| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13178
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Martin Schwenke <martins@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Dec 13 13:03:16 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
|
|
This avoids running the test while samba is modifying and locking the same database,
as this can lead to a deadlock.
The deadlock is not seen in production as the LDB read lock is not held while
waiting for another process, but this test needs to do this to demonstrate
the locking safety.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 8 21:47:55 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
|