| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Create a symlink reparse point over SMB2. Then query file info over SMB2 and
check the POSIX file type is correctly assigned in the POSIX info levels.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
infolevel
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
This kept failing in a local make test not being able to cleanup the test
directory in the *subsequent* test test_create_reparse_nonempty_directory().
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Will be used for sockets next
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
With the source3/ based clilist.c, we can't test all infolevels where
this matters (see callers of get_dirent_ea_size()). But porting the
source4 based all-infolevel search code into source3/libsmb or doing
this one the reparse point test in the source4 infrastructure to me
seems like a lot of effort for moderate gain.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
We need to put them into knownfail.d individually
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
|
|
The with statement creates a new variable. I thought it opens a block
where "e" is only valid in that block. But instead it runs the whole
thing, expecting an exception somewhere. Learning python....
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
|
|
Works against Windows 2016
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
|
|
Works against Windows 2016
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
|
|
This happens when a path has an unknown reparse point in the middle
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
|
|
This still all fails, but if you run them against Windows they work.
How to run:
PYTHONPATH=bin/python \
LOCAL_PATH=/tmp \
SMB1_SHARE=share \
SMB2_SHARE=share \
SHARENAME=share \
SERVER_IP=<server-ip> \
DOMAIN=<your-domain> \
USERNAME=Administrator \
PASSWORD=<your-password> \
SMB_CONF_PATH=/usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf \
SERVERCONFFILE="$SMB_CONF_PATH" \
python3 -m samba.subunit.run samba.tests.reparsepoints
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|