATORY_LABEL and
SEC_ACE_TYPE_SYSTEM_SCOPED_POLICY_ID into the fire.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Because we're going to add more ACE types.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
This allows us to pass the new tests we just added.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15338
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Don't rebuild libcli/security when not necessary
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This message shows up a lot at level 6 for no particularly good reason
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
|
|
(bug #9481)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
Guenther
|
|
|
|
Some tests showed that these ACEs are not removed if the DACL_PROTECTED flag is provided at the same time.
This is not documented but tests prove it and it has been observerd in deployment.
|
|
They should be inherited without the IO flag unless they contain generic information.
|
|
Autobuild-User: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Thu Jan 13 15:53:16 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
When an ACE gontaining GA, GE, GR, GW, CO or CG is provided by a user or inherited
the final SD actually has to have 2 ACEs, one is an effective expanded one, and the
original one with IO flag added.
|
|
The location in MS-DTYPE changed.
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Oct 23 21:33:46 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This should ensure we only have one copy of these core functions
in the tree.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>
|